The permanent portfolio is not for me

General Discussion on the Permanent Portfolio Strategy

Moderator: Global Moderator

Post Reply
User avatar
lordmetroid
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 200
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2014 3:53 pm

The permanent portfolio is not for me

Post by lordmetroid » Fri Nov 13, 2015 4:49 am

I have tried to keep a permanent portfolio for the last year and I have concluded it is not a portfolio that suits me. I am unable to sit idle and am always poking and tuning. Which does more harm than good for a permanent portfolio strategy.
Last edited by lordmetroid on Fri Nov 13, 2015 6:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
ochotona
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 3353
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2015 5:54 am

Re: The permanent portfolio is not for me

Post by ochotona » Fri Nov 13, 2015 7:01 am

I think it's good to split one's assets between active and passive. That way you can stay engaged and feel that you're making a difference. The passive portion is in case you're not making a difference, but actually harming! (a bet against yourself).
User avatar
buddtholomew
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 2464
Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 4:16 pm

Re: The permanent portfolio is not for me

Post by buddtholomew » Fri Nov 13, 2015 8:44 am

Have you decided on your new asset allocation?
"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool" --Feynman.
User avatar
AdamA
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 2336
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 8:49 pm

Re: The permanent portfolio is not for me

Post by AdamA » Fri Nov 13, 2015 11:37 am

I hope you keep posting anyway.

Lordmetroid is the best screen name ever.
"All men's miseries derive from not being able to sit in a quiet room alone."

Pascal
User avatar
MediumTex
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9096
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:47 pm
Contact:

Re: The permanent portfolio is not for me

Post by MediumTex » Sat Nov 14, 2015 12:54 am

AdamA wrote: I hope you keep posting anyway.

Lordmetroid is the best screen name ever.
I agree.

Good luck with whatever allocation you decide on.
Q: “Do you have funny shaped balloons?”
A: “Not unless round is funny.”
User avatar
lordmetroid
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 200
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2014 3:53 pm

Re: The permanent portfolio is not for me

Post by lordmetroid » Sat Nov 14, 2015 3:47 am

buddtholomew wrote: Have you decided on your new asset allocation?
I will try to the dual momentumstrategy, it seems more suitable for someone with my personality.
AdamA wrote: I hope you keep posting anyway.

Lordmetroid is the best screen name ever.
I will be here, this forum is awesome, thank you.
User avatar
ochotona
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 3353
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2015 5:54 am

Re: The permanent portfolio is not for me

Post by ochotona » Sat Nov 14, 2015 7:27 am

Look at Mebane Faber's papers, downloadable for free from SSRN. If you read them, the Ivy Portfolio book is redundant. I am giving that strategy a go. Also building a small taxable PP on the side as an emergency & retirement fund.
User avatar
mathjak107
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 4456
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 2:54 am
Location: bayside queens ny
Contact:

Re: The permanent portfolio is not for me

Post by mathjak107 » Sat Nov 14, 2015 7:57 am

if you have intentions of using the pp as a bridge portfolio in retirement if delaying ss be careful .

as an example i am living off my portfolio now while delaying . if we have an extended downturn and i blow through the cash , the next line of defense to refill cash is my short to intermediate term bond funds . the last thing i would want as a 2nd line of defense is bonds that can be more volatile if rates rise then the stocks i am trying to delay selling .

because you may wan to spend down that bridge portfolio possibly in an order of volatility to buy time in this case  it is important to not have assets with all the same volatility levels .

in the long term bucketizing , the order you spend vs pulling equally from the pie does not matter , it equals out . short term may not work out so well in that regard  so you may want to be able to have buckets that step up in volatility so the most volatile get spent last in the short term bridge portfolio ..
Last edited by mathjak107 on Sat Nov 14, 2015 9:11 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
AdamA
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 2336
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 8:49 pm

Re: The permanent portfolio is not for me

Post by AdamA » Sat Nov 14, 2015 9:07 am

TennPaGa wrote:
AdamA wrote: I hope you keep posting anyway.

Lordmetroid is the best screen name ever.
I concur with your first point. 

But on your second point, I counter with:

Image
Although that is an excellent screen name, it relies heavily on the icon.  Lordmetroid, in  my opionion, is better if only using text to judge.

Also, let's not forget about kobe1, who I think had a picture of kobe bryant with a lightsaber as his icon at one point. 

Not a lot of Jedi on the forum any more.  I feel a disturbance in the Force. 
"All men's miseries derive from not being able to sit in a quiet room alone."

Pascal
User avatar
dualstow
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 14227
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
Location: synagogue of Satan
Contact:

Re: The permanent portfolio is not for me

Post by dualstow » Sat Nov 14, 2015 9:19 am

But Jedi was a nice pun on Jed, whereas Kobe is not. Unless there's some obscure Star Wars character that a casual fan like me would miss.
Oh, Kobe1, Obi Wan. I get it, I get it. Nice.  :)
RIP Marcello Gandini
finster869
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 14
Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2015 3:33 pm

Re: The permanent portfolio is not for me

Post by finster869 » Sat Nov 14, 2015 9:34 am

To each their own, but sounds like capitulation to me..........A turn in gold must be approaching.
User avatar
mathjak107
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 4456
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 2:54 am
Location: bayside queens ny
Contact:

Re: The permanent portfolio is not for me

Post by mathjak107 » Sat Nov 14, 2015 9:37 am

i think it can see a short term pop  which is why for my monthly speculation i was thinking of going with gld . went with exxon instead but i think after falling another 10% ytd  gold may be a bit over sold .

nothing i would hold longer than a quick pop and i am out .
Libertarian666
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 5994
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm

Re: The permanent portfolio is not for me

Post by Libertarian666 » Sat Nov 14, 2015 11:32 am

finster869 wrote: To each their own, but sounds like capitulation to me..........A turn in gold must be approaching.
I think "must" is a bit strong, but I agree that the sentiment is horrible, which usually means we are nearer a bottom than a top.
User avatar
lordmetroid
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 200
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2014 3:53 pm

Re: The permanent portfolio is not for me

Post by lordmetroid » Sat Nov 14, 2015 5:52 pm

finster869 wrote: To each their own, but sounds like capitulation to me..........A turn in gold must be approaching.
I live in Sweden and Gold is positive in SEK so gold has nothing to do with it. It is all about my personality, I can't keep a passive strategy passive. I am always watching it and poking in it. Without my doing so, I would have had a positive year but I have ended up with a result of -2% so I need to change strategy that suits my personality better.

The only way I could possibly keep calm and not rock the boat is if I am invested in the winner. So this Dual momentum strategy will probably suit me very well.
Last edited by lordmetroid on Sat Nov 14, 2015 5:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Pointedstick
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 8864
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:21 pm
Contact:

Re: The permanent portfolio is not for me

Post by Pointedstick » Sat Nov 14, 2015 6:03 pm

lordmetroid wrote:
finster869 wrote: To each their own, but sounds like capitulation to me..........A turn in gold must be approaching.
I live in Sweden and Gold is positive in SEK so gold has nothing to do with it. It is all about my personality, I can't keep a passive strategy passive. I am always watching it and poking in it. Without my doing so, I would have had a positive year but I have ended up with a result of -2% so I need to change strategy that suits my personality better.
This is an impressive and mature thing to be able to say. Congrats! Keep us in the loop about your future portfolio plans!
Human behavior is economic behavior. The particulars may vary, but competition for limited resources remains a constant.
- CEO Nwabudike Morgan
Libertarian666
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 5994
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm

Re: The permanent portfolio is not for me

Post by Libertarian666 » Sat Nov 14, 2015 6:42 pm

lordmetroid wrote:
finster869 wrote: To each their own, but sounds like capitulation to me..........A turn in gold must be approaching.
I live in Sweden and Gold is positive in SEK so gold has nothing to do with it. It is all about my personality, I can't keep a passive strategy passive. I am always watching it and poking in it. Without my doing so, I would have had a positive year but I have ended up with a result of -2% so I need to change strategy that suits my personality better.

The only way I could possibly keep calm and not rock the boat is if I am invested in the winner. So this Dual momentum strategy will probably suit me very well.
I look forward to updates on how it does over the next few years.
User avatar
ochotona
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 3353
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2015 5:54 am

Re: The permanent portfolio is not for me

Post by ochotona » Sat Nov 14, 2015 7:04 pm

Trend following the stocks, long bonds, and gold of the PP has been shown to work. That could keep you busy.
User avatar
kobe1
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 20
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2012 3:01 pm

Re: The permanent portfolio is not for me

Post by kobe1 » Sun Nov 15, 2015 8:51 am

dualstow wrote: But Jedi was a nice pun on Jed, whereas Kobe is not. Unless there's some obscure Star Wars character that a casual fan like me would miss.
Oh, Kobe1, Obi Wan. I get it, I get it. Nice.  :)
Aw shucks guys, it's nice to be remembered.  FYI, the Jedi are not gone, we are just lurking in the shadows.
Sam Brazil
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 103
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 1:01 pm

Re: The permanent portfolio is not for me

Post by Sam Brazil » Sun Nov 15, 2015 2:56 pm

Knowing you can't help but tinker requires a great deal of self awareness, but I wonder if committing to tinkering is the best solution for everyone. For example, what if you could force yourself to not touch it for X years, bearing exceptional circumstances? I'm pretty sure you could set something like that up with a trust of some kind where you no longer retain any ownership in the trust, but the expenses probably only make sense for portfolios of a certain size. But then again, given the likely costs of tinkering long term, the portfolio size probably isn't as large as you might think in order to net out ahead (not to mention the asset protection bonus, whatever that's worth).

I wonder if there are cheaper ways to do the same thing without setup a trust? Maybe something around "fooling" yourself so that it's not as ironclad as a trust, but you setup some kind of huge pain in the ass requires in order to tinker. For example, you add a family member to the account, ideally someone who really doesn't care about investments, and then you have the mail/communication all forwarded to them. I wouldn't want to do something like that with all my money, but a portion of it? Sounds appealing. Unfortunately the details of executing something like this are murky enough that I've never acted on it...I wonder if there's a very straightforward way of doing it...
Fred
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 318
Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2015 4:55 pm

Re: The permanent portfolio is not for me

Post by Fred » Tue Nov 17, 2015 6:32 pm

Well I concluded today that the PP isn't for my wife, at least. She's 17 years younger than me (age 49) and when I went with the PP I set up her  IRA as the bond/cash/gold portion of her PP with the stock portion being in her company 401k. As of yesterday she was down about 10%.

So I sold the gold ETF's and the lower interest rate LT's in her IRA and bought FCNTX (Fidelity Contrafund). Will keep an eye on it for a while before tinkering with my own IRA (Down about 8% because it's also gold/cash/bond).
Sam Brazil
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 103
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 1:01 pm

Re: The permanent portfolio is not for me

Post by Sam Brazil » Tue Nov 17, 2015 8:16 pm

I'm confused by that Fidelity contrafund. The description says it invests in overlooked stocks, and then I look at the top 10 holdings:
FACEBOOK INC A
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CL A
APPLE INC
WELLS FARGO & CO
GOOGLE INC CL A
GOOGLE INC CL C
AMAZON.COM INC
VISA INC CL A
DISNEY (WALT) CO
STARBUCKS CORP
WTF?
User avatar
Pointedstick
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 8864
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:21 pm
Contact:

Re: The permanent portfolio is not for me

Post by Pointedstick » Tue Nov 17, 2015 8:19 pm

You mean you've heard of Apple and Facebook!?!??!! I'd better sell!
Human behavior is economic behavior. The particulars may vary, but competition for limited resources remains a constant.
- CEO Nwabudike Morgan
User avatar
dualstow
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 14227
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
Location: synagogue of Satan
Contact:

Re: The permanent portfolio is not for me

Post by dualstow » Tue Nov 17, 2015 8:31 pm

Sam Brazil wrote: I'm confused by that Fidelity contrafund. The description says it invests in overlooked stocks, and then I look at the top 10 holdings:
FACEBOOK INC A
~
WTF?
Heh heh.  :) I think they mean overlooked opportunities, not unheard-of companies.
As a result, our investment approach seeks companies we believe are poised for sustained, above-average earnings growth that is not accurately reflected in the stocks' current valuation.
- From the Commentary tab at https://fundresearch.fidelity.com/mutua ... /316071109
RIP Marcello Gandini
User avatar
Cortopassi
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 3338
Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2014 2:28 pm
Location: https://www.jwst.nasa.gov/content/webbL ... sWebb.html

Re: The permanent portfolio is not for me

Post by Cortopassi » Tue Nov 17, 2015 8:38 pm

Every damn fund is in the same boat.  If the market tanks (it never will be allowed to ever again....!) tons of funds will get destroyed.  I would bet 80% of long funds out there own sizable %s in AAPL alone.
Test of the signature line
User avatar
mathjak107
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 4456
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 2:54 am
Location: bayside queens ny
Contact:

Re: The permanent portfolio is not for me

Post by mathjak107 » Wed Nov 18, 2015 4:07 am

Sam Brazil wrote: I'm confused by that Fidelity contrafund. The description says it invests in overlooked stocks, and then I look at the top 10 holdings:
FACEBOOK INC A
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CL A
APPLE INC
WELLS FARGO & CO
GOOGLE INC CL A
GOOGLE INC CL C
AMAZON.COM INC
VISA INC CL A
DISNEY (WALT) CO
STARBUCKS CORP
WTF?
keep in mind those lists of what they own are months old as well . they may no longer even own what they show as holdings . one of the reasons i like the newsletter is they stay on top of major position changes  in funds way before the listings which go obsolete pretty quick .

on your own you can buy a bunch of fidelity growth funds and have such overlap . the newsletter at least tries to prevent that as much as possible although keeping up with daily position changes is impossible except for the largest changes .. . .
Last edited by mathjak107 on Thu Nov 19, 2015 4:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
Post Reply