Page 1 of 1

bird photography

Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2020 2:17 pm
by mathjak107
nikon z6 with nikon 70-200mm f2.8 and nikon 2x telecontertor

Image

Image

Image

Re: bird photography

Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2020 4:42 pm
by Mark Leavy
Beautiful, Mathjak.
How long was that lens? The depth of field doesn't look like more than an inch or two. Do you carry a tripod?

Edit: I just saw that you posted the lens info. I wouldn't have thought you could do that with 200mm.

Re: bird photography

Posted: Sun Jun 28, 2020 4:19 am
by mathjak107
Mark Leavy wrote: Sat Jun 27, 2020 4:42 pm Beautiful, Mathjak.
How long was that lens? The depth of field doesn't look like more than an inch or two. Do you carry a tripod?

Edit: I just saw that you posted the lens info. I wouldn't have thought you could do that with 200mm.
i used a tripod this time but don;t usually ...the 200mm lens also had a 2x tele-converter on it bumping it to 400 . i have a 200-500 lens coming next week

Re: bird photography

Posted: Sun Jun 28, 2020 7:41 am
by yankees60
mathjak107 wrote: Sun Jun 28, 2020 4:19 am
Mark Leavy wrote: Sat Jun 27, 2020 4:42 pm Beautiful, Mathjak.
How long was that lens? The depth of field doesn't look like more than an inch or two. Do you carry a tripod?

Edit: I just saw that you posted the lens info. I wouldn't have thought you could do that with 200mm.
i used a tripod this time but don;t usually ...the 200mm lens also had a 2x tele-converter on it bumping it to 400 . i have a 200-500 lens coming next week
So obviously you don't believe that the tele-converter creates any degradation? And, I further assume yours must be of top quality?

Vinny

Re: bird photography

Posted: Sun Jun 28, 2020 7:46 am
by mathjak107
yankees60 wrote: Sun Jun 28, 2020 7:41 am
mathjak107 wrote: Sun Jun 28, 2020 4:19 am
Mark Leavy wrote: Sat Jun 27, 2020 4:42 pm Beautiful, Mathjak.
How long was that lens? The depth of field doesn't look like more than an inch or two. Do you carry a tripod?

Edit: I just saw that you posted the lens info. I wouldn't have thought you could do that with 200mm.
i used a tripod this time but don;t usually ...the 200mm lens also had a 2x tele-converter on it bumping it to 400 . i have a 200-500 lens coming next week
So obviously you don't believe that the tele-converter creates any degradation? And, I further assume yours must be of top quality?

Vinny

the teleconvertors do degrade slightly.. however the nikon extender was actually tailored to match the nikon 70-200mm f2.8 which i have . that is a 3k combo ....so used together quality loss is very slight .

but on cheaper lenses that were not tailored to that extender there can be a lot of loss in quality ....

my wife has the nikon 200-500mm which i just ordered friday for myself.. the bad thing about both of us being in to shooting is 2 of everything .... the extender will make that a 1000mm . but of course light is reduced greatly .