Correct me if I'm wrong but is it not men who are in the vast majority in the Senate, Congress, the upper echelons of the military, partners of the Big 4 Accounting firms, similar largest law firms, largest business consulting organizations...and so on?Libertarian666 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 12:16 pmI have found it extremely useful in predicting how people will react to various stimuli.vnatale wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 9:50 amI have loved the Myers Briggs. When I introduced to it over 30 years ago it became an avocation for several years. I ended up formally or informally testing over 100 people. But I later read (and was convinced) that it really has no scientific basis.Libertarian666 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 9:43 am
No, there is a rebuttable presumption. To use MBTI terminology, most women are Fs, and most men are Ts. Thus, when dealing with a woman whom you know nothing else about, it is wise to assume that she is an F, which means that she makes decisions primarily via emotion rather than thought. With an otherwise unknown man, you can generally assume that he will make decisions primarily based on thought rather than emotion.
Of course once you are acquainted with a particular person it's usually not hard to figure out his/her preference in this matter, so then the presumption is either confirmed or refuted.
Please cite an example of such a culture.
Most people do.Libertarian666 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 9:31 amAnd, I've just recently read (and, been convinced) that deep down, for major decisions just about all of all decide based upon how we feel.
The US is female dominated. If you don't believe me, spend a day in divorce court and watch men being shredded, or watch what happens to any man who is accused of doing anything inappropriate to a woman, with or without any evidence that it even occurred (especially if the man isn't a Democrat).Libertarian666 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 9:31 amNo such culture exists because I don't believe there are any female dominated cultures or neutral cultures. Are there any that are not predominantly male run?
Or take a look at the applications for obtaining or renewing a professional license such as an insurance license. If you are behind on child support payments, expect to have your license revoked even though this has absolutely nothing to do with your qualifications for selling insurance.
Here's a description of some of the disadvantages of being male in the US today: https://menslaws.com/men-now-officially ... izens-now/
Which camp?
Moderator: Global Moderator
- vnatale
- Executive Member
- Posts: 9423
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 8:56 pm
- Location: Massachusetts
- Contact:
Re: Which camp?
Above provided by: Vinny, who always says: "I only regret that I have but one lap to give to my cats." AND "I'm a more-is-more person."
- vnatale
- Executive Member
- Posts: 9423
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 8:56 pm
- Location: Massachusetts
- Contact:
Re: Which camp?
Here, you (or anyone else) can see and hear the same thing I (mainly) heard yesterday....dualstow wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 12:20 pmSounds like something out of a William Gibson novel.Kriegsspiel wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 10:36 amLOL, I just googled the author of Gender And Our Brains, Gina Rippon. She calls the book I recommended, The Female Brain, neurotrash I'll see if I can get a hold of Rippon's book though, since I would like to see what she says.
https://www.c-span.org/person/?ginarippon
Vinny
Above provided by: Vinny, who always says: "I only regret that I have but one lap to give to my cats." AND "I'm a more-is-more person."
-
- Full Member
- Posts: 64
- Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2017 4:53 pm
Re: Which camp?
It would be if you got all your information about Baron-Cohen's research from a single short quote from an article.the citing of Alex and Hannah be the epitome of anecdotal "proof" and entirely un-scientific? And, am I an outlier since I don't use a cell phone for talking, keep my wired phone unplugged at home, hardly ever use my office phone, preferring either email or face-to-face communications?
I'm with Libertarian666 on this issue though, anyway.
Much more important what is happening in the courts and the actual lives of men and women than what a scientist with an ax to grind has to say.
You as well, Vinny, sound like you have already come to your conclusions, because your dismissals of opposing opinions have been on about the level of Men/Mars Women/Venus.
The woman you posted about is straw manning and you seem to be too.
- vnatale
- Executive Member
- Posts: 9423
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 8:56 pm
- Location: Massachusetts
- Contact:
Re: Which camp?
I was reacting to the quote provided to us regarding Baron-Cohen's research.sweetbthescrivener wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 1:04 pmIt would be if you got all your information about Baron-Cohen's research from a single short quote from an article.the citing of Alex and Hannah be the epitome of anecdotal "proof" and entirely un-scientific? And, am I an outlier since I don't use a cell phone for talking, keep my wired phone unplugged at home, hardly ever use my office phone, preferring either email or face-to-face communications?
I'm with Libertarian666 on this issue though, anyway.
Much more important what is happening in the courts and the actual lives of men and women than what a scientist with an ax to grind has to say.
You as well, Vinny, sound like you have already come to your conclusions, because your dismissals of opposing opinions have been on about the level of Men/Mars Women/Venus.
The woman you posted about is straw manning and you seem to be too.
And, what is your basis for asserting: "what a scientist with an ax to grind has to say". My judgment was she was being at true scientist following what the facts actual stated, the opposite of what you assert.
Why am I not allowed to have "already" come to my conclusions? I'm almost always "already" coming to my conclusions. Otherwise, how could I state an opinion?
And, I am unfamiliar with the term "straw manning". I will now do an internet search of it. Now I see you are saying the woman and myself are guilty of using a straw man argument.
Vinny
Above provided by: Vinny, who always says: "I only regret that I have but one lap to give to my cats." AND "I'm a more-is-more person."
Re: Which camp?
I'm putting this in the category of "okay, even if what you say is true, so what?"
It's hard to believe that the process of natural selection favoring a reproductive benefit wouldn't have resulted in some difference between male and female brains. But even if both males and females ended up with identical CPU's along the way, what are we supposed to do with that information?
It's hard to believe that the process of natural selection favoring a reproductive benefit wouldn't have resulted in some difference between male and female brains. But even if both males and females ended up with identical CPU's along the way, what are we supposed to do with that information?
- vnatale
- Executive Member
- Posts: 9423
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 8:56 pm
- Location: Massachusetts
- Contact:
Re: Which camp?
Not assume that certain roles / positions are male ones while others are female ones.jacksonm2 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 2:13 pmI'm putting this in the category of "okay, even if what you say is true, so what?"
It's hard to believe that the process of natural selection favoring a reproductive benefit wouldn't have resulted in some difference between male and female brains. But even if both males and females ended up with identical CPU's along the way, what are we supposed to do with that information?
That said, and I've not stated this yet, I fully believe in the average physical differences between men and women, i.e., size, strength, speed. That is why we have not yet had one women play in any professional men's major league. Not even in the minors as far as baseball and basketball go. And, because of those differences women's professional basketball can never potentially be as exciting as men's professional basketball. The overall average skills brought to the sport is generally going to be far below what the men bring to it. But if a job that strictly requires brains (and other non-physical attributes) then....
Vinny
Above provided by: Vinny, who always says: "I only regret that I have but one lap to give to my cats." AND "I'm a more-is-more person."
Re: Which camp?
I think we're pretty close to already being there. Just look at doctors and lawyers.vnatale wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 2:30 pmNot assume that certain roles / positions are male ones while others are female ones.jacksonm2 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 2:13 pmI'm putting this in the category of "okay, even if what you say is true, so what?"
It's hard to believe that the process of natural selection favoring a reproductive benefit wouldn't have resulted in some difference between male and female brains. But even if both males and females ended up with identical CPU's along the way, what are we supposed to do with that information?
In my profession as a software engineer I did not find this to be true at all but it wasn't always that way. It was before my time which is saying a lot since I started programming computers in the 70's, but I've read that there was a time when women dominated my field.
I do tend to think that women will always excel at being mothers however and there is nothing we can do about that.
- Mountaineer
- Executive Member
- Posts: 4959
- Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2012 10:54 am
Re: Which camp?
Absolutely women's highest value vocation. Just like being a father is a man's highest value vocation. In my opinion, those who preach equality of the sexes have not though through the logic (or rather illogic) of their statements (that is said as kindly as I can). The only real equality of the sexes is in God's eyes.jacksonm2 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 2:56 pmI think we're pretty close to already being there. Just look at doctors and lawyers.vnatale wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 2:30 pmNot assume that certain roles / positions are male ones while others are female ones.jacksonm2 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 2:13 pmI'm putting this in the category of "okay, even if what you say is true, so what?"
It's hard to believe that the process of natural selection favoring a reproductive benefit wouldn't have resulted in some difference between male and female brains. But even if both males and females ended up with identical CPU's along the way, what are we supposed to do with that information?
In my profession as a software engineer I did not find this to be true at all but it wasn't always that way. It was before my time which is saying a lot since I started programming computers in the 70's, but I've read that there was a time when women dominated my field.
I do tend to think that women will always excel at being mothers however and there is nothing we can do about that.
DNA has its own language (code), and language requires intelligence. There is no known mechanism by which matter can give birth to information, let alone language. It is unreasonable to believe the world could have happened by chance.
- vnatale
- Executive Member
- Posts: 9423
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 8:56 pm
- Location: Massachusetts
- Contact:
Re: Which camp?
What does that say for those of either sex who have no children?Mountaineer wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 3:04 pmAbsolutely women's highest value vocation. Just like being a father is a man's highest value vocation. In my opinion, those who preach equality of the sexes have not though through the logic (or rather illogic) of their statements (that is said as kindly as I can). The only real equality of the sexes is in God's eyes.jacksonm2 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 2:56 pmI think we're pretty close to already being there. Just look at doctors and lawyers.
In my profession as a software engineer I did not find this to be true at all but it wasn't always that way. It was before my time which is saying a lot since I started programming computers in the 70's, but I've read that there was a time when women dominated my field.
I do tend to think that women will always excel at being mothers however and there is nothing we can do about that.
Vinny
Above provided by: Vinny, who always says: "I only regret that I have but one lap to give to my cats." AND "I'm a more-is-more person."
-
- Executive Member
- Posts: 5994
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
Re: Which camp?
This is an elementary analytical error called "the apex fallacy".vnatale wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 12:44 pmCorrect me if I'm wrong but is it not men who are in the vast majority in the Senate, Congress, the upper echelons of the military, partners of the Big 4 Accounting firms, similar largest law firms, largest business consulting organizations...and so on?Libertarian666 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 12:16 pmI have found it extremely useful in predicting how people will react to various stimuli.
Most people do.Libertarian666 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 9:31 amAnd, I've just recently read (and, been convinced) that deep down, for major decisions just about all of all decide based upon how we feel.
The US is female dominated. If you don't believe me, spend a day in divorce court and watch men being shredded, or watch what happens to any man who is accused of doing anything inappropriate to a woman, with or without any evidence that it even occurred (especially if the man isn't a Democrat).Libertarian666 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 9:31 amNo such culture exists because I don't believe there are any female dominated cultures or neutral cultures. Are there any that are not predominantly male run?
Or take a look at the applications for obtaining or renewing a professional license such as an insurance license. If you are behind on child support payments, expect to have your license revoked even though this has absolutely nothing to do with your qualifications for selling insurance.
Here's a description of some of the disadvantages of being male in the US today: https://menslaws.com/men-now-officially ... izens-now/
Yes, it is true that the top 0.1% of positions of power are mostly occupied by men.
However, the other 99.9% of men have far less power than women in our current society.
Hope that helps.
- vnatale
- Executive Member
- Posts: 9423
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 8:56 pm
- Location: Massachusetts
- Contact:
Re: Which camp?
I JUST concluded watching the debate. After seeing Rippon yesterday I had a bias. And, that bias was not changed after listening to all three of them. I view Rippon as a true scientist. I'm biased towards scientists. Simon Baron-Cohen is a psychologist. I'm biased against them because psychologists deal with the soft sciences. The unprovable. I'm forgetting who the third person was (also a woman) and what her profession was. She was probably the weakest of the three.sweetbthescrivener wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 11:55 amA counterpoint to her ideas might be the work of Simon Baron Cohen.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eEYy1GXaNNY
https://www.theguardian.com/books/2003/ ... ianreview6
Though I have the feeling that Rippon would respond by saying who are you going to believe, me or Ali G's brother?Why do most men use the phone to exchange information rather than have a chat? Why do so many women love talking about their feelings and relationships? We may suspect profound differences between the sexes but do they stand up to scientific scrutiny?
Simon Baron-Cohen argues that men's and women's brains are made differently: the female brain is hard-wired for empathy, and the male to understand and build systems. Take brother and sister Alex and Hannah. Alex's mother remembers that, as a toddler, he loved toy tractors and fire engines and would happily sit for hours prodding and pressing objects just to see what would happen. By the age of five he was obsessed with compiling football stickers. Music came later - naturally he drew up his own pop charts and stored his tapes in strict order - and in his teens he quickly mastered computers. His mother recalls that the interests just "seemed to come from deep within him". Alex, Baron-Cohen says, has a typical systemising, male or "S" type brain.
Hannah's big passion was people. Even in her early years she loved making them laugh and smile. Hannah learned to talk earlier than her brother and plastered her walls with pictures of kittens and foals. As a teenager she also loved pop music, but rather than carefully cataloguing it, she would dance and sing in front of the mirror with her friends. "She's really good at asking people sensitive questions so that she can explore how they're feeling," her mother says. Baron-Cohen says Hannah has an empathic, female or "E" type brain.
Baron-Cohen popped into my head when I first came across this thread, and what do you know, the two have already debated:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=31c48XUtwVg
Vinny
Above provided by: Vinny, who always says: "I only regret that I have but one lap to give to my cats." AND "I'm a more-is-more person."
Re: Which camp?
Slightly off-topic, but I highly recommend Michael Lewis's "The Undoing Project". In addition to being fascinating like most/all of his work, reading this I discovered I had no idea what psychologists actually did, or how interesting it is.
-
- Executive Member
- Posts: 1313
- Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2016 1:40 am
- Contact:
Re: Which camp?
For me theres nothing more interesting, psychology chips away at our identity. If we live in a cause and effect world, determinism, theres no free will. We're all just chimping out, hopelessly flailing against an inevitable future. Or maybe that's just my excuse to drink!