TLT vs EDV vs ZROZ

Discussion of the Bond portion of the Permanent Portfolio

Moderator: Global Moderator

Post Reply
ppnewbie
Associate Member
Associate Member
Posts: 48
Joined: Fri May 03, 2019 6:04 pm

TLT vs EDV vs ZROZ

Post by ppnewbie » Sat Jun 01, 2019 12:10 am

Has anyone used zero coupon bonds in the PP? Doing some back testing on portfoliovisualizer based on some previous responses to a question. It seems like EDV has a slightly higher return than TLT and has a low expense ratio of .07. It also seems less correlated with the US stock market.

(In a tax deferred account)
Thanks!
pmward
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 369
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2019 4:39 pm

Re: TLT vs EDV vs ZROZ

Post by pmward » Sat Jun 01, 2019 7:05 am

ppnewbie wrote:
Sat Jun 01, 2019 12:10 am
Has anyone used zero coupon bonds in the PP? Doing some back testing on portfoliovisualizer based on some previous responses to a question. It seems like EDV has a slightly higher return than TLT and has a low expense ratio of .07. It also seems less correlated with the US stock market.

(In a tax deferred account)
Thanks!
Of course they have backtested better, we are at the tail end of a 30 year bull market in bonds and they are more volatile than normal LTT's. We don't know what the future holds though. Whenever inflation returns and/or yields rise that volatility of zeros will cut both ways and take more of a beating. Harry really only recommended zeros for those with a lot of leveraged real estate investments as the extra volatility can help hedge their mortgages in a deflation. Zeros can be a double edged sword, so one needs to ask now much risk they want to take on the bond side. A lot of people are afraid of zeros, but then again a lot of people (even people on this board) are afraid of LTT's as well.
ppnewbie
Associate Member
Associate Member
Posts: 48
Joined: Fri May 03, 2019 6:04 pm

Re: TLT vs EDV vs ZROZ

Post by ppnewbie » Sat Jun 01, 2019 1:48 pm

Thanks that is a very helpful perspective.
boglerdude
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 349
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2016 1:40 am

Re: TLT vs EDV vs ZROZ

Post by boglerdude » Sat Jun 01, 2019 11:58 pm

volatility is better for rebalancing?
User avatar
sophie
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 3017
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 7:15 pm

Re: TLT vs EDV vs ZROZ

Post by sophie » Sun Jun 02, 2019 8:48 am

I bought one in a retirement account alongside standard 30 year bonds just to see how it would perform. It is definitely more volatile but it's not a huge effect.

The only real issue with using these is that the bid-ask spreads on zeros tend to be higher, so it will cost a bit extra to sell. Not that much of a big deal though, when it's spread out over 10 years of ownership. You also get to decide whether you want the cash that's spun off of regular bonds, which you then have to think about reinvesting. With a zero, you get reinvesting automatically.
FarmerD
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 434
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 10:37 pm

Re: TLT vs EDV vs ZROZ

Post by FarmerD » Tue Jun 25, 2019 9:48 pm

I've used EDV for the past 8 years for all my long bonds. Keep in mind EDV is about 50% more volatile than TLT so you need less of it to balance out your stock holdings. Craig, Tex and others have discussed before so review the older posts in the bond section.
User avatar
dualstow
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 8141
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
Location: next to emotional support peacock
Contact:

Re: TLT vs EDV vs ZROZ

Post by dualstow » Fri Jun 28, 2019 9:28 pm

I bought some, very little, in tax deferred.
I have some EDV in a Roth IRA.

I’m glad you said tax deferred for real zeroes, OP, as I wouldn’t want to mess with imputed interest(?)
Perth Mint ETF makes NYSE debut as gold hits a six-year high - yahoo
TODFTHR
Post Reply