MachineGhost wrote:
Cortopassi wrote:
But it is, at this point, pretty well defined science that excessive carbs through the standard American diet, sugar, pastas, breads, etc. is the overwhelming leading cause of diabetes, obesity, and probably the root of many other diseases.
No it isn't. It's EXCESS calories. There's no difference between low carb and high carb in terms of pre-diabetes or diabetes. In the short term.
P.S. Inflammation is the ROOT causes of many diseases.
And to throw another monkey wrench into the works, there's at least one study showing that its not the ferritin level that is the problem and may actually be a beneficial indicator.
I've gone near zero carbs for a month at a time in the past couple years. And while I did not measure actual calories, I suspect I likely ate more calories during that month because 70+% of the calories I was eating were from fat.
I lost weight every time.
This is like Trump vs. Clinton. You'll have some hard core people saying high carb is not an issue, and others that it will eventually kill you. I can't say for sure. I have been reasonably low carb compared to the standard Am diet (probably sub 100g/day, many days sub 50) for at least 3 years or so. I have weighed within +/-5 lbs that whole time. Even before, when I was much higher carbs. I just dont' eat a lot in general.
I cannot say for a fact anything health-wise has improved for me going mainly low carb; I am generally healthy. But personally I have seen enough evidence in my extended family that high carbs = fat people and low carbs = skinny to moderate people.
Sure, it is quite likely more the type of carbs vs. the absolute amount.
But as for calorie consumption, see this film:
http://thatsugarfilm.com/ He spent 30 days eating the same number of calories he did prior, but focused on eating items that were considered "healthy" but had lots of added sugar. He gained a lot of weight and got a belly and his blood numbers went to crap.