Yes, unfortunately. We may end up with "Idiocracy" after all... although that is actually way too optimistic.Jack Jones wrote:Seems to me that the intelligent tend to have less babies though.Libertarian666 wrote: Actually, in a few thousand years of modern medicine, the baby's heads might be even bigger. Assuming that allows them to be more intelligent and therefore survive better given intervention to get them out alive via a C-section, evolution doesn't care that they need to be surgically extracted...
Democratic discomfort on the taxes that would actually fund their ideas
Moderator: Global Moderator
-
Libertarian666
- Executive Member

- Posts: 5994
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
Re: Democratic discomfort on the taxes that would actually fund their ideas
Re: Democratic discomfort on the taxes that would actually fund their ideas
That's "fewer".Jack Jones wrote:Seems to me that the intelligent tend to have less babies though.Libertarian666 wrote: Actually, in a few thousand years of modern medicine, the baby's heads might be even bigger. Assuming that allows them to be more intelligent and therefore survive better given intervention to get them out alive via a C-section, evolution doesn't care that they need to be surgically extracted...
-
Jack Jones
- Executive Member

- Posts: 740
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2015 3:12 pm
Re: Democratic discomfort on the taxes that would actually fund their ideas
Thank you for pointing out that my existence proves my point.Xan wrote:That's "fewer".Jack Jones wrote:Seems to me that the intelligent tend to have less babies though.Libertarian666 wrote: Actually, in a few thousand years of modern medicine, the baby's heads might be even bigger. Assuming that allows them to be more intelligent and therefore survive better given intervention to get them out alive via a C-section, evolution doesn't care that they need to be surgically extracted...![]()
Re: Democratic discomfort on the taxes that would actually fund their ideas
I'm sure you will reproduce prodigiouslyJack Jones wrote:Thank you for pointing out that my existence proves my point.Xan wrote:That's "fewer".Jack Jones wrote: Seems to me that the intelligent tend to have less babies though.![]()
Re: Democratic discomfort on the taxes that would actually fund their ideas
Just catching up on this thread. The bolded part is the funniest typo I have read in a while. I'm off to Southeast Asia!Libertarian666 wrote: This is a major reason for "medical tourism" to places like Malaysia and the Philippines (IIRC); there, you can get a private room with hot and cold running nurses for under (in some cases well under) $100/day.
-
Libertarian666
- Executive Member

- Posts: 5994
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
Re: Democratic discomfort on the taxes that would actually fund their ideas
That's not a typo; it's a quotation from a book, I think a Heinlein one.barrett wrote:Just catching up on this thread. The bolded part is the funniest typo I have read in a while. I'm off to Southeast Asia!Libertarian666 wrote: This is a major reason for "medical tourism" to places like Malaysia and the Philippines (IIRC); there, you can get a private room with hot and cold running nurses for under (in some cases well under) $100/day.
