Died Suddenly

Other discussions not related to the Permanent Portfolio

Moderator: Global Moderator

User avatar
yankees60
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 10380
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 8:56 pm
Location: Massachusetts

Re: Died Suddenly

Post by yankees60 »

Mountaineer wrote: Fri Dec 16, 2022 5:27 pm
yankees60 wrote: Fri Dec 16, 2022 4:22 pm
Mountaineer wrote: Fri Dec 16, 2022 12:52 pm
COVID-19 vaccine update re new studies in the link:

https://yourlocalepidemiologist.substac ... dium=email

Bottom line

The fall boosters work. There is now evidence fall boosters broaden protection, help against infection, protect against severe disease, and (we think and hope) provide longer protection. There is one major problem though: more than 150 million people are eligible for a fall booster in the U.S. and have yet to get one.

Love, YLE

“Your Local Epidemiologist (YLE)” is written by Dr. Katelyn Jetelina, MPH PhD—an epidemiologist, data scientist, wife, and mom of two little girls.


1. I take it you endorse this?
2. Have you had yours yet?
3. You presenting this here has raised my sense of urgency and priority to get mine .... though I am living such a super isolated life these days it seems almost impossible to catch anything. But once I get by some things I have been working on day and night I will be more social.


1. Not necessarily, I just present it as it seems to be one of the least partisan/political well informed and well educated sources I've read. I think people should look at the data, do more research as they wish, and form their own conclusions about what is best for themselves re vaccinations. I do think she has a good point about 150 million not fully boosted - that will make it more[align=][/align] difficult for ever reaching some type of herd immunity, thus the virus will just keep mutating in my opinion.

2. Yes - late September.

3. Best wishes. I hope those walls and closed doors protect you from the sub-microscopic airborne critters. 8)


Other than the ones my 12 pets provide to me on a daily basis. But they live an even more isolated existence than me, never ever going outside. So no way for any of them to acquire anything that is not already in the house.
Above provided by: Vinny, who always says: "I only regret that I have but one lap to give to my cats." AND "I'm a more-is-more person."
stuper1
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1373
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 7:18 pm

Re: Died Suddenly

Post by stuper1 »

Does this UK physician seem likely to be a quack?

https://twitter.com/CitizenFreePres/sta ... h-con-3%2F

He's saying things that brave, reasonable doctors have been saying for the last two years, but nobody heard them because they were being censored.

One thing that cracks me up is hearing the PSAs on the radio for the covid vaccines. If any other medication is mentioned on the radio or TV it's accompanied by a tedious listing of every possible side effect. But they get around this for the covid vaccines by having them done as PSAs by the government, rather than paid for by the pharmaceutical companies, so all you hear is how great the vaccine is and you don't hear any mention of any possible side effects.

Take a look at the VAERS database. For say the 20 years prior to 2021, the annual number of reported adverse events due to vaccines was always around 300 or so (I could be off a little; it's been a while since I looked). In 2021 and 2022, the number skyrocketed into the tens of thousands. Is this just a bunch of anti-scientific kooks trying to throw off the system?

If you want to take the vaccine for yourself, be my guest. The only thing I really ask is that you don't pressure your younger relatives (say under 50) to get the vaccine. We really don't know what the long-term effects of this brand new mRNA vaccine technology are going to be. People under 50 are very unlikely to suffer much due to covid, but they do seem to be suffering much due to the vaccine. This is a real sore spot with me, because my parents who are in their late 80s won't let my wife and I come visit them because we haven't been vaccinated. To me, they are the biggest anti-vaxxers of all, because apparently they think the vaccine they took isn't good enough to protect them against us unclean people (even though we've both had covid and thus certainly have strong natural immunity). But the kicker is they convinced my son who is in his early 20s to get the vaccine and booster because he wanted to visit them so badly. To me, that's just sick. They are willing to expose him to a lifetime of potential problems from a vaccine that hasn't had long-term testing yet just to save their own skins when they've had a long life already and supposedly should be protected by this wonderful vaccine anyway.
User avatar
yankees60
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 10380
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 8:56 pm
Location: Massachusetts

Re: Died Suddenly

Post by yankees60 »

stuper1 wrote: Sat Dec 17, 2022 2:09 pm
Does this UK physician seem likely to be a quack?

https://twitter.com/CitizenFreePres/sta ... h-con-3%2F

He's saying things that brave, reasonable doctors have been saying for the last two years, but nobody heard them because they were being censored.

One thing that cracks me up is hearing the PSAs on the radio for the covid vaccines. If any other medication is mentioned on the radio or TV it's accompanied by a tedious listing of every possible side effect. But they get around this for the covid vaccines by having them done as PSAs by the government, rather than paid for by the pharmaceutical companies, so all you hear is how great the vaccine is and you don't hear any mention of any possible side effects.

Take a look at the VAERS database. For say the 20 years prior to 2021, the annual number of reported adverse events due to vaccines was always around 300 or so (I could be off a little; it's been a while since I looked). In 2021 and 2022, the number skyrocketed into the tens of thousands. Is this just a bunch of anti-scientific kooks trying to throw off the system?

If you want to take the vaccine for yourself, be my guest. The only thing I really ask is that you don't pressure your younger relatives (say under 50) to get the vaccine. We really don't know what the long-term effects of this brand new mRNA vaccine technology are going to be. People under 50 are very unlikely to suffer much due to covid, but they do seem to be suffering much due to the vaccine. This is a real sore spot with me, because my parents who are in their late 80s won't let my wife and I come visit them because we haven't been vaccinated. To me, they are the biggest anti-vaxxers of all, because apparently they think the vaccine they took isn't good enough to protect them against us unclean people (even though we've both had covid and thus certainly have strong natural immunity). But the kicker is they convinced my son who is in his early 20s to get the vaccine and booster because he wanted to visit them so badly. To me, that's just sick. They are willing to expose him to a lifetime of potential problems from a vaccine that hasn't had long-term testing yet just to save their own skins when they've had a long life already and supposedly should be protected by this wonderful vaccine anyway.


Your Twitter physician does not seem to have high credibility: https://fullfact.org/online/gb-news-sur ... -vaccines/
Above provided by: Vinny, who always says: "I only regret that I have but one lap to give to my cats." AND "I'm a more-is-more person."
stuper1
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1373
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 7:18 pm

Re: Died Suddenly

Post by stuper1 »

Your fact-checking website does not seem to have high credibility:

https://medium.com/@paulaustinmurphy200 ... 3565c90f0b
User avatar
yankees60
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 10380
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 8:56 pm
Location: Massachusetts

Re: Died Suddenly

Post by yankees60 »

stuper1 wrote: Sat Dec 17, 2022 3:56 pm
Your fact-checking website does not seem to have high credibility:

https://medium.com/@paulaustinmurphy200 ... 3565c90f0b


I do not see the article saying that as much as saying Full Fact has a bias. Within its bias it can be presenting true facts, which is how their assessment of the physician should be read. How accurate were their facts in evaluating his assertions?
Above provided by: Vinny, who always says: "I only regret that I have but one lap to give to my cats." AND "I'm a more-is-more person."
stuper1
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1373
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 7:18 pm

Re: Died Suddenly

Post by stuper1 »

Another interesting article about your fact-checker:

https://thecritic.co.uk/how-neutral-is-full-fact/

One thing that jumps out at me is that most of the staff used to work at the BBC or other similar mass media places.

I have friends in the UK. They say nobody believes the BBC anymore. It's not your grandfather's BBC. It's well known that today's BBC is just the propaganda arm of big business and the government.
User avatar
yankees60
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 10380
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 8:56 pm
Location: Massachusetts

Re: Died Suddenly

Post by yankees60 »

stuper1 wrote: Sat Dec 17, 2022 4:30 pm
Another interesting article about your fact-checker:

https://thecritic.co.uk/how-neutral-is-full-fact/

One thing that jumps out at me is that most of the staff used to work at the BBC or other similar mass media places.

I have friends in the UK. They say nobody believes the BBC anymore. It's not your grandfather's BBC. It's well known that today's BBC is just the propaganda arm of big business and the government.


Basic question I have for the believers of the monolithic big business / government combination.

What happens if two big businesses have completely opposite needs and goals? You cater to one, you hurt the other. Who decides whose turn it is to benefit? And, so on?

I do believe that big businesses get more say than you or I in how things get done. But not complete say. They are competing against other big businesses to have the government to also have their needs met.

Seems to me highly simplistic to believe that all big businesses and government are just one huge oligarchy. When does a company like Amazon that started out as a few people get invited to be part of this oligarchy? Who extends the invitation?

Why has not one book come by someone who was part of the oligarchy (or had intimate knowledge of its workings) detailing how totally independent companies are working together with those in government to decide on which propaganda is going to be fed to the populace? And, all the other things these independent businesses and government work on together?
Above provided by: Vinny, who always says: "I only regret that I have but one lap to give to my cats." AND "I'm a more-is-more person."
boglerdude
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1472
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2016 1:40 am
Contact:

Re: Died Suddenly

Post by boglerdude »

Nothing is blank and white, and its an emergent phenomenon. Zuckerberg for example is heavily invested in the S&P and needs that to go up, despite that it might contain competitors.

https://ritholtz.com/2020/07/should-ind ... illegal-2/
User avatar
yankees60
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 10380
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 8:56 pm
Location: Massachusetts

Re: Died Suddenly

Post by yankees60 »

boglerdude wrote: Sat Dec 17, 2022 7:13 pm
Nothing is blank and white, and its an emergent phenomenon. Zuckerberg for example is heavily invested in the S&P and needs that to go up, despite that it might contain competitors.

https://ritholtz.com/2020/07/should-ind ... illegal-2/


I read the article. There is a flaw in the premise of since there is common ownership of competing companies why should it matter.

It matters because in each of those Fortune 500 companies there are individuals whose compensation and overall equity ownership is highly correlated to how well their business does.
Above provided by: Vinny, who always says: "I only regret that I have but one lap to give to my cats." AND "I'm a more-is-more person."
stuper1
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1373
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 7:18 pm

Re: Died Suddenly

Post by stuper1 »

Here's a good example for you, Vinny, and actually probably the best example: immigration.

Who benefits from having high immigration to a country? And who loses?

The people who benefit are super rich business owners. They get lower labor costs because there is more supply of labor. At the same time they get more consumers to buy their products of toothpaste, toilet paper, etc.

The people who lose are the poor and middle class people who were in the country originally before the immigration happened, because their wages go down and plus they have to put up with living with a bunch of people from a foreign culture who have different ways of doing things. The rich people in their gated communities hardly notice the things that cause friction between people of different cultures because the rich are insulated from all that by their wealth.

I just finished reading Thomas Sowell's book "Migration and Cultures" which is an excellent book, highly recommended by me, discussing many of the major migrations of various peoples through history. One thing that stuck out to me is that many times it really didn't work out because of a clash of cultures. For example, Indian people migrated in large numbers to eastern Africa around 1900 and lived there for generations, but later got kicked out when the situation changed. Something similar happened in Malaysia, Indonesia, Fiji, and Guiana.

Here's another example: the Covid lockdowns. Who benefited from those? Well, let's see, Amazon, Target, Walmart, Home Depot, Lowes, and some other large businesses that were exempt from the lockdowns. Who suffered: thousands or millions of small businesses that went bankrupt.
User avatar
yankees60
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 10380
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 8:56 pm
Location: Massachusetts

Re: Died Suddenly

Post by yankees60 »

stuper1 wrote: Sat Dec 17, 2022 9:29 pm
Here's a good example for you, Vinny, and actually probably the best example: immigration.

Who benefits from having high immigration to a country? And who loses?

The people who benefit are super rich business owners. They get lower labor costs because there is more supply of labor. At the same time they get more consumers to buy their products of toothpaste, toilet paper, etc.

The people who lose are the poor and middle class people who were in the country originally before the immigration happened, because their wages go down and plus they have to put up with living with a bunch of people from a foreign culture who have different ways of doing things. The rich people in their gated communities hardly notice the things that cause friction between people of different cultures because the rich are insulated from all that by their wealth.

I just finished reading Thomas Sowell's book "Migration and Cultures" which is an excellent book, highly recommended by me, discussing many of the major migrations of various peoples through history. One thing that stuck out to me is that many times it really didn't work out because of a clash of cultures. For example, Indian people migrated in large numbers to eastern Africa around 1900 and lived there for generations, but later got kicked out when the situation changed. Something similar happened in Malaysia, Indonesia, Fiji, and Guiana.

Here's another example: the Covid lockdowns. Who benefited from those? Well, let's see, Amazon, Target, Walmart, Home Depot, Lowes, and some other large businesses that were exempt from the lockdowns. Who suffered: thousands or millions of small businesses that went bankrupt.


I assume you are referring to LEGAL immigrants?

So unless you are a descendent from an American Indian you have some immigrants in your background?

I have always described myself as a first generation and one-half since my father came from Italy as well as my mother's parents. That has biased me to hold immigrants in high esteem. My father came here around 1926, 1927 as part of a poor family at a time when in parts of the country Italians were looked upon as being no better than blacks and there were the severe immigration restrictions between the early 1920s until they were finally lifted in 1965. Under those conditions I have no idea why they let him and his family in.

I'd say that it is the immigrant who benefits the most. My father had a bitter attitude towards Italy. He said he was poor there and he would have remained poor if he had stayed there. As an immigrant to our country he achieved the American dream.

We all benefit from immigration as initially many of the lower skilled ones will take jobs that many Americans will not take.

We all further benefit from it when my father turned into the highly productive worker he was plus produced highly productive children like me and my sister.

I'd say all businesses benefit because they either get lower priced labor or labor that no one else will do. Plus they all have a larger customer base.

I grew up in Rhode Island and it was practically "Little Italy" where I grew up. I'd say that of the 2,000+ students that were in my three year high school that about half of them were thorough-bred, 100% Italians such as myself. But we had zero Italian culture, little Italian identify. Little doubt it was because their parents or grand parents came here like my father for the American Dream and we were, thus, brought up to be Americans and not Italian-Americans.

I went to Amazon to add to my list your Sowell book. Quite surprised to see that for a 25+ year old book it still maintains such a high price, even for a used version.

Your examples of who did or did not benefit from the lockdown is true. But, again, I don't believe that was the result of the concerted efforts of those big businesses and government to do it that way. It was just the way it happened. There was no grand plan as to how to handle the pandemic. Everyone was trying to figure out on a day-by-day basis how to best handle it.
Above provided by: Vinny, who always says: "I only regret that I have but one lap to give to my cats." AND "I'm a more-is-more person."
stuper1
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1373
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 7:18 pm

Re: Died Suddenly

Post by stuper1 »

Yeah, they locked down 100% of the population for a disease that was known to mainly be a problem for 15% of the population, and they did it for way longer than the promised "two weeks to flatten the curve", and none of that was due to pressure from big businesses who could see that they were profiting like crazy? Ok, it's a semi-free country, so you can believe whatever you like. Me, I believe that money talks, and if anyone has money it's big business.
stuper1
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1373
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 7:18 pm

Re: Died Suddenly

Post by stuper1 »

Vinny, let me tell you a fanciful story about immigration and then ask you some questions.

Imagine that Belgium has an open-borders policy where anybody who showed up at their border from anywhere in the world is allowed to move in and become a Belgian citizen. After a while, the Belgians get upset because they find that a whole bunch of Dutch people are moving into their country, and the nice Belgian floors are getting terribly marred by all the Dutch people walking around in their wooden shoes. So, the Belgian people elect legislators who pass a new law that says as of January 1 of the next year we are closing our borders and not letting in any more immigrants. January 1 comes around and the borders get closed. Everything goes fine for a while, but pretty soon the Belgians realize that more Dutch people are getting across the border and moving in to live in Belgium permanently. A reporter does an investigation and finds out that the richest man in Belgium has a huge factory that makes wooden shoes. It turns out the rich guy bribed the president of Belgium to stop enforcing the no-immigration law, so even though the law is still on the books, it is not being enforced, and Dutch people are again freely moving into Belgium whenever they want.

Here are my questions:

1. Do the Belgians have a right as a sovereign people to make a collective decision on how many immigrants they want to accept and to pass laws enacting that decision? Or is there some natural law that says they don't have that right and they have to accept any person who shows up at their border and let that person move in and become a Belgian citizen?

2. If they do pass immigration laws, is it okay for their president to make her own unilateral decision to not enforce the laws that have been enacted according to the proper legislative process?
glennds
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1336
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2013 11:24 am

Re: Died Suddenly

Post by glennds »

stuper1 wrote: Sat Dec 17, 2022 9:29 pm
Who benefits from having high immigration to a country? And who loses?

The people who benefit are super rich business owners. They get lower labor costs because there is more supply of labor. At the same time they get more consumers to buy their products of toothpaste, toilet paper, etc.

The people who lose are the poor and middle class people who were in the country originally before the immigration happened, because their wages go down and plus they have to put up with living with a bunch of people from a foreign culture who have different ways of doing things. The rich people in their gated communities hardly notice the things that cause friction between people of different cultures because the rich are insulated from all that by their wealth.
I think there's immigration and then there's immigration. There's a big difference between motivated, productive legal immigrants who are willing and able to start businesses or work in skilled positions and pay taxes, and migrants who are non-productive and an immediate burden on the system.

Pierre Trudeau's Canada is a good example of a country that built its tax base through legal immigration in the 1960s and 1970s and seems to have done so very successfully. The vast majority of those in that wave of immigration were productive contributors to the tax base, and Canada experienced considerable growth. Yes, there were instances of cultural friction, but generally speaking they celebrated what Trudeau Sr. called the Canadian mosaic which he touted as being superior to the American melting pot. Today, cities like Toronto and Montreal are very multi-cultural. It's amazing how the people who were there originally before the immigration happened got real quiet when their lives improved, home values went up, benefits increased. I saw this myself in the 70's.

These days here in the US, seems like we have labor shortages and an ever growing list of jobs Americans don't particularly care to do. If legal immigration came back to pre-Trump levels and we brought in productive, working, tax paying people, it might solve multiple problems. And I don't see why we couldn't make legal immigration conditional on settlement locations where labor and economic stimulus is needed. Maybe other conditions too.

Non productive, non-legal migrants who are an immediate burden on the system are a different story. There ought to be a civilized but firm way to just say no. On that I think we agree.
boglerdude
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1472
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2016 1:40 am
Contact:

Re: Died Suddenly

Post by boglerdude »

> There ought to be a civilized but firm way to just say no

That would be mean. ie not the "woke" communist utopia we're heading for.

ofc there was a plan for a pandemic and it had nothing to do with house arrest for healthy people.
https://old.reddit.com/r/LockdownSkepti ... e/j07s4d2/

But China demonstrated the impressive control governments could get away with if they fomented hysteria. North Korea has a happy upper class, and most of them actually believe the system is just. Cherry picking evidence to fit your self-serving narrative is Man's greatest weakness.

Image
User avatar
yankees60
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 10380
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 8:56 pm
Location: Massachusetts

Re: Died Suddenly

Post by yankees60 »

stuper1 wrote: Sat Dec 17, 2022 10:21 pm
Yeah, they locked down 100% of the population for a disease that was known to mainly be a problem for 15% of the population, and they did it for way longer than the promised "two weeks to flatten the curve", and none of that was due to pressure from big businesses who could see that they were profiting like crazy? Ok, it's a semi-free country, so you can believe whatever you like. Me, I believe that money talks, and if anyone has money it's big business.


Yes, no denying that for certain money has influence and power. But your beliefs leave a lot of basic details / questions unanswered.
Above provided by: Vinny, who always says: "I only regret that I have but one lap to give to my cats." AND "I'm a more-is-more person."
User avatar
yankees60
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 10380
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 8:56 pm
Location: Massachusetts

Re: Died Suddenly

Post by yankees60 »

stuper1 wrote: Sat Dec 17, 2022 11:40 pm
Vinny, let me tell you a fanciful story about immigration and then ask you some questions.

Imagine that Belgium has an open-borders policy where anybody who showed up at their border from anywhere in the world is allowed to move in and become a Belgian citizen. After a while, the Belgians get upset because they find that a whole bunch of Dutch people are moving into their country, and the nice Belgian floors are getting terribly marred by all the Dutch people walking around in their wooden shoes. So, the Belgian people elect legislators who pass a new law that says as of January 1 of the next year we are closing our borders and not letting in any more immigrants. January 1 comes around and the borders get closed. Everything goes fine for a while, but pretty soon the Belgians realize that more Dutch people are getting across the border and moving in to live in Belgium permanently. A reporter does an investigation and finds out that the richest man in Belgium has a huge factory that makes wooden shoes. It turns out the rich guy bribed the president of Belgium to stop enforcing the no-immigration law, so even though the law is still on the books, it is not being enforced, and Dutch people are again freely moving into Belgium whenever they want.

Here are my questions:

1. Do the Belgians have a right as a sovereign people to make a collective decision on how many immigrants they want to accept and to pass laws enacting that decision? Or is there some natural law that says they don't have that right and they have to accept any person who shows up at their border and let that person move in and become a Belgian citizen?

2. If they do pass immigration laws, is it okay for their president to make her own unilateral decision to not enforce the laws that have been enacted according to the proper legislative process?


For the scenario proposed and the questions asked ....

1. The Belgians have a right as a ....

2. Not okay for president to make own unilateral decision
Above provided by: Vinny, who always says: "I only regret that I have but one lap to give to my cats." AND "I'm a more-is-more person."
User avatar
yankees60
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 10380
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 8:56 pm
Location: Massachusetts

Re: Died Suddenly

Post by yankees60 »

boglerdude wrote: Sun Dec 18, 2022 12:44 am
> There ought to be a civilized but firm way to just say no

That would be mean. ie not the "woke" communist utopia we're heading for.

ofc there was a plan for a pandemic and it had nothing to do with house arrest for healthy people.
https://old.reddit.com/r/LockdownSkepti ... e/j07s4d2/

But China demonstrated the impressive control governments could get away with if they fomented hysteria. North Korea has a happy upper class, and most of them actually believe the system is just. Cherry picking evidence to fit your self-serving narrative is Man's greatest weakness.

Image


I assume that you are saying this is universal and that none of us are innocent of doing this/
Above provided by: Vinny, who always says: "I only regret that I have but one lap to give to my cats." AND "I'm a more-is-more person."
User avatar
yankees60
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 10380
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 8:56 pm
Location: Massachusetts

Re: Died Suddenly

Post by yankees60 »

stuper1 wrote: Sat Dec 17, 2022 2:09 pm


If you want to take the vaccine for yourself, be my guest. The only thing I really ask is that you don't pressure your younger relatives (say under 50) to get the vaccine. We really don't know what the long-term effects of this brand new mRNA vaccine technology are going to be. People under 50 are very unlikely to suffer much due to covid, but they do seem to be suffering much due to the vaccine. This is a real sore spot with me, because my parents who are in their late 80s won't let my wife and I come visit them because we haven't been vaccinated. To me, they are the biggest anti-vaxxers of all, because apparently they think the vaccine they took isn't good enough to protect them against us unclean people (even though we've both had covid and thus certainly have strong natural immunity). But the kicker is they convinced my son who is in his early 20s to get the vaccine and booster because he wanted to visit them so badly. To me, that's just sick. They are willing to expose him to a lifetime of potential problems from a vaccine that hasn't had long-term testing yet just to save their own skins when they've had a long life already and supposedly should be protected by this wonderful vaccine anyway.


On the other hand regarding your son ...... how about the vaccine perhaps preventing him from a lifetime of potential problems including death?

Doesn't it come down to the potential problems caused by the vaccine versus the potential problems averted by having had the vaccine.

Also, in this forum there are many posts about the potential downsides of having had the vaccine.

However, there seems to be little of this:

https://www.statnews.com/2022/12/13/cov ... on-deaths/

HEALTH
Covid vaccines averted 3 million deaths in U.S., according to new study
Brittany Trang
By Brittany TrangDec. 13, 2022
Above provided by: Vinny, who always says: "I only regret that I have but one lap to give to my cats." AND "I'm a more-is-more person."
User avatar
jalanlong
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 831
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2019 7:30 am

Re: Died Suddenly

Post by jalanlong »

yankees60 wrote: Sat Dec 17, 2022 10:08 pm
I grew up in Rhode Island and it was practically "Little Italy" where I grew up. I'd say that of the 2,000+ students that were in my three year high school that about half of them were thorough-bred, 100% Italians such as myself. But we had zero Italian culture, little Italian identify. Little doubt it was because their parents or grand parents came here like my father for the American Dream and we were, thus, brought up to be Americans and not Italian-Americans.
I am having quite the opposite experience here as I age. I live in a state that in my lifetime has grown from 14% Hispanic when I was young to almost 45% now and projected to be at over 50% by the time I pass on. The cultural change is something I have witnessed first hand.

When I walk down the halls of my office now, I am very likely to hear large groups of co-workers speaking Spanish. Yes I could learn Spanish if I wanted to but that is not the point. Their desks have Mexican flags and photos of Mexican celebrities of which I am completely unfamiliar. They do not listen to the music that I or my friends or family listen to as they mostly play Tejano radio stations ...they watch mostly Mexican soccer and cheer on the Mexican National Team. I could go on.

Whenever someone says that people like to be around people that are like themselves, the Left will cancel you almost immediately and shut down discussion. But there is something to be said for having a shared culture and shared references. We do not tend to pick friends or spouses that are completely foreign to us. There have been many sociological studies (a lot in lunchrooms) showing that people tend to gravitate to other people that they feel are like themselves. There have to be consequences like a sense of alienation when people start to feel like they no longer share any interests or values of the people around them. It may not be avoidable but I think it is a topic that bears discussion and not derision from the media.

And this is coming from a Libertarian who believes that if people want to move somewhere, work and build a life then the fact that they have crossed some sort of imaginary line in the sand should not prevent them from doing so. But we should not ignore the cultural changes that will occur.
stuper1
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1373
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 7:18 pm

Re: Died Suddenly

Post by stuper1 »

yankees60 wrote: Sun Dec 18, 2022 9:40 am
stuper1 wrote: Sat Dec 17, 2022 2:09 pm

If you want to take the vaccine for yourself, be my guest. The only thing I really ask is that you don't pressure your younger relatives (say under 50) to get the vaccine. We really don't know what the long-term effects of this brand new mRNA vaccine technology are going to be. People under 50 are very unlikely to suffer much due to covid, but they do seem to be suffering much due to the vaccine. This is a real sore spot with me, because my parents who are in their late 80s won't let my wife and I come visit them because we haven't been vaccinated. To me, they are the biggest anti-vaxxers of all, because apparently they think the vaccine they took isn't good enough to protect them against us unclean people (even though we've both had covid and thus certainly have strong natural immunity). But the kicker is they convinced my son who is in his early 20s to get the vaccine and booster because he wanted to visit them so badly. To me, that's just sick. They are willing to expose him to a lifetime of potential problems from a vaccine that hasn't had long-term testing yet just to save their own skins when they've had a long life already and supposedly should be protected by this wonderful vaccine anyway.
On the other hand regarding your son ...... how about the vaccine perhaps preventing him from a lifetime of potential problems including death?

Doesn't it come down to the potential problems caused by the vaccine versus the potential problems averted by having had the vaccine.

Also, in this forum there are many posts about the potential downsides of having had the vaccine.

However, there seems to be little of this:

https://www.statnews.com/2022/12/13/cov ... on-deaths/

HEALTH
Covid vaccines averted 3 million deaths in U.S., according to new study
Brittany Trang
By Brittany TrangDec. 13, 2022
Vinny, with all due respect because I'm sure you're a very nice person, but you're talking nonsense.

The government's statistics show that excess mortality for people under 45 rose sharply only after the covid vaccines were introduced. This means that for some of those grandparents, like my silly parents, who insisted their grandchildren get the covid vaccine before coming to visit, well they didn't get to see their grandchildren after all because the grandchildren were dead from the vaccine. That's pretty sad if you ask me.
User avatar
jalanlong
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 831
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2019 7:30 am

Re: Died Suddenly

Post by jalanlong »

yankees60 wrote: Sun Dec 18, 2022 9:40 am

On the other hand regarding your son ...... how about the vaccine perhaps preventing him from a lifetime of potential problems including death?
Come on. The death rate from Covid cases across all ages groups is approx 3%. People in the 18-29 age range only constitute 1.8% of the total Covid deaths. A lifetime of potential problems and death sounds a like like Biden's "winter of severe illness and death" scare tactic last Christmas. A study done in Michigan shows that people in their 20s were 11x more likely to die of a traffic accident than Covid. So really they shouldn't be driving to get the vaccine!

https://www.mackinac.org/for-most-peopl ... -accidents
User avatar
yankees60
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 10380
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 8:56 pm
Location: Massachusetts

Re: Died Suddenly

Post by yankees60 »

jalanlong wrote: Sun Dec 18, 2022 10:22 am
yankees60 wrote: Sat Dec 17, 2022 10:08 pm

I grew up in Rhode Island and it was practically "Little Italy" where I grew up. I'd say that of the 2,000+ students that were in my three year high school that about half of them were thorough-bred, 100% Italians such as myself. But we had zero Italian culture, little Italian identify. Little doubt it was because their parents or grand parents came here like my father for the American Dream and we were, thus, brought up to be Americans and not Italian-Americans.



I am having quite the opposite experience here as I age. I live in a state that in my lifetime has grown from 14% Hispanic when I was young to almost 45% now and projected to be at over 50% by the time I pass on. The cultural change is something I have witnessed first hand.

When I walk down the halls of my office now, I am very likely to hear large groups of co-workers speaking Spanish. Yes I could learn Spanish if I wanted to but that is not the point. Their desks have Mexican flags and photos of Mexican celebrities of which I am completely unfamiliar. They do not listen to the music that I or my friends or family listen to as they mostly play Tejano radio stations ...they watch mostly Mexican soccer and cheer on the Mexican National Team. I could go on.

Whenever someone says that people like to be around people that are like themselves, the Left will cancel you almost immediately and shut down discussion. But there is something to be said for having a shared culture and shared references. We do not tend to pick friends or spouses that are completely foreign to us. There have been many sociological studies (a lot in lunchrooms) showing that people tend to gravitate to other people that they feel are like themselves. There have to be consequences like a sense of alienation when people start to feel like they no longer share any interests or values of the people around them. It may not be avoidable but I think it is a topic that bears discussion and not derision from the media.

And this is coming from a Libertarian who believes that if people want to move somewhere, work and build a life then the fact that they have crossed some sort of imaginary line in the sand should not prevent them from doing so. But we should not ignore the cultural changes that will occur.


Yes, that is completely foreign to what I experienced in a Italian semi-enclave where so many of us were first or second generation Italians yet were not at all brought up to be Italian but as Americans. I've many times stated that I'm 100% genetically Italian but 100% culturally American. Another personal data point. When both my sister and I chose French as our foreign language to learn neither of our parents asked, "Why not Italian?" I attribute that to both of them fully participating in the American Dream.
Above provided by: Vinny, who always says: "I only regret that I have but one lap to give to my cats." AND "I'm a more-is-more person."
User avatar
yankees60
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 10380
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 8:56 pm
Location: Massachusetts

Re: Died Suddenly

Post by yankees60 »

stuper1 wrote: Sun Dec 18, 2022 11:29 am

The government's statistics show that excess mortality for people under 45 rose sharply only after the covid vaccines were introduced. This means that for some of those grandparents, like my silly parents, who insisted their grandchildren get the covid vaccine before coming to visit, well they didn't get to see their grandchildren after all because the grandchildren were dead from the vaccine. That's pretty sad if you ask me.


Do you have support for this?
Above provided by: Vinny, who always says: "I only regret that I have but one lap to give to my cats." AND "I'm a more-is-more person."
User avatar
Kriegsspiel
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 4052
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 5:28 pm

Re: Died Suddenly

Post by Kriegsspiel »

jalanlong wrote: Sun Dec 18, 2022 10:22 am And this is coming from a Libertarian who believes that if people want to move somewhere, work and build a life then the fact that they have crossed some sort of imaginary line in the sand should not prevent them from doing so. But we should not ignore the cultural changes that will occur.
I'm of the same mindset regarding people bringing their foreign loyalties into a new country. Something I've been thinking about for a while now is that in places with healthy immigration program, it seems that immigrants voluntarily impose an "immigrant tax" on themselves when they move to a new country. IE, a new immigrant is naturally suspect in a way that a native isn't. As they prove that they're fully on board with their new country's culture and ethics, and pass them through to their children, they overcome the immigrant tax and become assimilated. Refusal to assimilate would be punished in a healthy system. I think that the New World has become a closed frontier, so any mass migrations or population/borders mismatch would look more like it does in the Old World (ie, Bad).

And that's why I'm no longer a Libertarian in the traditional sense. Citizens of other countries don't have any right to come to mine unless they're invited. I don't know if I'd just be considered a nationalist conservative (libertarian nationalist?), but I think allowing unmitigated immigration across "imaginary lines" is fucking retarded. The imaginary lines on the map are where countries cease to enforce (via law & culture) their laws and customs ends, and the limit of our investment in our homeland, so I think it's a good thing to mitigate people crossing them. Libertarian concepts aren't universal and don't work with all cultures.
You there, Ephialtes. May you live forever.
Post Reply