Trump as tragicomedy
Moderator: Global Moderator
- dualstow
- Executive Member
- Posts: 14232
- Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
- Location: synagogue of Satan
- Contact:
Re: Trump as tragicomedy
Thank you, Vintaneer. Figure of speech. I’ll just take melatonin.
Sam Bankman-Fried sentenced to 25 years
-
- Executive Member
- Posts: 5994
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
- Cortopassi
- Executive Member
- Posts: 3338
- Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2014 2:28 pm
- Location: https://www.jwst.nasa.gov/content/webbL ... sWebb.html
Re: Trump as tragicomedy
Imagine what that number would be if he were able to drop the need to hit back. Simply be able to say things like "I'm not going to respond to that."Libertarian666 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 30, 2020 11:15 pm• 60% approve of President Trump’s response; 93% of Republicans and 29% of Democrats agree.
I think his approval would be 80%+ easy. GWB was at 90% after Sept 11. I'm not sure that is a valid comparison, but he jumped 40 points from before the 11th.
But as you see below, the bumps do not last long.
- Cortopassi
- Executive Member
- Posts: 3338
- Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2014 2:28 pm
- Location: https://www.jwst.nasa.gov/content/webbL ... sWebb.html
Re: Trump as tragicomedy
Sure, but that's pretty boring, forgettable news vs. things like "Trump lashes out at the governor of Michigan."Libertarian666 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 31, 2020 9:10 am
If he did that, then CNN, MSNBC, etc., would say "He has no response to that, which means he agrees with it. Impeach!"
- Kriegsspiel
- Executive Member
- Posts: 4052
- Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 5:28 pm
Re: Trump as tragicomedy
Trump doesn't show ANY signs of senility, that motherfucker is sharp. I wasn't sure at first whether you were referring to Sanders and Biden, but Sanders doesn't seem senile either. Biden seems nearly non-functional.
You there, Ephialtes. May you live forever.
Re: Trump as tragicomedy
He is much sharper than Biden seems to be. Something we can definitely agree on.Kriegsspiel wrote: ↑Tue Mar 31, 2020 6:43 pmTrump doesn't show ANY signs of senility, that motherfucker is sharp. I wasn't sure at first whether you were referring to Sanders and Biden, but Sanders doesn't seem senile either. Biden seems nearly non-functional.
🛞 The All-Terrain Portfolio 🛞
- dualstow
- Executive Member
- Posts: 14232
- Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
- Location: synagogue of Satan
- Contact:
Re: Trump as tragicomedy
He must be talking about Canadian politics.Kriegsspiel wrote: ↑Tue Mar 31, 2020 6:43 pmTrump doesn't show ANY signs of senility, that motherfucker is sharp. I wasn't sure at first whether you were referring to Sanders and Biden, but Sanders doesn't seem senile either. Biden seems nearly non-functional.
Darn, I didn’t want to push this to the next page. I was enjoying all the gold coins (tech’s avatar over and over).
Sam Bankman-Fried sentenced to 25 years
- vnatale
- Executive Member
- Posts: 9423
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 8:56 pm
- Location: Massachusetts
- Contact:
Re: Trump as tragicomedy
Below is a better explanation of how he is NOT getting what he deserves and how the media has been too soft on him and continues to be too soft on him (for what he deserves)…….dualstow wrote: ↑Mon Mar 30, 2020 7:56 pmI used to think so, too, but (A) They really don’t give him credit when his policies are working.
(B) It is not often that you see articles showing that Obama killed and deported with the same gusto as Trump. The articles are out there, but barely. It helps that people point you to them.
(C.) A lot of these “events” are non-events, and just Trump mouthing off.
(D) Some of the most terrible allegations, e.g. firing the pandemic expert staff months ago turn out to be false, or at least possibly false. I read about it in the Washington Post, I see guests on TV repeating it, I firmly believe it. And then I see a an article refuting this by someone who was there, pointed out by Tyler.
But I don’t have Tyler working on this all the time, and most people don’t have a Tyler. I don’t know what to believe anymore, and not because of right-wing propaganda. I don’t watch Fox. No, it’s because of the left’s incessant onslaught. I guess I need to read more from different conservative news sources but Jesus, I’m tired.
The NY Times takes hands-off journalism to a laughable new level with Trump’s testing headline
https://www.mediamatters.org/new-york-t ... g-headline
"you surrender to the he-said-she-said variety of reporting, every time"
"Do your job. We are facing one of the greatest challenges in American history, largely due to political failures of the current Administration. Dig. Find out what is happening, the roots of the failures. Name names. You have the resources of one of [the] biggest papers in the US. Stop the transcription of press conferences, calls as the news in and of itself. Go deeper. Explain how current American politics led to this epidemiological and economic calamity, and how our leaders are or are not rising to the challenge. You may lose your access to certain prized sources inside the White House, the invitations to the best parties in DC, but you'll gain the respect of your readers and rescue your reputations from the disdain of history."
"The Times needs to make itself more receptive to criticism; it can start by putting a stop to the endless coddling of this administration."
"Endless coddling"! Polar opposite of "unrelenting media attacks"!
Vinny
Above provided by: Vinny, who always says: "I only regret that I have but one lap to give to my cats." AND "I'm a more-is-more person."
- dualstow
- Executive Member
- Posts: 14232
- Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
- Location: synagogue of Satan
- Contact:
Re: Trump as tragicomedy
She’s nuts. The Times is the equivalent of a shotgun in his face 24/7, and she’s unhappy that a few stray bits missed him. I think readers have gotten the picture by now, bel- (i wanted to say “believe me”, but then i would sound like the person I’m defending, haha).
The first two journalists she cites are Mehdi Hasan and Soledad O’Brien. They have pretty dismal reputations themselves, and well -earned. No, the NYT is not soft on Trump. Not in the universe I’m living in.
The first two journalists she cites are Mehdi Hasan and Soledad O’Brien. They have pretty dismal reputations themselves, and well -earned. No, the NYT is not soft on Trump. Not in the universe I’m living in.
Sam Bankman-Fried sentenced to 25 years
- vnatale
- Executive Member
- Posts: 9423
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 8:56 pm
- Location: Massachusetts
- Contact:
Re: Trump as tragicomedy
About 6 in 10 voters think Trump was not prepared for coronavirus outbreak, poll finds
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/pol ... 101764002/
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/pol ... 101764002/
Above provided by: Vinny, who always says: "I only regret that I have but one lap to give to my cats." AND "I'm a more-is-more person."
- vnatale
- Executive Member
- Posts: 9423
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 8:56 pm
- Location: Massachusetts
- Contact:
Re: Trump as tragicomedy
Major retailers have opened only 5 drive-thru testing locations, none available to the general public
https://www.cnn.com/2020/03/31/politics ... index.html
https://www.cnn.com/2020/03/31/politics ... index.html
Above provided by: Vinny, who always says: "I only regret that I have but one lap to give to my cats." AND "I'm a more-is-more person."
- vnatale
- Executive Member
- Posts: 9423
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 8:56 pm
- Location: Massachusetts
- Contact:
Re: Trump as tragicomedy
Trump Just Admitted to Downplaying the Seriousness of the Coronavirus Threat
The president says he decided to be a "cheerleader for the country," although he knew the situation "could be horrible."
https://www.menshealth.com/health/a3200 ... ce=twitter
The president says he decided to be a "cheerleader for the country," although he knew the situation "could be horrible."
https://www.menshealth.com/health/a3200 ... ce=twitter
Above provided by: Vinny, who always says: "I only regret that I have but one lap to give to my cats." AND "I'm a more-is-more person."
- vnatale
- Executive Member
- Posts: 9423
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 8:56 pm
- Location: Massachusetts
- Contact:
Re: Trump as tragicomedy
Former Obama official: Trump needs to take a ‘military operations approach’ to the coronavirus pandemic
https://www.marketwatch.com/discover?ur ... amp_social
https://www.marketwatch.com/discover?ur ... amp_social
Above provided by: Vinny, who always says: "I only regret that I have but one lap to give to my cats." AND "I'm a more-is-more person."
Re: Trump as tragicomedy
Now do Communist China Xi Jinping, Were they prepared?vnatale wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:34 amAbout 6 in 10 voters think Trump was not prepared for coronavirus outbreak, poll finds
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/pol ... 101764002/
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
- Mountaineer
- Executive Member
- Posts: 4959
- Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2012 10:54 am
Re: Trump as tragicomedy
That's kind of like saying after the fact that poll finds 6 in 10 Japanese say Hirohito was not prepared for the atomic bomb.vnatale wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:34 amAbout 6 in 10 voters think Trump was not prepared for coronavirus outbreak, poll finds
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/pol ... 101764002/
DNA has its own language (code), and language requires intelligence. There is no known mechanism by which matter can give birth to information, let alone language. It is unreasonable to believe the world could have happened by chance.
Re: Trump as tragicomedy
Dude. Would you do me favor and listen to the the Presidents Press Conference and not post what Someone ELSE thinks or Interprets?vnatale wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:56 amTrump Just Admitted to Downplaying the Seriousness of the Coronavirus Threat
The president says he decided to be a "cheerleader for the country," although he knew the situation "could be horrible."
https://www.menshealth.com/health/a3200 ... ce=twitter
I saw that part of the speech and let's just say you would of had to be there.
So when information comes to you 2nd or 3rd hand does it mean what it says?
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
- vnatale
- Executive Member
- Posts: 9423
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 8:56 pm
- Location: Massachusetts
- Contact:
Re: Trump as tragicomedy
I think you need to further explain your analogy for me to understand it. As far I know just the fact that Japan had an Emperor means that they were a closed, non-participatory country. We, on the other hand, are a democratic republic with information free flowing.Mountaineer wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 11:06 amThat's kind of like saying after the fact that poll finds 6 in 10 Japanese say Hirohito was not prepared for the atomic bomb.vnatale wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:34 amAbout 6 in 10 voters think Trump was not prepared for coronavirus outbreak, poll finds
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/pol ... 101764002/
Next question for you....Of those 6 (in 10) what is your guess as to the range (low to high percent) who, if the election was held next week, would be voting for Trump?
Vinny
Above provided by: Vinny, who always says: "I only regret that I have but one lap to give to my cats." AND "I'm a more-is-more person."
- Mountaineer
- Executive Member
- Posts: 4959
- Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2012 10:54 am
Re: Trump as tragicomedy
Point one - it is impossible to predict disasters with much accuracy - in the case of Hiroshima a brand new weapon. Like trying to predict exactly (e.g. in time to evacuate people) when the Yellowstone caldera is going to blow again. Meanwhile, the tourists keep on flocking there. I'm sure though, if it blows in July, it will be Trump's fault (pun intended).vnatale wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 11:29 amI think you need to further explain your analogy for me to understand it. As far I know just the fact that Japan had an Emperor means that they were a closed, non-participatory country. We, on the other hand, are a democratic republic with information free flowing.Mountaineer wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 11:06 amThat's kind of like saying after the fact that poll finds 6 in 10 Japanese say Hirohito was not prepared for the atomic bomb.vnatale wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:34 amAbout 6 in 10 voters think Trump was not prepared for coronavirus outbreak, poll finds
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/pol ... 101764002/
Next question for you....Of those 6 (in 10) what is your guess as to the range (low to high percent) who, if the election was held next week, would be voting for Trump?
Vinny
Point two - the election is not going to be held next week - that's my prediction.
DNA has its own language (code), and language requires intelligence. There is no known mechanism by which matter can give birth to information, let alone language. It is unreasonable to believe the world could have happened by chance.
- vnatale
- Executive Member
- Posts: 9423
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 8:56 pm
- Location: Massachusetts
- Contact:
Re: Trump as tragicomedy
However, to stay on your analogy Nagasaki was 100% predictable. How many out of 10 Japanese would have said he was not prepared when he could have 100% prevented it?Mountaineer wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 11:46 amPoint one - it is impossible to predict disasters with much accuracy - in the case of Hiroshima a brand new weapon. Like trying to predict exactly (e.g. in time to evacuate people) when the Yellowstone caldera is going to blow again. Meanwhile, the tourists keep on flocking there. I'm sure though, if it blows in July, it will be Trump's fault (pun intended).vnatale wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 11:29 amI think you need to further explain your analogy for me to understand it. As far I know just the fact that Japan had an Emperor means that they were a closed, non-participatory country. We, on the other hand, are a democratic republic with information free flowing.Mountaineer wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 11:06 amThat's kind of like saying after the fact that poll finds 6 in 10 Japanese say Hirohito was not prepared for the atomic bomb.vnatale wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:34 amAbout 6 in 10 voters think Trump was not prepared for coronavirus outbreak, poll finds
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/pol ... 101764002/
Next question for you....Of those 6 (in 10) what is your guess as to the range (low to high percent) who, if the election was held next week, would be voting for Trump?
Vinny
Point two - the election is not going to be held next week - that's my prediction.
Trump kept downplaying the seriousness of what this has turned out to be. Think that had no affect on the poor behavior of others?
I'll spare you here my other thoughts on what more he could reasonably been expected to do but which chose to not do.
Vinny
Above provided by: Vinny, who always says: "I only regret that I have but one lap to give to my cats." AND "I'm a more-is-more person."
- vnatale
- Executive Member
- Posts: 9423
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 8:56 pm
- Location: Massachusetts
- Contact:
Re: Trump as tragicomedy
Trump on Feb. 26: "This is a flu. This is like a flu” ... It's a little like the regular flu that we have flu shots for. And we'll essentially have a flu shot for this in a fairly quick manner." Trump on March 15: “It’s something we have tremendous control of"vnatale wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 11:54 amHowever, to stay on your analogy Nagasaki was 100% predictable. How many out of 10 Japanese would have said he was not prepared when he could have 100% prevented it?Mountaineer wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 11:46 amPoint one - it is impossible to predict disasters with much accuracy - in the case of Hiroshima a brand new weapon. Like trying to predict exactly (e.g. in time to evacuate people) when the Yellowstone caldera is going to blow again. Meanwhile, the tourists keep on flocking there. I'm sure though, if it blows in July, it will be Trump's fault (pun intended).vnatale wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 11:29 amI think you need to further explain your analogy for me to understand it. As far I know just the fact that Japan had an Emperor means that they were a closed, non-participatory country. We, on the other hand, are a democratic republic with information free flowing.Mountaineer wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 11:06 amThat's kind of like saying after the fact that poll finds 6 in 10 Japanese say Hirohito was not prepared for the atomic bomb.vnatale wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:34 amAbout 6 in 10 voters think Trump was not prepared for coronavirus outbreak, poll finds
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/pol ... 101764002/
Next question for you....Of those 6 (in 10) what is your guess as to the range (low to high percent) who, if the election was held next week, would be voting for Trump?
Vinny
Point two - the election is not going to be held next week - that's my prediction.
Trump kept downplaying the seriousness of what this has turned out to be. Think that had no affect on the poor behavior of others?
I'll spare you here my other thoughts on what more he could reasonably been expected to do but which chose to not do.
Vinny
Vinny
Above provided by: Vinny, who always says: "I only regret that I have but one lap to give to my cats." AND "I'm a more-is-more person."
- Mountaineer
- Executive Member
- Posts: 4959
- Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2012 10:54 am
Re: Trump as tragicomedy
Perhaps Nagasaki was reasonably predictible, perhaps not (this is my view especially if you apply the adjective reasonably to the noun predictable).... it was only a couple days later. I seriously doubt they could have evacuated every city in Japan just because they thought another atomic bomb were coming somewhere. I expect they also could have reasonably predicted Tokyo was a target but they still lost more people in the fire bombing than at Hiroshima (I think). I think when one views events like a horse through blinders, one will miss a lot of the unseen events that can totally change the overall scene. Leaves? Trees? Forrest? Some never see they are in a forrest. Some do, but only with 20-20 hindsight.vnatale wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 11:54 amHowever, to stay on your analogy Nagasaki was 100% predictable. How many out of 10 Japanese would have said he was not prepared when he could have 100% prevented it?Mountaineer wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 11:46 amPoint one - it is impossible to predict disasters with much accuracy - in the case of Hiroshima a brand new weapon. Like trying to predict exactly (e.g. in time to evacuate people) when the Yellowstone caldera is going to blow again. Meanwhile, the tourists keep on flocking there. I'm sure though, if it blows in July, it will be Trump's fault (pun intended).vnatale wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 11:29 amI think you need to further explain your analogy for me to understand it. As far I know just the fact that Japan had an Emperor means that they were a closed, non-participatory country. We, on the other hand, are a democratic republic with information free flowing.Mountaineer wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 11:06 amThat's kind of like saying after the fact that poll finds 6 in 10 Japanese say Hirohito was not prepared for the atomic bomb.vnatale wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:34 amAbout 6 in 10 voters think Trump was not prepared for coronavirus outbreak, poll finds
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/pol ... 101764002/
Next question for you....Of those 6 (in 10) what is your guess as to the range (low to high percent) who, if the election was held next week, would be voting for Trump?
Vinny
Point two - the election is not going to be held next week - that's my prediction.
Trump kept downplaying the seriousness of what this has turned out to be. Think that had no affect on the poor behavior of others?
I'll spare you here my other thoughts on what more he could reasonably been expected to do but which chose to not do.
Vinny
DNA has its own language (code), and language requires intelligence. There is no known mechanism by which matter can give birth to information, let alone language. It is unreasonable to believe the world could have happened by chance.
Re: Trump as tragicomedy
He could have surrendered after the first one instead of waiting for a second.Mountaineer wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 12:03 pmPerhaps Nagasaki was reasonably predictible, perhaps not (this is my view especially if you apply the adjective reasonably to the noun predictable).... it was only a couple days later. I seriously doubt they could have evacuated every city in Japan just because they thought another atomic bomb were coming somewhere. I expect they also could have reasonably predicted Tokyo was a target but they still lost more people in the fire bombing than at Hiroshima (I think). I think when one views events like a horse through blinders, one will miss a lot of the unseen events that can totally change the overall scene. Leaves? Trees? Forrest? Some never see they are in a forrest. Some do, but only with 20-20 hindsight.
It's actually a good thing for us he surrendered after two, because (IIRC) that's all we had.
- vnatale
- Executive Member
- Posts: 9423
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 8:56 pm
- Location: Massachusetts
- Contact:
Re: Trump as tragicomedy
A White House report blows up Trump’s latest coronavirus defense
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions ... s-defense/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions ... s-defense/
Above provided by: Vinny, who always says: "I only regret that I have but one lap to give to my cats." AND "I'm a more-is-more person."
- vnatale
- Executive Member
- Posts: 9423
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 8:56 pm
- Location: Massachusetts
- Contact:
Re: Trump as tragicomedy
All you say is reasonable. However, isn't it reasonable to also assume that after the first atomic bomb that the Emperor could have decided enough is enough? Thought that If the Americans had that one, how many others do they have? How can I continue to allow such destruction to occur in my beloved country?Mountaineer wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 12:03 pmPerhaps Nagasaki was reasonably predictible, perhaps not (this is my view especially if you apply the adjective reasonably to the noun predictable).... it was only a couple days later. I seriously doubt they could have evacuated every city in Japan just because they thought another atomic bomb were coming somewhere. I expect they also could have reasonably predicted Tokyo was a target but they still lost more people in the fire bombing than at Hiroshima (I think). I think when one views events like a horse through blinders, one will miss a lot of the unseen events that can totally change the overall scene. Leaves? Trees? Forrest? Some never see they are in a forrest. Some do, but only with 20-20 hindsight.vnatale wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 11:54 amHowever, to stay on your analogy Nagasaki was 100% predictable. How many out of 10 Japanese would have said he was not prepared when he could have 100% prevented it?Mountaineer wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 11:46 amPoint one - it is impossible to predict disasters with much accuracy - in the case of Hiroshima a brand new weapon. Like trying to predict exactly (e.g. in time to evacuate people) when the Yellowstone caldera is going to blow again. Meanwhile, the tourists keep on flocking there. I'm sure though, if it blows in July, it will be Trump's fault (pun intended).vnatale wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 11:29 amI think you need to further explain your analogy for me to understand it. As far I know just the fact that Japan had an Emperor means that they were a closed, non-participatory country. We, on the other hand, are a democratic republic with information free flowing.Mountaineer wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 11:06 amThat's kind of like saying after the fact that poll finds 6 in 10 Japanese say Hirohito was not prepared for the atomic bomb.vnatale wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:34 amAbout 6 in 10 voters think Trump was not prepared for coronavirus outbreak, poll finds
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/pol ... 101764002/
Next question for you....Of those 6 (in 10) what is your guess as to the range (low to high percent) who, if the election was held next week, would be voting for Trump?
Vinny
Point two - the election is not going to be held next week - that's my prediction.
Trump kept downplaying the seriousness of what this has turned out to be. Think that had no affect on the poor behavior of others?
I'll spare you here my other thoughts on what more he could reasonably been expected to do but which chose to not do.
Vinny
The point was not evacuating. The point was unconditional surrendering.
Vinny
Above provided by: Vinny, who always says: "I only regret that I have but one lap to give to my cats." AND "I'm a more-is-more person."
- vnatale
- Executive Member
- Posts: 9423
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 8:56 pm
- Location: Massachusetts
- Contact:
Re: Trump as tragicomedy
And, it's good for us (and the rest of the world) those were those only two that have ever been used in any war.Xan wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 12:06 pmHe could have surrendered after the first one instead of waiting for a second.Mountaineer wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 12:03 pmPerhaps Nagasaki was reasonably predictible, perhaps not (this is my view especially if you apply the adjective reasonably to the noun predictable).... it was only a couple days later. I seriously doubt they could have evacuated every city in Japan just because they thought another atomic bomb were coming somewhere. I expect they also could have reasonably predicted Tokyo was a target but they still lost more people in the fire bombing than at Hiroshima (I think). I think when one views events like a horse through blinders, one will miss a lot of the unseen events that can totally change the overall scene. Leaves? Trees? Forrest? Some never see they are in a forrest. Some do, but only with 20-20 hindsight.
It's actually a good thing for us he surrendered after two, because (IIRC) that's all we had.
We are now 75 years later. Certainly not the case for any other weapon ever invented, some of which had the name of "peacemaker" due to the human destruction they caused and the thought the threat of their use would prevent wars.
Vinny
Above provided by: Vinny, who always says: "I only regret that I have but one lap to give to my cats." AND "I'm a more-is-more person."