Would you trust these numbers?
Find the same data from the Russian side and take the averages, then you may get more realistic numbers. :-)
IMHO - Probably was going to teeter. Trying to fight Russia using the Ukranians as cannon fodder and not getting our hands dirty, probably won't work and eventually politicians will lose interest.
There’s one premise I still don’t accept—
Fair enough. I definitely could be wrong.dualstow wrote: ↑Sat Dec 30, 2023 6:21 amThere’s one premise I still don’t accept—
- I know that the Ukrainians (government) are corrupt. That never changed anything for me.
- Watching Russia adapt after their early poor performance, I have come around to the notion that they can win, especially if we have to save funds and ammo & armaments for Israel and for Taiwan
- I don’t accept that we’re using the Ukrainians as cannon fodder, as if they are puppets and have no choice in the matter.
Wish we had some Ukrainians here to tell us what they think: if they think it’s time to capitulate, etc.
Perhaps Putin and his cronies are not involved, perhaps. Maybe it’s we the people who are most responsible. That’s even worse. But what is the root cause?
Ukrainians feel betrayed by the US, Republicans vetoing aid and past limitations that restricted Ukraine to having to fight with one arm tied behind its back signifying more a case of support for Putin. Capitulation isn't a option given past Russian/Ukraine history, instead the nuclear last post option is increasingly being seen as the more likely, 15+ times Chernobyl's (in a war zone, so left open to spew massive amounts of radiation into the atmosphere rather than being capped = sustained global impact). After Chernobyl the increase of radiation in rainwater in Washington State was more than 140 times the background level measured before Chernobyl (if Ukraine is deemed to be lost the level of radiation in the US could be increased to in excess of 3000 times higher). 70%+ of Russians live within continental Europe, as would the rest of Europe be massively impacted, perhaps even uninhabitable for 20,000+ years. Russia given its radiation exposure levels and very high numbers of deaths may very well be inclined to launch its nukes.
As they should.
From Ukrainian military top brass, can't recall the name, TV news instead of being read, some months back and along the lines of if Ukraine loses the whole world loses with highlighting of the number/size of nuclear reactors across Ukraine and the widespread radiation that could arise, a strong inference that the rest of the world should be taking greater steps against Russia/support of Ukraine to avoid major nuclear incidents. Shortly thereafter Zelenskyy was putting out about the risk Russia was inducing against possible nuclear reactors across Ukraine i.e. redirection that if nuclear reactor de-caps did occur then both sides could imply it was the other as being the cause.
Mountaineer wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2024 1:04 pm
I think (note I said ‘think’ rather than the popular ‘feel’ often used by the woke)
yankees60 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 26, 2024 8:51 amSorry. But this use of "feel" rather than "think" predates woke by decades and decades.Mountaineer wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2024 1:04 pm I think (note I said ‘think’ rather than the popular ‘feel’ often used by the woke)
I've been railing against it similarly for decades, saying "I don't want to know how you feel, I want to know what you think."
Loosely related.
Start paying attention to how often you are hearing people say "a little bit" when they actually are referring to things that are on the spectrum of "somewhat significant to significant to quite significant".
"A little bit" means barely perceptible. It's almost never used properly to describe that.
Xan wrote: ↑Tue Mar 26, 2024 9:13 am
yankees60 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 26, 2024 8:51 am
Mountaineer wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2024 1:04 pm
I think (note I said ‘think’ rather than the popular ‘feel’ often used by the woke)
Sorry. But this use of "feel" rather than "think" predates woke by decades and decades.
I've been railing against it similarly for decades, saying "I don't want to know how you feel, I want to know what you think."
Loosely related.
Start paying attention to how often you are hearing people say "a little bit" when they actually are referring to things that are on the spectrum of "somewhat significant to significant to quite significant".
"A little bit" means barely perceptible. It's almost never used properly to describe that.
One that bugs me is the use of "like", which has sadly expanded far beyond the Valley girls. Somebody will relay a story to me and say "I was like, 'what were you thinking?'". I'll reply, "You were 'LIKE' that? Does that mean you said it or you thought it?"