The GOLD scream room

Discussion of the Gold portion of the Permanent Portfolio

Moderator: Global Moderator

User avatar
dualstow
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 14231
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
Location: synagogue of Satan
Contact:

Re: The GOLD scream room

Post by dualstow » Fri Feb 23, 2018 7:05 am

Kriegsspiel wrote:BUDD YOU HAVE TO STAY MY GYROSCOPICINVESTING DRINKING GAME IS WORTHLESS WITHOUT YOU NOOOOOOO
Merits a thread O0
Sam Bankman-Fried sentenced to 25 years
flyingpylon
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1102
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2012 9:04 am

Re: The GOLD scream room

Post by flyingpylon » Fri Feb 23, 2018 7:59 am

eufo wrote:I'm about done here, but you need to understand that you are wrapped up in emotion right now. Emotions won't help you make a smart move financially, except by sheer chance. Maybe you'll get lucky.
In general people make decisions based on emotions and then use confirmation bias and cognitive dissonance to justify them.

There are some things that people just need to experience for themselves before they "get it" (such as the emotional pain of a significant market drop and loss of portfolio value).
User avatar
Xan
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 4392
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 1:51 pm

Re: The GOLD scream room

Post by Xan » Fri Feb 23, 2018 9:56 am

Perhaps it's cynical, or perhaps there's a lot of truth to it, but one of my favorite quotes is "There are two reasons behind every action: a good reason, and the real reason."
User avatar
buddtholomew
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 2464
Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 4:16 pm

Re: The GOLD scream room

Post by buddtholomew » Fri Feb 23, 2018 10:08 am

First let me say I don’t intend to discount any of Tyler’s work which is awesome and second you are correct that I am too emotional to rationally decide what to do next.

The money is in cash until I can reasses. I will decide without looking at current day gains and losses to avoid the behavioral pitfalls.

Thanks so much.
User avatar
Kriegsspiel
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 4052
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 5:28 pm

Re: The GOLD scream room

Post by Kriegsspiel » Fri Feb 23, 2018 11:04 am

WRT emotions in investing; that's a definite advantage to using the PP philosophy. Big swings in investments create big emotional swings. The PP is so even-keeled, you can't really get emotional over it. It's gonna sit there and return 3-4% real returns pretty consistently. I have had a 100% stocks VP until pretty recently and having the PP core allows me the luxury of not giving a fuck. I think the big trick to unemotional investing is to arrange your affairs so that you have no reason to be emotional.
Mr Vacuum
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 164
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2016 11:51 am

Re: The GOLD scream room

Post by Mr Vacuum » Fri Feb 23, 2018 11:33 am

sophie wrote:Budd, why would you expect the PP to outperform the 70/30? That's not the goal. As Harry Browne said, "Investing is about taking the returns that the market gives you."

If there were a risk-free investment that could beat a 70/30 over time, believe me we'd all be there. The problem is, there isn't. And I might point out that your time frame of 10 years for judging stock market behavior isn't long enough. You need at least 15 years. Take a look at the PP vs 70/30 for 1998-2008, and you'll see what I mean.
Well said, Sophie. I also liked the way Cliff Asness put it in this interview in the context of who is on the other side of the trade and where does the money go (https://medium.com/conversations-with-t ... 6ba8e92b4f emphasis added):
ASNESS: ... There is the phenomenon that I still want to look into more, because someone has to be making this money. This is going to sound stupid. No one’s figured out who’s making the money. But Jack Bogle quotes these numbers a lot.

There are all these paradoxes where the average mutual fund investor seems to get out and in at the wrong times. Remember I talked about value and momentum?

COWEN: Of course.

ASNESS: I like to call them — it’s a geeky phrase, maybe I’m the only one who likes it. They are momentum investors at a value time horizon. Remember, I told you value works long term. You have to hold 3, 5, 10 years. Momentum is a 6 to 12 month horizon.

If you’re going to be momentum, you’ve got to really do it. You’ve got to be disciplined. You’ve got to come in every day, and you’ve got to count on these under- and overreaction things.

If you wait five years and buy what’s worked for five years, you can call that a negative value investor or a momentum investor working with the wrong numbers. I do think that is one of the things people do too much out there. It’s probably the biggest —

Somebody is making that money. Maybe we’re making some of that money. Maybe it’s the flipside. It’s very hard to track.
User avatar
ochotona
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 3353
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2015 5:54 am

Re: The GOLD scream room

Post by ochotona » Fri Feb 23, 2018 12:01 pm

Mr Vacuum wrote:ASNESS: I like to call them — it’s a geeky phrase, maybe I’m the only one who likes it. They are momentum investors at a value time horizon. Remember, I told you value works long term. You have to hold 3, 5, 10 years. Momentum is a 6 to 12 month horizon.

If you’re going to be momentum, you’ve got to really do it. You’ve got to be disciplined. You’ve got to come in every day, and you’ve got to count on these under- and overreaction things.

If you wait five years and buy what’s worked for five years, you can call that a negative value investor or a momentum investor working with the wrong numbers. I do think that is one of the things people do too much out there.
So hard to do, so obvious in hindsight. Buy gold in 2001. Buy equities in 1932, 1982, 2009. Your inner psyche will scream as you do it!
User avatar
blue_ruin17
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 153
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2016 11:16 pm
Location: New Brunswick, Canada

Re: The GOLD scream room

Post by blue_ruin17 » Sun Feb 25, 2018 8:42 am

There's a quote from the Bogleheads PP thread that always stuck with me, and I think it really applies to Budd's chronic PP anxiety:
In my experience, most people don’t particularly like their portfolios, much less get a lift from them. They tolerate their portfolios. They may be pleased enough with the performance, but they don’t get a psychic boost from their portfolios. They don’t enjoy the confidence and strength of spirit that a solid pack or a solid portfolio can provide. And before you say that this really doesn’t matter to you, that so long as your portfolio performs up to a certain standard you couldn’t really care less whether it provides any “psychic strength” or any such mumbo-jumbo hogwash, let me stop you to say that you’re not just wrong, you’re completely wrong. In truth, the only thing that matters to you about your portfolio is its psychic reward, the positive way it makes you feel.
Budd, it is clear to me that the PP is a source of *massive* anxiety for you. You do not tolerate or like the portfolio, much less receive even the slightest "psychic reward" from it. Quite the opposite, in fact: the PP tortures you.

The PP does not jive with you, for whatever reason...and that's okay! It just means it is not for you. There are many portfolios out there that would have me feeling the same way -- that's why I avoid them, regardless of their technical and theoretical merits. Example: the 60/40 portfolio is a damn good portfolio, theoretically, and I would not disparage it if someone asked me my opinion about it... BUT, for me it would be a source of massive anxiety not having a firm foothold in a gold position, and therefore the 60/40 portfolio is totally unsuitable for me, despite its sound construction.

Even if you explain to me in logical terms why the PP is, theoretically, a good fit for you, Budd, I would still maintain the position that the PP is categorically not for you. The evidence is baked into your consistently intense negative emotional reaction to it.

What I can't figure out is if you, Budd, should be in 100% cash or 100% stocks, but I think your optimal portfolio is probably one or the other. You ruminate over even the slightest of gyrations on a daily scale, which would lead me to believe that you would be happiest just parking everything in T-Bills. OTOH, you seem to stress about missing out on long-term equity gains and have stated before that you are comfortable with large stock market corrections. If that's the case, you should just go all-in on stocks and be done with it.
STAT PERPETUS PORTFOLIO DUM VOLVITUR ORBIS

Amazon: Investing Equanimity: The Logic & Wisdom of the Permanent Portfolio
User avatar
ochotona
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 3353
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2015 5:54 am

Re: The GOLD scream room

Post by ochotona » Sun Feb 25, 2018 12:12 pm

blue_ruin17 wrote:What I can't figure out is if you, Budd, should be in 100% cash or 100% stocks, but I think your optimal portfolio is probably one or the other. You ruminate over even the slightest of gyrations on a daily scale, which would lead me to believe that you would be happiest just parking everything in T-Bills. OTOH, you seem to stress about missing out on long-term equity gains and have stated before that you are comfortable with large stock market corrections. If that's the case, you should just go all-in on stocks and be done with it.
If he went 100% stocks, the next bear market would explode his head. If he went 100% cash, he'd be deep in FOMO. If he was 50% stocks, 50% cash, the grass would be always greener, so he'd be buying and selling constantly, underperforming a static portfolio of 50-50 (Scott Burn's "Couch Potato")

He should find a professional portfolio manager.
User avatar
buddtholomew
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 2464
Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 4:16 pm

Re: The GOLD scream room

Post by buddtholomew » Sun Feb 25, 2018 1:00 pm

ochotona wrote:
blue_ruin17 wrote:What I can't figure out is if you, Budd, should be in 100% cash or 100% stocks, but I think your optimal portfolio is probably one or the other. You ruminate over even the slightest of gyrations on a daily scale, which would lead me to believe that you would be happiest just parking everything in T-Bills. OTOH, you seem to stress about missing out on long-term equity gains and have stated before that you are comfortable with large stock market corrections. If that's the case, you should just go all-in on stocks and be done with it.
If he went 100% stocks, the next bear market would explode his head. If he went 100% cash, he'd be deep in FOMO. If he was 50% stocks, 50% cash, the grass would be always greener, so he'd be buying and selling constantly, underperforming a static portfolio of 50-50 (Scott Burn's "Couch Potato")

He should find a professional portfolio manager.
Actually, I now believe I have it right where I want it.
Ocho, don’t confuse my questions with my actions as I have been 70/30 in retirement accounts since 2008/9.
The PP with additional cash is just about right for me in a taxable account.
I will keep the 25/21/15/39 allocation in taxable for now and figure out what to do with the additional cash + bonus (hopefully, find out tomorrow) soon.
User avatar
l82start
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 1291
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 9:51 pm

Re: The GOLD scream room

Post by l82start » Sun Feb 25, 2018 3:58 pm

to paraphrase Yogi Berra, 'good investing is 90 percent mental. The other half is just thinking about numbers’ :D
-Government 2020+ - a BANANA REPUBLIC - if you can keep it

-Belief is the death of intelligence. As soon as one believes a doctrine of any sort, or assumes certitude, one stops thinking about that aspect of existence
User avatar
dualstow
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 14231
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
Location: synagogue of Satan
Contact:

Re: The GOLD scream room

Post by dualstow » Sun Feb 25, 2018 9:08 pm

O0
Sam Bankman-Fried sentenced to 25 years
User avatar
Tyler
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 2066
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 3:23 pm
Contact:

Re: The GOLD scream room

Post by Tyler » Mon Feb 26, 2018 12:33 pm

Tyler wrote: Explaining how your observations about the PP vs your 70/30 portfolio jive with history is sorta tricky, and it inspired me to tinker with a new calculator that directly compares portfolios. It's still a work in progress, but I'll give you a sneak preview as I think it will help.
For anyone interested in playing with the numbers for themselves, the tool is now live.

https://portfoliocharts.com/2018/02/26/ ... -accuracy/

Try a few portfolios with and without gold, and you'll start to really appreciate its ability to raise the floor on returns.

@Budd -- No matter what asset allocation you ultimately settle on, my hope is that you find an archer you trust enough to let her do her job without so much worry about the precise location of every arrow.
User avatar
blue_ruin17
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 153
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2016 11:16 pm
Location: New Brunswick, Canada

Re: The GOLD scream room

Post by blue_ruin17 » Mon Feb 26, 2018 3:58 pm

Yet another amazing calculator, Tyler.
STAT PERPETUS PORTFOLIO DUM VOLVITUR ORBIS

Amazon: Investing Equanimity: The Logic & Wisdom of the Permanent Portfolio
User avatar
eufo
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 243
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2016 7:17 pm

Re: The GOLD scream room

Post by eufo » Mon Feb 26, 2018 6:02 pm

Tyler wrote:For anyone interested in playing with the numbers for themselves, the tool is now live.
I'm sure I speak for everyone when I say your continued hard work is greatly appreciated, Tyler! It's interesting to compare the more volatile portfolios with either PP, GB, or my own concoction. There is a kind of WANT to see that 15 year looking stronger, but it's the tradeoff for a more stable allocation. How might you interpret these two portfolios? The orange is my own allocation... the black is my good friend's allocation.

Image
Don't agree with me too strongly or I'm going to change my mind
User avatar
Tyler
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 2066
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 3:23 pm
Contact:

Re: The GOLD scream room

Post by Tyler » Mon Feb 26, 2018 6:36 pm

eufo wrote:It's interesting to compare the more volatile portfolios with either PP, GB, or my own concoction. There is a kind of WANT to see that 15 year looking stronger, but it's the tradeoff for a more stable allocation. How might you interpret these two portfolios? The orange is my own allocation... the black is my good friend's allocation.
I hear you on the desire to up that 15-year return, but sometimes the best answer to upping your returns is not to add more investing risk but to stick with a highly dependable portfolio that works well for you and simply save a little more. That gets you the best of both worlds -- higher account values and greater accuracy. ;)

Also, it's important to keep an eye on the big picture and look at the options from few different perspectives. For example, your portfolio looks a lot more appealing in the Drawdowns calculator. Different people are motivated by different things, so it's hard to make generalizations. The best I can do is offer some tools to help people figure that out for themselves.

And as a side note, I'd personally take special note of that estimated tag on portfolio B resulting from the high EM allocation. That asset in particular has a lot of potential tracking error. I offer the best estimate I can give with the data I have available, but I can't guarantee the results for an EM allocation that high.
User avatar
eufo
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 243
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2016 7:17 pm

Re: The GOLD scream room

Post by eufo » Mon Feb 26, 2018 9:00 pm

Tyler wrote:Also, it's important to keep an eye on the big picture and look at the options from few different perspectives. For example, your portfolio looks a lot more appealing in the Drawdowns calculator. Different people are motivated by different things, so it's hard to make generalizations. The best I can do is offer some tools to help people figure that out for themselves.
Yes. Your site is how I decided on my current allocation. I think it blends together stability and returns in a way that works for me. I also like my same allocation minus cash, but find it harder to follow, so, for now, I'll keep cash.
Tyler wrote:And as a side note, I'd personally take special note of that estimated tag on portfolio B resulting from the high EM allocation. That asset in particular has a lot of potential tracking error. I offer the best estimate I can give with the data I have available, but I can't guarantee the results for an EM allocation that high.
Personally, I think he's nuts to hold that much EM, but he seems to love it for now. I think he'll change his mind after a drawdown. I'm also estimating his bond allocations. He's technically 20% Total Bond Market and 20% TIPS. I think you used to have TIPS on your site, didn't you? I never really liked them.

Thank you for your response. I shouldn't be filling "The GOLD scream room" with this. Lol!
Don't agree with me too strongly or I'm going to change my mind
User avatar
ochotona
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 3353
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2015 5:54 am

Re: The GOLD scream room

Post by ochotona » Wed Mar 21, 2018 3:09 pm

Why did gold spike today? Isn't the Fed being hawkish?
User avatar
buddtholomew
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 2464
Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 4:16 pm

Re: The GOLD scream room

Post by buddtholomew » Wed Mar 21, 2018 3:15 pm

ochotona wrote:Why did gold spike today? Isn't the Fed being hawkish?
duh...Libertarian666's recent purchase obviously raised the price O0
User avatar
Cortopassi
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 3338
Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2014 2:28 pm
Location: https://www.jwst.nasa.gov/content/webbL ... sWebb.html

Re: The GOLD scream room

Post by Cortopassi » Wed Mar 21, 2018 4:02 pm

https://www.investopedia.com/articles/i ... s-gold.asp

Despite widespread popular belief of a strong negative correlation between interest rates and the price of gold , a long-term review of the respective paths and trends of interest rates and gold prices reveals that no such relationship actually exists. The correlation between interest rates and the price of gold over the past half century, from 1970 to 2015, has only been about 28%, which is considered to be not much of a significant correlation at all.

Given the historical tendencies of the actual reactions of stock market prices and gold prices to interest rate increases, the likelihood is greater that stock prices will be negatively impacted by rising interest rates and that gold may in fact benefit as an alternative investment to equities.
Libertarian666
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 5994
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm

Re: The GOLD scream room

Post by Libertarian666 » Wed Mar 21, 2018 4:55 pm

ochotona wrote:Why did gold spike today? Isn't the Fed being hawkish?
Don't worry, I'm sure this is just a glitch in the matrix. Gold should be plunging because I just bought a chunk!
User avatar
ochotona
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 3353
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2015 5:54 am

Re: The GOLD scream room

Post by ochotona » Wed Mar 21, 2018 7:11 pm

Mr Vacuum
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 164
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2016 11:51 am

Re: The GOLD scream room

Post by Mr Vacuum » Fri Mar 23, 2018 12:50 pm

It's working today, budd!!!
User avatar
Cortopassi
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 3338
Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2014 2:28 pm
Location: https://www.jwst.nasa.gov/content/webbL ... sWebb.html

Re: The GOLD scream room

Post by Cortopassi » Fri Mar 23, 2018 2:57 pm

Sure is!

Image
User avatar
buddtholomew
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 2464
Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 4:16 pm

Re: The GOLD scream room

Post by buddtholomew » Fri Mar 23, 2018 3:03 pm

I guess...
Gold closed at the lows + 1.3 with the S&P down 2.1%. TLT was down so nothing magical.
70/30 allocation is bruised but to be expected. After today, both 70/30 and PP should be down about the same YTD.
Post Reply