Insuring a safe deposit box, in addition to greatly increasing the carrying cost of gold, seems to defeat some of the advantages of gold, namely:ochotona wrote: ↑Sat Jul 28, 2018 7:13 pmVery unlikely to lose anything from a SDB, and you can insure the loss! 100% certainty of no loss then. Between Chappell Hill Bank, Delaware Depository, I don't lose any sleep. But I can't forgot that boating accident when I lost all the rest of my gold in Loch Ness, Scotland.
* It's entirely outside The System (TM)
* You don't tell anyone you have it
* If you're inclined to take advantage of it (which I am not) there may not be a practical way for government to enforce the paying of taxes on gains
Also, I wonder about the practicality of insurance. It seems that in almost every case, there would be some reason for the insurer to deny your claim. I suppose if a hurricane destroys the bank completely, it's pretty unambiguous. But no matter what, you can't prove that you didn't just take the gold out. And in a situation like the article I linked to earlier, when the bank is claiming that proper notification was done, would insurance actually pay out?
I guess I would like to see some documentation, and some statistics, of insurance actually paying out for a safe deposit box problem. Because I'm basically skeptical that it ever happens.