Greg wrote:
To extend your viewpoint more Mountaineer, this is one of the reasons why I'm interested in studying comparative religion so that ideally I will come to truth. If not, I would have such a worry that I could package a religion in a good enough way to entice someone to it and in turn, steer them away from the correct religion.
The problem is "truth" is always subjective. Everyone is entitlted to their own version of the "truth" (but not their own objective facts). "Truth" is metaphysical just like property, money, borders, government, etc.
Underlying your potential worry seems to be that you're intending to convert people to the one True Religion. I think that is the single biggest bugaboo about religion in any interaction with True Believers -- there's always that dark, malevolent undercurrent of a conversion agenda that just poisons the atmosphere.
I think for your long-term peace of mind you'd be a much happier person if you worried less about what other people believe their guiding principles are so you wouldn't have need to worry. AFAIK, being a good Christian is not dependent on converting others. That's just missionary requirements for non-inclusive cults, i.e. Scientology, Mormonism, Jehovah's Witnesses, Seventh Day Adventists, etc.. What's wrong with leading by example and reveling in that?