Wikipedia

Other discussions not related to the Permanent Portfolio

Moderator: Global Moderator

Post Reply
User avatar
I Shrugged
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 2064
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 6:35 pm

Re: Wikipedia

Post by I Shrugged »

MangoMan wrote: Fri Jul 16, 2021 3:54 pm One of the founders of Wikipedia has now come out saying that the site has such a left wing bias, it is no longer credible.
https://twitter.com/unherd/status/1415325372233682945

Are there any other similar sites that still have integrity and are worth consulting for information?
I'd be surprised if there are.
User avatar
vnatale
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 9472
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 8:56 pm
Location: Massachusetts
Contact:

Re: Wikipedia

Post by vnatale »

MangoMan wrote: Fri Jul 16, 2021 3:54 pm
One of the founders of Wikipedia has now come out saying that the site has such a left wing bias, it is no longer credible.
https://twitter.com/unherd/status/1415325372233682945

Are there any other similar sites that still have integrity and are worth consulting for information?


You are focusing on any possible biased political related content only, which is just a tiny, tiny, tiny portion of the information it provides.

When I go there to find any out information in the entertainment field, e.g., music, movies...what political bias do I encounter?

I just randomly chose to go here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AK-47

How much biased political content it there? Where else could you go to get even the tiniest amount of information provided here?
Above provided by: Vinny, who always says: "I only regret that I have but one lap to give to my cats." AND "I'm a more-is-more person."
Post Reply