The U.S. Military: Like the French at Agincourt?

Other discussions not related to the Permanent Portfolio

Moderator: Global Moderator

Post Reply
User avatar
Ad Orientem
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 3483
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2011 2:47 pm
Location: Florida USA
Contact:

The U.S. Military: Like the French at Agincourt?

Post by Ad Orientem »

America risks a catastrophic defeat if it doesn’t radically change the way it thinks about war.

Early on a Sunday morning in 1932, a fleet of some 150 fighters, dive-bombers and torpedo planes struck the naval base at Pearl Harbor. The ships lying at anchor on Battleship Row sustained direct hits. Also hit were the base’s fuel storage tanks and the Army Air Corps planes parked nearby at Hickam Field.

The surprise was as complete as it was devastating. Only this was an Army-Navy war game, the attackers were American pilots operating from the carriers Saratoga and Lexington, and the bombs they dropped were sacks of flour.

The lesson of “Grand Joint Exercise 4,” as it was called, is that forewarned is not always forearmed. It took the actual sinking of much of the U.S. battle fleet nearly a decade later to bring the lesson home to U.S. military planners that the age of the carrier had arrived.

Fast forward to 2006, when a small Chinese diesel-electric submarine surfaced well within torpedo-firing range from the 80,000-ton Kitty Hawk, having gone undetected by the carrier and her escorts. That incident ought to have been a loud wake-up call to the Navy that the age of the super-carrier is drawing to a close just as surely as the age of the battleship was coming to an end by the 1930s.


Read the rest here...
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/25/opin ... e=Homepage
jacksonM
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 364
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2018 1:59 pm

Re: The U.S. Military: Like the French at Agincourt?

Post by jacksonM »

Ad Orientem wrote: Thu Apr 25, 2019 12:10 pm
Read the rest here...
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/25/opin ... e=Homepage
Unfortunately this is behind a paywall. What does the author suggest replacing the air craft carriers with?
User avatar
Ad Orientem
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 3483
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2011 2:47 pm
Location: Florida USA
Contact:

Re: The U.S. Military: Like the French at Agincourt?

Post by Ad Orientem »

jacksonM wrote: Thu Apr 25, 2019 1:55 pm
Ad Orientem wrote: Thu Apr 25, 2019 12:10 pm
Read the rest here...
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/25/opin ... e=Homepage
Unfortunately this is behind a paywall. What does the author suggest replacing the air craft carriers with?
You can usually bypass the paywall by opening it in a private browsing window.
User avatar
Kriegsspiel
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 4052
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 5:28 pm

Re: The U.S. Military: Like the French at Agincourt?

Post by Kriegsspiel »

jacksonM wrote: Thu Apr 25, 2019 1:55 pm
Ad Orientem wrote: Thu Apr 25, 2019 12:10 pm
Read the rest here...
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/25/opin ... e=Homepage
Unfortunately this is behind a paywall. What does the author suggest replacing the air craft carriers with?
“Put simply,” Brose writes, “U.S. rivals are fielding large quantities of multimillion-dollar weapons to destroy the United States’ multibillion-dollar military systems.”
It make sense that Asians (and Russians, to be honest) would be inspired by a Zerg Rush.
That’s a recipe for strategic failure on budgetary grounds alone. The coming of technologies like hypersonic propulsion, space-based weapons and quantum sensors (able to detect minute disruptions of air or water) makes it a recipe for rapid military defeat as well — at least if nothing changes.

The answer, Brose argues, is to radically increase the numbers of military platforms, lower their costs, and — within ethical limits — enhance their autonomy. This puts fewer war fighters in harm’s way, creates more (and more difficult) targets for an enemy to track, and makes the loss of any one of them far easier to bear. Right now the Navy is straining to reach a target of 355 ships. It should be aiming for a significantly higher number, much of it unmanned.
Youtube link was in the article.
You there, Ephialtes. May you live forever.
Post Reply