Investment Advisor

Other discussions not related to the Permanent Portfolio

Moderator: Global Moderator

Post Reply
User avatar
BearBones
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 689
Joined: Sat Sep 18, 2010 4:26 pm

Investment Advisor

Post by BearBones » Mon Jul 17, 2017 2:08 pm

Hi you all. It has been a while, in part because I got paralyzed in my investment approach this past few years. I am increasingly realizing that, while I generally trust myself (and you all) more than most "professionals," I do not trust myself to review the portfolio and rebalance regularly. My assets are scattered thought all sorts of tax deferred and taxable accounts, a PP and a VP, and I just have grown to HATE IT (especially when I'm doing poorly compared to those in traditional portfolios). When I retire, I can consolidate a bit, but my desire for spending time on this is fading quickly.

Do any of you have any suggestion on some outside management resource? If the assets are large, I am participating in the decisions about asset mix, and the individual assets are simple, it would be nice to keep the cost in the .1-.3% range at most. Vanguard will help me for .2% but they are pretty inflexible in their ability to go beyond a typical boglehead mix (they hate gold and do not understand LTTs, from what I can see).

I REALLY appreciate your suggestions.

Bones
User avatar
Mountaineer
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 4959
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2012 10:54 am

Re: Investment Advisor

Post by Mountaineer » Mon Jul 17, 2017 3:52 pm

Might not be able to do a PP portfolio, but you might consider an all-in-one Vanguard Retirement portfolio- might be “good enough “ to meet your desire for simplicity and reasonable returns at low cost expense ratio and require no management fee up front.
DNA has its own language (code), and language requires intelligence. There is no known mechanism by which matter can give birth to information, let alone language. It is unreasonable to believe the world could have happened by chance.
Dmilligan
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 14
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2012 7:49 am

Re: Investment Advisor

Post by Dmilligan » Mon Jul 17, 2017 6:30 pm

http://alankemp.ca/how-we-work#permanent

I follow this investment advisor on Twitter. They manage a Permanent Portfolio on behalf of customers (both a US and a Canadian). They are located in Canada. I enjoy reading their quarterly commentary on the performance of the Permanent Portfolio. Other than that, I have not used them and I do not know anything about their fees.

I second Desert's thoughts. My investment advisor took up more of my time than the PP does and required more decisions. Once the PP is set up, there really isn't anything to do except occasionally look at it. I run a PP in predominately taxable accounts, so am using 35/15 rebalance bands. In the past 6 years, I've only rebalanced maybe once or twice. My investment advisor used to take up more of my time than that--and he cost a lot more than my current PP expense ratios.
User avatar
Pointedstick
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 8864
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Investment Advisor

Post by Pointedstick » Mon Jul 17, 2017 6:39 pm

Desert is absolutely right. Consolidate, consolidate, consolidate. I've consolidated my accounts into as few as possible, and I have them all at Vanguard and am happy as a clam. Super simple, easy auto-investment, great fund choices. No downsides, really.

Your actual portfolio doesn't really matter. If managing it is keeping you up at night, then move over time into something easier to manage. Life is too short to worry about managing money. Money is supposed to make life easier, not harder.
User avatar
ochotona
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 3353
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2015 5:54 am

Re: Investment Advisor

Post by ochotona » Mon Jul 17, 2017 8:56 pm

I second the notion of getting an inexpensive, one all-in-one investment product, and holding gold on the side.

Look at AOK from iShares.

If you hold 25% gold and 75% AOK, you get 25% global equities, 50% fixed income of various kinds, and of course, 25% gold.
Mr Vacuum
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 164
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2016 11:51 am

Re: Investment Advisor

Post by Mr Vacuum » Mon Jul 17, 2017 11:01 pm

As a point of clarification on fees, with an all-in-one fund, do you have to add the weighted average fees of the constituent funds to get an accurate picture of costs? For example, AOK has a net expense ratio of .25%. Do you add about 10 basis points for IVV, IEMG, etc? Even if so, that's still not bad in the iShares or Vanguard index world, but I'd fear for those getting a double whammy in expensive 401k offerings.
User avatar
ochotona
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 3353
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2015 5:54 am

Re: Investment Advisor

Post by ochotona » Tue Jul 18, 2017 5:14 am

Some all in one products are a rip off, charging 1%. iShares AOK AOM AOR AOA series cost 25 basis points, period. No fees beyond that.
WiseOne
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 2692
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2022 11:08 am

Re: Investment Advisor

Post by WiseOne » Thu Jul 20, 2017 8:00 am

Bearbones, good to hear from you!!!

Desert & PS are right: what can you do to simplify your investment structure? Then if you still need to hire an advisor, there will be less for them to do (and screw up).

If you want to post a list of accounts and their relative (not absolute) sizes, maybe we can offer suggestions. Is part of the problem trying to implement a sprawling PP across non-gold-friendly accounts?
User avatar
dualstow
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 14226
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
Location: synagogue of Satan
Contact:

Re: Investment Advisor

Post by dualstow » Fri Jul 21, 2017 6:55 am

If you do go outside, maybe you could try that Allan Roth guy. He charges a one-time fee, and I hear it's pretty reasonable.
That way you would (A) never say to yourself, I wish I had gotten an advisor, but
can (B) get back on the right track without having a long-time advisor get his hooks into you, with fees that drag everything down.
RIP Marcello Gandini
User avatar
BearBones
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 689
Joined: Sat Sep 18, 2010 4:26 pm

Re: Investment Advisor

Post by BearBones » Mon Jul 24, 2017 2:32 pm

Thank you all so much. Love this forum!

Yes, yes, I need to consolidate and simplify more. But I also need to get more certain and clear...

I need to be honest (more so with myself). I am near retirement, and I am really scared of investing! I just don't trust myself. But I also don't trust many other people. So, once again, I am frozen with a TON of cash. I like the PP idea, but I remain a bit concerned about it, enough that when I do have separate accounts (like I had a 401k Rollover into IRA, and started another 401k), I tend to find myself wanting to hedge my bets. So not only do I have a lot of accounts that cannot be merged (like a decent HSA), but I also find myself creating a PP in one, a boglehead portfolio in another, a portfolio constructed from Tyler's PPCharts in still another.

I cannot be the only one who does this kind of stuff, so it is worth writing about. I think I need therapy :)
User avatar
Pointedstick
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 8864
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Investment Advisor

Post by Pointedstick » Mon Jul 24, 2017 6:24 pm

Then ditch the PP and move into whatever makes you sleep at night (within reason). If nothing fits the bill, then you have some issues to work out with investing as a concept and how it relates to you, and you should address that before making changes of any sort. Tyler's website is a font of knowledge on that front and is highly recommended: http://portfoliocharts.com/
User avatar
Mountaineer
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 4959
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2012 10:54 am

Re: Investment Advisor

Post by Mountaineer » Mon Jul 24, 2017 7:02 pm

Mountaineer wrote:Might not be able to do a PP portfolio, but you might consider an all-in-one Vanguard Retirement portfolio- might be “good enough “ to meet your desire for simplicity and reasonable returns at low cost expense ratio and require no management fee up front.
I shall repeat my earlier post. Go with the Vanguard VTINX. Not perfect but probably good enough for you, and me and countless others. Very simple. Once you start taking RMDs, put the excess, if any, in another simple after tax fund, maybe even a separate VTINX, or just put it in the Vanguard Money Market Prime until you decide what to do with it. Best wishes and good luck.
DNA has its own language (code), and language requires intelligence. There is no known mechanism by which matter can give birth to information, let alone language. It is unreasonable to believe the world could have happened by chance.
User avatar
BearBones
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 689
Joined: Sat Sep 18, 2010 4:26 pm

Re: Investment Advisor

Post by BearBones » Tue Jul 25, 2017 8:46 pm

PS, not sure I will every "sleep at night" with whatever I do. I tend to second guess when advisors question why I might want LLT or gold right now. I think the suggestions posted here are as good as I will get.

Will probably do as you said, Mountaineer, at least with part of my assets. Would be easier than what I have now if I just committed to the PP for half of my assets and VTINX for the rest, my sort of super conservative variable portfolio.

I do trust many of you more than any advisor I have spoken to, and I feel more comfortable having had your continued advice (and a bit of hand holding). Thanks.
User avatar
dualstow
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 14226
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
Location: synagogue of Satan
Contact:

Re: Investment Advisor

Post by dualstow » Tue Jul 25, 2017 9:10 pm

I originally put some funds into a Vanguard target retirement fund (2035) as something to compete against. I have to concede that it's easier to put money in there than into a single asset, or even four assets simultaneously, if you don't think about how the sausage is made.

Not exactly VTINX, but same idea.
RIP Marcello Gandini
WiseOne
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 2692
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2022 11:08 am

Re: Investment Advisor

Post by WiseOne » Wed Jul 26, 2017 7:09 am

BearBones wrote:Would be easier than what I have now if I just committed to the PP for half of my assets and VTINX for the rest, my sort of super conservative variable portfolio.
This sounds like an excellent plan, especially for accounts that are not PP-compatible. You can make those "set it and forget it" with the simple, one-fund approach, and then not even think about them until it's time to withdraw funds.

Is it the PP part that you're uncomfortable with? It does take some twiddling, especially buying the long bonds and gold, and figuring out what to do with new contributions. How are you handling these currently?
barrett
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1982
Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2014 2:54 pm

Re: Investment Advisor

Post by barrett » Wed Jul 26, 2017 8:21 am

Bones,

It would also be interesting (and probably helpful) to know what your current AA looks like. When you say that you have a "a ton" of cash, does that mean that you have 50% or 60% in cash? If so, maybe you are just a cash kind of guy and it should just be invested in T-Bills. That was a Harry Browne recommendation for those who just weren't comfortable with other strategies.

Depending on your spending versus your assets, you might be able to coast through retirement just holding a lower percentage of the volatile assets.

In case you haven't seen it, Tyler wrote this excellent piece on cash:

https://portfoliocharts.com/2017/05/12/ ... -investor/

Agree with PS that money should be something that makes life easier and not harder. But I also understand from my own experience how analysis paralysis can drive one crazy. Fortunately we have this safe haven called the PP Forum where we can all get free therapy when needed! Best of luck to you.
Post Reply