Then why do we grant them permanent wartime powers?dualstow wrote:Probably very rarely. Well, maybe in Canada.moda0306 wrote:If there is none since this is all done in secret, well there's my point right there. When has foreign policy ever been done in public interest or with morals at heart?
Trump and Syria
Moderator: Global Moderator
Re: Trump and Syria
- dualstow
- Executive Member
- Posts: 14309
- Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
- Location: synagogue of Satan
- Contact:
Re: Trump and Syria
What can I tell you. South American countries show the results of true populism.
We're the "best worst" system.
We're the "best worst" system.
Re: Trump and Syria
First off, let's not forget the degree to which America has repeatedly fucked over countries in South America.dualstow wrote:What can I tell you. South American countries show the results of true populism.
We're the "best worst" system.
Further, we don't have to adopt Venezuelan style socialism to end the permanent war time state in the United States. These are completely different priorities. Our options are not 1) sloppy socialist populism, and 2) permanent empire defense for the plutocrats.
Falsest dichotomy I've seen in a while.
(Corrected misspellings. Damn Siri.)
Last edited by moda0306 on Thu Apr 13, 2017 7:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
- dualstow
- Executive Member
- Posts: 14309
- Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
- Location: synagogue of Satan
- Contact:
Re: Trump and Syria
Falsest?
I don't have any answers for you. Hopefully someone else does.
I don't have any answers for you. Hopefully someone else does.
Re: Trump and Syria
Yes. Falsest. As in falsier than the others.dualstow wrote:Falsest?
I don't have any answers for you. Hopefully someone else does.
Re: Trump and Syria
Hillary would've been terrible on foreign policy.Libertarian666 wrote:I don't like what Trump is doing.
I also don't think that Hillary would have been better. In fact I'm pretty sure she would have been worse.
Oh well, at least I've had a few months of thinking that things might actually get better overall.
Let's just get that behind us.
Neo-con... empire... dick Cheney.... terrible.
- I Shrugged
- Executive Member
- Posts: 2064
- Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 6:35 pm
Re: Trump and Syria
Me too.Libertarian666 wrote:I don't like what Trump is doing.
I also don't think that Hillary would have been better. In fact I'm pretty sure she would have been worse.
Oh well, at least I've had a few months of thinking that things might actually get better overall.
So did DJT scam us, or is he is just a chameleon who is now surrounded by neocons?
I keep thinking how to him everything is about negotiation and leverage. Maybe now he views bombs and threats of bombs as negotiating tools?
- I Shrugged
- Executive Member
- Posts: 2064
- Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 6:35 pm
Re: Trump and Syria
Here is Scott Adams, a Trump admirer, putting some meat into the argument that this is all about negotiating.
http://blog.dilbert.com/post/1594950946 ... ea-reframe
http://blog.dilbert.com/post/1594950946 ... ea-reframe
The only thing lacking in Trump’s reframing was a credible threat that he would launch a decapitation strike against North Korea. That problem was solved over chocolate cake at Mar Lago when the visiting President of China, Xi, observed Trump give the order to send 59 Tomahawk missiles into a sovereign country that had pissed him off just a few days earlier.
- dualstow
- Executive Member
- Posts: 14309
- Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
- Location: synagogue of Satan
- Contact:
Re: Trump and Syria
I've got this groundbreaking new theory that politicians just say stuff to get elected. /facetious/I Shrugged wrote: So did DJT scam us, or is he is just a chameleon who is now surrounded by neocons?
Well, that would be my standard response, but in this case I don't think Donald was being dishonest. I really think he's malleable and impressionable.
He's surrounded by...businessmen.
Re: Trump and Syria
As of today two independent organizations have verified sarin was used with the latest saying the evidence from 10 victims is incontrovertible.
So let's all resolve to use multiple information sources, facts and actual analytical skills in evaluating something vs. our favorite conspiracy theory conforming to our personal biases carefully cultivated by click driven for money websites.
You too can live paranoia free with basic thinking skills...try it you'll be happier too.
So let's all resolve to use multiple information sources, facts and actual analytical skills in evaluating something vs. our favorite conspiracy theory conforming to our personal biases carefully cultivated by click driven for money websites.
You too can live paranoia free with basic thinking skills...try it you'll be happier too.
Re: Trump and Syria
Links?Kbg wrote:As of today two independent organizations have verified sarin was used with the latest saying the evidence from 10 victims is incontrovertible.
So let's all resolve to use multiple information sources, facts and actual analytical skills in evaluating something vs. our favorite conspiracy theory conforming to our personal biases carefully cultivated by click driven for money websites.
You too can live paranoia free with basic thinking skills...try it you'll be happier too.
Also, you are still leagues away in the decision tree map from bombing airbases being the correct moral/tactical step.
We need to know far, far more.
Re: Trump and Syria
Well that's an interesting assertion...is war and violence moral? If so, when, where, why? If not, same questions. For me personally on this specific event, entirely good with it politically and morally. To each their own however. Seems like a personal judgement to me and mine can be different than yours. I think we have sufficient information to make our respective moral judgements.moda0306 wrote:Links?Kbg wrote:As of today two independent organizations have verified sarin was used with the latest saying the evidence from 10 victims is incontrovertible.
So let's all resolve to use multiple information sources, facts and actual analytical skills in evaluating something vs. our favorite conspiracy theory conforming to our personal biases carefully cultivated by click driven for money websites.
You too can live paranoia free with basic thinking skills...try it you'll be happier too.
Also, you are still leagues away in the decision tree map from bombing airbases being the correct moral/tactical step.
We need to know far, far more.
And on the last point, yes, the truth is out there. Please do continue your search.
Re: Trump and Syria
[/quote]TennPaGa wrote: Meanwhile, the fallout from the incident and the U.S. retaliation is severe and potentially catastrophic. As Princeton Professor Stephen Cohen, America’s leading expert on Russia, put it recently:
[/font][/size]I think this is the most dangerous moment in American-Russian relations, at least since the Cuban missile crisis. And arguably, it’s more dangerous, because it’s more complex. … So the question arises, naturally: Why did Trump launch 50 Tomahawk missiles at a Syrian Air Force base, when, God help us, he did kill some people, but was of no military value whatsoever? Was this meant to show ‘I’m not a Kremlin agent?’ Because, normally, a president would have done the following. You would go to the United Nations … and ask for an investigation about what happened with those chemical weapons. And then you would decide what to do. But while having dinner at Mar-a-Lago with the leader of China, who was deeply humiliated, because he’s an ally of Russia, they rushed off these Tomahawk missiles.
That was the absolute first thing that occurred to me. I think the answer is yes - and the strategy worked.
Disgusting, to use another country and some of its citizens as a pawn in our little media & politics game. But I'm equally disgusted at the media for pushing the administration to the brink to begin with.
- Mountaineer
- Executive Member
- Posts: 4965
- Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2012 10:54 am
Re: Trump and Syria
That was the absolute first thing that occurred to me. I think the answer is yes - and the strategy worked.WiseOne wrote:TennPaGa wrote: Meanwhile, the fallout from the incident and the U.S. retaliation is severe and potentially catastrophic. As Princeton Professor Stephen Cohen, America’s leading expert on Russia, put it recently:
[/font][/size]I think this is the most dangerous moment in American-Russian relations, at least since the Cuban missile crisis. And arguably, it’s more dangerous, because it’s more complex. … So the question arises, naturally: Why did Trump launch 50 Tomahawk missiles at a Syrian Air Force base, when, God help us, he did kill some people, but was of no military value whatsoever? Was this meant to show ‘I’m not a Kremlin agent?’ Because, normally, a president would have done the following. You would go to the United Nations … and ask for an investigation about what happened with those chemical weapons. And then you would decide what to do. But while having dinner at Mar-a-Lago with the leader of China, who was deeply humiliated, because he’s an ally of Russia, they rushed off these Tomahawk missiles.
Disgusting, to use another country and some of its citizens as a pawn in our little media & politics game. But I'm equally disgusted at the media for pushing the administration to the brink to begin with.[/quote]
Indeed.
http://www.conservativecountry.net/poli ... st-networ/
DNA has its own language (code), and language requires intelligence. There is no known mechanism by which matter can give birth to information, let alone language. It is unreasonable to believe the world could have happened by chance.
-
- Executive Member
- Posts: 5994
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
Re: Trump and Syria
And here I thought about the only good thing about leftists (aside from the pot issue) was that they were anti-war. Not any more, apparently.TennPaGa wrote: Anyway, something else I find disgusting in all this is the media's blatant love affair of war. Did you hear Brian William's comment?Brian Williams caused a Twitter uproar following comments he made during his show on Thursday about what he called "beautiful pictures" of U.S. missiles launching during an attack on a Syrian air base.
During "The 11th Hour" on MSNBC, Williams stated that the "beautiful pictures at night" of the airstrike tempted him to quote a line from a Leonard Cohen song: "I am guided by the beauty of our weapons."
He went on to call the images "beautiful pictures of fearsome armaments."
- Mountaineer
- Executive Member
- Posts: 4965
- Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2012 10:54 am
Re: Trump and Syria
Those "beautiful pictures of fearsome armaments" made me think of the Star Spangled Banner. Being captivated by those bombs bursting in air are a recurring theme. Some things never change. We just go around the block over, and over, and over expecting to see something new when we round the corner ... but it turns out to be the same old rear end of those at the back of the line too tired to keep up with the frantic pace of those who think they are progressing.TennPaGa wrote:I would agree that the Trump/Russia stories were overblown. In the end, though, I have higher expectations of the President than to try to curry the favor of a group of people he probably dislikes anyway by bombing another country.WiseOne wrote:That was the absolute first thing that occurred to me. I think the answer is yes - and the strategy worked.I think this is the most dangerous moment in American-Russian relations, at least since the Cuban missile crisis. And arguably, it’s more dangerous, because it’s more complex. … So the question arises, naturally: Why did Trump launch 50 Tomahawk missiles at a Syrian Air Force base, when, God help us, he did kill some people, but was of no military value whatsoever? Was this meant to show ‘I’m not a Kremlin agent?’
Disgusting, to use another country and some of its citizens as a pawn in our little media & politics game. But I'm equally disgusted at the media for pushing the administration to the brink to begin with.
In any case, I don't think he ought to be surprised by the tone of the (non-war) coverage. It isn't like Trump was treated much differently during either the primary or the general election campaign. In fact, I'd say he fed off this in the campaign.
Anyway, something else I find disgusting in all this is the media's blatant love affair of war. Did you hear Brian William's comment?Brian Williams caused a Twitter uproar following comments he made during his show on Thursday about what he called "beautiful pictures" of U.S. missiles launching during an attack on a Syrian air base.
During "The 11th Hour" on MSNBC, Williams stated that the "beautiful pictures at night" of the airstrike tempted him to quote a line from a Leonard Cohen song: "I am guided by the beauty of our weapons."
He went on to call the images "beautiful pictures of fearsome armaments."
DNA has its own language (code), and language requires intelligence. There is no known mechanism by which matter can give birth to information, let alone language. It is unreasonable to believe the world could have happened by chance.
Re: Trump and Syria
French and Turkish governments both confirm Syrian origin of sarin. While I'm not sure I'd believe much coming from Turkey, France is certainly more credible. Good article in the WSJ on the forensics...worth reading to get a sense of what/how this stuff is analyzed.
Or we could go with the some of the other sources recently posted. Any old information will do to conform to our beliefs if that's how we think.
Or we could go with the some of the other sources recently posted. Any old information will do to conform to our beliefs if that's how we think.
Re: Trump and Syria
Kbg,
You seem very trusting of governments. You do understand who governments exist to serve, don't you? Yes, the wealthy and powerful. They aren't looking out for the little guy (i.e., me). They are looking out for people who make millions and billions of dollars. That's how it works. If it fits the narrative to help the multinational corporations, then any "legitimate" government will support it.
The funniest thing I saw this week, which literally made me laugh out loud, was a news flash that popped up on my phone saying that authorities are now investigating suspected Russian influence in the French election to help Le Pen. The media has their marching orders. They must do whatever they can to try to sabotage Le Pen because she wouldn't be good for the globalist business system.
You seem very trusting of governments. You do understand who governments exist to serve, don't you? Yes, the wealthy and powerful. They aren't looking out for the little guy (i.e., me). They are looking out for people who make millions and billions of dollars. That's how it works. If it fits the narrative to help the multinational corporations, then any "legitimate" government will support it.
The funniest thing I saw this week, which literally made me laugh out loud, was a news flash that popped up on my phone saying that authorities are now investigating suspected Russian influence in the French election to help Le Pen. The media has their marching orders. They must do whatever they can to try to sabotage Le Pen because she wouldn't be good for the globalist business system.
Re: Trump and Syria
Perhaps we should start a "Proving Assad gassed Syrians" thread where we attempt to hash this out based on simple deductive logic that should be obvious to anyone who isn't reflexively choosing not to believe the motives of agents of the state.TennPaGa wrote:Would you be willing to post links to the information you are citing?Kbg wrote:French and Turkish governments both confirm Syrian origin of sarin. While I'm not sure I'd believe much coming from Turkey, France is certainly more credible. Good article in the WSJ on the forensics...worth reading to get a sense of what/how this stuff is analyzed.
Or we could go with the some of the other sources recently posted. Any old information will do to conform to our beliefs if that's how we think.
That should settle this quickly.
- Mountaineer
- Executive Member
- Posts: 4965
- Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2012 10:54 am
Re: Trump and Syria
Perhaps we should add "Proving the US (or Russia, or China, or Turkey, or New Zealand, or even Switzerland) did not gas Syrians". That should definitely get to the bottom of it given the talents of our astute logicians. PROOF, mind you, not evidence. This crowd does not subscribe to the court room view that "evidence" is sufficient and should have absolutely no trouble proving a negative.moda0306 wrote:Perhaps we should start a "Proving Assad gassed Syrians" thread where we attempt to hash this out based on simple deductive logic that should be obvious to anyone who isn't reflexively choosing not to believe the motives of agents of the state.TennPaGa wrote:Would you be willing to post links to the information you are citing?Kbg wrote:French and Turkish governments both confirm Syrian origin of sarin. While I'm not sure I'd believe much coming from Turkey, France is certainly more credible. Good article in the WSJ on the forensics...worth reading to get a sense of what/how this stuff is analyzed.
Or we could go with the some of the other sources recently posted. Any old information will do to conform to our beliefs if that's how we think.
That should settle this quickly.
DNA has its own language (code), and language requires intelligence. There is no known mechanism by which matter can give birth to information, let alone language. It is unreasonable to believe the world could have happened by chance.
Re: Trump and Syria
In defense of the Star Spangled Banner, it is hardly a paean to weapons, bombs, and violence. It's true that the tune that it's paired with has some high notes which could be said to emphasize the rockets and bombs. But the poem simply describes how those things provided the illumination so that it could be determined that the flag still flew over the fort.
- dualstow
- Executive Member
- Posts: 14309
- Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
- Location: synagogue of Satan
- Contact:
Re: Trump and Syria
I remember my mom being disturbed by Wolf Blitzer -- aren't all moms-- during the shock & awe campaign. This was because he shouted "ooh, that was a good one!" when one of our bombs exploded.
Re: Trump and Syria
I'm not trusting or untrusting of government. Governments are like and composed of humans and share the same foibles and strengths. I do get ever increasingly annoyed with what in my mind is a decreasing ability of people to think critically, evaluate source credibility and weigh factual evidence. A starting analytical bias is step 1 of an inability to think critically.
I don't care what political belief spectrum someone is on, if to me they clearly aren't doing any of the above I reserve the right to take written and rhetorical pot shots at them.
I don't care what political belief spectrum someone is on, if to me they clearly aren't doing any of the above I reserve the right to take written and rhetorical pot shots at them.
Re: Trump and Syria
You haven't posted one source. You've only posted snark towards people who are skeptical of the official government lines on this.Kbg wrote:I'm not trusting or untrusting of government. Governments are like and composed of humans and share the same foibles and strengths. I do get ever increasingly annoyed with what in my mind is a decreasing ability of people to think critically, evaluate source credibility and weigh factual evidence. A starting analytical bias is step 1 of an inability to think critically.
I don't care what political belief spectrum someone is on, if to me they clearly aren't doing any of the above I reserve the right to take written and rhetorical pot shots at them.
Furthermore, even if we can assume Assad gassed his own people (as opposed to relentlessly bombing them), you haven't even begun to build a rational case for these tactics within a broader coherent strategy for either projecting our interests or disincentivising war atrocities by Assad. So please bring on the critical thinking. We'd love to see something other than frustration with people who have noticed the myriad of lies that have preceded every war we've been involved in.
- dualstow
- Executive Member
- Posts: 14309
- Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
- Location: synagogue of Satan
- Contact:
Re: Trump and Syria
I understand skepticism and cynicism in the face of perennially lying governments. Still, I tend to believe what I have read at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khan_Shay ... cal_attack
even without digging up the sources cited there. Now that may change. Turned out Saddam didn't have a cache of WMDs, I know. So that belief (re Khan Shaykhun) could change.
At the same time, to put the burden of proof on kbg is laughable.
Welcome to the gyro forum, where the burden of proof is not on the fringe but on the mainstream. I'd type more, but I needto go watch Capricorn One.
even without digging up the sources cited there. Now that may change. Turned out Saddam didn't have a cache of WMDs, I know. So that belief (re Khan Shaykhun) could change.
At the same time, to put the burden of proof on kbg is laughable.
Welcome to the gyro forum, where the burden of proof is not on the fringe but on the mainstream. I'd type more, but I needto go watch Capricorn One.
Simonjester wrote:
even the "no wmd" claim has been questioned as fiction put out by the perennially lying government
i have no idea why they would lie about that one (cover for the countries they were shipped to maybe?) but there are far to many solders who came back with illnesses and injuries related to exposure for the "none there" claim to be true -- or so they say---