Kbg wrote: ↑Wed Nov 16, 2022 10:34 am
By line break...
Agree. Should have stopped with Afghanistan. Though I've zero personal problem with knocking off Saddam and pretty sure a majority of Iraqis would say the same (unless in the Saddam/Sunni power structure).
Personally, I also think it's a good thing the Saddam government was overthrown and he was executed. Inside a vacuum. Outside the vacuum, it's harder to deal with the other aspects of Iraq II. Like our own government's information operations, the massive damage to civilian infrastructure during the initial invasion, turning that part of the world into even
more of a hellhole for a long time, and the massive casualties afterwards. But yea, reading about how the Baath party treated its citizens is pretty gross. Lots of similarities with the Ukrainians, Russians, and Donbass groups.
Not sure where you are getting your information, but you're going to have to provide some evidence for your assertion that Ukraine is setting up it's civilians to get killed. Stating it doesn't cut it. Why even do that when the Russians provide all the PR Ukraine could want on a daily basis for the entire world to see?
My assertion is that the Ukrainian military sets up in civilian areas and attracts Russian ordnance. A couple examples:

- apc school.png (1.34 MiB) Viewed 6931 times
Ukrainian armed forces and armed groups maintained their positions and further
embedded their weapons and forces in populated areas, in violation of their obligations
under international humanitarian law. In Shyrokyne, a key location in the ‘grey zone’
between the Government-controlled city of Mariupol and the town of Novoazovsk
controlled by the armed groups, OHCHR documented extensive use of civilian buildings
and locations by the Ukrainian military and the Azov regiment, and looting of civilian
property, leading to displacement
. Prima facie civilian buildings in Donetsk city, such as
residential buildings, a shelter for homeless people
, and a former art gallery, continued
to be used by armed groups, thereby endangering civilians. In the village of Kominternove,
Donetsk region, residents reported that members of the armed groups of the ‘Donetsk
people’s republic’ took over abandoned houses. In January and February 2016, hostilities
between the armed groups stationed in Kominternove and Ukrainian armed forces stationed
in the nearby village of Vodiane have endangered the local population
.Armed groups and Ukrainian armed forces also continued to position military forces
in or near hospitals. In Telmanove, armed members of the ‘Donetsk people’s republic’ have
occupied part of the general hospital building, which is adjacent to a maternity hospital
and sustained damage from shelling. In Volnovakha, Ukrainian armed forces were stationed
in close proximity to a local hospital. OHCHR recalls that hospitals are specifically
protected under article 11 of Additional Protocol II to the Geneva Conventions, which are
binding on the warring parties.
Another good example that I may be able to find later is a video showing destroyed Ukrainian vehicles (or artillery pieces, I can't remember) where they were parked between two apartment complexes.
I'll assume you also would like me to provide examples of Ukrainians behaving in a manner that's unworthy of our support.
A former member of an armed group informed OHCHR about his ill-treatment by
Ukrainian forces (allegedly SBU) in September 2014, in the town of Sloviansk, Donetsk
region. After his arrest, he was reportedly kept in the basement of the local college and
regularly beaten. He was later transferred to the town of Izium, where he was kept in a
basement, together with 12 other detainees. He claimed having witnessed a summary
execution while there.
. . .
OHCHR also documented
the case of three women, who were detained in May 2015, in a town under Government
control in Donetsk region. The victims included the wife of an armed group commander
and her daughter. The latter was allegedly severely tortured, and both were allegedly
threatened with sexual violence
. . .
In another case, a ‘pro-federalism’ activist from Odesa, charged of acts of terrorism
was pressured to sign a confession after being tortured at the Odesa SBU. During his
interrogation, he was reportedly suffocated with a plastic bag covering his head and was
beaten on the face, head and body. The SBU officers then allegedly took him to the lobby
of the SBU building where he was shown his son whom they had also arrested. His son was
taken to a separate room and the father could hear his harrowing screams.
Via
the United Nations. There are more examples in that report and elsewhere.
Not to mention their history in Chechnya and Syria. This assertion falls flat on it's face.
My argument isn't that one should support Russia over Ukraine. It's that we shouldn't support Ukraine or Russia.
I also was using World Bank data, compiled by Our World In Data, first seen
here:

- lajksdfdfg.png (265.72 KiB) Viewed 6931 times
Your link data starts at 1987 and uses current US $. The link that the above screenshot comes from obviously starts at 1990 and uses PPP, but it shows the divergence of the other countries in the Soviet sphere and Ukraine. If you start at 1992, it looks a little better for Ukraine, but they're still down.
Corruption, yep. Wonder where that culture came from? They will have to get a grip on it if they're serious about joining the EU.
Ukraine is corrupt. No issues there.
Good to know you think the Ukrainian populace would have been better off. Ukrainians clearly don't and are voting with their lives. Perhaps it would be helpful for you to read up on Stalin's mass deportations (and importations of Russians). Russian claims on Crimea as being "Russian" are particularly shall we say rich in historical irony.
No argument here. Some Ukrainians didn't want to be part of Ukraine after the coup, others still did, and they started fighting over whether they'd be allowed to leave. Personally, I don't have a problem with areas deciding they don't want to be part of certain governments anymore. Places like Scotland and Catalan are fortunate that they're in a relatively peaceful part of the world where they can put it up for a vote. Looking at how violent the coup was, I can see why the forces of Donetsk and Luhansk didn't want to give the new Ukrainian government time to stop them.
Yep, that's a thing. Perhaps one should ask, why do eastern Europeans despise Russia and Russians and why did they try to get into NATO as soon as they could?
NATO is a great deal for the non-Americans in it, no question. Ethnic Ukrainians do seem to hate Russia. As I understand it, a lot of Russians got "trapped" behind the borders of Ukraine when the Soviet Union dissolved. It would make sense to me that those areas want to revert back to Russia. I can also understand Ukraine not wanting to give them up without a fight since they have a lot of resources they wouldn't want to lose. This has been a common theme in European history. I don't think there's a moral imperative that the US gets involved in a territorial battle between Ukraine and Russia.
As noted by others, Putin turned Russia into a pariah state. 100% deservedly so. That sucks for individual Russians no doubt and if the mobilization reports are accurate I feel doubly sad for those guys...but for Russia, typical. That's their culture and military culture specifically. Admittedly not Russian military, but besides ISIS who takes a person no matter how bad they are and smashes their head in with a sledge hammer?
IIRC, in War Is A Force That Gives Us Meaning, Hedges talked about the Serbian paramilitary executing groups of people they captured with a sledgehammer. I'm honestly surprised that you think the Russo-Ukraine war is a more worthy one to support than the US policing action in the Balkans.
Who takes a captured soldier and castrates him (that one was Russian military)? And then...films it all and posts it???
There are videos of Ukrainian military executing Russian POWs (
About 20% down this NYT article). It appears that they slit their throats, then shot one who was still alive. It's heinous over there. The UN report lists a lot more of this kind of stuff, from all sides.
In terms of what to do as a US geopolitical strategist, this one's not even hard.
If you're going to talk about geopolitical strategy, you have to bring up geography, not "flouting international norms." This is the only line of argument that has any weight with me; the Zeihan argument that Russia wants to expand up to more defensible borders on the western side of Ukraine. I'm sure the thought process is "if Russia can secure more defensible borders, then they'll be more apt to attack neighbors (and the US) since they are better able to defend themselves." I would just say that I agree with Zeihan that the days of the US being the world police are coming to an end because we're finding that the cost of it isn't worth it when we're not facing off against the powerful Soviet Union.
You don't get to flout international norms to the extent Putin has and not pay a price eventually.
As the New Testament says...by their fruits you shall know them. And Kriegs, you're on the wrong side of history with this one my friend.
It's awkward to say that Russia is flouting international norms as an American. You brought up Syria earlier, where we've armed insurgents and conducted combat operations to overthrow their government without anything approaching a declaration of war AFAIK. Russia was there at the invitation of the government to fight the insurgents, which is objectively more in keeping with international norms than what we were doing.