stuper1 wrote:The Putin analogies are funny to me. I know, I know, he's a tyrannical autocrat who supposedly has had a bunch of people bumped off, etc., etc. But does anyone stop to think about where all of that information came from? Yeah, from the establishment media, which I for one am firmly convinced is solidly controlled by the military-industrial complex who likes nothing better than to create bogeymen, so that the US government will give them billions of more dollars, of which some small percentage of course will go back to the politicians who gave them the money in the first place.
All I'm saying is "don't believe everything you read, even if it comes from CNN or Reuters or whatever". Of course, everybody here knows that already, but I don't know, it seems like it gets forgotten amidst mushy, feel-good desires.
I think for the most part Putin wants what is best for Russia. I think for the most part Trump wants what is best for America. Those two things don't necessarily have to be at odds with each other. We really aren't that different culturally believe it or not. Of course, Putin and Trump wouldn't mind if a few extra million/billion dollars end up in their own pockets also, but that's pretty much how politics is.
Perhaps Putin IS a murderous autocrat AND the perma-war state & media are simply using this specific instance (as they have numerous times in the past) of authoritarian tendencies to build distrust of him as compared to other murderous autocrats we fully support, quietly (well, I don't consider Trump's glowing orb meeting with the Saudi's particularly "quiet" but you get my drift).
I agree that there seems to be a weird connection between the media and the perma-war surveillance state & industry, and this is something I think should be highlighted to no end, but do you really think Trump in any material way is a threat to that? To me, it's clear that he's just a fan of what he sees as a "smarter" brand of brutal imperialism. His calls for non-intervention have always been in the context that it's just dumb, rather than illegal or immoral. He's made it perfectly clear he has no qualms with bombing the sh!t out of anyone if he can see that "we" benefit from it. He has no problems with the police or spy state. None.
If you really have a concern that "the media" is an arm of the M-I complex, I really don't see how you can see Trump as anything but a cog in that machine, with "the media" happy to heir his idiocy for profit on news channels while people die, and Trump happy to distract us with Tweets while either bumbling around aimlessly while the careerists do their work or helping them do their work (depending on how intelligently/active you think he is in strategy/planning/policy).
- He's continuing support of Saudi genocide in Yemen.
- He's continuing the war in Afghanistan.
- He's got Mike Pompeo as head of the CIA.
- He's got James Mattis as head of the DoD (not a terrible pick but no anti-establishment dove)
- Our military is increasingly getting engaged in Africa in ways we don't know about
- The Saudi's, who supposedly had a lot to do with 9/11 that we were going to shine a light on, are now having glowing orb parties with Trump happy to attend.
Where's the anti-establishment candidate? Just please ignore the MSM "coverage" for a second (as I mostly do) and just look at his administration and tell me where he's anything but a bombastic-yet-establishment Republican? The only anti-establishment opinions I can see that he seems to actually hold are immigration and trade-deals.