Joe Biden is a lying POS

Other discussions not related to the Permanent Portfolio

Moderator: Global Moderator

User avatar
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 7163
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2010 11:20 pm

Re: Joe Biden is a lying POS

Post by technovelist » Thu Sep 03, 2020 12:43 pm

sophie wrote:
Thu Sep 03, 2020 8:40 am
Biden is now visiting Kenosha, where he is apparently to be greeted with open arms while Trump was told to stay away. The narratives just amaze me.

I very much do not like his statement that the officer who shot Blake should be charged & prosecuted. He has no right to say that. This is a decision that has to come from the DA's office after examination of all the evidence, including the parts that haven't been made public and that Biden therefore knows nothing about.

Same for the Breonna Taylor case. That was tragic, but the decision not to prosecute also isn't Biden's call. The officers were confronted with a shooter in the apartment. The problem in that case was the no-knock warrant, which is illegal in many states because of this exact scenario. Ironically it was a Republican (Rand Paul) who introduced a bill to outlaw those warrants as a result of the case. In comparison, the Democrats did nothing constructive. They are just using these cases to foment hate.
Yes, no-knock warrants should be abolished as being obviously unconstitutional.

As for the Democrats, they have no platform that they can promote because it would be soundly rejected by the majority of the public if they knew about it.
So they are running with "Orange Man Bad".
I don't think it's going to work.
Another nod to the most beautiful equation: e + 1 = 0
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 192
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 7:56 pm

Re: Joe Biden is a lying POS

Post by Lonestar » Thu Sep 03, 2020 3:36 pm

technovelist wrote:
Thu Sep 03, 2020 12:41 pm
Lonestar wrote:
Thu Sep 03, 2020 12:14 pm
“Everyone charged with a penal offense has the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty". The democratic nominee for president and the liberal press have apparently never discovered this tenet.
They have a new standard:

Anyone who supports Trump should be presumed guilty until proven innocent.
Anyone who hates Trump should be presumed innocent without trial.
Can anyone get a fair trial after a president or presidential candidate has already convicted them without any evidence being presented? We have several police related incidents over the past few months that have caused protests. Most of the protest were violent. In each of these police related incidents the only facts we know so far is that the suspects were non-compliant with the police, and there were apparently drugs involved. It seems that until we have more facts, it's very premature to find either party guilty, especially by a politician.
Post Reply