Debate: Government or Political Parties are the Problem
Moderator: Global Moderator
Debate: Government or Political Parties are the Problem
Personally I think the government per se isn’t the problem, but rather the two dominant political parties who have rigged the system for their extreme wings.
Thoughts/counterpoints?
Thoughts/counterpoints?
-
- Full Member
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Thu Feb 27, 2020 12:18 pm
Re: Debate: Government or Political Parties are the Problem
What did those dominant political parties use to rig it for them? Government.
The government is the problem. Anything that has a non market monopoly will always be a negative to society. If there was no government for these people to get control of and rig in their favor the damage they cause would be limited to what they could get control of which would be much smaller, and therefore less damaging to society.
-
- Executive Member
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2016 1:40 am
- Contact:
Re: Debate: Government or Political Parties are the Problem
Governments have and will always be a thing. The smaller the better but how
Some low hanging fruit is term limits and ranked choice voting https://www.fairvote.org/rcv
Some low hanging fruit is term limits and ranked choice voting https://www.fairvote.org/rcv
Re: Debate: Government or Political Parties are the Problem
Well..... I would say lack of knowledge is the problem.
Both Government and Political Parties consist of people. I suspect that many people may be indoctrinated, so regardless of the "structure" of Government/Parties, educated decisions may not be able to be made.
Just happened to stumble across this clip and it made me remember my "education" decades ago. No idea what it's like now, but the majority of teachers were left wing and espoused their ideology as fact. Hilariously, economics was taught by a teacher who stated he was a communist
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4oYiQ8JUj0
PS: I remember a German man who had been "educated" during the Nazi reign. Up till the time he passed away, he still considered considered killing Jews as "We were just cleaning up the place."
Both Government and Political Parties consist of people. I suspect that many people may be indoctrinated, so regardless of the "structure" of Government/Parties, educated decisions may not be able to be made.
Just happened to stumble across this clip and it made me remember my "education" decades ago. No idea what it's like now, but the majority of teachers were left wing and espoused their ideology as fact. Hilariously, economics was taught by a teacher who stated he was a communist
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4oYiQ8JUj0
PS: I remember a German man who had been "educated" during the Nazi reign. Up till the time he passed away, he still considered considered killing Jews as "We were just cleaning up the place."
Last edited by Hal on Wed Oct 21, 2020 2:25 am, edited 1 time in total.
Aussie GoldSmithPP - 25% PMGOLD, 75% VDCO
- Kriegsspiel
- Executive Member
- Posts: 4052
- Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 5:28 pm
Re: Debate: Government or Political Parties are the Problem
Platonic philosopher-kings could probably run a bad system well, but I think it's better to bet on fallible people and give them a less-corruptible government to run. I believe that was the thought process of the founders.
Recently we seem to be in an ongoing perfect storm where both the government and the people running it are both sub-par. Or above-par, if you know how golf works.
Recently we seem to be in an ongoing perfect storm where both the government and the people running it are both sub-par. Or above-par, if you know how golf works.
You there, Ephialtes. May you live forever.
Re: Debate: Government or Political Parties are the Problem
It seems that the system of checks and balances, among the three branches of the federal government and with the states, is largely broken by political parties. The parties will check each other as they can (on many issues, anyway), but that leaves us with just one check rather than the many that were designed.
- I Shrugged
- Executive Member
- Posts: 2064
- Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 6:35 pm
Re: Debate: Government or Political Parties are the Problem
The enormity of the federal government is the main problem.
Re: Debate: Government or Political Parties are the Problem
What would you say has caused that? Is it the natural tendency of power to flow to the top?I Shrugged wrote: ↑Wed Oct 21, 2020 9:35 am The enormity of the federal government is the main problem.
- I Shrugged
- Executive Member
- Posts: 2064
- Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 6:35 pm
Re: Debate: Government or Political Parties are the Problem
Direct democracy and the ability to get elected by catering to groups. Combined with Parkinson’s Law I suppose.Xan wrote: ↑Wed Oct 21, 2020 9:38 amWhat would you say has caused that? Is it the natural tendency of power to flow to the top?I Shrugged wrote: ↑Wed Oct 21, 2020 9:35 am The enormity of the federal government is the main problem.
- vnatale
- Executive Member
- Posts: 9490
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 8:56 pm
- Location: Massachusetts
- Contact:
Re: Debate: Government or Political Parties are the Problem
I have always been a firm believer in this quote:
In a democracy, the people get the government they deserve. It was Joseph de Maistre who wrote in 1811 "Every nation gets the government it deserves."
Everyone says they want to vote out all the incumbents. Except their own. Because their incumbents bring them what they want.
Vinny
Above provided by: Vinny, who always says: "I only regret that I have but one lap to give to my cats." AND "I'm a more-is-more person."
- vnatale
- Executive Member
- Posts: 9490
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 8:56 pm
- Location: Massachusetts
- Contact:
Re: Debate: Government or Political Parties are the Problem
Ranked choice voting a ballot question in Massachusetts. I predict it passes.boglerdude wrote: ↑Wed Oct 21, 2020 12:54 am Governments have and will always be a thing. The smaller the better but how
Some low hanging fruit is term limits and ranked choice voting https://www.fairvote.org/rcv
Vinny
Above provided by: Vinny, who always says: "I only regret that I have but one lap to give to my cats." AND "I'm a more-is-more person."
-
- Executive Member
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2016 1:40 am
- Contact:
Re: Debate: Government or Political Parties are the Problem
"There are FAR stricter rules around how political parties can spend money in other countries; During the campaign for the UK’s 2017 general election, political parties, candidates, and non-party campaigners spent around £40 million in total. In the 2016 US election, presidential candidates, Senate and House candidates, political parties, and outside interest groups spent about $6.5 billion trying to influence federal elections."
https://www.reddit.com/r/Ask_Politics/c ... g/fg2nqq2/
Also the Revolving Door
https://www.reddit.com/r/Ask_Politics/c ... g/fg2nqq2/
Also the Revolving Door
- vnatale
- Executive Member
- Posts: 9490
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 8:56 pm
- Location: Massachusetts
- Contact:
Re: Debate: Government or Political Parties are the Problem
Have any of you ever contributed money to a political campaign?boglerdude wrote: ↑Wed Oct 21, 2020 10:37 pm "There are FAR stricter rules around how political parties can spend money in other countries; During the campaign for the UK’s 2017 general election, political parties, candidates, and non-party campaigners spent around £40 million in total. In the 2016 US election, presidential candidates, Senate and House candidates, political parties, and outside interest groups spent about $6.5 billion trying to influence federal elections."
https://www.reddit.com/r/Ask_Politics/c ... g/fg2nqq2/
Also the Revolving Door
I never have and never will.
I find the amounts of money spent to be obscene with messages being simple and directed to the lowest common denominator.
In my ideal world political campaigns would be confined to a web site wherein each politician stated their positions. Extremely low costs campaigns! Of course the electorate would refuse to be informed by actually reading rather than watching TV so this is doomed from the start.
VInny
Above provided by: Vinny, who always says: "I only regret that I have but one lap to give to my cats." AND "I'm a more-is-more person."
Re: Debate: Government or Political Parties are the Problem
I was on an exchange program where I got to spend two seriously difficult weeks in Paris learning about the French government and it’s approach to national security. A couple of sessions were like basic French Government 101 for us ignorant Americans.
One thing they told us about was how they do national elections...I forget the exact details so undoubtedly I’ve got some details wrong but the thrust is correct.
100% publicly financed
Something like a 3 month first round to narrow down the field (sorta primaryish but not really a primary)
Something like a 1 month final round with 2-3 candidates, done.
One of the French participants asked...how can you stand 1-2 years of presidential campaigning, doesn’t it drive you crazy?
Answer...from the US side...yes.
Personally I’d be totally on board with the French approach.
And the Paris comment was tongue in cheek...I get why Paris is considered one of the great world cities. It was an awesome two weeks.
One thing they told us about was how they do national elections...I forget the exact details so undoubtedly I’ve got some details wrong but the thrust is correct.
100% publicly financed
Something like a 3 month first round to narrow down the field (sorta primaryish but not really a primary)
Something like a 1 month final round with 2-3 candidates, done.
One of the French participants asked...how can you stand 1-2 years of presidential campaigning, doesn’t it drive you crazy?
Answer...from the US side...yes.
Personally I’d be totally on board with the French approach.
And the Paris comment was tongue in cheek...I get why Paris is considered one of the great world cities. It was an awesome two weeks.
-
- Executive Member
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2016 1:40 am
- Contact:
Re: Debate: Government or Political Parties are the Problem
Why do they allow so much immigration. Or has that actually been a net good for the country
- Kriegsspiel
- Executive Member
- Posts: 4052
- Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 5:28 pm
Re: Debate: Government or Political Parties are the Problem
Are you talking about France or the US?
You there, Ephialtes. May you live forever.
Re: Debate: Government or Political Parties are the Problem
It's a pretty controversial thing when it comes to Islamic immigration. The French are hyper separation of church and state. Hardcore secular in fact. IIRC there isn't a ton of legal immigration but there are special exceptions for former colonies. I found the French way less race oriented but they demand conformity to French ways and beliefs.boglerdude wrote: ↑Thu Oct 22, 2020 3:19 am Why do they allow so much immigration. Or has that actually been a net good for the country
To be blunt, most of the European countries are in population decline vis-a-vis their historical populations and they are figuring out how to deal with that fact. You can allow immigration or turn into Japan.
- Kriegsspiel
- Executive Member
- Posts: 4052
- Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 5:28 pm
Re: Debate: Government or Political Parties are the Problem
Two books I found worthwhile were Reflections On The Revolution In Europe by Caldwell (2009) and The Strange Death Of Europe by Murray (2017).
You there, Ephialtes. May you live forever.
- Kriegsspiel
- Executive Member
- Posts: 4052
- Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 5:28 pm
Re: Debate: Government or Political Parties are the Problem
You there, Ephialtes. May you live forever.
Re: Debate: Government or Political Parties are the Problem
Doesn't the French system also involve multiple rounds, in part to mitigate shock surprises like Brexit (or maybe Trump 2016)?Kbg wrote: ↑Thu Oct 22, 2020 2:18 am I was on an exchange program where I got to spend two seriously difficult weeks in Paris learning about the French government and it’s approach to national security. A couple of sessions were like basic French Government 101 for us ignorant Americans.
One thing they told us about was how they do national elections...I forget the exact details so undoubtedly I’ve got some details wrong but the thrust is correct.
100% publicly financed
Something like a 3 month first round to narrow down the field (sorta primaryish but not really a primary)
Something like a 1 month final round with 2-3 candidates, done.
One of the French participants asked...how can you stand 1-2 years of presidential campaigning, doesn’t it drive you crazy?
Answer...from the US side...yes.
Personally I’d be totally on board with the French approach.
And the Paris comment was tongue in cheek...I get why Paris is considered one of the great world cities. It was an awesome two weeks.
The idea being that in the second round more people are spurred to vote, or maybe some sober up for the second vote after getting an anger vote out of their system.
Re: Debate: Government or Political Parties are the Problem
Why is turning into Japan such a bad thing? Everyone always used them as an example of what we don't want to become...it doesn't seem so bad over there to me.Kbg wrote: ↑Thu Oct 22, 2020 7:03 amIt's a pretty controversial thing when it comes to Islamic immigration. The French are hyper separation of church and state. Hardcore secular in fact. IIRC there isn't a ton of legal immigration but there are special exceptions for former colonies. I found the French way less race oriented but they demand conformity to French ways and beliefs.boglerdude wrote: ↑Thu Oct 22, 2020 3:19 am Why do they allow so much immigration. Or has that actually been a net good for the country
To be blunt, most of the European countries are in population decline vis-a-vis their historical populations and they are figuring out how to deal with that fact. You can allow immigration or turn into Japan.
- vnatale
- Executive Member
- Posts: 9490
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 8:56 pm
- Location: Massachusetts
- Contact:
Re: Debate: Government or Political Parties are the Problem
I believe it was in response to their having an aging population and not enough younger people to be able to financially support the elderly in their retirement?doodle wrote: ↑Thu Oct 22, 2020 11:05 amWhy is turning into Japan such a bad thing? Everyone always used them as an example of what we don't want to become...it doesn't seem so bad over there to me.Kbg wrote: ↑Thu Oct 22, 2020 7:03 amIt's a pretty controversial thing when it comes to Islamic immigration. The French are hyper separation of church and state. Hardcore secular in fact. IIRC there isn't a ton of legal immigration but there are special exceptions for former colonies. I found the French way less race oriented but they demand conformity to French ways and beliefs.boglerdude wrote: ↑Thu Oct 22, 2020 3:19 am Why do they allow so much immigration. Or has that actually been a net good for the country
To be blunt, most of the European countries are in population decline vis-a-vis their historical populations and they are figuring out how to deal with that fact. You can allow immigration or turn into Japan.
Vinny
Above provided by: Vinny, who always says: "I only regret that I have but one lap to give to my cats." AND "I'm a more-is-more person."
- Mountaineer
- Executive Member
- Posts: 4963
- Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2012 10:54 am
Re: Debate: Government or Political Parties are the Problem
My memory as well. Look at what the US would become on its own without our past and current immigration given the societal thrust on abortion, transgenderism, birth control, homosexuality, etc. We are bent on pleasuring ourselves in a long painful slide into death. The production mechanism is failing to make us sustainable, not enough "new" people being made.vnatale wrote: ↑Thu Oct 22, 2020 11:33 amI believe it was in response to their having an aging population and not enough younger people to be able to financially support the elderly in their retirement?doodle wrote: ↑Thu Oct 22, 2020 11:05 amWhy is turning into Japan such a bad thing? Everyone always used them as an example of what we don't want to become...it doesn't seem so bad over there to me.Kbg wrote: ↑Thu Oct 22, 2020 7:03 amIt's a pretty controversial thing when it comes to Islamic immigration. The French are hyper separation of church and state. Hardcore secular in fact. IIRC there isn't a ton of legal immigration but there are special exceptions for former colonies. I found the French way less race oriented but they demand conformity to French ways and beliefs.boglerdude wrote: ↑Thu Oct 22, 2020 3:19 am Why do they allow so much immigration. Or has that actually been a net good for the country
To be blunt, most of the European countries are in population decline vis-a-vis their historical populations and they are figuring out how to deal with that fact. You can allow immigration or turn into Japan.
Vinny
DNA has its own language (code), and language requires intelligence. There is no known mechanism by which matter can give birth to information, let alone language. It is unreasonable to believe the world could have happened by chance.
Re: Debate: Government or Political Parties are the Problem
Meh. I'd be happy if the world's population naturally dwindled to half or even a quarter of it's present size. In that regard Japan is on the right path for me. Exponential growth is unsustainable anyways. At some point we will reach a steady state. Id rather do it where I don't have to wait in long lines, crowded and huddled together . Unlike a virus, I'd hope that our purpose lies beyond replication.