Exactly why it's not "laughable" to ask someone to provide it if they want to drop bombs that are sure to kill civilians and put more permanent murderous, manipulative power in the hands of a limited few.dualstow wrote:Burden of proof is just a term from logic, not something someone has to live with.
But no need for "proof." I'd settle for evidence and a coherent strategy for starters. He's provided neither, even from a third party source. He's provided nothing but snark towards those that don't believe our government.
As for my own searching, I've found some sources for the former. No decent ones for the latter.
