Page 1 of 1

Bloomberg Article on PRPFX

Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2011 11:27 am
by hrux

Re: Bloomberg Article on PRPFX

Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2011 11:46 am
by melveyr
Gotta love that "Good Luck" quote. I think the four-way split is actually better... :D

Re: Bloomberg Article on PRPFX

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 9:07 pm
by Lone Wolf
melveyr wrote: Gotta love that "Good Luck" quote. I think the four-way split is actually better... :D
Heh, that was amusing.  Is he implying that his stock-picking is somehow the secret sauce of PRPFX?  I guess all of us that are using these S&P 500 and TSM funds are in big trouble then, huh?  :)

Re: Bloomberg Article on PRPFX

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 9:14 pm
by Gumby
Lone Wolf wrote:
melveyr wrote: Gotta love that "Good Luck" quote. I think the four-way split is actually better... :D
Heh, that was amusing.  Is he implying that his stock-picking is somehow the secret sauce of PRPFX?  I guess all of us that are using these S&P 500 and TSM funds are in big trouble then, huh?  :)
It gave me a laugh as well. But, I wouldn't read into it. He's just a salesman, trying to justify the expense ratio and keep shareholders interested. What else could he say?... "yeah, the truth is you could mimic this fund with a few simple investments, for a lot less money." :)

If any of us were the manager of PRPFX, I suspect we'd say the same thing if we wanted to keep as many shareholders as possible.

Whenever I see an "expert" opinion on TV, I don't think they are doing it out of the kindness of their own heart to help other investors. They do it because they are selling something (a fund, a book, a firm, etc). In my opinion, when Cuggino gives an interview talking about the Swiss Franc — or Jack Bogle goes on a media blitz when stocks are falling (with a picture of the Vanguard headquarters hung behind him) explaining why Gold isn't an investment — they aren't so much offering expertise as they are trying to sell us a service.