Tempted to rebalance

General Discussion on the Permanent Portfolio Strategy

Moderator: Global Moderator

Post Reply
D

Tempted to rebalance

Post by D »

I'm having long term treasury at 29% and stocks at 21% and I feel temptation to rebalance. I never rebalanced and I'm not sure if I should do it at 20/30 rather than 15/35 given that I don't have to pay capital gain tax.
TripleB
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 882
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2011 1:28 am
Contact:

Re: Tempted to rebalance

Post by TripleB »

Just be prepared that stocks may fall further down, and bonds may appreciate further up. If that happens, don't blame the PP.
clacy
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1128
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 8:16 pm

Re: Tempted to rebalance

Post by clacy »

You could rebalance half way by bringing stocks up to 23% and bonds down to 27%.  Just by eyeballing charts, it seems like long term treasuries tend to mean revert pretty greatly in the medium term.
User avatar
moda0306
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 7680
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2010 9:05 pm
Location: Minnesota

Re: Tempted to rebalance

Post by moda0306 »

Rarely do you see the 10 year drop this much below the S&P 500 dividend yield.  Maybe that's not the best technical indicator, but it's something.  P/E ratios on stocks may not be stellar, but with bond rates so low, the alternative is hardly so either.
"Men did not make the earth. It is the value of the improvements only, and not the earth itself, that is individual property. Every proprietor owes to the community a ground rent for the land which he holds."

- Thomas Paine
TripleB
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 882
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2011 1:28 am
Contact:

Re: Tempted to rebalance

Post by TripleB »

moda0306 wrote: Rarely do you see the 10 year drop this much below the S&P 500 dividend yield.  Maybe that's not the best technical indicator, but it's something.  P/E ratios on stocks may not be stellar, but with bond rates so low, the alternative is hardly so either.

You're right. Clearly this means that dividend yielding companies on the SP500 are about to cut dividends again, due to poor economic conditions, and thus reduce things back in line.

Also, everyday for the last 6 years, my neighbor has left his house at 6:02am. Today he left at 6:04am. The only logical explanation is brain cancer.
Indices
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 245
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 10:51 pm
Contact:

Re: Tempted to rebalance

Post by Indices »

There are no indicators. Or there are indicators but you don't know if they were indicators until after they've indicated successfully.

Something like that.
User avatar
moda0306
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 7680
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2010 9:05 pm
Location: Minnesota

Re: Tempted to rebalance

Post by moda0306 »

TripleB... Not sure where the analysis ends and the sarcasm starts.

I don't know what the history is of companies lowering yields.  Personally, I tend to want to look at the fundamentals of the earnings of the companies, as well as their balance sheets, while putting only minimal weight on what dividends they're throwing out.  I was simply indicating that we're well past a threshhold that would maybe indicate expensive bonds & cheap stocks.... maybe.
"Men did not make the earth. It is the value of the improvements only, and not the earth itself, that is individual property. Every proprietor owes to the community a ground rent for the land which he holds."

- Thomas Paine
Post Reply