Permanent Portfolio Forum
https://www.gyroscopicinvesting.com/forum/
https://www.gyroscopicinvesting.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=10427
Do you know what the three drugs are? That could be useful information.mathjak107 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 30, 2020 12:31 pm My ex was released yesterday ..she said if they catch it early on there is a three drug cocktail they have been using that has been fairly effective .....she couldn’t breath and talk when she went in on Friday .they gave it to her for a day ....she is home recuperating but feels so much better ......
Is the three drug cocktail the malaria drug, Zpac, plus zinc?mathjak107 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 30, 2020 12:31 pm My ex was released yesterday ..she said if they catch it early on there is a three drug cocktail they have been using that has been fairly effective .....she couldn’t breath and talk when she went in on Friday .they gave it to her for a day ....she is home recuperating but feels so much better ......
https://www.wsj.com/articles/harvards-c ... 1585585597Some of the same people who fret so loudly about how we refer to Covid-19 are utterly indifferent to this other racial discrimination affecting Chinese-Americans.
Start with the mayor of New York, Bill de Blasio. After Mr. Trump tweeted out a reference to “the China virus” earlier this month, Mr. de Blasio clapped back. Asian-Americans, the mayor thundered, “don’t need you fueling more bigotry.”
If someone fuels bigotry by calling a virus a name accurately derived from its geographic origins, what about a mayor who works overtime to reduce the number of Asian-Americans in his city’s most competitive public high schools, not because they haven’t earned their entry but because they aren’t the right race.
“The worst thing you can do with insurance is try to time it,” Taleb, a distinguished professor of risk engineering at New York University, said in an interview Monday on Bloomberg Television. “If you don’t have tail insurance, you don’t have a portfolio. Your portfolio is going to blow up.”
Yes, that seems correct.Smith1776 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 31, 2020 7:34 am https://ca.finance.yahoo.com/news/taleb ... 13998.html
Taleb on Coronavirus and the markets:
“The worst thing you can do with insurance is try to time it,” Taleb, a distinguished professor of risk engineering at New York University, said in an interview Monday on Bloomberg Television. “If you don’t have tail insurance, you don’t have a portfolio. Your portfolio is going to blow up.”
Video for articleSmith1776 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 31, 2020 7:34 am https://ca.finance.yahoo.com/news/taleb ... 13998.html
Taleb on Coronavirus and the markets:
“The worst thing you can do with insurance is try to time it,” Taleb, a distinguished professor of risk engineering at New York University, said in an interview Monday on Bloomberg Television. “If you don’t have tail insurance, you don’t have a portfolio. Your portfolio is going to blow up.”
One of the things that I appreciate about Taleb is that he explains his reasoning. He's not saying "wear a mask because it works". He says "wear a mask because it is asymmetric". Meaning that there could be a high likelihood that wearing a mask is a small net negative (it doesn't do anything and it is annoying) versus a small chance that it is hugely positive (It wards off the apocalypse)shekels wrote: ↑Tue Mar 31, 2020 9:58 am
He also says "This is the strongest statistical association I've seen w/ respect to the virus. Wear a mask, mandate others to wear masks, & remember that @WHO is criminally incompetent. To repeat:@WHO is criminally incompetent. PS-Don't get into elevators, buses, etc. unless your mask in N95 "
I agree that wearing a mask does not have many negatives.Mark Leavy wrote: ↑Tue Mar 31, 2020 10:28 amOne of the things that I appreciate about Taleb is that he explains his reasoning. He's not saying "wear a mask because it works". He says "wear a mask because it is asymmetric". Meaning that there could be a high likelihood that wearing a mask is a small net negative (it doesn't do anything and it is annoying) versus a small chance that it is hugely positive (It wards off the apocalypse)shekels wrote: ↑Tue Mar 31, 2020 9:58 am
He also says "This is the strongest statistical association I've seen w/ respect to the virus. Wear a mask, mandate others to wear masks, & remember that @WHO is criminally incompetent. To repeat:@WHO is criminally incompetent. PS-Don't get into elevators, buses, etc. unless your mask in N95 "
Things certainly seem to be moving quickly in that direction:
The CDC must have been stuck in traffic.Tortoise wrote: ↑Tue Mar 31, 2020 12:27 pmThings certainly seem to be moving quickly in that direction:
The CDC is said to be considering asking people to cover their face in public — but would reserve masks for medical workers
https://www.businessinsider.com/coronav ... ics-2020-3
Doesn't that top circled group include China, where for sure they wear masks?shekels wrote: ↑Tue Mar 31, 2020 12:32 pmThe CDC must have been stuck in traffic.Tortoise wrote: ↑Tue Mar 31, 2020 12:27 pmThings certainly seem to be moving quickly in that direction:
The CDC is said to be considering asking people to cover their face in public — but would reserve masks for medical workers
https://www.businessinsider.com/coronav ... ics-2020-3
What would they say if there were enough masks to go around ?
Even taking such common-sense precautions as washing hands is often an unaffordable luxury to the half of the population. . . Even seemingly costless social distancing is hard to implement. Our lifestyle is deeply communal, with extended families traditionally sharing the burdens and bounties of life together, eating meals from the same plate.
A virus that ignores borders cannot be tackled successfully like this.
It's funny, he seems to be making the opposite argument.Momentary victory by a rich country in controlling the virus at a national level, coupled with travel bans and border closures, may give a semblance of accomplishment. But we all know this is a stopgap.
Ahhh.all of Africa’s development partners must ensure that their development aid budgets remain ringfenced and are not diverted to domestic priorities. link
quiet, youPlease use the sharing tools found via the share button at the top or side of articles. Copying articles to share with others is a breach of -
https://www.ft.com/content/c12a09c8-6db ... bea055720bIf Covid-19 is not beaten in Africa it will return to haunt us all | Free to read
Only a global victory can end this pandemic, not a temporary rich countries’ win
How about if we require quarantine for travelers from countries that host pandemic illnesses? That should help.dualstow wrote: ↑Tue Mar 31, 2020 3:58 pm bleep bloop, I'm a bot. kriegs seems to be quoting from this page:
quiet, youPlease use the sharing tools found via the share button at the top or side of articles. Copying articles to share with others is a breach of -https://www.ft.com/content/c12a09c8-6db ... bea055720bIf Covid-19 is not beaten in Africa it will return to haunt us all | Free to read
Only a global victory can end this pandemic, not a temporary rich countries’ win
Foreign aid to "developing" countries is money down a rathole. All it does is make the rats bigger.Kriegsspiel wrote: ↑Tue Mar 31, 2020 3:46 pmEven taking such common-sense precautions as washing hands is often an unaffordable luxury to the half of the population. . . Even seemingly costless social distancing is hard to implement. Our lifestyle is deeply communal, with extended families traditionally sharing the burdens and bounties of life together, eating meals from the same plate.A virus that ignores borders cannot be tackled successfully like this.It's funny, he seems to be making the opposite argument.Momentary victory by a rich country in controlling the virus at a national level, coupled with travel bans and border closures, may give a semblance of accomplishment. But we all know this is a stopgap.
Ahhh.all of Africa’s development partners must ensure that their development aid budgets remain ringfenced and are not diverted to domestic priorities. link
Coincidentally, I was just thinking that all foreign aid should be diverted to domestic priorities right now.
Yup. Yesterday my dad emailed me a coronavirus article written by Dr. Fauci et al. in the New England Journal of Medicine on Feb 26. Over a month ago.
Another view of Taleb from an emergency room doctor:Mark Leavy wrote: ↑Tue Mar 31, 2020 10:28 amOne of the things that I appreciate about Taleb is that he explains his reasoning. He's not saying "wear a mask because it works". He says "wear a mask because it is asymmetric". Meaning that there could be a high likelihood that wearing a mask is a small net negative (it doesn't do anything and it is annoying) versus a small chance that it is hugely positive (It wards off the apocalypse)shekels wrote: ↑Tue Mar 31, 2020 9:58 am
He also says "This is the strongest statistical association I've seen w/ respect to the virus. Wear a mask, mandate others to wear masks, & remember that @WHO is criminally incompetent. To repeat:@WHO is criminally incompetent. PS-Don't get into elevators, buses, etc. unless your mask in N95 "