In for a penny, in for a pound
Moderator: Global Moderator
- Pointedstick
- Executive Member
- Posts: 8883
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:21 pm
- Contact:
Re: In for a penny, in for a pound
Stocks still seem cheap? Perhaps I'm still looking from a short-term perspective, but it looks to me like stocks are at an all-time high, while bonds and gold have pulled back and are a much better buy today than they were recently.
Human behavior is economic behavior. The particulars may vary, but competition for limited resources remains a constant.
- CEO Nwabudike Morgan
- CEO Nwabudike Morgan
Re: In for a penny, in for a pound
I don`t say all stocks are cheap, but somePointedstick wrote: Stocks still seem cheap? Perhaps I'm still looking from a short-term perspective, but it looks to me like stocks are at an all-time high, while bonds and gold have pulled back and are a much better buy today than they were recently.

- Pointedstick
- Executive Member
- Posts: 8883
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:21 pm
- Contact:
Re: In for a penny, in for a pound
Which individual stocks look cheap to you right now? MCD is near its all-time nigh... That doesn't mean it's a bad buy but it certainly doesn't look like anything I'd call cheap.frommi wrote: I don`t say all stocks are cheap, but some. Thats the problem with index investors, for you stocks are one singular blob. Look for example what MCD has done in 2008, it gained 8%.
Human behavior is economic behavior. The particulars may vary, but competition for limited resources remains a constant.
- CEO Nwabudike Morgan
- CEO Nwabudike Morgan
Re: In for a penny, in for a pound
That doesn`t anything about the intrinsic value of MCD. Based on the cashflow MCD is around 10-20% undervalued currently. AAPL,MSFT, ORCL, XOM, CVX, BP, IBM, WMT, JPM all look undervalued currently. But don`t count on my wordsPointedstick wrote: Which individual stocks look cheap to you right now? MCD is near its all-time nigh... That doesn't mean it's a bad buy but it certainly doesn't look like anything I'd call cheap.

Last edited by frommi on Sun Sep 15, 2013 1:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 148
- Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2013 1:49 am
- Location: The Netherlands
Re: In for a penny, in for a pound
Good luck finding any 'true value' in 2008's stock market...
- buddtholomew
- Executive Member
- Posts: 2464
- Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 4:16 pm
Re: In for a penny, in for a pound
That's a little extreme don't you think? There are certainly alternatives along the spectrum on 0% cash and 100% cash to dampen volatility when paired with the PP. I now consider the cash portion of the PP + an additional amount held in a savings account as my emergency fund. Remaining assets in taxable are invested in the other PP assets. It works out to approximately 65% (SPY, GLD, TLT) and 35% Cash. It's still a little more volatile than I would like.craigr wrote: If volatility is a big concern, then an investor should consider being 100% in cash. They will suffer inflation risk, but the reported value of the asset won't be volatile.
"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool" --Feynman.