MediumTex wrote:
LesWurse wrote:
I've been waiting for someone to raise the consequences of continually printing more Monopoly money to avoid defaulting on trillions of dollars of national debt. How long before we face the long promised spector of taking a wheelbarrow full of paper to the store for a loaf of bread?
No rising wages = no inflationary spiral.
That's a nice thought, but it is not how the real world works. Compare Zimbabwe as the most recent example I know.
In Zimbabwe wages did not rise even 1/10 as fast as inflation, and many/most people quit working because it was not worth their time. Some people were/are able to extract additional money (e.g. bribes for police) and some incredibly dedicated people did keep working (e.g. some teachers, medical professionals, etc) and either lived on donations or foreign savings. One of Cathy's more recent articles where she mentions wages (31 july 2010,
http://www.cathybuckle.com/index.php?id=2) alludes a bit to a daily wage of $5 for a civil servant, which might provide essentials but nothing extra.
Even in Wiemar Germany wages did not come close to keeping up with inflation.
Perhaps the idea fails because of foreign savings being converted into local currency (I suspect that was significant in Zimbabwe but have no idea about Germany) or perhaps it is because of state expenditures and the politically connected having the "new money" first.
No matter the reason, the vast majority of people suffer huge declines in purchasing power while the inflationary death spiral occurs, precisely because increasing wages lag the spiral, not cause it.