Coronavirus General Discussion

Other discussions not related to the Permanent Portfolio

Moderator: Global Moderator

User avatar
Mark Leavy
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1950
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2012 10:20 pm
Location: US Citizen, Permanent Traveler

Re: Coronavirus General Discussion

Post by Mark Leavy » Fri Dec 25, 2020 1:33 am

Dieter wrote:
Fri Dec 25, 2020 1:25 am
"What if instead of a vaccine we just were able to get exposed to a weak version of the virus that enabled us to build the antibodies we need to fight the real thing"

https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status ... 4718113794

What a splendid idea. Call it something like Viral Antibody Calibrated Creation via INnocuous Exposure.

Although might need to abbreviate that somehow
I like where you are going with this :)

Cracks me up though, when people propose that the vaccine provides better immunity than infection.
And while the vaccine is likely not as risky as infection. We're just rolling the dice.
User avatar
Mark Leavy
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1950
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2012 10:20 pm
Location: US Citizen, Permanent Traveler

Re: Coronavirus General Discussion

Post by Mark Leavy » Fri Dec 25, 2020 1:38 am

Why shouldn't I get the same 'good citizen' points for trying to get infected as someone who volunteers for a vaccine.
Am I not doing my part to stem the tide? At great personal sacrifice.
User avatar
dualstow
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 14225
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
Location: synagogue of Satan
Contact:

Re: Coronavirus General Discussion

Post by dualstow » Fri Dec 25, 2020 2:52 pm

Cloth mask pansy here. Since my reputation is already ruined O0 I don’t mind pointing out that yes, not only are there men’s formula shampoos, but there are also beard shampoos.

You probably shouldn’t wash your face with soap as it can clog your pores. Purpose from Johnson & Johnson is a good cleanser with minimal junk it in it.

Soap might also clog your scalp more than shampoo would- I’m not sure. I used to use Dr Bronner’s peppermint soap for everything.
RIP Marcello Gandini
User avatar
vnatale
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 9422
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 8:56 pm
Location: Massachusetts
Contact:

Re: Coronavirus General Discussion

Post by vnatale » Fri Dec 25, 2020 4:17 pm

dualstow wrote:
Fri Dec 25, 2020 2:52 pm
Cloth mask pansy here. Since my reputation is already ruined O0 I don’t mind pointing out that yes, not only are there men’s formula shampoos, but there are also beard shampoos.

You probably shouldn’t wash your face with soap as it can clog your pores. Purpose from Johnson & Johnson is a good cleanser with minimal junk it in it.

Soap might also clog your scalp more than shampoo would- I’m not sure. I used to use Dr Bronner’s peppermint soap for everything.
I just completed day two of no shampoo or soap.

Entire body feels clean. Beard feels clean. But, again, while the hair feels clean it is also flat. But no real issue. Just a distinct difference from not using shampoo.

By the way, my hot water is heated to 120 degrees and I'm fairly close to using the hot water straight with little cold water mixed in.

I'm a big baby when it comes to feeling cold in any way but, in general, I'm almost in all ways say, "Bring on the heat!"

75.9 in this room with my two feet on the 100 watt foot warmer.

Vinny
Above provided by: Vinny, who always says: "I only regret that I have but one lap to give to my cats." AND "I'm a more-is-more person."
User avatar
Mark Leavy
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1950
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2012 10:20 pm
Location: US Citizen, Permanent Traveler

Re: Coronavirus General Discussion

Post by Mark Leavy » Fri Dec 25, 2020 4:34 pm

I don't do this anymore, but I tried washing my hair with an egg yolk for awhile.

It's a pain in the neck to separate an egg before your shower, but it works extremely well and has zero soap. The lecithin in the yolk is an emulsifier and binds the fat in your hair to the shower water. Basically it makes mayonnaise out of your scalp grease, which just rinses out with the shower water. Don't use super hot water or you'll end up with cooked egg in your hair.
WiseOne
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 2692
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2022 11:08 am

Re: Coronavirus General Discussion

Post by WiseOne » Fri Dec 25, 2020 9:21 pm

Mark Leavy wrote:
Fri Dec 25, 2020 4:34 pm
I don't do this anymore, but I tried washing my hair with an egg yolk for awhile.

It's a pain in the neck to separate an egg before your shower, but it works extremely well and has zero soap. The lecithin in the yolk is an emulsifier and binds the fat in your hair to the shower water. Basically it makes mayonnaise out of your scalp grease, which just rinses out with the shower water. Don't use super hot water or you'll end up with cooked egg in your hair.
Interesting. You can buy egg yolk lecithin in powder form, either loose or in capsules. It's expensive, but I wonder if that would work.

I've tried using shampoo bars but they leave a ton of crud in my hair that has to washed out with a clarifying shampoo. I've also tried a bunch of "no-poo" alternatives but they either didn't clean my hair or they left a lot of buildup. I guess long hair is a whole different ball game from a typical guy haircut. With really short hair, I bet just plain water with some scrubbing in the shower might even work just fine.
User avatar
Mark Leavy
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1950
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2012 10:20 pm
Location: US Citizen, Permanent Traveler

Re: Coronavirus General Discussion

Post by Mark Leavy » Fri Dec 25, 2020 9:33 pm

WiseOne wrote:
Fri Dec 25, 2020 9:21 pm
Interesting. You can buy egg yolk lecithin in powder form, either loose or in capsules. It's expensive, but I wonder if that would work.
Now you've got me curious to try the powder form. I just added some to my Amazon cart and next time I'm near a locker I'll pick some up.

I'll report back. For science.
boglerdude
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1313
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2016 1:40 am
Contact:

Re: Coronavirus General Discussion

Post by boglerdude » Sun Dec 27, 2020 9:06 pm

whatchamacallit
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 750
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 7:32 pm

Re: Coronavirus General Discussion

Post by whatchamacallit » Mon Dec 28, 2020 8:59 am

I was thinking which industry has most vested interest in getting covid mortality correct without the virtue signal.

Life insurance. Premiums have not increased.

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/has-c ... 2020-12-07
Libertarian666
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 5994
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm

Re: Coronavirus General Discussion

Post by Libertarian666 » Mon Dec 28, 2020 9:22 am

MangoMan wrote:
Mon Dec 28, 2020 9:20 am
whatchamacallit wrote:
Mon Dec 28, 2020 8:59 am
I was thinking which industry has most vested interest in getting covid mortality correct without the virtue signal.

Life insurance. Premiums have not increased.

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/has-c ... 2020-12-07
Very, very interesting.
Yes, that is a pretty good signal that the whole thing is extremely overblown.
User avatar
Xan
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 4392
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 1:51 pm

Re: Coronavirus General Discussion

Post by Xan » Mon Dec 28, 2020 9:27 am

Doesn't that just mean that people who have their lives insured aren't statistically more likely to die? Pretty much that excludes anybody who's retired, doesn't it?

We do already know that in terms of life and death, people pre-retirement are at very little risk. That doesn't mean that it isn't killing too many people 60+. And it doesn't mean that younger people aren't suffering weird symptoms that can persist for a long time and perhaps cause lifelong damage.

Just playing devil's advocate here.
User avatar
Xan
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 4392
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 1:51 pm

Re: Coronavirus General Discussion

Post by Xan » Mon Dec 28, 2020 9:42 am

MangoMan wrote:
Mon Dec 28, 2020 9:40 am
Xan wrote:
Mon Dec 28, 2020 9:27 am
Doesn't that just mean that people who have their lives insured aren't statistically more likely to die? Pretty much that excludes anybody who's retired, doesn't it?

We do already know that in terms of life and death, people pre-retirement are at very little risk. That doesn't mean that it isn't killing too many people 60+. And it doesn't mean that younger people aren't suffering weird symptoms that can persist for a long time and perhaps cause lifelong damage.

Just playing devil's advocate here.
That alone is of value in terms of the hysteria.
I should clarify that I'm saying that young people suffering such issues would likely not be reflected in life insurance premiums. But maybe it would be..?
User avatar
Cortopassi
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 3338
Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2014 2:28 pm
Location: https://www.jwst.nasa.gov/content/webbL ... sWebb.html

Re: Coronavirus General Discussion

Post by Cortopassi » Mon Dec 28, 2020 10:47 am

There is this from the article:

University of Kentucky and Illinois State University economists did discover fewer policies being extended to the oldest of potential policyholders, above age 75. But even then, the cost of those premiums did not noticeably increase. By July, there was a 13.6% drop in the number of policies offered for one-, five- and 10-year terms offered to this demographic, according to the study distributed by the National Bureau of Economic Research.

So, they definitely were seeming to write fewer policies to older people.
WiseOne
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 2692
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2022 11:08 am

Re: Coronavirus General Discussion

Post by WiseOne » Mon Dec 28, 2020 12:43 pm

Xan wrote:
Mon Dec 28, 2020 9:27 am
Doesn't that just mean that people who have their lives insured aren't statistically more likely to die? Pretty much that excludes anybody who's retired, doesn't it?
Not really. There are new life insurance products that include the ability to draw from the policy while the insured is still alive, to cover medical expenses. It's an alternative to disability insurance. When I looked into it for my mom, I thought it was substantially better and I (along with her Morgan Stanley financial advisor) urged her to get it. There was a cutoff of age 80 (or 82, I can't quite remember) and she needed to pass a physical. In fact I'm thinking about signing up for this myself.

I'm not sure what the bar was for passing the physical, because she wasn't much of a test - at the time she was healthy except for mild hypertension. Assuming they would only block people with obvious late stage stuff like cancer or advanced heart disease, there could be a lot of sick elderly people with life insurance. If rates are holding constant, that is indeed a pretty good signal that despite the highly publicized COVID death counts, there isn't a lot in the way of years of life lost. (A statistic I would very much like to see, especially because no one seems interested in looking into it.)

Also, compared to most terminal conditions, COVID is fast and dirt cheap. It's mainly about supportive care, and it's all over in a matter of a few weeks. Compare that to cancer (IV infusions of shockingly expensive chemotherapy drugs, radiation, surgeries, on and on x years) or heart disease (very expensive interventional procedures and surgeries, expensive medications, also dragging on for years). This is surely reducing long-term costs for insurance companies and most especially for Medicare and Medicaid, though I have no idea how these would figure into life insurance premiums.
User avatar
Kriegsspiel
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 4052
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 5:28 pm

Re: Coronavirus General Discussion

Post by Kriegsspiel » Mon Dec 28, 2020 6:55 pm

Megan McArdle commonly writes things that make sense.
If you watch the YouTube video of the now-infamous November meeting of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, you’ll hear Chairman José Romero thank everyone for a “robust discussion.” Shortly thereafter, the committee unanimously agreed that essential workers should get vaccinated ahead of the elderly, even though they’d been told this would mean up to 6 percent more deaths. This decision was supported in part by noting that America’s essential workers are more racially diverse than its senior citizens.

On Dec. 20, after the public belatedly noticed this attempted geronticide, the advisory panel walked it back, so I need not point out the many flaws of this reasoning. Instead, let’s dwell on the equally flawed process by which the committee reached its decision, because that itself is a symptom of much deeper problems that have plagued us since the beginning of the pandemic. link.
You there, Ephialtes. May you live forever.
User avatar
vnatale
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 9422
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 8:56 pm
Location: Massachusetts
Contact:

Re: Coronavirus General Discussion

Post by vnatale » Mon Dec 28, 2020 7:10 pm

Kriegsspiel wrote:
Mon Dec 28, 2020 6:55 pm
Megan McArdle commonly writes things that make sense.
If you watch the YouTube video of the now-infamous November meeting of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, you’ll hear Chairman José Romero thank everyone for a “robust discussion.” Shortly thereafter, the committee unanimously agreed that essential workers should get vaccinated ahead of the elderly, even though they’d been told this would mean up to 6 percent more deaths. This decision was supported in part by noting that America’s essential workers are more racially diverse than its senior citizens.

On Dec. 20, after the public belatedly noticed this attempted geronticide, the advisory panel walked it back, so I need not point out the many flaws of this reasoning. Instead, let’s dwell on the equally flawed process by which the committee reached its decision, because that itself is a symptom of much deeper problems that have plagued us since the beginning of the pandemic. link.
Always distressing to see a professional writer use cliches rather than using more descriptive words such as:
"retreated from" or "distanced themselves from" or "reversed themselves". I need more description to understand how and in what way they actually "walked it back".

Vinny
Above provided by: Vinny, who always says: "I only regret that I have but one lap to give to my cats." AND "I'm a more-is-more person."
User avatar
dualstow
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 14225
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
Location: synagogue of Satan
Contact:

Re: Coronavirus General Discussion

Post by dualstow » Tue Dec 29, 2020 9:44 am

🚧 I think this warrants a thread, Vinny. I’ll start one. 🚧

📍viewtopic.php?f=9&t=11723
RIP Marcello Gandini
User avatar
vnatale
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 9422
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 8:56 pm
Location: Massachusetts
Contact:

Re: Coronavirus General Discussion

Post by vnatale » Tue Dec 29, 2020 12:59 pm

dualstow wrote:
Tue Dec 29, 2020 9:44 am
🚧 I think this warrants a thread, Vinny. I’ll start one. 🚧

📍viewtopic.php?f=9&t=11723
Definitely!

I have in my my mind to start a topic called "Words", in which this discussion would definitely belong.

This forum has a lot of excellent writers who use their words well.

Vinny
Above provided by: Vinny, who always says: "I only regret that I have but one lap to give to my cats." AND "I'm a more-is-more person."
User avatar
doodle
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 4658
Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 2:17 pm

Re: Coronavirus General Discussion

Post by doodle » Tue Dec 29, 2020 11:56 pm

https://readsector.com/republican-loui ... th-covid

Now dead. Newlyborn and young child. Received same treatment as Trump and Giuliani yet dies. Why is a 41 year old dying from respiratory illness after a few weeks?
whatchamacallit
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 750
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 7:32 pm

Re: Coronavirus General Discussion

Post by whatchamacallit » Wed Dec 30, 2020 8:57 am

doodle wrote:
Tue Dec 29, 2020 11:56 pm
https://readsector.com/republican-loui ... th-covid

Now dead. Newlyborn and young child. Received same treatment as Trump and Giuliani yet dies. Why is a 41 year old dying from respiratory illness after a few weeks?
Are you referring to this? 41 year old congressman elect?

https://www.nola.com/news/coronavirus/a ... 1.amp.html

Definitely scary. Makes you wonder what you can really do.
SomeDude
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1080
Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2020 1:45 am

Re: Coronavirus General Discussion

Post by SomeDude » Wed Dec 30, 2020 9:41 am

whatchamacallit wrote:
Wed Dec 30, 2020 8:57 am
doodle wrote:
Tue Dec 29, 2020 11:56 pm
https://readsector.com/republican-loui ... th-covid

Now dead. Newlyborn and young child. Received same treatment as Trump and Giuliani yet dies. Why is a 41 year old dying from respiratory illness after a few weeks?
Are you referring to this? 41 year old congressman elect?

https://www.nola.com/news/coronavirus/a ... 1.amp.html

Definitely scary. Makes you wonder what you can really do.
Didn't he die of a heart attack? He looks somewhat overweight, don't know if he had heart problems or if they run in his family, but influenza increases the chance of a heart attack by something like 600% in the week after diagnosis.
User avatar
doodle
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 4658
Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 2:17 pm

Re: Coronavirus General Discussion

Post by doodle » Wed Dec 30, 2020 11:26 am

MangoMan wrote:
Wed Dec 30, 2020 11:07 am
SomeDude wrote:
Wed Dec 30, 2020 9:41 am
whatchamacallit wrote:
Wed Dec 30, 2020 8:57 am
doodle wrote:
Tue Dec 29, 2020 11:56 pm
https://readsector.com/republican-loui ... th-covid

Now dead. Newlyborn and young child. Received same treatment as Trump and Giuliani yet dies. Why is a 41 year old dying from respiratory illness after a few weeks?
Are you referring to this? 41 year old congressman elect?

https://www.nola.com/news/coronavirus/a ... 1.amp.html

Definitely scary. Makes you wonder what you can really do.
Didn't he die of a heart attack? He looks somewhat overweight, don't know if he had heart problems or if they run in his family, but influenza increases the chance of a heart attack by something like 600% in the week after diagnosis.
Not at all overweight. But there may have been some other comorbidity. Or not.

Keep in mind tho, that seemingly healthy people also die of influenza every year. You just don't hear about it bc Covid
True, and a lot of this could be just hyper focusing on covid and these weird outlier events. The data does seem to suggest that it's about 10 times deadlier than average flu. 1% vs .1% death rate. It's just that it seems so rare that a healthy 40 year old...healthy enough to father children, run for political office, maintain normal weight etc. Dies from a respiratory illness after ten days of receiving same treatment as Giuliani and Trump and Christie presumably....all of whom are in much worse health it would appear on first glance. Someday I'm sure we will have a better understanding of this weird virus.
User avatar
Cortopassi
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 3338
Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2014 2:28 pm
Location: https://www.jwst.nasa.gov/content/webbL ... sWebb.html

Re: Coronavirus General Discussion

Post by Cortopassi » Wed Dec 30, 2020 11:38 am

The comorbidity aspect is such a slippery slope/point of contention and concern, in my opinion.

He/she was fat, continues down the slope of they ate terribly, didn't exercise, compromised their body, and it's THEIR fault. If that goes through my head at times when watching the news of a young (obese) person dying of Covid, I'm sure many others have done the same.

And that's terrible.

You can make a case that an 85 year old who gets it and gets their life cut short by a few days/months that it's not a major deal.

But that gets much harder when it is young people.

I'm not saying this to try to justify lockdowns; just stating what I think a lot of people may be thinking and it's terrible these thoughts go through my head.

If this virus mainly targeted kids, I'm sure we'd all have a different perspective.
User avatar
Cortopassi
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 3338
Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2014 2:28 pm
Location: https://www.jwst.nasa.gov/content/webbL ... sWebb.html

Re: Coronavirus General Discussion

Post by Cortopassi » Wed Dec 30, 2020 12:14 pm

MangoMan wrote:
Wed Dec 30, 2020 11:58 am
Cortopassi wrote:
Wed Dec 30, 2020 11:38 am
The comorbidity aspect is such a slippery slope/point of contention and concern, in my opinion.

He/she was fat, continues down the slope of they ate terribly, didn't exercise, compromised their body, and it's THEIR fault. If that goes through my head at times when watching the news of a young (obese) person dying of Covid, I'm sure many others have done the same.

And that's terrible.

You can make a case that an 85 year old who gets it and gets their life cut short by a few days/months that it's not a major deal.

But that gets much harder when it is young people.

I'm not saying this to try to justify lockdowns; just stating what I think a lot of people may be thinking and it's terrible these thoughts go through my head.

If this virus mainly targeted kids, I'm sure we'd all have a different perspective.
If they get diabetes from being fat and not exercising, is that THEIR fault? If they then need their foot amputated or develop some other diabetes related issue that cuts their life short or makes it less pleasant, is that THEIR fault? If a chain smoker gets lung cancer, is that THEIR fault? If not, whose fault is it? I'm not a sure I understand your logic.
My logic kind of is:

--Person in 20s/30s/40s is obese/overweight
--Yeah, it is messing with their body, and yeah, maybe a majority aren't doing anything about it
--But in general, it will take decades of damage to to get to the stuff you describe and/or death
--And instead of decades, Covid turns that into days/weeks

My thinking, as usual, is certainly not black and white.
Post Reply