Thinking of 5, 7 or 10 year ARM
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2011 3:03 pm
I feel like I'd like to make a bet on my prediction that rates will stay low for years, or that at the very least, if they do rise, it will be as a result of new-found prosperity and/or inflation working its way back into the economy, and my home price will be some cushion to higher rates.
I'm still not maxing out my retirement accounts, so I feel like worsening my cash-flow by doing a 15-20 year mortgage is not the right choice.
What I'm seeing now is 4.2% on 30 year mortgages, but between 3% and 3.5% on 5-10 year ARMS.
I literally could improve my cash-flow by about $1,900 per year, after taxes, by going with a 5-year ARM vs refinancing to a 4.2% 30 year fixed... and honestly I think after year 5 I'd still be paying lower than 4.2%, or at least lower than the 5% (+ .5% mortgage insurance) I'm paying now...
Maybe something like a 10 year ARM, where I'd still save about .7% over a traditional 30-year, would be more appropriate so I get plenty of years of paydown (and savings that can be diverted to principal) as a cushion to rate adjustments.
I know most of you avoid debt like the plague, and try to stay away from ARMs, but let me know if you see deep flaws in my logic.... I just don't like paying a whole .7%-1.2% more to protect myself from what I really don't think is going to happen.
I'm still not maxing out my retirement accounts, so I feel like worsening my cash-flow by doing a 15-20 year mortgage is not the right choice.
What I'm seeing now is 4.2% on 30 year mortgages, but between 3% and 3.5% on 5-10 year ARMS.
I literally could improve my cash-flow by about $1,900 per year, after taxes, by going with a 5-year ARM vs refinancing to a 4.2% 30 year fixed... and honestly I think after year 5 I'd still be paying lower than 4.2%, or at least lower than the 5% (+ .5% mortgage insurance) I'm paying now...
Maybe something like a 10 year ARM, where I'd still save about .7% over a traditional 30-year, would be more appropriate so I get plenty of years of paydown (and savings that can be diverted to principal) as a cushion to rate adjustments.
I know most of you avoid debt like the plague, and try to stay away from ARMs, but let me know if you see deep flaws in my logic.... I just don't like paying a whole .7%-1.2% more to protect myself from what I really don't think is going to happen.