I'm in the same boat as you, Mark.Mark Leavy wrote: Not that I won't try and exploit a few tax loopholes now and then when I find them, but... if my spreadsheet says "More options with cash in the bank" vs. "Better Tax treatment with 401K", then I sit up a few nights and figure out which is better for *ME* - assuming that whatever legislation that is currently active is temporal.
Tax-deferred retirement accounts are designed to benefit the very specific goal of saving money to retire on when you hit 60+. Sure you can access money before that if you jump through a few narrow hoops, but in general they're not designed with that purpose in mind. The primary goal is to help the average person 1) save more than zero for retirement, and 2) hopefully forget about that money so they don't touch it too soon.
A while back I decided that waiting until 60 to retire was a life assumption I was ready to challenge. I wanted to do it before 40 and met my goal with a few years to spare. Well, someone in my situation has a very different viewpoint of the benefits of tax-deferred savings versus liquid money I can spend today. I made a conscious decision as I was accumulating to not necessarily max out my tax-deferred savings, and instead focused on maintaining a set percentage of my net worth in taxable vs. tax-deferred. It's all about not putting all of your eggs into one basket with a lock on it.
Now I fully admit I'm an outlier. I just wanted to point out that tax savings is not necessarily the only thing you can optimize for and sometimes a bit of balance is helpful.