There’s a reason only a handful of investors own the PP and it’s not because it’s at the top of the pyramid year after year. I worry about those who believe the PP is the holy grail to investing when it most definitely is not. Funny how over the years others have come to the realization that a VP heavy in stocks is necessary to balance the 4x25. If you held 4x25 since 2008 how have you done? Poorly, that’s how. Now whose the fool?
Purpose of the PP
Moderator: Global Moderator
- buddtholomew
- Executive Member
- Posts: 2464
- Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 4:16 pm
Re: Purpose of the PP
Re: Purpose of the PP
The fool is the person who thought it had anything to do with the top of a pyramid.
- buddtholomew
- Executive Member
- Posts: 2464
- Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 4:16 pm
Re: Purpose of the PP
Actually I think you are the fool.
I’ve run across people like you all my life, thinking they are superior than someone else in one way or another.
Again, humorous to me these are usually the losers of the bunch Mr. vacuum cleaner. Like the PP, you suck.
Re: Purpose of the PP
Cmon guys, this forum has generally been a civil place. Let's keep it that way.
Budd, we love you, but your posts CAN be a bit irritating. Day after day, more of the same. We get it, the PP ain't doing so great these days. Believe me, none of us are happy about that. The ones who are happy are the ones who only check in once a year. They get to miss all the drama.
Here's the thing, the PP was never designed to be a high-risk, high-reward portfolio. It's designed to be a low-risk, moderate-reward portfolio. Harry Browne said that it's for the money that you CAN'T AFFORD TO LOSE. That's it. It's not meant for your speculative investments that you hope will do really well, although you realize there's a chance they won't. You already realize this, because you're only 40% in the PP anyway, or something like that. So, why all the griping? It gets old after a while.
Budd, we love you, but your posts CAN be a bit irritating. Day after day, more of the same. We get it, the PP ain't doing so great these days. Believe me, none of us are happy about that. The ones who are happy are the ones who only check in once a year. They get to miss all the drama.
Here's the thing, the PP was never designed to be a high-risk, high-reward portfolio. It's designed to be a low-risk, moderate-reward portfolio. Harry Browne said that it's for the money that you CAN'T AFFORD TO LOSE. That's it. It's not meant for your speculative investments that you hope will do really well, although you realize there's a chance they won't. You already realize this, because you're only 40% in the PP anyway, or something like that. So, why all the griping? It gets old after a while.
- buddtholomew
- Executive Member
- Posts: 2464
- Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 4:16 pm
Re: Purpose of the PP
As I recall, this is the first post that actually agrees with my point of view...many, if not all others, continue to voice how pleased they are with the portfolio performance and I just can’t align with that perspective.We get it, the PP ain't doing so great these days. Believe me, none of us are happy about that.
Like I said, I continue to invest in the 4 asset classes, just not 4x25. I was one of those youthful investors 10 years ago who challenged 4x25, only to find out that those who opposed my position either had a healthy dose of stocks or never held the PP in the prescribed allocation ever. Others have long since abandoned the portfolio or returned with a different allocation altogether. Obviously, there are some that have stayed the course.
So yes I have disdain for those “cocky” individuals especially now that the performance bears out my concerns.
- Cortopassi
- Executive Member
- Posts: 3338
- Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2014 2:28 pm
- Location: https://www.jwst.nasa.gov/content/webbL ... sWebb.html
Re: Purpose of the PP
Some comparisons. Portfolio 1 is the PP, 2 is 60/40, 3 is 100 stock
From my investing start, 1989. Comments. I stuck through the dot com bubble, but sold out in 2008. Regardless, although the PP is lower across the board, after a slow, steady 20 year rise of the PP, stocks collapsed to be nearly even with it, and has been on a lower trajectory since then, but still up.
We are down over 400 points again right now. Gold is up decently. Treasuries flat. So much of this is recency bias. PP is doing what it is meant to, for me at least. Keeping me calm and not caring about the breathless reporting of the "stock market plunging" which I am sure is all over the news right now.
Someone near retirement, started investing in 1974 (data only goes to 1978)
Someone at 40, start 2000:
Starting 2008:
From my investing start, 1989. Comments. I stuck through the dot com bubble, but sold out in 2008. Regardless, although the PP is lower across the board, after a slow, steady 20 year rise of the PP, stocks collapsed to be nearly even with it, and has been on a lower trajectory since then, but still up.
We are down over 400 points again right now. Gold is up decently. Treasuries flat. So much of this is recency bias. PP is doing what it is meant to, for me at least. Keeping me calm and not caring about the breathless reporting of the "stock market plunging" which I am sure is all over the news right now.
Someone near retirement, started investing in 1974 (data only goes to 1978)
Someone at 40, start 2000:
Starting 2008:
-
- Executive Member
- Posts: 1102
- Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2012 9:04 am
Re: Purpose of the PP
That's true for many of us here, yet somehow we're able restrain ourselves from bellowing "OMG the PP sucks!" every time something happens in the markets.buddtholomew wrote: ↑Fri Dec 07, 2018 11:51 am Like I said, I continue to invest in the 4 asset classes, just not 4x25.
- buddtholomew
- Executive Member
- Posts: 2464
- Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 4:16 pm
Re: Purpose of the PP
That’s my point, flyingpylon - very rare to find someone who holds 4x25. Perhaps if you did, you may understand my frustration. Nevertheless, it is over the top. That much I do understand.flyingpylon wrote: ↑Fri Dec 07, 2018 1:09 pmThat's true for many of us here, yet somehow we're able restrain ourselves from bellowing "OMG the PP sucks!" every time something happens in the markets.buddtholomew wrote: ↑Fri Dec 07, 2018 11:51 am Like I said, I continue to invest in the 4 asset classes, just not 4x25.
Re: Purpose of the PP
Budd, I don't think you get our point. Even Harry Browne wasn't 4 x 25, and he was the inventor of the PP. He was only 4 x 25 for a certain portion of his portfolio -- the portion that he figured was too important to bet on riskier investments. Each PP investor has to figure out for themselves what that portion is.
- buddtholomew
- Executive Member
- Posts: 2464
- Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 4:16 pm
Re: Purpose of the PP
If you change the allocation to suit your needs, then the PP no longer exists as advertised.stuper1 wrote: ↑Fri Dec 07, 2018 2:14 pm Budd, I don't think you get our point. Even Harry Browne wasn't 4 x 25, and he was the inventor of the PP. He was only 4 x 25 for a certain portion of his portfolio -- the portion that he figured was too important to bet on riskier investments. Each PP investor has to figure out for themselves what that portion is.
What is so special about stocks, bonds, gold and cash...most investors hold ALL these assets in proportions other than 4x25%.
If there's no magic to being agnostic about the future (equal parts, 25% each for economic environments) then what the hell are we doing here.
The more you move away from 4x25, the closer you are to a traditional Boglehead portfolio with a sliver of gold.
Where's the genius and ingenuity...you're telling me it doesn't exist as HB himself only held the PP for a portion of his investments.
What a farce.
After years of under-performing a traditional 60/40 SPY/BND portfolio, the PP is now -4% lower than this allocation YTD. Please...
Re: Purpose of the PP
They say that money can't buy happiness.
However, it can buy books ... which is almost the same thing.
You could do worse than starting with some of HB's. Or the Bible. Or both.
However, it can buy books ... which is almost the same thing.
You could do worse than starting with some of HB's. Or the Bible. Or both.
- buddtholomew
- Executive Member
- Posts: 2464
- Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 4:16 pm
Re: Purpose of the PP
Budd, this has always been a very "hands-off" forum in terms of moderation. Please help us keep it that way. "Mr Vacuum Cleaner" has decided this forum is no longer worth his effort, and based on the personal attack here I don't think I blame him for that opinion.buddtholomew wrote: ↑Fri Dec 07, 2018 10:37 amActually I think you are the fool.
I’ve run across people like you all my life, thinking they are superior than someone else in one way or another.
Again, humorous to me these are usually the losers of the bunch Mr. vacuum cleaner. Like the PP, you suck.
- buddtholomew
- Executive Member
- Posts: 2464
- Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 4:16 pm
Re: Purpose of the PP
Don’t really care; nothing here for me either but smoke and mirrors. I’ve had my fair share of negativity as well and am tired of being everyone’s “joke”. I’ll leave as well so the groupthink can continue without my involvement.Xan wrote: ↑Fri Dec 07, 2018 10:15 pmBudd, this has always been a very "hands-off" forum in terms of moderation. Please help us keep it that way. "Mr Vacuum Cleaner" has decided this forum is no longer worth his effort, and based on the personal attack here I don't think I blame him for that opinion.buddtholomew wrote: ↑Fri Dec 07, 2018 10:37 amActually I think you are the fool.
I’ve run across people like you all my life, thinking they are superior than someone else in one way or another.
Again, humorous to me these are usually the losers of the bunch Mr. vacuum cleaner. Like the PP, you suck.
A waste of a decade but a valuable lesson.
I’m a winner investing in a loser.
Took me a while to figure out but thanks for making it easy.
- Cortopassi
- Executive Member
- Posts: 3338
- Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2014 2:28 pm
- Location: https://www.jwst.nasa.gov/content/webbL ... sWebb.html
Re: Purpose of the PP
Good luck to you, budd. I'm sure you'll be fine. We should revisit where things are at in mid-2019.buddtholomew wrote: ↑Sat Dec 08, 2018 7:56 amDon’t really care; nothing here for me either but smoke and mirrors. I’ve had my fair share of negativity as well and am tired of being everyone’s “joke”. I’ll leave as well so the groupthink can continue without my involvement.Xan wrote: ↑Fri Dec 07, 2018 10:15 pmBudd, this has always been a very "hands-off" forum in terms of moderation. Please help us keep it that way. "Mr Vacuum Cleaner" has decided this forum is no longer worth his effort, and based on the personal attack here I don't think I blame him for that opinion.buddtholomew wrote: ↑Fri Dec 07, 2018 10:37 am
Actually I think you are the fool.
I’ve run across people like you all my life, thinking they are superior than someone else in one way or another.
Again, humorous to me these are usually the losers of the bunch Mr. vacuum cleaner. Like the PP, you suck.
A waste of a decade but a valuable lesson.
I’m a winner investing in a loser.
Took me a while to figure out but thanks for making it easy.
Re: Purpose of the PP
Anti-hedge sentiment, one of the thousand points of light (?) ringing a bell at the top. Watch this Forum for the explosion of traffic after next major bear market, when actually it will be time to get back into the market.
-
- Executive Member
- Posts: 1102
- Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2012 9:04 am
Re: Purpose of the PP
The only groupthink here is the idea that everyone has different goals for their investments, there can be different ways to achieve those goals, and that ultimately the individual investor has to do what feels right to them. Occasionally someone shows up that values pure financial performance above all else, which is fine, but then they blather on and on about how stupid and wrong everyone else is and how much the PP sucks.buddtholomew wrote: ↑Sat Dec 08, 2018 7:56 am Don’t really care; nothing here for me either but smoke and mirrors. I’ve had my fair share of negativity as well and am tired of being everyone’s “joke”. I’ll leave as well so the groupthink can continue without my involvement.
A waste of a decade but a valuable lesson.
I’m a winner investing in a loser.
Took me a while to figure out but thanks for making it easy.
Budd, I don’t know you at all but your behavior on the forum suggests that you lack emotional maturity. Life is not a race, you are not a “winner” and the PP is not a “loser”. Since you have plenty of money already, perhaps it would bring you more happiness to maximize the investments in other aspects of your life.
- Kriegsspiel
- Executive Member
- Posts: 4052
- Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 5:28 pm
Re: Purpose of the PP
I consider the PP a "better" version of bonds. So when budd says "yea, but you need a lot of stocks in the VP" I am down with that. 60/40 stocks/PP, go for it. 50/50 like Markowitz? How about half stocks, half PP (or... 62.5% stocks, 12.5% LTTs, STTs, gold).
Re: Purpose of the PP
I hope you stick around. But if you don't you will be missed by me. You are trying very hard to get an allocation that fits. If you had to tell us the perfect allocation I would love to hear it. You have given this a lot of thought and I would be appreciative of where you are at the present time. This of course is Just a Budd allocation and it would be just for now. New effort and new knowledge might change this for the future.buddtholomew wrote: ↑Sat Dec 08, 2018 7:56 amDon’t really care; nothing here for me either but smoke and mirrors. I’ve had my fair share of negativity as well and am tired of being everyone’s “joke”. I’ll leave as well so the groupthink can continue without my involvement.Xan wrote: ↑Fri Dec 07, 2018 10:15 pmBudd, this has always been a very "hands-off" forum in terms of moderation. Please help us keep it that way. "Mr Vacuum Cleaner" has decided this forum is no longer worth his effort, and based on the personal attack here I don't think I blame him for that opinion.buddtholomew wrote: ↑Fri Dec 07, 2018 10:37 am Actually I think you are the fool.
I’ve run across people like you all my life, thinking they are superior than someone else in one way or another.
Again, humorous to me these are usually the losers of the bunch Mr. vacuum cleaner. Like the PP, you suck.
A waste of a decade but a valuable lesson.
I’m a winner investing in a loser.
Took me a while to figure out but thanks for making it easy.
Re: Purpose of the PP
Budd...90+ percent of the comments to you have simply been pick something you are happy with and don't expect literal daily non-correlation of assets. I can't speak for everyone on the board but the multiple Budd bursts got a bit annoying when the solution space is entirely within your span of control to do something about. We are all big boys and girls here and part of why we are here is to get some hand holding to keep the faith. And, I doubt most would mind holding yours metaphorically from time to time. But when someone thinks they are trying to assist and they get repeated face shots, at a point, one just thinks "Good lord man, just rebalance to something you can live with and let's be done with this."buddtholomew wrote: ↑Sat Dec 08, 2018 7:56 amDon’t really care; nothing here for me either but smoke and mirrors. I’ve had my fair share of negativity as well and am tired of being everyone’s “joke”. I’ll leave as well so the groupthink can continue without my involvement.Xan wrote: ↑Fri Dec 07, 2018 10:15 pmBudd, this has always been a very "hands-off" forum in terms of moderation. Please help us keep it that way. "Mr Vacuum Cleaner" has decided this forum is no longer worth his effort, and based on the personal attack here I don't think I blame him for that opinion.buddtholomew wrote: ↑Fri Dec 07, 2018 10:37 am
Actually I think you are the fool.
I’ve run across people like you all my life, thinking they are superior than someone else in one way or another.
Again, humorous to me these are usually the losers of the bunch Mr. vacuum cleaner. Like the PP, you suck.
A waste of a decade but a valuable lesson.
I’m a winner investing in a loser.
Took me a while to figure out but thanks for making it easy.
Perhaps at this point we should just all move on to another subject. CraigR was correct...after awhile what else is there to say about the PP?
Re: Purpose of the PP
I also hope that both Budd and Mr Vacuum stick around. But if they don't, they're making the right choice for them.
I think Budd's is a cautionary tale. Rationally or not, I believe (and I bet many others here do too) that if I could only hit X million dollars in the brokerage account, then I wouldn't have to worry about money anymore. I could do something more productive and interesting with my life.
Budd has enough saved up for several lifetimes of comfortable living. Yet he's completely bent out of shape at the slightest loss. Not even loss: at the underperformance of his assets against some other asset he could have owned instead.
As an outsider to this situation, I can say that the right answer to Budd's money situation is to put it into, well, largely anything (apart from things that can really go to zero like a small number of individual stocks, junk bonds, etc) and then forget about it.
But would I really be able to do that if I were in that situation? Or would I be like Ebeneezer Scrooge, counting my millions every day to make sure I hadn't lost any? Or worse, counting to make sure I am growing richer as fast as I possibly can, and lamenting if otherwise?
What a pitiable life.
One thing the PP does for me is bring this "don't care" attitude into the here and now, without the millions in the bank. It's simple, it won't lose much, it will recover quickly, and its historical returns are respectable. Also because it's so smooth, I can plan on it being there in case I need to withdraw, whenever that might be. I still have to keep earning and saving, but I certainly hope that when that time is over, I will be doing other things with my life than worrying about not having maximized the gains in my savings.
I think Budd's is a cautionary tale. Rationally or not, I believe (and I bet many others here do too) that if I could only hit X million dollars in the brokerage account, then I wouldn't have to worry about money anymore. I could do something more productive and interesting with my life.
Budd has enough saved up for several lifetimes of comfortable living. Yet he's completely bent out of shape at the slightest loss. Not even loss: at the underperformance of his assets against some other asset he could have owned instead.
As an outsider to this situation, I can say that the right answer to Budd's money situation is to put it into, well, largely anything (apart from things that can really go to zero like a small number of individual stocks, junk bonds, etc) and then forget about it.
But would I really be able to do that if I were in that situation? Or would I be like Ebeneezer Scrooge, counting my millions every day to make sure I hadn't lost any? Or worse, counting to make sure I am growing richer as fast as I possibly can, and lamenting if otherwise?
What a pitiable life.
One thing the PP does for me is bring this "don't care" attitude into the here and now, without the millions in the bank. It's simple, it won't lose much, it will recover quickly, and its historical returns are respectable. Also because it's so smooth, I can plan on it being there in case I need to withdraw, whenever that might be. I still have to keep earning and saving, but I certainly hope that when that time is over, I will be doing other things with my life than worrying about not having maximized the gains in my savings.
- Cortopassi
- Executive Member
- Posts: 3338
- Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2014 2:28 pm
- Location: https://www.jwst.nasa.gov/content/webbL ... sWebb.html
Re: Purpose of the PP
There are so many lessons on this forum I only wish I had back when I graduated college...and not taken until my 40s to figure out!Xan wrote: ↑Sat Dec 08, 2018 3:02 pm if I could only hit X million dollars in the brokerage account, then I wouldn't have to worry about money anymore.
One thing the PP does for me is bring this "don't care" attitude into the here and now, without the millions in the bank. It's simple, it won't lose much, it will recover quickly, and its historical returns are respectable. Also because it's so smooth, I can plan on it being there in case I need to withdraw, whenever that might be.
Re: Purpose of the PP
One of the fellows on the Bogleheads forums has posted recently about how the Permanent Portfolio is probably the best portfolio allocation for those wanting to setup a family trust -- a portfolio to last indefinitely. I've done some thinking on the issue, and I'm inclined to do the same thing for my children and theirs with the same goal.
If we're talking about the purpose of the PP, it seems to me that time horizon plays a huge role. People like Budd might lament at the PP's short term performance, but I'm beginning to see that the word permanent in the name of the portfolio isn't just for alliteration. If you want to preserve wealth for your heirs and to have the most bulletproof strategy (without crazy complexity), it seems to me that the PP is pretty much where it's at.
If we're talking about the purpose of the PP, it seems to me that time horizon plays a huge role. People like Budd might lament at the PP's short term performance, but I'm beginning to see that the word permanent in the name of the portfolio isn't just for alliteration. If you want to preserve wealth for your heirs and to have the most bulletproof strategy (without crazy complexity), it seems to me that the PP is pretty much where it's at.
MB
Ruby on Rails rules all
www.allterraininvesting.com
Ruby on Rails rules all
www.allterraininvesting.com
- dualstow
- Executive Member
- Posts: 14306
- Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
- Location: synagogue of Satan
- Contact:
Re: Purpose of the PP
I think that’s why I don’t mind holding gold. I’m not wealthy by many (most?) people’s standards, but I’ll be ok if gold does nothing in my lifetime. It may perform for my heirs one day.
Re: Purpose of the PP
Yes, me too.
One thing I want to touch on. A lot of people say that gold probably won't do as well if a 70s inflationary environment comes back. They cite that the discoupling from the gold standard and the subsequent price explosion was a one-time event.
I'd submit that if the 70s happens again, gold's price doesn't have to skyrocket to show that its inclusion was worthy. All it has to do is even just maintain purchasing power, which I suspect it would in such a scenario.
Here the key point: it's not just that the 70s was great for gold, it's that it was astonishingly bad for just about everything else. Even if the 70s price spike doesn't happen again, it can still make for an effective diversifier.
The above, as i'm sure we're all familiar with, is the PP (blue) vs a 50/50 (red) portfolio of stocks and bonds in real returns. The 50/50 is underwater for about 12 years. Yes, the PP went up because of the price explosion in gold. However, again, the next time such a scenario happens all gold has to do is just maintain purchasing power and you'll be ahead of the typical boglehead portfolio.
As for TIPS? I still don't like them for the same reasons Craig articulated.
One thing I want to touch on. A lot of people say that gold probably won't do as well if a 70s inflationary environment comes back. They cite that the discoupling from the gold standard and the subsequent price explosion was a one-time event.
I'd submit that if the 70s happens again, gold's price doesn't have to skyrocket to show that its inclusion was worthy. All it has to do is even just maintain purchasing power, which I suspect it would in such a scenario.
Here the key point: it's not just that the 70s was great for gold, it's that it was astonishingly bad for just about everything else. Even if the 70s price spike doesn't happen again, it can still make for an effective diversifier.
The above, as i'm sure we're all familiar with, is the PP (blue) vs a 50/50 (red) portfolio of stocks and bonds in real returns. The 50/50 is underwater for about 12 years. Yes, the PP went up because of the price explosion in gold. However, again, the next time such a scenario happens all gold has to do is just maintain purchasing power and you'll be ahead of the typical boglehead portfolio.
As for TIPS? I still don't like them for the same reasons Craig articulated.
MB
Ruby on Rails rules all
www.allterraininvesting.com
Ruby on Rails rules all
www.allterraininvesting.com