When Short Interest Exceeds 100% of Stock
Posted: Fri Feb 05, 2021 11:53 am
I’m just bumping Glenn's question from the GME thread:
glennds wrote: ↑Wed Feb 03, 2021 8:35 pm I'd like to better understand the ramifications of short interest greater than 100% of a company's stock. Obviously it is not possible in this situation for all short positions to be covered. So what happens to those positions that cannot be covered? Is it the broker that is on the hook for selling a naked short (i.e. selling the short position when the broker does not have access to the underlying shares)?
In reality, long position stockholders have to agree to lend their stock in the first place, and not all will do so, so I would think the universe of stock available to brokers would be some number significantly less than 100% thus exacerbating the naked short situation? Unless the broker is forced to go out an acquire the shares on the open market in order to cover the transaction?
Or is it a situation like fractional banking where so long as there isn't a run on the bank the house of cards continues standing?
I'd appreciate it if anyone could explain this aspect of the mechanics.