New I Bond Rate 11/1/18 to 4/30/18

[sophie]

So barrett, are you all good with your plans for your I bonds? They've turned out to be pretty darned good investments!

Hey sophie,

It seems that the best course of action based on current assumptions and multiple i-ORP runs is to keep income low for now to take advantage of ACA subsidies, and then go really aggressive on Roth conversions for five year after Medicare kicks in and before RMDs do. My best I-Bonds will in that scenario be held to maturity and cashed out in my early 70s. Some of them have 3.6% fixed yields but tax liabilities force us to think about doing things that aren't very intuitive. Too much information??

Sounds like a perfectly good plan! Maybe it would simplify things to just do this. List the ibonds that will mature before you hit age 65. Just hold onto the rest. Every year about this time, figure out how much income space you have before you hit the Obamacare cliff, and allocate that space toward cashing out I bonds from that before-65 pile, doing Roth conversions, and tax-gain harvesting. You could also cash them out earlier in the year for money to live on. Unlike a 401K withdrawal, only part of the proceeds will be taxable - so they will actually be a big help to you in staying under the ACA cap.

[Kbg]

.

[jhogue]

Who sets the fixed rate, and how. Why should they pay us anything...competing with foreign bonds? Private sector bonds?

Oddly enough, Treasury has never announced how it determines the I bond fixed rate. The I bond composite rate is composed of both a fixed rate and a variable rate (from the CPI-U estimate for inflation). Once an I bond is purchased, the fixed rate remains unchanged until final maturity of the bond (currently 30 years). The U.S. Treasury Department can adjust the I bond fixed rate for new purchases twice per year, on 1 May and 1 November.

I am not sure I understand your second question. Historically, the US Treasury has been borrowing money to fund the government in exchange for interest-bearing bonds ever since Alexander Hamilton became secretary of the Treasury. EE and I series savings bonds originated in the popular war bond drives directly marketed to the public for the first time during World War II. They are distinguished by the fact that they are redeemable, but cannot be bought or sold on the secondary market. As a consequence their price and yield never fluctuates.

[boglerdude]

Was wondering whats wrong about MMT: "interest from issuance of govts is a corporate subsidy"

http://mikenormaneconomics.blogspot.com ... -rich.html

edit2 https://www.thenation.com/article/beyond-austerity/
edit1 http://bilbo.economicoutlook.net/blog/?p=41133

[jhogue]

I don’t claim to be up on the latest debates over Modern Monetary Theory, but there are some gaping holes in the blogpost you referenced:

Mike Norman’s claim that Treasury bonds are “welfare for the rich” strikes me as misleading—perhaps deliberately so. Sure, Warren Buffet’s company has billions in T-bonds, but the total market cap value of Berkshire Hathaway is far greater. Simply put, Warren would rather own shares in his company rather than an equivalent pile of T-bonds because their expected return is greater.

More to the point for us here—who do not necessarily think of ourselves as “rich”-- practically anybody can buy Treasury debt at market rates on the secondary market. Millions of ordinary citizens do. The minimum purchase for I bonds is only $25. Fidelity brokerage will sell you a Treasury of any duration from 3 months to 30 years for as little as $1,000.

Oh, and by the way: If you don’t like the interest T bills are currently paying, you can always buy corporate debt instead. AAA-rated corporate bonds will pay you more interest, but that reflects a market-adjusted return of capital risk premium. Treasury has never defaulted on its debt, which is why its bonds always pays less interest.

See TreasuryDirect website for more info on the history of savings bonds

[barrett]

So barrett, are you all good with your plans for your I bonds? They've turned out to be pretty darned good investments!

Hey sophie,

It seems that the best course of action based on current assumptions and multiple i-ORP runs is to keep income low for now to take advantage of ACA subsidies, and then go really aggressive on Roth conversions for five year after Medicare kicks in and before RMDs do. My best I-Bonds will in that scenario be held to maturity and cashed out in my early 70s. Some of them have 3.6% fixed yields but tax liabilities force us to think about doing things that aren't very intuitive. Too much information??

Sounds like a perfectly good plan! Maybe it would simplify things to just do this. List the ibonds that will mature before you hit age 65. Just hold onto the rest. Every year about this time, figure out how much income space you have before you hit the Obamacare cliff, and allocate that space toward cashing out I bonds from that before-65 pile, doing Roth conversions, and tax-gain harvesting. You could also cash them out earlier in the year for money to live on. Unlike a 401K withdrawal, only part of the proceeds will be taxable - so they will actually be a big help to you in staying under the ACA cap.

Doing all of the above, sophie. The pre-65 pile are actually EEs but that doesn't change anything. Just send me a bill for your advice!

[sophie]

Was wondering whats wrong about MMT: "interest from issuance of govts is a corporate subsidy"

http://mikenormaneconomics.blogspot.com ... -rich.html

edit2 https://www.thenation.com/article/beyond-austerity/
edit1 http://bilbo.economicoutlook.net/blog/?p=41133

Don't know why I just spent about 10 minutes reading that tripe.

I would ask Mike Norman exactly how he proposes to fund the national debt for zero cost. And, if he's aware that foreign investors (e.g. in China, Russia, and Europe) hold a large proportion of outstanding Treasuries. I'm pretty sure they wouldn't be interested in loaning us money for free, and that we wouldn't be able to fund the debt purely within the U.S. The Nation article was pure word salad. I gave up after the first few paragraphs.

I guess as long as the interest payments are held to 10% or less of the federal budget (currently it's ~7%) it's liveable. If by some miracle the debt were to be suddenly paid off, I wonder what would happen...probably something surprisingly bad. The world of finance is highly dependent on Treasury debt.

[jhogue]

sophie,
Do you not find it passing strange that some investors fret over whether the US Treasury will make its interest payments on time, but don’t think twice about buying bond funds littered with paper issued by Puerto Rico or Enron?