It demonstrated that they were willing to give up some liberties in some cases to help protect against some threats.vnatale wrote: ↑Thu Apr 23, 2020 9:31 amWhy the surprise? The government's reactions to 9/11 and the public's subsequent compliance to all these reactions already well demonstrated all of this.Kriegsspiel wrote: ↑Thu Apr 23, 2020 8:39 amPage 62:Mountaineer wrote: ↑Thu Apr 23, 2020 8:33 amThat had to have been a strangely worded poll question - I hope.
54355.png
Vinny
This question is asking the inverse (or converse?). It's asking whether there's EVER a time to take a safety risk for the sake of liberty.
Of course, it's actually very likely that people aren't interpreting the question carefully, and just hear "safety vs liberty".