I think we may be at a point now where the old adage is true that if you stay in the middle of the road you will get run over. Our Governor here in Texas is a prime example. With Covid he started out following his Republican party, focused on the economy and had few restrictions. Then as Covid cases started to spike he could not stand the heat from the media and Left so he tried to find some sort of compromise of shutting down certain businesses to a certain degree. The result is that his approval rating plummeted. The Right felt that he betrayed his small government party platform and the Left said it was too little, too late. So now nobody is happy with him. If he would have picked a side and stuck to it, then at least that side would be happy.doodle wrote: ↑Wed Oct 07, 2020 8:44 amDo you think it's healthy that both political parties have pushed to the extreme...do you think it's representative of most americans? If a moderate could get through the primary process I think they would win in a landslide.tomfoolery wrote: ↑Wed Oct 07, 2020 12:13 amMaybe democrats have turned over a new leaf in 2020 and produced less of a similar reaction that led to Mr Tromp being voted in.
Common sense economic shutdowns in liberal states, common sense mandated mask wearing in liberal states, peaceful protesting where liberal mayors/governors refused Herr Trumps offer to have the national guard murder peaceful protesters.
Yes, I’m sure Democrats have turned off less middle and right-leaning voters this election cycle.
Biden 2020!!!
On the one hand I agree with you. People view politics like sports now. It is my team vs your team. My team is always right and virtuous and the other team is always evil, cheating etc. That allows people to not have to really ever critically think about issues and just go with whatever their team tells them is the right thing to do. Which is how you end up where we are now. My prime example is Bush who did some things (ie prescription drugs for seniors) that Democrats should have loved. But it made no difference because he was on the other team and therefore he was bad. My Republican parents are the same way. If Obama does it then it is bad but if Bush did the exact same thing it is good. Just depends on the uniform you are wearing. I dont know how you get out of that now because everyone has wrapped up their identity in their team and they are not going to let that go easily.
On the other hand, from a philosophical standpoint, if you believe in something strongly, is it right to compromise? For example, I am a Libertarian at heart. So if you take an issue that I firmly believe the government has no business being involved in, let's say running a lottery. How should I compromise on that? Should I be ok with them running it only on occasion? If I feel that the government has no place running a gambling operation and the other side feels they should in order to raise funds outside of normal taxation, how do we reach the middle of the road on that?
I had a history professor in college many years ago who said that we have a lot of people in this country with a lot of very different values and perspectives and he was just not sure how you unify those people into a common vision.