No where to hide

General Discussion on the Permanent Portfolio Strategy

Moderator: Global Moderator

User avatar
MachineGhost
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 10054
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 9:31 am

Re: No where to hide

Post by MachineGhost » Sat May 16, 2015 3:29 pm

Wow, 16 pages of hand wringing again in just a bit over two weeks?  I'm not going to even bother reading.

Some people need to get out of the PP.  There's no shame in admitting defeat.  There are less risky portfolios.
Last edited by MachineGhost on Sat May 16, 2015 3:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"All generous minds have a horror of what are commonly called 'Facts'. They are the brute beasts of the intellectual domain." -- Thomas Hobbes

Disclaimer: I am not a broker, dealer, investment advisor, physician, theologian or prophet.  I should not be considered as legally permitted to render such advice!
User avatar
Stewardship
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 219
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2014 6:31 am

Re: No where to hide

Post by Stewardship » Sat May 16, 2015 4:27 pm

MachineGhost wrote: There are less risky portfolios.
Such as?
In a world of ever-increasing financial intangibility and government imposition, I tend to expect otherwise.
User avatar
MachineGhost
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 10054
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 9:31 am

Re: No where to hide

Post by MachineGhost » Sat May 16, 2015 5:17 pm

Stewardship wrote:
MachineGhost wrote: There are less risky portfolios.
Such as?
Burn's Fat Tail Minimization Portfolio.
"All generous minds have a horror of what are commonly called 'Facts'. They are the brute beasts of the intellectual domain." -- Thomas Hobbes

Disclaimer: I am not a broker, dealer, investment advisor, physician, theologian or prophet.  I should not be considered as legally permitted to render such advice!
User avatar
ochotona
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 3353
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2015 5:54 am

Re: No where to hide

Post by ochotona » Sat May 16, 2015 5:22 pm

MachineGhost wrote:
Stewardship wrote:
MachineGhost wrote: There are less risky portfolios.
Such as?
Burn's Fat Tail Minimization Portfolio.
Larry Swedroe?
Libertarian666
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 5994
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm

Re: No where to hide

Post by Libertarian666 » Mon May 18, 2015 8:29 am

MachineGhost wrote:
Stewardship wrote:
MachineGhost wrote: There are less risky portfolios.
Such as?
Burn's Fat Tail Minimization Portfolio.
I looked for that briefly and couldn't find it, so does it have any significant amount of gold? If not, I don't consider it low-risk.
rickb
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 762
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 12:12 am

Re: No where to hide

Post by rickb » Mon May 18, 2015 10:19 am

Libertarian666 wrote:
MachineGhost wrote:
Stewardship wrote: Such as?
Burn's Fat Tail Minimization Portfolio.
I looked for that briefly and couldn't find it, so does it have any significant amount of gold? If not, I don't consider it low-risk.
MG must mean Swedroe's Fat Tail Minimization Portfolio (Burns is the Couch Potato guy).  Swedroe's Fat Tail Minimization Portfolio is 30% stock (half small cap value and half emerging markets), 35% TIPS, and 35% short term treasuries.  No gold (Swedroe does not like gold).
User avatar
Stewardship
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 219
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2014 6:31 am

Re: No where to hide

Post by Stewardship » Mon May 18, 2015 2:23 pm

Libertarian666 wrote: I looked for that briefly and couldn't find it, so does it have any significant amount of gold? If not, I don't consider it low-risk.
+1
In a world of ever-increasing financial intangibility and government imposition, I tend to expect otherwise.
LC475
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 427
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 4:23 pm

Re: No where to hide

Post by LC475 » Wed May 20, 2015 2:13 pm

Ad Orientem wrote: Harry Browne was a smart guy but he was not infallible. Stating that government never works is just silly.
Well, I guess from that we can say that government works for you.  Bully.

That's great you have an opinion and are not afraid to voice it.  I am happy to allow you your opinion.  My only wish -- it is a simple wish -- is that those of your point of view would allow me to have mine.

Seems only civilized.

But then, perhaps I'm "just silly."
LC475
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 427
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 4:23 pm

Re: No where to hide

Post by LC475 » Wed May 20, 2015 2:25 pm

Stewardship wrote: Apologies for the conversation drift.  I'll start a new thread if I want to discuss the different possible options for sewage
On where to hide: if the Permanent Portfolio is performing badly, perhaps the first question to ask should be:

What economic state are we in?

Prosperity?  Recession?  Inflation?  Deflation?

So what is the answer?  If you have no answer to that question, perhaps best to hold off on action until you do have an answer.  Otherwise, you're walking off blindfolded, and in a place with an awful lot of cliffs.
Reub
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 3158
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2011 5:44 pm

Re: No where to hide

Post by Reub » Wed May 20, 2015 6:15 pm

Legendary Vanguard Group founder Jack Bogle warns that there is an "awful lot" to fear in the current stock market and investors have few “good options.”

"This is a hard time to invest because there aren't a lot of good options to stocks, and bond yields are extremely low," he told CNBC.

He said the Federal Reserve’s continued insistence on low interest rates has only artificially boosted stock prices.

"That's a scary thing because it can't stay that way forever," he said. "So, I do advocate a cautious approach to investing."

http://www.newsmax.com/Finance/StreetTa ... id/645782/

Cash anyone?
User avatar
buddtholomew
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 2464
Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 4:16 pm

Re: No where to hide

Post by buddtholomew » Wed May 20, 2015 6:25 pm

Reub wrote: Legendary Vanguard Group founder Jack Bogle warns that there is an "awful lot" to fear in the current stock market and investors have few “good options.”

"This is a hard time to invest because there aren't a lot of good options to stocks, and bond yields are extremely low," he told CNBC.

He said the Federal Reserve’s continued insistence on low interest rates has only artificially boosted stock prices.

"That's a scary thing because it can't stay that way forever," he said. "So, I do advocate a cautious approach to investing."

http://www.newsmax.com/Finance/StreetTa ... id/645782/

Cash anyone?
He also mentioned to stay out of long-term treasuries...sure wish he added unless they are part of a well diversified portfolio.

Poor guy...CNBC asked what he would tell the young investor who believes the entire market is manipulated? Mr. Bogle calmly attempted to explain dividends and earnings...I'm certain if any young investors were listening they most certainly would have already tuned out!
"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool" --Feynman.
User avatar
Stewardship
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 219
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2014 6:31 am

Re: No where to hide

Post by Stewardship » Wed May 20, 2015 10:09 pm

buddtholomew wrote: Poor guy...CNBC asked what he would tell the young investor who believes the entire market is manipulated? Mr. Bogle calmly attempted to explain dividends and earnings...
So he didn't answer the question?
In a world of ever-increasing financial intangibility and government imposition, I tend to expect otherwise.
Reub
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 3158
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2011 5:44 pm

Re: No where to hide

Post by Reub » Wed Jun 03, 2015 2:20 pm

buddtholomew wrote:
Reub wrote: Legendary Vanguard Group founder Jack Bogle warns that there is an "awful lot" to fear in the current stock market and investors have few “good options.”

"This is a hard time to invest because there aren't a lot of good options to stocks, and bond yields are extremely low," he told CNBC.

He said the Federal Reserve’s continued insistence on low interest rates has only artificially boosted stock prices.

"That's a scary thing because it can't stay that way forever," he said. "So, I do advocate a cautious approach to investing."

http://www.newsmax.com/Finance/StreetTa ... id/645782/

Cash anyone?
He also mentioned to stay out of long-term treasuries...sure wish he added unless they are part of a well diversified portfolio.

Poor guy...CNBC asked what he would tell the young investor who believes the entire market is manipulated? Mr. Bogle calmly attempted to explain dividends and earnings...I'm certain if any young investors were listening they most certainly would have already tuned out!
The PP really sucks recently! Is it yesterday's news?
As I said once before, the place to hide is in cash.
User avatar
I Shrugged
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 2062
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 6:35 pm

Re: No where to hide

Post by I Shrugged » Wed Jun 03, 2015 9:07 pm

LC475 wrote:


What economic state are we in?

Prosperity?  Recession?  Inflation?  Deflation?

deflation
Stay free, my friends.
User avatar
ochotona
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 3353
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2015 5:54 am

Re: No where to hide

Post by ochotona » Thu Jun 04, 2015 5:14 am

Deflation, and no help from bonds!
barrett
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1982
Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2014 2:54 pm

Re: No where to hide

Post by barrett » Thu Jun 04, 2015 7:44 am

LC475 wrote: What economic state are we in?

Prosperity?  Recession?  Inflation?  Deflation?
Since 2008 we are in the midst of a massive deleveraging which I think so far is generally deflationary.
ochotona wrote: Deflation, and no help from bonds!
Yes, not in the short term but bonds performed strongly in 2008, 2011 & 2014. I'm not ready to dump mine yet. Ride them when they are doing well, take some profits, endure some bond pain, and (hopefully) repeat.
User avatar
4x4
Associate Member
Associate Member
Posts: 41
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2014 3:30 am

Re: No where to hide

Post by 4x4 » Sun Jun 07, 2015 7:36 pm

I Shrugged wrote:
LC475 wrote:


What economic state are we in?

Prosperity?  Recession?  Inflation?  Deflation?

deflation

Ding, Ding, Ding, we have a winner imho.

I think without the manipulation of markets through interest rates, this would be painfully obvious to all.  This central planning that adjusting interest rates to move markets, and might even place rules making items such as gold to be less appealing to the masses, makes it even more difficult to analyze markets and profit from an active management approach. 

This makes the PP's agnostic approach even more appealing imho.  For those believing they can time the market and fearful of losses, cash is likely a good place to be.  For how long is the question?  I have come to doubt my ability to time markets, and as such am still fascinated w PP as an option.  Not to say VPs aren't also a viable way to augment one's investment strategy, if used wisely, i.e. with money you won't need soon (afford to loose might be the common description, but imo who has money to loose?)
flagator
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 23
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2015 6:29 pm

Re: No where to hide

Post by flagator » Mon Jun 08, 2015 5:32 pm

Reub wrote:
buddtholomew wrote:
Reub wrote: Legendary Vanguard Group founder Jack Bogle warns that there is an "awful lot" to fear in the current stock market and investors have few “good options.”

"This is a hard time to invest because there aren't a lot of good options to stocks, and bond yields are extremely low," he told CNBC.

He said the Federal Reserve’s continued insistence on low interest rates has only artificially boosted stock prices.

"That's a scary thing because it can't stay that way forever," he said. "So, I do advocate a cautious approach to investing."

http://www.newsmax.com/Finance/StreetTa ... id/645782/

Cash anyone?
He also mentioned to stay out of long-term treasuries...sure wish he added unless they are part of a well diversified portfolio.

Poor guy...CNBC asked what he would tell the young investor who believes the entire market is manipulated? Mr. Bogle calmly attempted to explain dividends and earnings...I'm certain if any young investors were listening they most certainly would have already tuned out!
The PP really sucks recently! Is it yesterday's news?
As I said once before, the place to hide is in cash.
Hello everyone!

I am new here.
I just recently went all in by investing in the PP on 4/22/15.

As of today I am -7.27 on long term treasuries
                        -0.48 on short term treasuries
                        -1.05 stocks
                        -1.27 gold

I have lost 2.52 % of my investment in just a bit over a month.

I feel like there is really no place to hide and all the components are going down simultaneously.

I did not expect this at all. I am not sure what kind of environment we have in the economy because the data provided by govt are very suspicious. I do not know what to do from here on, but I am certainly racking up losses pretty steeply.

Any comments would be appreciated.
                       
User avatar
I Shrugged
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 2062
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 6:35 pm

Re: No where to hide

Post by I Shrugged » Mon Jun 08, 2015 6:45 pm

The beatings will continue until morale improves.


Honestly, if I was starting out with cash to invest, I'd sit on it and wait for some blood in the streets.  I know that is not what any top notch long term passive investment plan says to do.  But that's what I would do at this time. 
Stay free, my friends.
Pet Hog
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 257
Joined: Tue May 28, 2013 4:08 pm

Re: No where to hide

Post by Pet Hog » Mon Jun 08, 2015 7:15 pm

Hi Flagator, welcome to the board.

I began my PP just over two years ago, after about 15 years with no firm investing philosophy.  I had doubled my money as a newbie during the dotcom era, then lost about 80% of that using a combination of stupidity, ignorance, inexperience, and blind trust.  Eventually resorted to CDs, gold, and TIPS to protect my remaining "wealth," then discovered the PP, which got me back into stocks.  I completed my PP in mid-May 2013.  I took an instant hit of about 6% by the end of June 2013.  But by the end of 2013, I was back at breakeven.  And last year I was up 10%.  This year, slightly down.  So overall, I am up about 9% nominal in two years; about 2% real CAGR.

My experience with the PP was just like yours: a significant loss within the first six weeks.  But I was (still am) convinced of the track record of the PP, having read this forum for at least a year before implementing it, having crunched a lot of numbers, and having been amazed by its consistent real performance over 40+ years.  I cannot think of a better strategy for someone who doesn't want to see big losses, wants real growth, and who doesn't want to make emotional investing decisions.

A loss of 2.52% in six weeks sure does suck, but it is hardly "steep."  Such losses are quite common with this portfolio.  Also, bear in mind that we were up 4% in January, so you will also experience steep rises!

My gut feeling is that now is an average, or somewhat favorable, time to be starting a PP.  I think gold is fairly priced considering its trajectory over the last 10 years, a 30-year treasury yield of 3.11% seems reasonable considering its trajectory since the early 80s, and the SP500 has been hovering above 2000 for over nine months with no major hiccups.  Perhaps stocks have considerable room to fall from their recent all-time high, but something is always overvalued with this portfolio.  It's the nature of having non-correlated volatile assets.

My advice would be to stick with the PP for at least a year before complaining, or rejoicing, about its performance.  In fact, don't get emotional about it for at least three years.  You should have real gains by then.
stuper1
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1365
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 7:18 pm

Re: No where to hide

Post by stuper1 » Mon Jun 08, 2015 7:20 pm

Flagator,

Here's what you do:  just ride it out, and don't worry about it.  Whatever you do, don't sell at a loss and lock in your losses.  Look back at the PP performance over a multi-year time frame, not just year-to-date.  You're in it for the long-haul, not the short term.  You'd be in just as bad a position if you were in a 60/40 stock/bond blend.

When I started my PP in 2013, gold took a major beating almost right afterwards, and I was wondering what I'd gotten myself into, but then everything turned around in 2014.  2015 doesn't look so great right now, but that can change.  Every portfolio has volatility.  The PP just happens to not have as much volatility as many portfolios, and it still produces good gains on average.  The real beauty of the PP is that you now have a system to follow, rather than just making blind emotion-fueled guesses that end up lowering your rate of return dramatically.
Reub
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 3158
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2011 5:44 pm

Re: No where to hide

Post by Reub » Mon Jun 08, 2015 8:34 pm

There is no reason to go all in if you don't want to. Possibly for you 25% or 50% of your overall portfolio might be the ideal PP percentage. Possibly none. Have you explored the Boglehead approach, other investing styles? If you do decide to invest in the PP I would recommend dollar cost averaging in over, say a year. I would even say to enter slowly over a 2 year period in equal amounts. The rest can be parked in a 1% FDIC money market fund for safety in the interim.

“I’ve given you a great gift, George;” said Clarence, “the chance to see what the world will be like now that QE has driven the prospective return of every risky asset class to zero.”

http://www.hussmanfunds.com/wmc/wmc150608.htm
Last edited by Reub on Mon Jun 08, 2015 8:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
MediumTex
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9096
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:47 pm
Contact:

Re: No where to hide

Post by MediumTex » Tue Jun 09, 2015 11:03 am

If 40 years of performance is what made the PP attractive to you, I wouldn't let six weeks of performance shake your confidence too badly.

Just let it do its thing.  Looking all the time is very tempting, but it's not productive.
Q: “Do you have funny shaped balloons?”
A: “Not unless round is funny.”
User avatar
MachineGhost
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 10054
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 9:31 am

Re: No where to hide

Post by MachineGhost » Tue Jun 09, 2015 11:34 am

Averaging in over three years might be prudent since that is the longest flat period.
"All generous minds have a horror of what are commonly called 'Facts'. They are the brute beasts of the intellectual domain." -- Thomas Hobbes

Disclaimer: I am not a broker, dealer, investment advisor, physician, theologian or prophet.  I should not be considered as legally permitted to render such advice!
flagator
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 23
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2015 6:29 pm

Re: No where to hide

Post by flagator » Tue Jun 09, 2015 12:11 pm

Thank you for all your responses so far. I really appreciate them.

For those who recommended gradually investing in the PP over the next year or two or three, would you suggest I book my losses now, and then ease back in?

I am already fully invested.

Moreover, I am already semi retired so to speak, so in all likelihood, I am not going to be adding any more funds in the portfolio in the foreseeable future. This makes it a bit more challenging I believe.

Again, thank you very much for your input.
Post Reply