Re: Concrete Actions to Address Systemic Racism
Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2020 1:22 pm
Hilarious!Kriegsspiel wrote: ↑Mon Jun 15, 2020 9:16 pm
* Also, this bit from Triumph the Insult Comic Dog, a classic![]()
Permanent Portfolio Forum
https://www.gyroscopicinvesting.com/forum/
https://www.gyroscopicinvesting.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=10818
Hilarious!Kriegsspiel wrote: ↑Mon Jun 15, 2020 9:16 pm
* Also, this bit from Triumph the Insult Comic Dog, a classic![]()
I'm not sure what you think I had in mind, but I was just trying to clarify what you were saying, whether you were saying that you don't think systemic racism is even possible in any society, or if you were saying that it has already been eliminated from our society. It sounds like you mean the latter.pp4me wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 1:16 pmYes, that sounds like an excellent example but that problem has already been solved unless you believe the "voter suppression" narrative being pushed by a lot of Dems.
Judging from most of the posts in this thread the majority of posters seem to have a different definition of systemic racism than what you had in mind.
That really is brilliant.I Shrugged wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 1:22 pmHilarious!Kriegsspiel wrote: ↑Mon Jun 15, 2020 9:16 pm
* Also, this bit from Triumph the Insult Comic Dog, a classic![]()
Sorry for making assumptions about what you had in mind but given current events I automatically equated the George Floyd incident with what somebody means when they use the term "systemic racism".stuper1 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 1:30 pmI'm not sure what you think I had in mind, but I was just trying to clarify what you were saying, whether you were saying that you don't think systemic racism is even possible in any society, or if you were saying that it has already been eliminated from our society. It sounds like you mean the latter.pp4me wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 1:16 pmYes, that sounds like an excellent example but that problem has already been solved unless you believe the "voter suppression" narrative being pushed by a lot of Dems.
Judging from most of the posts in this thread the majority of posters seem to have a different definition of systemic racism than what you had in mind.
Sounds like WiseOne is suggesting eliminating a lot of welfare, along with providing government-backed low-income jobs, childcare, and social funding. I think the first part would help, but I have doubts about the second part. Government involvement with almost anything just means needless waste. I guess we made our bed, and now we have to lie in it though.
I watched the majority of the body-cam video (~40 minutes, I think), plus a separate surveillance camera video, and it seems pretty clear to me that the cop who shot him was acting in self-defense. One of the cops started to handcuff the guy, a struggle with both cops ensued, the guy grabbed the taser from one of the cops and started to run with it, turned while still running and shot the taser in the cop's direction (but missed), at which point the cop immediately reached for his gun and returned fire.pp4me wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 2:54 pm They also showed video of the incident at Wendy's in Atlanta where the black man overpowered the police and took one of their tasers and got shot in the back trying to run away. Personally, I don't think they should have shot him in the back like that but it isn't as clear cut as the George Floyd case.
Most of the cops I've heard on the subject seem to agree with you that they followed procedures by the book and I don't necessarily disagree. I tend to think however that if those cops had continued to deal with the subject in the same courteous manner when it came time to handcuff him it might not have happened. The man was obviously seriously drunk with all that entails, having been there and done that, but it was also obvious that he was capable of being reasoned with without a threat of violence. From my admittedly distant observation point, the triggering point was when the cops abruptly got out the handcuffs and displayed their intention to take him into custody by force. I do think that could have been handled better and maybe this video would be a good one for training in the future.Tortoise wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 3:45 pmI watched the majority of the body-cam video (~40 minutes, I think), plus a separate surveillance camera video, and it seems pretty clear to me that the cop who shot him was acting in self-defense. One of the cops started to handcuff the guy, a struggle with both cops ensued, the guy grabbed the taser from one of the cops and started to run with it, turned while still running and shot the taser in the cop's direction (but missed), at which point the cop immediately reached for his gun and returned fire.pp4me wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 2:54 pm They also showed video of the incident at Wendy's in Atlanta where the black man overpowered the police and took one of their tasers and got shot in the back trying to run away. Personally, I don't think they should have shot him in the back like that but it isn't as clear cut as the George Floyd case.
The fact that the bullet(s) hit the man in the back is incidental to the fact that the cop was returning fire a split-second after almost getting tased. I don't know the legal technicalities, but it seems like common sense that if you're a cop and someone steals your taser and attempts to shoot you with it (or even threatens to), you have to view him as a deadly threat since he could potentially tase you then steal your gun and shoot you with it.
What surprised me the most in the body-cam video was how courteous, professional, and accommodating the first cop was. He had to tell the man multiple times to move his car out of the drive-thru line, and the guy kept passing out at the wheel. After he finally parked his car, he kept exiting his car and approaching the cop, and the cop had to remind him several times to get back in his car and stay there. Yet the cop never lost his cool or became hostile. He practically bent over backwards to be courteous, understanding, and even friendly to a guy who was obviously three sheets to the wind and refused to follow simple directions.
The visuals are under embargo. This article represents the mainstream understanding of pale skinned, green eyed redheaded women. Note, that the science only addresses the female of the species.Kriegsspiel wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 5:55 amI've heard of A theory, maybe not yours. If it involves pale redheads with green eyes I'll need some visuals.Mark Leavy wrote: ↑Mon Jun 15, 2020 10:17 pm And have you heard my theory about redheads and pain killers?
...
The video I saw was a black guy telling the camera "Look at the white girl trying to set shit on fire. Look at the white girl. Look at the white girl trying to burn down Wendy's. This wasn't us." Their crime was in calling the police on the drunk guy passed out in the drive-thru line. One of BLM's demands is that police stop enforcing "petty" crimes, which presumably includes passing out and blocking a drive-thru.
And then the context comes after that.Today is the last day of my seven day challenge to provide a current example of systemic racism in America. No examples yet, just conceptual takes.
An essay broken up into 16 tweets in rapid succession. Interesting choice of medium. I personally would have just sent the first provocative tweet and then followed it up with a single tweet containing a link to my essay for context.I Shrugged wrote: ↑Wed Jun 17, 2020 5:28 pm https://twitter.com/ScottAdamsSays/stat ... 2031250433
And then the context comes after that.Today is the last day of my seven day challenge to provide a current example of systemic racism in America. No examples yet, just conceptual takes.
I don't think people can answer your question because...what is "systemic racism"?stuper1 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 1:30 pmI'm not sure what you think I had in mind, but I was just trying to clarify what you were saying, whether you were saying that you don't think systemic racism is even possible in any society, or if you were saying that it has already been eliminated from our society. It sounds like you mean the latter.pp4me wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 1:16 pmYes, that sounds like an excellent example but that problem has already been solved unless you believe the "voter suppression" narrative being pushed by a lot of Dems.
Judging from most of the posts in this thread the majority of posters seem to have a different definition of systemic racism than what you had in mind.
Sounds like WiseOne is suggesting eliminating a lot of welfare, along with providing government-backed low-income jobs, childcare, and social funding. I think the first part would help, but I have doubts about the second part. Government involvement with almost anything just means needless waste. I guess we made our bed, and now we have to lie in it though.
Is that what they're defining as "systemic racism"?Kriegsspiel wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 9:09 pm One of BLM's demands is that police stop enforcing "petty" crimes, which presumably includes passing out and blocking a drive-thru.
Yes, it’s quite common. A lot of people won’t click a link. And now that Google is threatening to demonetize sites with comments they don’t like, it’s better to keep the discussion on Twitter anyway.Tortoise wrote: ↑Wed Jun 17, 2020 8:38 pmAn essay broken up into 16 tweets in rapid succession. Interesting choice of medium. I personally would have just sent the first provocative tweet and then followed it up with a single tweet containing a link to my essay for context.I Shrugged wrote: ↑Wed Jun 17, 2020 5:28 pm https://twitter.com/ScottAdamsSays/stat ... 2031250433
And then the context comes after that.Today is the last day of my seven day challenge to provide a current example of systemic racism in America. No examples yet, just conceptual takes.
I don't use social media; is this "essay packetizing" something that a lot of Twitter users are doing these days?
Scott Adams had an interesting take on reparations for slavery the other day. I think it was on Carl Tuckerson's show.flyingpylon wrote: ↑Thu Jun 18, 2020 7:19 amYes, it’s quite common. A lot of people won’t click a link. And now that Google is threatening to demonetize sites with comments they don’t like, it’s better to keep the discussion on Twitter anyway.Tortoise wrote: ↑Wed Jun 17, 2020 8:38 pmAn essay broken up into 16 tweets in rapid succession. Interesting choice of medium. I personally would have just sent the first provocative tweet and then followed it up with a single tweet containing a link to my essay for context.I Shrugged wrote: ↑Wed Jun 17, 2020 5:28 pm https://twitter.com/ScottAdamsSays/stat ... 2031250433
And then the context comes after that.Today is the last day of my seven day challenge to provide a current example of systemic racism in America. No examples yet, just conceptual takes.
I don't use social media; is this "essay packetizing" something that a lot of Twitter users are doing these days?