The Platinum Coin
Moderator: Global Moderator
Re: The Platinum Coin
The trillion dollar coin is a bit gimmicky, but hardly damaging. The real question is, is having a debt ceiling just as if not more gimmicky or dangerous. One could argue that the debt ceiling tends to serve as a second check/balance on improper fiscal management and therefore serves a valuable purpose. Others would say it is far, far too clumbsy and dangerous a way of doing so.
If I thought the federal debt levels were a problem, I might actually agree with the debt celing as a backstop, but I don't like built in provisions that cause massive disruption in government or the market. However, I see the debt ceiling as being a tool of a very gimmicky side of the debate claiming that we have a debt/deficit problem that will blow up in our face when every sign in the market is pointing to the exact opposite.
So I say go ahead. Fight gimmick with gimmick. If our cash is Monopoly money, so is our national debt. You can't look at one as a worthless piece of paper and the other as a constraining liability.
If I thought the federal debt levels were a problem, I might actually agree with the debt celing as a backstop, but I don't like built in provisions that cause massive disruption in government or the market. However, I see the debt ceiling as being a tool of a very gimmicky side of the debate claiming that we have a debt/deficit problem that will blow up in our face when every sign in the market is pointing to the exact opposite.
So I say go ahead. Fight gimmick with gimmick. If our cash is Monopoly money, so is our national debt. You can't look at one as a worthless piece of paper and the other as a constraining liability.
"Men did not make the earth. It is the value of the improvements only, and not the earth itself, that is individual property. Every proprietor owes to the community a ground rent for the land which he holds."
- Thomas Paine
- Thomas Paine
-
- Executive Member
- Posts: 1675
- Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2010 3:44 pm
Re: The Platinum Coin
Would this proposal destroy the monopoly that the Fed has on our currency? Isn't this essentially going back to the Constitution that only Congress issue and coin money? Which power they delegated to the banking cartel (aka Federal Reserve).
Isn't this similar to Lincoln issuing Greenbacks and JFK ordering up silver certificates (which were destroyed after his assassination)?
Isn't this similar to Lincoln issuing Greenbacks and JFK ordering up silver certificates (which were destroyed after his assassination)?
Re: The Platinum Coin
I smell a Hollywood action flick in which a group of ragtag criminals plot to steal the $1 trillion coin.
Can you imagine trying to buy something with a $1 trillion coin?
Can you imagine trying to buy something with a $1 trillion coin?
Q: “Do you have funny shaped balloons?”
A: “Not unless round is funny.”
A: “Not unless round is funny.”
Re: The Platinum Coin
The entire debt limit is a scam anyway. Every few years we go through this and it is always raised and stops nothing. If there is no political will to control spending then spending shall continue.
-
- Executive Member
- Posts: 750
- Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 7:32 pm
Re: The Platinum Coin
I have been wondering something that is kind of related to this in regards to the national debt to the federal reserve.
Here is what I think I understand so far:
The treasury sells bonds to the federal reserve and this money gets deposited into the treasuries bank account at the federal reserve to be used as payments however they need. These bonds are then considered outstanding debt that is being held by the federal reserve.
My question is:
What happens when these bonds are either sold by the federal reserve or mature while the federal reserve is holding them?
Surely the federal reserve doesn't collect this money as their own profit. I would assume that this goes back to the treasury.
So, when it matures, nothing would be owed at all since it is owed to themselves?
Here is what I think I understand so far:
The treasury sells bonds to the federal reserve and this money gets deposited into the treasuries bank account at the federal reserve to be used as payments however they need. These bonds are then considered outstanding debt that is being held by the federal reserve.
My question is:
What happens when these bonds are either sold by the federal reserve or mature while the federal reserve is holding them?
Surely the federal reserve doesn't collect this money as their own profit. I would assume that this goes back to the treasury.
So, when it matures, nothing would be owed at all since it is owed to themselves?
Last edited by whatchamacallit on Tue Jan 08, 2013 1:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: The Platinum Coin
Why should they decrease/stop spending--they don't see it as a problem. In fact given the correct understanding of fiat money as I've learned on this board I'm not sure I understand enough to be able to justify why they can't keep spending.craigr wrote: If there is no political will to control spending then spending shall continue.
Clearly Krugment, Obama, etc see nothing wrong with continuing to spend (not that many/most on the rigth are much better) and will continue to do so by any means necessary.
It was good being the party of Robin Hood. Until they morphed into the Sheriff of Nottingham
- Pointedstick
- Executive Member
- Posts: 8864
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:21 pm
- Contact:
Re: The Platinum Coin
The problem is that in this idiotic monetary arrangement we have, the moral value of government spending and the operational necessity of providing liquidity have been joined together. So when the private sector banks stop lending, or people stop borrowing or default en masse, the money supply falls and the only thing that can prevent severe deflation is more government spending. Unfortunately, government typically spends wastefully on things that are stupid or even harmful (foreign wars, predator drones, more prisons, Obamaphones, etc).Benko wrote:Why should they decrease/stop spending--they don't see it as a problem. In fact given the correct understanding of fiat money as I've learned on this board I'm not sure I understand enough to be able to justify why they can't keep spending.craigr wrote: If there is no political will to control spending then spending shall continue.
If government spending weren't occasionally necessary to plug a hole caused by less private indebtedness, I'd be right along with Craig championing less government spending.
Human behavior is economic behavior. The particulars may vary, but competition for limited resources remains a constant.
- CEO Nwabudike Morgan
- CEO Nwabudike Morgan
Re: The Platinum Coin
Benko wrote:Why should they decrease/stop spending--they don't see it as a problem. In fact given the correct understanding of fiat money as I've learned on this board I'm not sure I understand enough to be able to justify why they can't keep spending.craigr wrote: If there is no political will to control spending then spending shall continue.
Yeah, you don't hear me saying that stuff though!
"If something cannot go on forever, it will stop."Clearly Krugment, Obama, etc see nothing wrong with continuing to spend (not that many/most on the rigth are much better) and will continue to do so by any means necessary.
Long-term I have no doubt that continued expansion of government spending is going to end very badly. Each year the ratchet tightens up more and more.
Re: The Platinum Coin
What backs the value of our currency is the demand for green pieces of paper that government creates when it taxes, and the government's continuation of supporting and facilitating the creation of wealth for higher incomes. Since wealth continues to flow more and more to the few, it's hard to argue that the government is creating horrible moral hazard hazard that leaves the private sector with little motivation to work to create wealth.
Eventual hyperinflation will be much more the result of non-monetary factors than "printing money," IMO.
Eventual hyperinflation will be much more the result of non-monetary factors than "printing money," IMO.
"Men did not make the earth. It is the value of the improvements only, and not the earth itself, that is individual property. Every proprietor owes to the community a ground rent for the land which he holds."
- Thomas Paine
- Thomas Paine
Re: The Platinum Coin
Not quite. The Treasury sells bonds to primary dealers, who resell them to other institutions (including foreign governments) and the general public. The proceeds of the sale are deposited into the Treasury's account at the Fed. The Fed holds the proceeds from the bond auctions, but not the bonds (which start at the primary dealers, but then end up in the hands of whoever ultimately buys them). Any taxes that are collected are also deposited into the Treasury's account at the Fed. Between taxes and proceeds of bond auctions, the Treasury's account at the Fed always shows a positive balance. In particular, the "federal deficit" does not correspond to a negative balance in the Treasury's Fed account but rather to the total face value of all outstanding bonds - i.e. the debt is not loaned to the government by the Fed but by whoever buys the bonds.whatchamacallit wrote: I have been wondering something that is kind of related to this in regards to the national debt to the federal reserve.
Here is what I think I understand so far:
The treasury sells bonds to the federal reserve and this money gets deposited into the treasuries bank account at the federal reserve to be used as payments however they need. These bonds are then considered outstanding debt that is being held by the federal reserve.
My question is:
What happens when these bonds are either sold by the federal reserve or mature while the federal reserve is holding them?
Surely the federal reserve doesn't collect this money as their own profit. I would assume that this goes back to the treasury.
So, when it matures, nothing would be owed at all since it is owed to themselves?
Interest payments on the bonds (and everything else the government pays for) are paid out of the Treasury's Fed account. When a bond matures, the bond holder receives the face value of the bond (from, you guessed it, the account at the Fed). So, as long as the government can sell more bonds than are currently maturing (increasing the debt) it can spend more than it receives in taxes.
-
- Executive Member
- Posts: 1675
- Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2010 3:44 pm
Re: The Platinum Coin
Rickb...I think what he's talking about are bonds owned directly by the Fed. Like those the Fed is buying in the QE iterations (except Twist). In those, the Fed collects interest payments as it is the owner of the bond.
- Pointedstick
- Executive Member
- Posts: 8864
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:21 pm
- Contact:
Re: The Platinum Coin
Agreed. Heck, I'da done away with it entirely. It's a terribly regressive tax compared to income taxes, which are not only progressive, but easy to dodge and reduce through judicious use of exemptions, credits, deductions, and retirement accounts. There's no reducing the payroll tax unless you make more than 102k per year.TennPaGa wrote: Of course, (i.e. I know you know this PS), money could be injected into the system via tax cuts as well. FWIW, I think that the proper stimulus in the environment we are currently in would be a huge payroll tax cut . For example, I would have (i) extended the payroll tax holday along with (ii) made the magnitude of the employee cut even larger, and (iii) given employers a similar payroll tax cut.
Human behavior is economic behavior. The particulars may vary, but competition for limited resources remains a constant.
- CEO Nwabudike Morgan
- CEO Nwabudike Morgan
-
- Executive Member
- Posts: 750
- Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 7:32 pm
Re: The Platinum Coin
Yes. Thank you murphy_p_t, I am referring to any securities held directly by the FED.murphy_p_t wrote: Rickb...I think what he's talking about are bonds owned directly by the Fed. Like those the Fed is buying in the QE iterations (except Twist). In those, the Fed collects interest payments as it is the owner of the bond.
Here is an ownership estimation graphic I found.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Estim ... y_year.gif
I would think that the interest payments would go back to the treasury as well?
Re: The Platinum Coin
For all our banter about spending on government expansion, I think a stimulus that consisted of a massive payroll tax cut would have been a great way to have A great recovery stimulus that most people on both sides to get behind. It's really more about repairing private sector balance sheets and after-tax incomes than building better freeways when they're at their least-travelled and the like.
"Men did not make the earth. It is the value of the improvements only, and not the earth itself, that is individual property. Every proprietor owes to the community a ground rent for the land which he holds."
- Thomas Paine
- Thomas Paine
-
- Executive Member
- Posts: 1675
- Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2010 3:44 pm
Re: The Platinum Coin
by law, the Fed remits some portion of its profits to the Treasury.
The real benefit to the Wall Street bankers (which is accrued thru their cartel aka the Fed) is controlling policy, not the nominal profits generated by their shares in the Fed.
The real benefit to the Wall Street bankers (which is accrued thru their cartel aka the Fed) is controlling policy, not the nominal profits generated by their shares in the Fed.
Re: The Platinum Coin
Do these banks really own "shares" in the fed?
"Men did not make the earth. It is the value of the improvements only, and not the earth itself, that is individual property. Every proprietor owes to the community a ground rent for the land which he holds."
- Thomas Paine
- Thomas Paine
-
- Executive Member
- Posts: 1675
- Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2010 3:44 pm
Re: The Platinum Coin
Interesting....
"Men did not make the earth. It is the value of the improvements only, and not the earth itself, that is individual property. Every proprietor owes to the community a ground rent for the land which he holds."
- Thomas Paine
- Thomas Paine
-
- Executive Member
- Posts: 1675
- Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2010 3:44 pm
Re: The Platinum Coin
from that link, my interpretation is that they openly confirm that this central bank is a cartel, complete w/ the protection of the gov't to enforce actions on behalf of the cartel
Re: The Platinum Coin
Yes. The shares held directly by the Fed are purchased on the open market with newly created Federal Reserve Notes. The interest that is earned on the bonds held by the Fed is returned to the Treasury after the Fed covers its expenses.whatchamacallit wrote:Yes. Thank you murphy_p_t, I am referring to any securities held directly by the FED.murphy_p_t wrote: Rickb...I think what he's talking about are bonds owned directly by the Fed. Like those the Fed is buying in the QE iterations (except Twist). In those, the Fed collects interest payments as it is the owner of the bond.
Here is an ownership estimation graphic I found.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Estim ... y_year.gif
I would think that the interest payments would go back to the treasury as well?
- MachineGhost
- Executive Member
- Posts: 10054
- Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 9:31 am
Re: The Platinum Coin
Here is the solution: http://gyroscopicinvesting.com/forum/in ... 1.msg54750Pointedstick wrote: The problem is that in this idiotic monetary arrangement we have, the moral value of government spending and the operational necessity of providing liquidity have been joined together. So when the private sector banks stop lending, or people stop borrowing or default en masse, the money supply falls and the only thing that can prevent severe deflation is more government spending. Unfortunately, government typically spends wastefully on things that are stupid or even harmful (foreign wars, predator drones, more prisons, Obamaphones, etc).
"All generous minds have a horror of what are commonly called 'Facts'. They are the brute beasts of the intellectual domain." -- Thomas Hobbes
Disclaimer: I am not a broker, dealer, investment advisor, physician, theologian or prophet. I should not be considered as legally permitted to render such advice!
Disclaimer: I am not a broker, dealer, investment advisor, physician, theologian or prophet. I should not be considered as legally permitted to render such advice!
-
- Executive Member
- Posts: 1675
- Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2010 3:44 pm
Re: The Platinum Coin
the practical effect of your solution is the same as Bernanke's, currency debasement, under the theory this will spur economic activity? no?
- MachineGhost
- Executive Member
- Posts: 10054
- Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 9:31 am
Re: The Platinum Coin
The Fed returns 95% of its income to the Treasury each year.whatchamacallit wrote: I would think that the interest payments would go back to the treasury as well?
"All generous minds have a horror of what are commonly called 'Facts'. They are the brute beasts of the intellectual domain." -- Thomas Hobbes
Disclaimer: I am not a broker, dealer, investment advisor, physician, theologian or prophet. I should not be considered as legally permitted to render such advice!
Disclaimer: I am not a broker, dealer, investment advisor, physician, theologian or prophet. I should not be considered as legally permitted to render such advice!
- MachineGhost
- Executive Member
- Posts: 10054
- Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 9:31 am
Re: The Platinum Coin
Yep, but at 0% rates of interest, no excess, no manipulation and no cartel.murphy_p_t wrote: the practical effect of your solution is the same as Bernanke's, currency debasement, under the theory this will spur economic activity? no?
"All generous minds have a horror of what are commonly called 'Facts'. They are the brute beasts of the intellectual domain." -- Thomas Hobbes
Disclaimer: I am not a broker, dealer, investment advisor, physician, theologian or prophet. I should not be considered as legally permitted to render such advice!
Disclaimer: I am not a broker, dealer, investment advisor, physician, theologian or prophet. I should not be considered as legally permitted to render such advice!
Re: The Platinum Coin
I keep a $1trillion Zimbabwe note around to remind me that no matter what's happening, dollars are pieces of paper whose value can change drastically.MediumTex wrote: I smell a Hollywood action flick in which a group of ragtag criminals plot to steal the $1 trillion coin.
Can you imagine trying to buy something with a $1 trillion coin?