Yes, I've been through all of those parks. Just beautiful. Never hurts to see / hike them again, though.
Coronavirus General Discussion
Moderator: Global Moderator
- Mark Leavy
- Executive Member
- Posts: 1369
- Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2012 10:20 pm
- Location: US Citizen, Permanent Traveler
- Kriegsspiel
- Executive Member
- Posts: 3303
- Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 5:28 pm
Re: Coronavirus General Discussion
I lold.
I hated all the things I had toiled for under the sun, because I must leave them to the one who comes after me. Who knows whether that person will be wise or foolish? Yet they will have control over all the fruit of my toil into which I have poured my effort and skill under the sun. . . Nothing is better for a man than to eat and drink and enjoy his work.
- Ecclesiastes
- Ecclesiastes
Re: Coronavirus General Discussion
It begins...
https://nypost.com/2020/12/04/san-franc ... -lockdown/
San Francisco just announced a total lockdown, more severe than what we had in NYC back in the spring.
Goodbye to Calfornia's economy. I expect very few small businesses will make it through this.
And, too bad they didn't catch WHO's report, based on multiple medical journal articles, about the ineffectiveness of lockdowns.
https://nypost.com/2020/12/04/san-franc ... -lockdown/
San Francisco just announced a total lockdown, more severe than what we had in NYC back in the spring.
Goodbye to Calfornia's economy. I expect very few small businesses will make it through this.
And, too bad they didn't catch WHO's report, based on multiple medical journal articles, about the ineffectiveness of lockdowns.
-
- Executive Member
- Posts: 5995
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
Re: Coronavirus General Discussion
I doubt that would have mattered.sophie wrote: ↑Sat Dec 05, 2020 2:49 pmIt begins...
https://nypost.com/2020/12/04/san-franc ... -lockdown/
San Francisco just announced a total lockdown, more severe than what we had in NYC back in the spring.
Goodbye to Calfornia's economy. I expect very few small businesses will make it through this.
And, too bad they didn't catch WHO's report, based on multiple medical journal articles, about the ineffectiveness of lockdowns.
They are mad with power and don't give a crap about the people suffering under their tyranny.
-
- Executive Member
- Posts: 702
- Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2016 1:40 am
- Contact:
Re: Coronavirus General Discussion
Well, they're effective at getting everyone to shop at Amazon. And if anyone's mad about that, they can have a Zoom protest.
- vnatale
- Executive Member
- Posts: 5403
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 8:56 pm
- Location: Massachusetts
- Contact:
Re: Coronavirus General Discussion
This seems to be an apt quote to put in this topic...
Vinny
Many medical facts are not facts in any sense of the
word, they have simply been made up. And that, ladies
and gentlemen, is a fact.
—Dr. Malcolm Kendrick, Doctoring Data
Vinny
Many medical facts are not facts in any sense of the
word, they have simply been made up. And that, ladies
and gentlemen, is a fact.
—Dr. Malcolm Kendrick, Doctoring Data
"I only regret that I have but one lap to give to my cats."
-
- Executive Member
- Posts: 702
- Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2016 1:40 am
- Contact:
Re: Coronavirus General Discussion
Orwell talked about the "Ministry of Truth" in 1984 but I think he got the title wrong. It will be the "Ministry of Science". They will tell us what the science says. The administrator will occupy a cabinet position and thus need to be confirmed by the senate so we can all agree that they are trustworthy. Doodle will probably like it.
Re: Coronavirus General Discussion
I've got a question. We are 10 months into this pandemic and we are still arguing over the effectiveness of wearing a mask. There appears to be an issue of personal rights, efficacy of the mask, as well as the subject has obviously been politicized.
Do we have any high quality studies on the efficacy of the different types of face coverings? I'm speaking of published scientific studies showing what type of mask(s) filter the virus particle, both for receiving and transmitting.
This kind of data just might prove effective in addressing this volatile issue, and minimize "opinions" from Fauci, Trump, Biden, et al.
Also, it seems medical academia would be looking closer at monitoring antibodies in previous Covid patients. There are estimates, all over the place, as to how long a person is immune after the infection. Isn't this really important to know going forward?
Do we have any high quality studies on the efficacy of the different types of face coverings? I'm speaking of published scientific studies showing what type of mask(s) filter the virus particle, both for receiving and transmitting.
This kind of data just might prove effective in addressing this volatile issue, and minimize "opinions" from Fauci, Trump, Biden, et al.
Also, it seems medical academia would be looking closer at monitoring antibodies in previous Covid patients. There are estimates, all over the place, as to how long a person is immune after the infection. Isn't this really important to know going forward?
-
- Executive Member
- Posts: 701
- Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2012 9:04 am
Re: Coronavirus General Discussion
Seems like science is just politics with more data.pp4me wrote: ↑Sun Dec 06, 2020 4:29 pmOrwell talked about the "Ministry of Truth" in 1984 but I think he got the title wrong. It will be the "Ministry of Science". They will tell us what the science says. The administrator will occupy a cabinet position and thus need to be confirmed by the senate so we can all agree that they are trustworthy. Doodle will probably like it.
-
- Executive Member
- Posts: 702
- Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2016 1:40 am
- Contact:
Re: Coronavirus General Discussion
whatsherface - I love my mask
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qGYQU1WRGxI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qGYQU1WRGxI