Cortopassi wrote: ↑Wed Sep 26, 2018 3:11 pm
As I noted in the post that started this topic, I knew a college guy who was also a mean drunk. And one time, very specifically, he and other friends were out drinking while I went to bed early (in the dorm). Sometime later that night, the door opens to laughter and something is dumped into his bed below mine. Very nearsighted, I tried to find my glasses and my eyes took in a passed out, completely naked college girl in the bed.
I have no idea what happened to her before or after. I do not recall who she was or how she got out of the room.
But I have firsthand experience with guys who are straight as a fucking arrow sober, and do weird, bad shit when they are drunk.
Why would you say that bad shit happened? More to the story?
So now there are three. What if in a week there are a few more, and by that point they've voted him onto the court? What then? Will these politicians turn around and impeach him?
Is there a critical mass of women that change this from a vast left wing conspiracy to oh shit, maybe he did do these things?
Just asking.
My opinion is that (if we assume the worst about all the incidents) if they wanted justice, they should have accused him right after it happened, when there was (presumably) evidence, when people had fresh memories, and when the justice system had a chance in hell of getting a rapist off the streets. I get that it can be tough for victims of sex crimes to do that, but it's necessary and moral.
I think that the #metoo trend has prepared the battlefield enough so that if you get enough women to accuse, you can bring about whatever you want. So yea, I think it's plausible that if women keep accusing him, the politicians will try, try again. Maybe one party begins asking the other which judge will be acceptable so as to avoid a Mutually Assured 'Metoo-Madness-Activated Recollection/Yarn, or MAMMARY for short.
You really didn't need more than one, provided she could prove it.