Re: The GOLD scream room
Posted: Wed May 16, 2018 4:33 pm
Exactly, Daddy grew up in Shandong eating you-tiao and drinking soy milk! I prefer powdered sugar instead of plain.
Gyroscopic Investing
Permanent Portfolio Forum
https://www.gyroscopicinvesting.com/forum/
The GOLD scream room
https://www.gyroscopicinvesting.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=4654
Page 71 of 148
Re: The GOLD scream room
Posted: Wed May 16, 2018 8:53 pm
Re: The GOLD scream room
Posted: Thu May 17, 2018 6:51 am
I always confused Churrascos with Churros until a little Mexican woman in Poughkeepsie set me straight a couple of weeks ago.
Can a brother get some help with the tones on you-tiao? Is "you" second tone as in "oil"?
And are we still in the Gold Scream Room or is the now the Food We Miss From Our Travels Room?
Re: The GOLD scream room
Posted: Thu May 17, 2018 7:03 am
We might need ounces of good to buy doughnuts at the rate we're going
Re: The GOLD scream room
Posted: Thu May 17, 2018 7:50 am
That's right, Barrett. In fact, it *is* oil, that character.
yóutiáo
yóutiáo
Re: The GOLD scream room
Posted: Fri May 18, 2018 3:15 pm
Ah, got it, dualstow. "Long Oily Thingies!" I've seen those around in Southeast Asia but have never tried them.
Apologies to anyone clicking on this post actually thinking it has anything to do with screaming about gold. dualstow and I have turned this section into a level two Chinese class.
Carry on!
Re: The GOLD scream room
Posted: Fri May 18, 2018 8:58 pm
They also serve up the snake blood as a aphrodisiac.
Re: The GOLD scream room
Posted: Fri May 18, 2018 10:59 pm
God damn my gerd ounces!
Re: The GOLD scream room
Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2018 8:32 am
Pathetic.
CPI up 6% and gold tanks.
We’re all morons.
CPI up 6% and gold tanks.
We’re all morons.
Re: The GOLD scream room
Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2018 8:55 am
Bwahahaha. I have to laugh. I expected this thread to activate again. Who cares. This is perfect. No one cares about gold at all. Ripe for a multi-year rise, right?
Re: The GOLD scream room
Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2018 8:57 am
We’ve been on the same hopium for a while now.
Even if equities tanked 100% I would still be way ahead of my gold position. Big mistake!
Even if equities tanked 100% I would still be way ahead of my gold position. Big mistake!
Re: The GOLD scream room
Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2018 9:01 am
So if your stocks went down to 0 that would still be better than gold?buddtholomew wrote: ↑Fri Jun 15, 2018 8:57 am We’ve been on the same hopium for a while now.
Even if equities tanked 100% I would still be way ahead of my gold position. Big mistake!
Wow, that is terrible!
Re: The GOLD scream room
Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2018 9:04 am
Ooh $1284.50 now
Re: The GOLD scream room
Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2018 9:38 am
Yup, and since your buy you’ve stunk it up...too bad.Libertarian666 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 15, 2018 9:01 amSo if your stocks went down to 0 that would still be better than gold?buddtholomew wrote: ↑Fri Jun 15, 2018 8:57 am We’ve been on the same hopium for a while now.
Even if equities tanked 100% I would still be way ahead of my gold position. Big mistake!
Wow, that is terrible!
Yet my 70/30 is up 340K YTD.
How’s your gold YTD?
Re: The GOLD scream room
Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2018 10:29 am
I think gold has potentially a way to fall yet.
Harry Dent is thinking $700/oz down to $400/oz? Seems extreme, but who knows?
Harry Dent is thinking $700/oz down to $400/oz? Seems extreme, but who knows?
Re: The GOLD scream room
Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2018 10:45 am
That makes more sense to me as it’s pretty much useless.
I can see divesting away from precious metals and being successful, but this 25% allocation to Gold is awful. Almost anything but gold would be better.
Re: The GOLD scream room
Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2018 10:51 am
Ok, if I did the math right, that means you, Buddtholomew, have about $12M in your portfolio, and yet you spend your time coming on here to whine about gold's poor performance over the last few years. I'd like to think that if I had that much in my portfolio, I would not be worried about money at all and would find plenty of other things to keep me busy. But, lest you forget so easily, gold saved the decade of 2000 to 2010 for those who held enough to make a difference (sadly not me).buddtholomew wrote: ↑Fri Jun 15, 2018 9:38 amYup, and since your buy you’ve stunk it up...too bad.Libertarian666 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 15, 2018 9:01 amSo if your stocks went down to 0 that would still be better than gold?buddtholomew wrote: ↑Fri Jun 15, 2018 8:57 am We’ve been on the same hopium for a while now.
Even if equities tanked 100% I would still be way ahead of my gold position. Big mistake!
Wow, that is terrible!
Yet my 70/30 is up 340K YTD.
How’s your gold YTD?
Re: The GOLD scream room
Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2018 11:00 am
No shit, I was just figuring the same thing!stuper1 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 15, 2018 10:51 amOk, if I did the math right, that means you, Buddtholomew, have about $12M in your portfolio, and yet you spend your time coming on here to whine about gold's poor performance over the last few years. I'd like to think that if I had that much in my portfolio, I would not be worried about money at all and would find plenty of other things to keep me busy. But, lest you forget so easily, gold saved the decade of 2000 to 2010 for those who held enough to make a difference (sadly not me).buddtholomew wrote: ↑Fri Jun 15, 2018 9:38 amYup, and since your buy you’ve stunk it up...too bad.Libertarian666 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 15, 2018 9:01 am
So if your stocks went down to 0 that would still be better than gold?
Wow, that is terrible!
Yet my 70/30 is up 340K YTD.
How’s your gold YTD?
And the drop is likely a delayed reaction to what the dollar did yesterday. It was surprising it didn't do it in lockstep as usual.
Re: The GOLD scream room
Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2018 11:05 am
It’s actually closer to 14M.stuper1 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 15, 2018 10:51 amOk, if I did the math right, that means you, Buddtholomew, have about $12M in your portfolio, and yet you spend your time coming on here to whine about gold's poor performance over the last few years. I'd like to think that if I had that much in my portfolio, I would not be worried about money at all and would find plenty of other things to keep me busy. But, lest you forget so easily, gold saved the decade of 2000 to 2010 for those who held enough to make a difference (sadly not me).buddtholomew wrote: ↑Fri Jun 15, 2018 9:38 amYup, and since your buy you’ve stunk it up...too bad.Libertarian666 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 15, 2018 9:01 am
So if your stocks went down to 0 that would still be better than gold?
Wow, that is terrible!
Yet my 70/30 is up 340K YTD.
How’s your gold YTD?
I spend my time as I see fit, 3-4 hours at the gym and 4-5 on development.
Re: The GOLD scream room
Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2018 11:37 am
budd, congrats, I am jealous.
Re: The GOLD scream room
Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2018 11:38 am
If you are 70% in stocks and your stocks went down 100%, that would mean you would lose 70% of your portfolio.buddtholomew wrote: ↑Fri Jun 15, 2018 9:38 amYup, and since your buy you’ve stunk it up...too bad.Libertarian666 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 15, 2018 9:01 amSo if your stocks went down to 0 that would still be better than gold?buddtholomew wrote: ↑Fri Jun 15, 2018 8:57 am We’ve been on the same hopium for a while now.
Even if equities tanked 100% I would still be way ahead of my gold position. Big mistake!
Wow, that is terrible!
Yet my 70/30 is up 340K YTD.
How’s your gold YTD?
Obviously math isn't your strong suit.
Re: The GOLD scream room
Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2018 11:42 am
Don’t be corto, I am a slave to my brain or lack thereof...
I focus less on the things that money can resolve and more on the things that any amount of money can’t resolve.
Always something for me to worry about.
Re: The GOLD scream room
Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2018 11:45 am
I would still have 30% in fixed income which is LTD +.Libertarian666 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 15, 2018 11:38 amIf you are 70% in stocks and your stocks went down 100%, that would mean you would lose 70% of your portfolio.buddtholomew wrote: ↑Fri Jun 15, 2018 9:38 amYup, and since your buy you’ve stunk it up...too bad.Libertarian666 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 15, 2018 9:01 am
So if your stocks went down to 0 that would still be better than gold?
Wow, that is terrible!
Yet my 70/30 is up 340K YTD.
How’s your gold YTD?
Obviously math isn't your strong suit.
Gold is LTD -ve.
Re: The GOLD scream room
Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2018 11:49 am
That explains a lot. At least multi-million dollar market fluctuations are something I'll never have to worry about.buddtholomew wrote: ↑Fri Jun 15, 2018 11:05 amIt’s actually closer to 14M.stuper1 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 15, 2018 10:51 amOk, if I did the math right, that means you, Buddtholomew, have about $12M in your portfolio, and yet you spend your time coming on here to whine about gold's poor performance over the last few years. I'd like to think that if I had that much in my portfolio, I would not be worried about money at all and would find plenty of other things to keep me busy. But, lest you forget so easily, gold saved the decade of 2000 to 2010 for those who held enough to make a difference (sadly not me).buddtholomew wrote: ↑Fri Jun 15, 2018 9:38 am
Yup, and since your buy you’ve stunk it up...too bad.
Yet my 70/30 is up 340K YTD.
How’s your gold YTD?
Re: The GOLD scream room
Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2018 12:07 pm
$14M in the bank, and you still come on here to make the rest of us miserable? Come on, man, have a little decency. If you're going to come on here, bring some kind of uplifting quote about the rewards of working hard or living in a great country or something.