China

Other discussions not related to the Permanent Portfolio

Moderator: Global Moderator

User avatar
MediumTex
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9096
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:47 pm
Contact:

Re: China

Post by MediumTex »

jmourik wrote: Yeah, and don't think Storm's kidding. My kid was in Shanghai last year, he's 24 now, and he was telling us about one day he was walking down the street somewhere and spotted this good looking chick in nice clothes. So he was totally, ehhm, admiring her... Then she shifted her head sideways and spit...

;D
Did she have Austin Powers teeth?

I suppose that's better that in some other developing countries where public defecation isn't frowned upon.

I knew a fellow who was in the Peace Corps and I believe he was in Madagscar.  He had recently arrived and was sitting near the beach enjoying the view when a fellow walked into his field of vision.  My friend said the first thing he thought to himself was that this man was one of the countless people he was here to help.  As he was thinking this, the man dropped his pants and took a crap on the beach.  When he was done my friend said the man sort of did one of those cat-in-the-catbox moves where you kick dirt over your droppings and walked away like it was nothing unusual.

My friend said this experience was very unsettling, and that the rest of his stay in the country inovolved many similar unpleasant surprises.

City people in places like the U.S. take many things for granted.
Q: “Do you have funny shaped balloons?”
A: “Not unless round is funny.”
TBV
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 250
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 2:20 pm

Re: China

Post by TBV »

MediumTex wrote: Is that a gigantic TV screen on the side of that building in the New China pic above?

***

If you want to talk about an Austrian School misallocation of capital, consider a situation where you have hundreds of millions of illiterate people with no social safety net in a modern economy, and rather than trying to figure out a way to bring them into the modern world you are building skyscrapers with TV screens on the side.

Storm, I liked your description of the ill-mannered farmers spitting and shoving their way through the cities.  I am picturing a grim Asian version of the Beverly Hillbillies.
The literacy rate in China is 95.9%.  Which country are you referring to?

The skyscrapers you see in the picture are in Pudong, across the Hwangpu River from Shanghai proper.  Nothing in the picture was there in 1990, as Shanghai had suffered from 40 years of under-investment and disinvestment.  The area was so forelorn that locals said even the dead didn't want to be buried there.  Today, it is the financial capital of China.  If you consider this a misallocation of capital, then perhaps so are Dallas and New York.

In the US, where 30% of all students drop out of high school, there is a place called Times Square.  It too has a TV screen planted on the side of a tall building for the amusement of passersby and foreign tourists.  Should Times Square be torn down and the money donated to indigent native Americans?

Really guys, I'm surprised at the tone of the comments here today.
Gumby
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 4012
Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 8:54 am

Re: China

Post by Gumby »

TBV wrote:
MediumTex wrote: Is that a gigantic TV screen on the side of that building in the New China pic above?

***

If you want to talk about an Austrian School misallocation of capital, consider a situation where you have hundreds of millions of illiterate people with no social safety net in a modern economy, and rather than trying to figure out a way to bring them into the modern world you are building skyscrapers with TV screens on the side.

Storm, I liked your description of the ill-mannered farmers spitting and shoving their way through the cities.  I am picturing a grim Asian version of the Beverly Hillbillies.
The literacy rate in China is 95.9%.  Which country are you referring to?

The skyscrapers you see in the picture are in Pudong, across the Hwangpu River from Shanghai proper.  Nothing in the picture was there in 1990, as Shanghai had suffered from 40 years of under-investment and disinvestment.  The area was so forelorn that locals said even the dead didn't want to be buried there.  Today, it is the financial capital of China.  If you consider this a misallocation of capital, then perhaps so are Dallas and New York.

In the US, where 30% of all students drop out of high school, there is a place called Times Square.  It too has a TV screen planted on the side of a tall building for the amusement of passersby and foreign tourists.  Should Times Square be torn down and the money donated to indigent native Americans?

Really guys, I'm surprised at the tone of the comments here today.
http://pinyin.info/news/2006/chinese-literacy/
Nothing I say should be construed as advice or expertise. I am only sharing opinions which may or may not be applicable in any given case.
TBV
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 250
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 2:20 pm

Re: China

Post by TBV »

Gumby wrote:
TBV wrote:
MediumTex wrote: Is that a gigantic TV screen on the side of that building in the New China pic above?

***

If you want to talk about an Austrian School misallocation of capital, consider a situation where you have hundreds of millions of illiterate people with no social safety net in a modern economy, and rather than trying to figure out a way to bring them into the modern world you are building skyscrapers with TV screens on the side.

Storm, I liked your description of the ill-mannered farmers spitting and shoving their way through the cities.  I am picturing a grim Asian version of the Beverly Hillbillies.
The literacy rate in China is 95.9%.  Which country are you referring to?

The skyscrapers you see in the picture are in Pudong, across the Hwangpu River from Shanghai proper.  Nothing in the picture was there in 1990, as Shanghai had suffered from 40 years of under-investment and disinvestment.  The area was so forelorn that locals said even the dead didn't want to be buried there.  Today, it is the financial capital of China.  If you consider this a misallocation of capital, then perhaps so are Dallas and New York.

In the US, where 30% of all students drop out of high school, there is a place called Times Square.  It too has a TV screen planted on the side of a tall building for the amusement of passersby and foreign tourists.  Should Times Square be torn down and the money donated to indigent native Americans?

Really guys, I'm surprised at the tone of the comments here today.
http://pinyin.info/news/2006/chinese-literacy/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_co ... eracy_rate

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Literacy_i ... ted_States
Last edited by TBV on Wed Jul 27, 2011 7:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
MediumTex
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9096
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:47 pm
Contact:

Re: China

Post by MediumTex »

TBV wrote:
MediumTex wrote: Is that a gigantic TV screen on the side of that building in the New China pic above?

***

If you want to talk about an Austrian School misallocation of capital, consider a situation where you have hundreds of millions of illiterate people with no social safety net in a modern economy, and rather than trying to figure out a way to bring them into the modern world you are building skyscrapers with TV screens on the side.

Storm, I liked your description of the ill-mannered farmers spitting and shoving their way through the cities.  I am picturing a grim Asian version of the Beverly Hillbillies.
The literacy rate in China is 95.9%.  Which country are you referring to?

The skyscrapers you see in the picture are in Pudong, across the Hwangpu River from Shanghai proper.  Nothing in the picture was there in 1990, as Shanghai had suffered from 40 years of under-investment and disinvestment.  The area was so forelorn that locals said even the dead didn't want to be buried there.  Today, it is the financial capital of China.  If you consider this a misallocation of capital, then perhaps so are Dallas and New York.

In the US, where 30% of all students drop out of high school, there is a place called Times Square.  It too has a TV screen planted on the side of a tall building for the amusement of passersby and foreign tourists.  Should Times Square be torn down and the money donated to indigent native Americans?

Really guys, I'm surprised at the tone of the comments here today.
I guess China is sort of like a political and economic Rorschach test--one person sees a vibrant emerging market poised to be a future superpower and another person sees a command economy run by a bunch of thuggish communists who don't give an oink about human rights, free political expression or loosening their grip on power, even if it means brutal repression of the mostly impoverished citizenry.

Perhaps the truth is somewhere in between.

One pattern that seems to emerge almost everywhere is that as people's economic freedom increases they begin to crave political freedom as well (which also normally includes a relatively free press).  I wonder how the communist bureaucrats will react to that when it begins to emerge on a large scale.  Their recent experience with such things does not make one confident that the process will be smooth.

All I am assuming is that the Chinese political leadership will be true to its own nature, just like I trust snakes and junkyard dogs to be true to their own natures.

Will the nature of China's authoritarian rulers change at some point in the future?  Sure, it might, and if it does I will revise my opinions as well.

As far as literacy rates go, it's great that China apparently has a lot of people who can read and write, but can they afford to live in the world that the Chinese are building in these megalopolis cities?

And what about the Chinese housing bubble?  How does anyone think that is going to work out?  Everything I hear about that market makes it sounds like it is being driven by pure speculation.

How far away does anyone think a formal Chinese renunciation of Mao is, along with some kind of truth and reconciliation efforts to identify criminals from that era?

How long until the Chinese press can cover a train wreck honestly?

Lots of work to do, IMHO.
Q: “Do you have funny shaped balloons?”
A: “Not unless round is funny.”
Gumby
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 4012
Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 8:54 am

Re: China

Post by Gumby »

TBV wrote:
Gumby wrote:
TBV wrote: The literacy rate in China is 95.9%.  Which country are you referring to?
http://pinyin.info/news/2006/chinese-literacy/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_co ... eracy_rate

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Literacy_i ... ted_States
It's been well documented (by UNESCO) that the "official" literacy statistics from China are nothing more than lies and propaganda. You can't trust official statistics from a country like China. China has a huge literacy problem. If you had read my previous link, you would have seen how China pulled it off. Here's a news report on the UNESCO report:
Chinese illiteracy a subject of world's concern
By Chen Jia (China Daily)
Updated: 2011-03-02 08:02

BEIJING - International concern has grown over the illiteracy and education inequality found in China, said a senior official of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) on Tuesday.

"Although China has maintained strong progress toward universal adult literacy, its illiterate population is still one of the biggest in the world," Tang Qian, assistant director-general for the education sector under the UNESCO, told China Daily during a forum in Beijing on Tuesday.

"China has the biggest educational system in the world and largest population among developing countries," he said. "So when China makes progress, the resulting statistics for the world are impressive."

China, when gauged according to the numbers of its citizens who are illiterate adults, ranks as the ninth worst among ten sample countries selected from around the world, according to a report released by UNESCO on Tuesday.

Around 72 percent of the illiterate adults in the world live in the ten countries, which were chosen from 128 countries, according to the report.

Across the planet, nearly 796 million adults lack basic literacy, making up about 17 percent of the world's adult population, according to the latest data from the UNESCO.

The vast majority of them live in South and West Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, although Arab states also have high levels of adult illiteracy, said the report.

"China has made rapid advances in cutting down the numbers of school drop-outs in recent years," according to Yuan Guiren, minister of education.

For example, about 80 percent of Chinese were illiterate in 1949, while the figure fell to less than 3.5 percent in 2010, he said.

"The country also has topped the world in its number of people who have received higher education, which has increased about 265 times during the past 60 years," he said.

Tang said at Tuesday's forum that "wider education inequalities between rural and urban regions are restricting opportunities in China", although this obstacle is not only present in China. Chinese experts warned that the low quality of the schooling offered in many rural areas is making it difficult for students from such places to be admitted to universities.

Only about one in five students at China's leading universities come from rural areas, according to the 21st Century Education Research Institute.

But the country has no official statistics showing how many rural students study in China's universities, a senior official of Ministry of Education said on Tuesday.

"The rapid urbanization makes it hard to count the total number of rural students studying in universities," said Li Yanli, a statistics official with the ministry.

Source: http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2011 ... 099275.htm
Nothing I say should be construed as advice or expertise. I am only sharing opinions which may or may not be applicable in any given case.
TBV
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 250
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 2:20 pm

Re: China

Post by TBV »

Gumby
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 4012
Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 8:54 am

Re: China

Post by Gumby »

TBV wrote: Gumby:

You were saying....

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/07/0 ... 91737.html
Heh. Actually... I can't say I'm surprised. But, maybe we can both agree that China does not have a 95% literacy rate. Their illiteracy is a very big, and well documented, problem.
Nothing I say should be construed as advice or expertise. I am only sharing opinions which may or may not be applicable in any given case.
User avatar
Lone Wolf
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1416
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2010 11:15 pm

Re: China

Post by Lone Wolf »

I'm enjoying getting all the different perspectives here.  Really interesting stuff, all.

China has got so much going for it (a huge, brilliant, hard-working populace with a high savings rate) and yet so very much going against it (a corrupt regime with a fetish for central planning and really big GDP numbers with interests totally misaligned with those of the citizens.)
MediumTex wrote: I suppose that's better that in some other developing countries where public defecation isn't frowned upon.
Wow, you're not kidding.  Nothing would put a dampener on "love at first sight" like having the "dream girl" you were admiring suddenly squat down and deposit a steamer at your feet.
User avatar
MediumTex
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9096
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:47 pm
Contact:

Re: China

Post by MediumTex »

Although I assumed that China had a large illiterate population just because Third World rural peasant populations normally have a high rate of illiteeracy, I am willing to accept that this population may have a high literacy rate.

Even if they can read and write, however, as a group they are still poor and lacking in skills to make a living in an industrialized urban environment.  It seems to me that the migration of this population to the cities just means that there will be enormous urban slums, just like the westeren world saw when we first began industrializing over a hundred years ago.

Why will it be different there?  Will there not be the normal menu of human rights abuses associated with urbanization and industrialization in a Third World country?  Child labor abuses, no workplace safety requirements, no wage and hours laws, no social safety net, etc.  I think the story last year of the suicides at the facility where Apple products are manufactured is symbolic of a lot of the issues I am describing.

I may be wrong, though.  China may be building the workers' paradise that the communists have been promising us for the last hundred years.
Q: “Do you have funny shaped balloons?”
A: “Not unless round is funny.”
User avatar
MediumTex
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9096
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:47 pm
Contact:

Re: China

Post by MediumTex »

Lone Wolf wrote:
MediumTex wrote: I suppose that's better that in some other developing countries where public defecation isn't frowned upon.
Wow, you're not kidding.  Nothing would put a dampener on "love at first sight" like having the "dream girl" you were admiring suddenly squat down and deposit a steamer at your feet.
And from her perspective, the kind of western men such an act would attract might not turn out to be the perfect mates, either.

This calls for a haiku:

Love was in the air
She squatted and pinched a loaf
Stink replaced the love
Last edited by MediumTex on Wed Jul 27, 2011 8:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Q: “Do you have funny shaped balloons?”
A: “Not unless round is funny.”
TBV
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 250
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 2:20 pm

Re: China

Post by TBV »

MediumTex wrote: Although I assumed that China had a large illiterate population just because Third World rural peasant populations normally have a high rate of illiteeracy, I am willing to accept that this population may have a high literacy rate.

Even if they can read and write, however, as a group they are still poor and lacking in skills to make a living in an industrialized urban environment.  It seems to me that the migration of this population to the cities just means that there will be enormous urban slums, just like the westeren world saw when we first began industrializing over a hundred years ago.

Why will it be different there?  Will there not be the normal menu of human rights abuses associated with urbanization and industrialization in a Third World country?  Child labor abuses, no workplace safety requirements, no wage and hours laws, no social safety net, etc.  I think the story last year of the suicides at the facility where Apple products are manufactured is symbolic of a lot of the issues I am describing.

I may be wrong, though.  China may be building the workers' paradise that the communists have been promising us for the last hundred years.
It's meaningless to describe 1.3 billion people as being anything in particular.  Just as it's meaningless to lump American Rhodes scholars in with clueless dropouts, and call the result average.  Whatever you can conjure up (good or bad), China probably has it.  Do they have underemployed urban dwellers who find it hard to make the cut in a modern society?  Yes.  Do they have as many, and all in one place, as Detroit does?  Frankly, no.  Are there labor abuses?  Of course.  Do they have criminal gangs pimping out hijacked immigrants like we do?  Not so much.  Does their political class piss off many Chinese in a myriad of ways? Indeed.  Don't look now, but so does ours.  

But let's recall, a hundred years of Jim Crow politics didn't stop America from becoming a World power.  Nor did Appalachian poverty stop the rest of the country from building the world's foremost consumer society.  Why should it be any different with China?  They have or will soon have more of everything than we do, be it engineers, doctors, architects, computer scientists or skilled workers who can actually do math.  That should give us pause.  Not because of some starry-eyed political euphoria for Maoism. But because we should be prepared to face stiff competition.
Last edited by TBV on Wed Jul 27, 2011 9:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
MediumTex
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9096
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:47 pm
Contact:

Re: China

Post by MediumTex »

TBV wrote: But let's recall, a hundred years of Jim Crow politics didn't stop America from becoming a World power.  Nor did Appalachian poverty stop the rest of the country from building the world's foremost consumer society.  Why should it be any different with China?
Because to date no communist government has ever presided over a society in which anything like a consumer society emerged. 

Democracy has the flexibility to adapt to changes in the culture and values of the people it governs.  Authoritarian governments normally do not have this capability.  The U.S. overcame human rights abuses and inequality through a dynamic political system.  If there had been a Chinese-style government in place here, African-Americans would probably be enjoying a Tibet-like existence today and the firehoses and dogs from the 1960s would have been Tiananmen Square-style gunfire followed by media blackouts as the bodies were collected and dumped at an undisclosed location.

When it comes to China, they say you either get it or you don't.  I don't get it.
They have or will soon have more of everything than we do, be it engineers, doctors, architects, computer scientists or skilled workers who can actually do math.  That should give us pause.
They don't have more political freedom and human rights than we do.  The process of wresting these things from the hands of an oppressive government normally involves violence and bloodshed.  Why will it be different this time?

They also don't have more Thomas Jeffersons and George Washingtons than we do.  This may change at some point in the future, though, and perhaps their society will have the opportunity to "water the tree of liberty" with the blood of communist tyrants.

China is a nation that deseves better leadership than it has.  The idea that a group of communist thugs could lead a nation like China to any kind of real national greatness just seems patently absurd.
Q: “Do you have funny shaped balloons?”
A: “Not unless round is funny.”
User avatar
Lone Wolf
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1416
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2010 11:15 pm

Re: China

Post by Lone Wolf »

MediumTex wrote: This calls for a haiku:

Love was in the air
She squatted and pinched a loaf
Stink replaced the love
Ha!

How are you not making bank writing romance novels?
User avatar
MediumTex
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9096
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:47 pm
Contact:

Re: China

Post by MediumTex »

Lone Wolf wrote:
MediumTex wrote: This calls for a haiku:

Love was in the air
She squatted and pinched a loaf
Stink replaced the love
Ha!

How are you not making bank writing romance novels?
I'm working on my first book right now.

It's called "Stinky Shanghai Nights."
Q: “Do you have funny shaped balloons?”
A: “Not unless round is funny.”
TBV
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 250
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 2:20 pm

Re: China

Post by TBV »

MediumTex wrote:
TBV wrote: But let's recall, a hundred years of Jim Crow politics didn't stop America from becoming a World power.  Nor did Appalachian poverty stop the rest of the country from building the world's foremost consumer society.  Why should it be any different with China?
Because to date no communist government has ever presided over a society in which anything like a consumer society emerged.  

Democracy has the flexibility to adapt to changes in the culture and values of the people it governs.  Authoritarian governments normally do not have this capability.  The U.S. overcame human rights abuses and inequality through a dynamic political system.  If there had been a Chinese-style government in place here, African-Americans would probably be enjoying a Tibet-like existence today and the firehoses and dogs from the 1960s would have been Tiananmen Square-style gunfire followed by media blackouts as the bodies were collected and dumped at an undisclosed location.

When it comes to China, they say you either get it or you don't.  I don't get it.
They have or will soon have more of everything than we do, be it engineers, doctors, architects, computer scientists or skilled workers who can actually do math.  That should give us pause.
They don't have more political freedom and human rights than we do.  The process of wresting these things from the hands of an oppressive government normally involves violence and bloodshed.  Why will it be different this time?

They also don't have more Thomas Jeffersons and George Washingtons than we do.  This may change at some point in the future, though, and perhaps their society will have the opportunity to "water the tree of liberty" with the blood of communist tyrants.

China is a nation that deseves better leadership than it has.  The idea that a group of communist thugs could lead a nation like China to any kind of real national greatness just seems patently absurd.
Is it still the 4th of July?  If not, I want you leading the parade next year.

I'm proud of what our country has accomplished.  But if it's OK to have taken 100 years to get from Reconstruction to the New South, then who knows what may transpire in China over a similar time frame?  As a student of politics, I'm also aware that our democratic political values (beloved as they are to us all) are not essential to build long-lived societies with extensive economic, cultural and military influence.  Macedonia, Rome, the Mongols, Imperial China (to name a few) are examples of world-conquering states that utterly lacked those qualities. As did, for all intents and purposes, the great European maritime states.  In the 20th century, we were hard-pressed to overcome powers whose values were antithetical to our own. You'd think we'd have learned by now.  It's unwise to underestimate the capabilities of others.
Last edited by TBV on Wed Jul 27, 2011 10:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Storm
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1652
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:04 pm

Re: China

Post by Storm »

TBV wrote: Storm:

China and Taiwan are very interesting indeed and it's a credit to you that you're trying to understand them. As someone who's traveled there many times over the past 30 years, let me add a few points:

1) A single family home is rarer than hen's teeth in Asia, especially so in China.  So, virtually all homes there strike Americans as being "centrally planned apartment buildings."  Truth is, even where there is far less central planning (like in Taiwan or Korea) homes are built more or less the same way.

2) You are not the first to notice the social differences between peasant migrants to urban centers and native urbanites.  This is fodder for much discussion and humor in China.  However, former peasants have usually not cashed in on the sale of "their land"  because it was never theirs to sell.  Farmland in China has been collectively owned either directly by the state or by communes.  Many communes have invested in factories, or allowed members to lease their share of land to neighbors, or they've imported migrant laborers from poorer provinces to actually do the farming. This has enabled many former peasants to seek their fortune in the big city, as urban workers or small-scale entrepreneurs, but not as Beverly Hillbilly style tycoons.  In Taiwan, on the other hand, where farmland was owned by the farmers, many have cashed in big time. In China, those unlucky to have farmed on state land can fare far worse if local officials choose to redevelop.

3)  If you think air pollution in Beijing is bad now, you should have been there six or seven years ago (not to mention Taipei or Kaohsiung in the early 80's.**)  The government has actually done wonders shutting down old factories and power plants in the Beijing area, but the explosion of the car culture has cut into many of the visible gains.  To be honest, many parts of China are overcast to begin with.  Even worse, in the spring, the northeast is hit with the dreaded yellow sand dust storms that travel from Mongolia all the way to central South Korea. So, like in LA, air quality is bad, but some of the causes are "natural."  [**Wiping one's nose in Taipei back then would get you a handkerchief full of soot!!]

4) The use of regulatory schemes to leverage political power and encourage "donations" to officeholders is well known.  In China, the politically connected gain access to favors via what is called the "back door", through which they and their "outside money" or "wai kwai" reach the decision  makers.  Here, the process of exchanging political contributions for favors is currently known as "granting waivers."

5) There is no one, "real China."  The Chinese middle class is every bit as real as the rest of the country.  Last year, the government's National Bureau of Statistics reported that 25% of the population was middle class.  That's close to 325 million. Their footprint is no Potemkin village mirage, since a "big city" experience can be found all over China, from Lanzhou, Chongqing and Wulumuqi in the west to Xiamen, Dalian and Shenzhen in the east.  Are there stark differences between locales?  Sure.  Just as there are between Rodeo Drive and South Central LA.

6) The proximity of big development projects to old neighborhoods is typical of China, but come back in a year or two and those old neighborhoods will be gone.  The process is especially far along in Beijing where the traditional hutong neighborhoods with four-sided walled compounds are an endangered species.  The outcry was such that the government built phony old-style developments, complete with fiber optic infrastructure.  Two year's ago, we visited a store in a city in the far west.  When we returned one week later to shop some more, the store and the entire city block had been emptied and cordoned off for demolition.  The US hasn't been able to match that since the days of New York's Robert Moses (or pre-2008 Las Vegas.).

7) People displaced by urban renewal are usually given new apartments in the suburbs at discounted prices.  This is common because home ownership does not involve ownership of the land.  It's also common for apartment blocks to get knocked down every 20 years or so, though with the rise of market-rate condo projects it may become too expensive to continue doing that.

BTW:  The "real China" street scene in Shanghai shown above reminds me of a back street near the Xujiahui area of Shanghai (an upscale shopping district.)  We could get free breakfast every day in our hotel, but we never ate it.  Instead, we'd go down the street to get steamed buns and Chinese fried donuts from the corner stand. Yummy.  Stuff like that is more common in Shanghai than Beijing where traditional morning street vendors have been driven from the main streets.  I hope that such scenes are not supposed to elicit a negative reaction.  If so, then there's no point in visiting the famous Shihlin night market in Taiwan, or the massive Jukdo Market in Pohang South Korea, or Maunakea Market in Honolulu, or the Temple Street Market in Hong Kong. Crowded street markets are a delight to Asians of all backgrounds, and much sought after.
TBV,

I truly hope I didn't offend with some of my descriptions of China.  I'm a tourist that doesn't speak the language, although my wife is native Taiwanese who translates very well for me, and allows me to see parts of China and Taiwan that most foreigners might miss.

I have to agree with you about the night markets and food in particular.  I hope you didn't think I was denigrating the real China vs. the New China.  Personally, I like the real China (and Taipei night markets as well) much more than the fake western malls and department stores that have popped up in their place.  When we were in Taipei I could go to the street vendors and get an awesome breakfast of scallion pancakes with egg, Tofu-wah (or Doh-wah as the Taiwanese call it), and rice milk for under $100 NTD which is the equivalent of about $3 USD.  This was way better tasting and healthier for me than anything I could find at McDonalds or some other western restaurant.

What I find offensive is that China is aggressively bulldozing the real China to make it more like America.  Sooner or later China will be completely strip malls with all the western stores and a good part of what makes it unique will be gone.

I have to say that I found a distinct difference between Taiwan and China that probably didn't come across in my post.  Regarding pollution, I think Taiwan is much cleaner now.  They have the problem of millions of motorized scooters that pollute the air, but they don't have the industrial pollution that China has, or the car pollution to the extent that China does.  Also, in general, I found that the Taiwanese people were cleaner than Chinese in the sense that they had more manners (less smoking in public places like hotels and restaurants) and were more courteous in general.

The "new China" pic I posted is from Shanghai, the financial district, as you mentioned.  The "real China" pic I posted is actually from Xi'an near the Muslim district.  It is truly a unique place.  I wish I would have taken pictures of the hotel we came from, because it was really unique how you could be on what looked like western streets with cars and traffic lights one minute, and go down an alley and instantly be in a city from 1000 years ago the next minute.  Unfortunately I mostly took pictures of temples and other historical monuments and artifacts.

I found it truly remarkable that in Xi'an was also where we saw the most construction on new apartment buildings.  In one case they were actually building 2 new apartment buildings within a few hundred meters of a coal burning power plant.  You literally would have smokestacks billowing smoke right outside your window.  Would anyone willingly live in such a place?
"I came here for financial advice, but I've ended up with a bunch of shave soaps and apparently am about to start eating sardines.  Not that I'm complaining, of course." -ZedThou
User avatar
MediumTex
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9096
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:47 pm
Contact:

Re: China

Post by MediumTex »

TBV wrote: Is it still the 4th of July?  If not, I want you leading the parade next year.

I'm proud of what our country has accomplished.  But if it's OK to have taken 100 years to get from Reconstruction to the New South, then who knows what may transpire in China over a similar time frame?  As a student of politics, I'm also aware that our democratic political values (beloved as they are to us all) are not essential to build long-lived societies with extensive economic, cultural and military influence.  Macedonia, Rome, the Mongols, Imperial China (to name a few) are examples of world-conquering states that utterly lacked those qualities. As did, for all intents and purposes, the great European maritime states.  In the 20th century, we were hard-pressed to overcome powers whose values were antithetical to our own. You'd think we'd have learned by now.  It's unwise to underestimate the capabilities of others.
I have no doubt that China will be a great nation one day, but it's tragic to think about how this coud have happened decades ago if Mao hadn't taken the country through a national soul-sucking communist experiment.

Modern China reminds me of a brand new PC running the orignal DOS operating system, and anyone who tries to upgrade the software gets shot.

***

I forgot to mention in my earlier posts the matter of religious persecution in China.  That's not going to end well for the political authorities.  History suggests that when politics tries to suppress religion, religion frequently prevails (normally after a lot of people get killed).  IMHO, a smart politician lets people practice their religion--from a purely Machiavellian perspective, it's just not a fight worth picking.

Also, who do you think today's China will fight its first war against (assuming it's not a civil war)?  I can see China and Russia getting into a scrap over something. 
 
Q: “Do you have funny shaped balloons?”
A: “Not unless round is funny.”
TBV
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 250
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 2:20 pm

Re: China

Post by TBV »

Storm wrote:
TBV,

I truly hope I didn't offend with some of my descriptions of China.  I'm a tourist that doesn't speak the language, although my wife is native Taiwanese who translates very well for me, and allows me to see parts of China and Taiwan that most foreigners might miss.

I have to agree with you about the night markets and food in particular.  I hope you didn't think I was denigrating the real China vs. the New China.  Personally, I like the real China (and Taipei night markets as well) much more than the fake western malls and department stores that have popped up in their place.  When we were in Taipei I could go to the street vendors and get an awesome breakfast of scallion pancakes with egg, Tofu-wah (or Doh-wah as the Taiwanese call it), and rice milk for under $100 NTD which is the equivalent of about $3 USD.  This was way better tasting and healthier for me than anything I could find at McDonalds or some other western restaurant.

What I find offensive is that China is aggressively bulldozing the real China to make it more like America.  Sooner or later China will be completely strip malls with all the western stores and a good part of what makes it unique will be gone.

I have to say that I found a distinct difference between Taiwan and China that probably didn't come across in my post.  Regarding pollution, I think Taiwan is much cleaner now.  They have the problem of millions of motorized scooters that pollute the air, but they don't have the industrial pollution that China has, or the car pollution to the extent that China does.  Also, in general, I found that the Taiwanese people were cleaner than Chinese in the sense that they had more manners (less smoking in public places like hotels and restaurants) and were more courteous in general.

The "new China" pic I posted is from Shanghai, the financial district, as you mentioned.  The "real China" pic I posted is actually from Xi'an near the Muslim district.  It is truly a unique place.  I wish I would have taken pictures of the hotel we came from, because it was really unique how you could be on what looked like western streets with cars and traffic lights one minute, and go down an alley and instantly be in a city from 1000 years ago the next minute.  Unfortunately I mostly took pictures of temples and other historical monuments and artifacts.

I found it truly remarkable that in Xi'an was also where we saw the most construction on new apartment buildings.  In one case they were actually building 2 new apartment buildings within a few hundred meters of a coal burning power plant.  You literally would have smokestacks billowing smoke right outside your window.  Would anyone willingly live in such a place?
No offense taken. In many ways, there's nothing more laughable than two Americans trying to "explain" China.  Anyway, your observations are still very engaging.  Xi'an is quite a town and I'm familiar with the Hui minority part of town that you describe.  As the former capital of China, and home to China's own Silicon Valley, Xi'an has a lot to offer.  Your comment about zoning is telling.  Taiwan used to be the same way.  You could live in an apartment and the guy next door might be running an export-import firm, or a chemicals factory.  You never quite knew.  That bit of economic freedom did, however, spark a torrent of home-based enterprises that helped lift a capital-deprived country out of poverty.  

Long live Taiwan street food! And don't forget the fresh-baked bread, fruit and lamb BBQ in Xinjiang.  The final day of my last trip to China, I spent an hour walking around Beijing streets, alleys and apartment block courtyards in search of egg sandwiches (like jianbing) and bean milk.  One Egg McMuffin at Mickey D's (30 RMB). Two egg sandwiches and two bean milks on the street (4 RMB).  Gotta love it.  Years ago, the morning streets were full of guys cooking pancakes and dumplings, cutting hair, or whatever.  They all had to be gone by 7 AM, however, to make room for the rush hour traffic (which meant bicycles for the most part.) How times have changed.  Ditto for Taipei's Railway Station area.  It used to bustle with pedestrian traffic and street hawkers, but now has been gentrified with underground malls and such.  Oh well.
User avatar
MediumTex
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9096
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:47 pm
Contact:

Re: China

Post by MediumTex »

TBV,

What has been the occasion for your travel to China and Taiwan?

You're talking about it like it's routine.
Q: “Do you have funny shaped balloons?”
A: “Not unless round is funny.”
User avatar
smurff
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 981
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 2:17 am

Re: China

Post by smurff »

Storm wrote: While we were in China, we marveled at their new high speed railway that was just completed between Beijing and Shanghai.  You can now travel by train in less than 6 hours between these two large cities.  The trip used to take 27 hours.  Then, during our visit, I heard the news that 2 trains collided on the track.  There is an official death toll of 39 people, however the actual death toll is believed to be much higher.  Over 200 people were injured.  The government promptly buried the train cars at the crash site, rather than perform a thorough investigation of the causes of the crash.  They claimed burying the cars was necessary for "national security reasons, to protect the technology in the cars from foreign spies."

We also heard about 3 bridges that collapsed in the last month due to substandard construction.  The official government reason they collapsed is that there was "too much traffic."
Storm, I laughed when I read that; it reminded me of one of my favorite shows--the kind where you laugh out loud at the preposterousness of it all, yet wonder at the same time.  Since one doesn't have time to do one's own research into these things, it just leaves a dangling hole in the curtain of reality.

It's a series that's occasionally shown on The History Channel, Ancient Aliens.  It's a controversial series, where various theorists (including some legit scientists) go the next step and ask what aliens did when they got here thousands of years ago.  The show that comes on Thursday afternoon (28 July, 13:00 or 1:00 PM EDT), "Alien Devastations,"  is about (according to the Verizon FiOS program guide) "...aliens caused some of history's natural disasters."  The point of the series is that aliens visited eons ago for a variety of reasons, "interacted" with humanoids, and gave the resulting human species (who over the ages have regarded them as "gods") many things, including what we would today think of as "technology."    Whenever a human group gets their hands on a new technology from the aliens, they hoard it, guard it with the highest secrecy, and use it to fight other human groups--the Nazis during WWII with nuclear technology are a favorite example the theorists use, but there are others, like stealth technology, artificial intelligence, robotics, you name it.

So the Chinese buried the damaged rail cars?  What possible technology can they have that's so secret that they have to bury damaged pieces of a train rather than take them apart to see what caused the accident in the first place?  Or to learn how to prevent similar accidents in the future?

Maybe aliens gave them the technology, and they feel the need to hide that fact.  :D

Just kidding. ;)
User avatar
MediumTex
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9096
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:47 pm
Contact:

Re: China

Post by MediumTex »

smurff wrote: The point of the series is that aliens visited eons ago for a variety of reasons, "interacted" with humanoids, and gave the resulting human species (who over the ages have regarded them as "gods") many things, including what we would today think of as "technology."    Whenever a human group gets their hands on a new technology from the aliens, they hoard it, guard it with the highest secrecy, and use it to fight other human groups--the Nazis during WWII with nuclear technology are a favorite example the theorists use, but there are others, like stealth technology, artificial intelligence, robotics, you name it.
The story I always heard was that a long time ago the aliens came down and had relations with the monkeys and human beings were the resulting species.

The reason they keep coming back is to check on their creation, and we are also fascinated by these creatures with whom we feel a strange bond.

That's why we don't have that much body hair (aliens are smooth, right?) and we have a persistent longing for a thing we cannot name.
Q: “Do you have funny shaped balloons?”
A: “Not unless round is funny.”
User avatar
smurff
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 981
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 2:17 am

Re: China

Post by smurff »

TBV wrote: Years ago, the morning streets were full of guys cooking pancakes and dumplings, cutting hair, or whatever.  They all had to be gone by 7 AM, however, to make room for the rush hour traffic (which meant bicycles for the most part.) How times have changed.  Ditto for Taipei's Railway Station area.  It used to bustle with pedestrian traffic and street hawkers, but now has been gentrified with underground malls and such.  Oh well.
Sounds like Grand Central Terminal in NYC.  Over the past decade it's been gentrified and transformed into a mall with a commuter train station attached.  They're even  converting part of the Main Hall into an Apple Store: 

http://www.brandchannel.com/home/post/2 ... Shack.aspx

I like Apple (I'm using one as I write this), but... Oh well.
Gumby
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 4012
Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 8:54 am

Re: China

Post by Gumby »

smurff wrote:What possible technology can they have that's so secret that they have to bury damaged pieces of a train rather than take them apart to see what caused the accident in the first place?  Or to learn how to prevent similar accidents in the future?
Super secret technology that's so important, they realized they needed to dig the train out again!

http://mdn.mainichi.jp/mdnnews/news/201 ... 1000c.html

Maybe they forgot their keys to the other trains?
Last edited by Gumby on Wed Jul 27, 2011 11:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Nothing I say should be construed as advice or expertise. I am only sharing opinions which may or may not be applicable in any given case.
TBV
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 250
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 2:20 pm

Re: China

Post by TBV »

MediumTex wrote:
TBV wrote: Is it still the 4th of July?  If not, I want you leading the parade next year.

I'm proud of what our country has accomplished.  But if it's OK to have taken 100 years to get from Reconstruction to the New South, then who knows what may transpire in China over a similar time frame?  As a student of politics, I'm also aware that our democratic political values (beloved as they are to us all) are not essential to build long-lived societies with extensive economic, cultural and military influence.  Macedonia, Rome, the Mongols, Imperial China (to name a few) are examples of world-conquering states that utterly lacked those qualities. As did, for all intents and purposes, the great European maritime states.  In the 20th century, we were hard-pressed to overcome powers whose values were antithetical to our own. You'd think we'd have learned by now.  It's unwise to underestimate the capabilities of others.
I have no doubt that China will be a great nation one day, but it's tragic to think about how this coud have happened decades ago if Mao hadn't taken the country through a national soul-sucking communist experiment.

Modern China reminds me of a brand new PC running the orignal DOS operating system, and anyone who tries to upgrade the software gets shot.

***

I forgot to mention in my earlier posts the matter of religious persecution in China.  That's not going to end well for the political authorities.  History suggests that when politics tries to suppress religion, religion frequently prevails (normally after a lot of people get killed).  IMHO, a smart politician lets people practice their religion--from a purely Machiavellian perspective, it's just not a fight worth picking.

Also, who do you think today's China will fight its first war against (assuming it's not a civil war)?  I can see China and Russia getting into a scrap over something.  
More than a little truth in what you say.  On the matter of religion, you'd be surprised. Unlike the US, the Chinese government actually helps support construction and rehabilitation of religious buildings, shrines, etc. What??? Actually, yes.  Forty years ago, Red Guards were tearing them down.  Now they've reversed the process.  It's not the existence of religion per se that's the issue, it's whether it's controlled by the relevant government organizations that matters.  Go outside the prescribed channels, especially in a public way like Falun Dafa, or Catholic home-church pilgrimages, and things can go very badly.  Otherwise, things can appear quite normal.  On the matter of war, I'll follow the PP mantra: who knows?, but expect the unexpected.  China is like the US coming out of the 19th century.  Having united the country, spanned the continent with a transportation grid, and become the world's #1 manufacturing country, we turned our attention outward.  The US built the "Great White Fleet" and the Panama Canal, engaged in Dollar Diplomacy, and embarked on military incursions into several neighboring states.  Why?  Go back and read what we said the reasons were.  They may sound remarkably current, only it might be China saying them this time around.  Then again, maybe not.

Finally, if you haven't gone to China yet, do.  Not just the usual Beijing, Shanghai, Xi'an run (which are still must-sees) but also places like Wulumuqi (Urumqi), Dalian, Qingdao, Chongqing and Shenzhen.  It's a big country and the stuff we hear about is happening all over, not just in Beijing or Shanghai.  No matter how you feel about what you see, you'll learn a lot.  But only if you feel others can teach you a thing or two.
Last edited by TBV on Thu Jul 28, 2011 8:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
Post Reply