10 Year Treasury in ETFs

Discussion of the Bond portion of the Permanent Portfolio

Moderator: Global Moderator

Post Reply
User avatar
jalanlong
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 829
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2019 7:30 am

10 Year Treasury in ETFs

Post by jalanlong » Fri Oct 04, 2019 11:51 am

If I wanted to get as close as possible to a constant 10 year Treasury in ETF form, how would I divvy up these ETFS?

IEF 7-10 Treasury has an avg maturity of 8.49 years and an avg duration of 7.59 years

TLH 10-20 Treasury has an avg maturity of 16.97 years and an avg duration of 12.50 years

Do I weight the durations or the maturities?
User avatar
Tortoise
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 2751
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 2:35 am

Re: 10 Year Treasury in ETFs

Post by Tortoise » Fri Oct 04, 2019 12:48 pm

You would weight the maturities. The "10-year" in "10-year Treasury" means the bond matures in 10 years.
User avatar
Tyler
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 2066
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 3:23 pm
Contact:

Re: 10 Year Treasury in ETFs

Post by Tyler » Fri Oct 04, 2019 2:24 pm

Yep - you’d weight the maturities.

Although if you want to keep it simple, IEF is pretty close already. Just think of it as a ladder that constantly buys 10-year treasuries and holds them for three years instead of one.
User avatar
ochotona
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 3353
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2015 5:54 am

Re: 10 Year Treasury in ETFs

Post by ochotona » Fri Oct 04, 2019 6:58 pm

I thought you sum the durations. Duration measures how the security really responds to interest rate changes. Duration = Maturity for Treasuries, but not for funds composed of many things.
Kbg
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 2815
Joined: Fri May 23, 2014 4:18 pm

Re: 10 Year Treasury in ETFs

Post by Kbg » Sat Oct 05, 2019 8:42 am

No, duration in a fund is the average weighted duration of all bonds in the fund. You can do the same with two funds as well by weighting them differently. So, using the OP you could decide you wanted 10 as your duration and 50/50 comes pretty close to that. Accordingly, with a 1% interest change we would expect the impact to be 10% overall.
User avatar
Kriegsspiel
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 4052
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 5:28 pm

Re: 10 Year Treasury in ETFs

Post by Kriegsspiel » Sat Oct 05, 2019 9:12 am

If he wanted a 10 year average duration, he'd weight the durations. But 10 year Treasury means a Treasury with a 10 year maturity, so if he wants to approximate that, he'd weight the maturities.
You there, Ephialtes. May you live forever.
User avatar
mathjak107
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 4456
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 2:54 am
Location: bayside queens ny
Contact:

Re: 10 Year Treasury in ETFs

Post by mathjak107 » Sat Oct 05, 2019 9:14 am

Long term treasuries can be very volatile because they trade like stocks would , based on fear ,greed and perception..you can combine a long term treasury fund and a shorter term one and you would expect it to behave like an intermediate term bond fund . But it usually does not .....the longer term treasuries react far more volatile causing a bigger reaction than the intermediate term fund
Last edited by mathjak107 on Sat Oct 05, 2019 10:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
ochotona
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 3353
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2015 5:54 am

Re: 10 Year Treasury in ETFs

Post by ochotona » Sat Oct 05, 2019 9:25 am

Kbg wrote:
Sat Oct 05, 2019 8:42 am
No, duration in a fund is the average weighted duration of all bonds in the fund. You can do the same with two funds as well by weighting them differently. So, using the OP you could decide you wanted 10 as your duration and 50/50 comes pretty close to that. Accordingly, with a 1% interest change we would expect the impact to be 10% overall.
I meant weighted average, sorry. I still think duration is the right thing to average. I don't care if a security has a long or short maturity, that's just a calendar date, I want to know how it behaves relative to an actual US Treasury, that's what I care about... the interest rate volatility.
User avatar
Kriegsspiel
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 4052
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 5:28 pm

Re: 10 Year Treasury in ETFs

Post by Kriegsspiel » Sat Oct 05, 2019 9:43 am

The difference is in the question.

Here's what I want, how do I get it?

vs

What should I want, and how do I get it?
You there, Ephialtes. May you live forever.
User avatar
jalanlong
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 829
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2019 7:30 am

Re: 10 Year Treasury in ETFs

Post by jalanlong » Sat Oct 05, 2019 9:50 am

Kriegsspiel wrote:
Sat Oct 05, 2019 9:43 am
The difference is in the question.

Here's what I want, how do I get it?

vs

What should I want, and how do I get it?
Essentially I am running the Desert Portfolio and trying to keep as close to a 10 Year Treasury as possible. I am using M1 Finance so purchasing 10 year Treasuries directly is not possible thru them. So I am wondering with ETFs (IEF or TLH) how I can get the closest to owning a perpetual 10 year Treasury.

Although backtesting to 2008, the difference in 100% IEF vs various %s of TLH thrown in does not make a huge amount of difference.
User avatar
Kriegsspiel
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 4052
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 5:28 pm

Re: 10 Year Treasury in ETFs

Post by Kriegsspiel » Sat Oct 05, 2019 10:18 am

jalanlong wrote:
Sat Oct 05, 2019 9:50 am
Kriegsspiel wrote:
Sat Oct 05, 2019 9:43 am
The difference is in the question.

Here's what I want, how do I get it?

vs

What should I want, and how do I get it?
Essentially I am running the Desert Portfolio and trying to keep as close to a 10 Year Treasury as possible. I am using M1 Finance so purchasing 10 year Treasuries directly is not possible thru them. So I am wondering with ETFs (IEF or TLH) how I can get the closest to owning a perpetual 10 year Treasury.

Although backtesting to 2008, the difference in 100% IEF vs various %s of TLH thrown in does not make a huge amount of difference.
According to Desert, his goal was a 10 year maturity, not duration. He said he used:
Desert wrote:
Sat Jul 25, 2015 4:46 pm
48% Intermediate-Term Treasury Fund (VFIUX)
12% Long-Term Treasury Fund (VUSUX)

The average maturity of VFIUX is 6 years, and VUSUX is 25 years.  A 4:1 ratio of these two funds gives an average maturity of approximately 10 years. 

I'm paying an expense ratio of 0.10% for the convenience of using funds.  I will probably eventually move to a ladder of treasury bonds. 

One could also combine cash and long treasuries to achieve the same maturity, as Pointedstick mentioned above. 
You there, Ephialtes. May you live forever.
User avatar
sophie
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1959
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 7:15 pm

Re: 10 Year Treasury in ETFs

Post by sophie » Sat Oct 05, 2019 10:42 am

I personally have a strong preference for the cash & long term treasury (barbell) combination, over the 10 year ladder or intermediate fund, because it's so much more flexible, and there are many good things about having a big chunk of cash. Assuming the barbell really is equivalent to the 10 year bond, which I guess might vary.

To do this you use a proportion of 40% (of the 60%) long treasuries (25 year duration) and 60% cash. That would put the total portfolio as 36% cash, 30% stocks, 24% long bonds, and 10% gold.
User avatar
ochotona
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 3353
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2015 5:54 am

Re: 10 Year Treasury in ETFs

Post by ochotona » Sun Oct 06, 2019 10:51 am

IEF seems to outperform the 10 year Treasury benchmark at Portfoliovisualizer.com. Therefore, I would be inclined to just be happy with IEF and not over-science it.
User avatar
jalanlong
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 829
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2019 7:30 am

Re: 10 Year Treasury in ETFs

Post by jalanlong » Wed Oct 16, 2019 8:05 pm

sophie wrote:
Sat Oct 05, 2019 10:42 am
I personally have a strong preference for the cash & long term treasury (barbell) combination, over the 10 year ladder or intermediate fund, because it's so much more flexible, and there are many good things about having a big chunk of cash. Assuming the barbell really is equivalent to the 10 year bond, which I guess might vary.

To do this you use a proportion of 40% (of the 60%) long treasuries (25 year duration) and 60% cash. That would put the total portfolio as 36% cash, 30% stocks, 24% long bonds, and 10% gold.
So according to my backtest the regular Desert Portfolio (using IEF in place of 10 year bonds) beats that portfolio and the PP both in pure terms and in volatility adjusted terms since 2007.

I know that backtesting is dependent on the timeframe you use. But aside from a spike in gold where i would want 25% instead of 10%, in what other scenarios would I want to have the PP instead of the Desert?
User avatar
sophie
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1959
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 7:15 pm

Re: 10 Year Treasury in ETFs

Post by sophie » Thu Oct 17, 2019 7:51 am

That's interesting, jalanlong. Can you post some numbers?

I'd assumed the barbell is equivalent to IEF, but it is probably not simply a linear combination. I would expect it to be heavily dependent on the shape of the yield curve, and that difference in performance may not hold up in other time periods (or going forward).
User avatar
jalanlong
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 829
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2019 7:30 am

Re: 10 Year Treasury in ETFs

Post by jalanlong » Thu Oct 17, 2019 8:05 am

sophie wrote:
Thu Oct 17, 2019 7:51 am
That's interesting, jalanlong. Can you post some numbers?

I'd assumed the barbell is equivalent to IEF, but it is probably not simply a linear combination. I would expect it to be heavily dependent on the shape of the yield curve, and that difference in performance may not hold up in other time periods (or going forward).

So using the Portfolio Visualizer from Jan 2008 until Sept 2019:

60% IEF Ishares 7-10 Year Treasury
30% VTI Total Stock Mkt
10% IAU Ishares Gold ETF

CAGR 6.58% Standard Dev 5.83% Max DD -10.40% Sharpe 1.03 Sortino 1.72


30% SHV Ishares 1 Year Treasury ETF
30% TLT Ishares 20+ Treasury
30% VTI Total Stock Mkt
10% IAU Ishares Gold ETF

CAGR 6.28% Standard Dev 5.92% Max DD -9.56% Sharpe 0.97 Sortino 1.57

Not a huge difference. Biggest difference was 2010 when the 10 Year made 13.80% and the Barbell made 10.92%
User avatar
sophie
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1959
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 7:15 pm

Re: 10 Year Treasury in ETFs

Post by sophie » Thu Oct 17, 2019 8:19 am

Ah, I see the problem. You split the barbell 50/50 between cash and long treasuries. To equate to a 10 year, you would use 40% long treasuries and 60% cash.

Also you used SHV which returned near zero during most of your tested time period. Keeping cash gives you a lot of options that can do much better, e.g. I Bonds, directly held T bills, online savings accounts, CDs etc.
User avatar
jalanlong
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 829
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2019 7:30 am

Re: 10 Year Treasury in ETFs

Post by jalanlong » Thu Oct 17, 2019 8:29 am

sophie wrote:
Thu Oct 17, 2019 8:19 am
Ah, I see the problem. You split the barbell 50/50 between cash and long treasuries. To equate to a 10 year, you would use 40% long treasuries and 60% cash.

Also you used SHV which returned near zero during most of your tested time period. Keeping cash gives you a lot of options that can do much better, e.g. I Bonds, directly held T bills, online savings accounts, CDs etc.
Changing it to 60/40 cash and TLT makes it worse actually. That makes a CAGR of 5.67% during the same period. But your point about SHV not always being the best option is very valid I am not sure how much that would juice up your returns to get an extra 1% out of 36% of your portfolio. But it would certainly help.
User avatar
jhogue
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 755
Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2017 10:47 am

Re: 10 Year Treasury in ETFs

Post by jhogue » Tue Oct 29, 2019 1:36 pm

jalanlong wrote:
Wed Oct 16, 2019 8:05 pm
sophie wrote:
Sat Oct 05, 2019 10:42 am
I personally have a strong preference for the cash & long term treasury (barbell) combination, over the 10 year ladder or intermediate fund, because it's so much more flexible, and there are many good things about having a big chunk of cash. Assuming the barbell really is equivalent to the 10 year bond, which I guess might vary.

To do this you use a proportion of 40% (of the 60%) long treasuries (25 year duration) and 60% cash. That would put the total portfolio as 36% cash, 30% stocks, 24% long bonds, and 10% gold.
So according to my backtest the regular Desert Portfolio (using IEF in place of 10 year bonds) beats that portfolio and the PP both in pure terms and in volatility adjusted terms since 2007.

I know that backtesting is dependent on the timeframe you use. But aside from a spike in gold where i would want 25% instead of 10%, in what other scenarios would I want to have the PP instead of the Desert?
I think that the scenario your chosen backtesting timeframe is missing is something like the "Volker recession" of 1980-1981, in which the Fed chair drove up short term interest rates to kill inflation and returns from the other three assets all declined. If you had cash in a money market fund, the rates hit 20-21% and you felt like a genius. If you were holding intermediate or long term Treasurys, you got burned when bond prices collapsed. Maybe those conditions won't return any time soon, but I would not bet on it.

Like sophie, I am a fan of the traditional HBPP barbell because I think it gives investors much more flexibility to react to changing or unusual conditions in the money markets.
“Groucho Marx wrote:
A stock trader asked him, "Groucho, where do you put all your money?" Groucho was said to have replied, "In Treasury bonds", and the trader said, "You can't make much money on those." Groucho said, "You can if you have enough of them!"
User avatar
jalanlong
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 829
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2019 7:30 am

Re: 10 Year Treasury in ETFs

Post by jalanlong » Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:38 pm

https://www.portfoliovisualizer.com/bac ... 0&total3=0

According to my backtest, in 1980 the Desert Portfolio lost 1.63% and the standard PP lost 6.13.
User avatar
jhogue
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 755
Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2017 10:47 am

Re: 10 Year Treasury in ETFs

Post by jhogue » Tue Oct 29, 2019 5:04 pm

Hmmm… I tried (unsuccessfully) to run a comparison between the Desert and HBPP portfolios for longer periods (5 or 10 years) ending in 1981.

Portfolio Visualizer shortened the period to Jan. 1978 – Dec 1981, with a note that: “The time period was constrained by the available data for Long Term Treasury (Jan 1978-Sep 2019).” According to TreasuryDirect.gov the 30 year T bond replaced the 25 year T bond in 1977 and Portfolio Visualizer is not equipped to compensate for the multiple changes that have occurred in the term (and sometimes the offering) of the bellwether long bond.

From Jan 1978 to Dec 1981, the Desert Portfolio had a CAGR of 7.96%, and the HBPP had a CAGR of 12.96%. It seems likely to me that you were correct and that the latter outperformed the former due to the gold spike of 1980. But this exercise is also perhaps another cautionary tale that the utility of backtesting is limited when the definitions of apples and oranges have changed over time.
“Groucho Marx wrote:
A stock trader asked him, "Groucho, where do you put all your money?" Groucho was said to have replied, "In Treasury bonds", and the trader said, "You can't make much money on those." Groucho said, "You can if you have enough of them!"
User avatar
jalanlong
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 829
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2019 7:30 am

Re: 10 Year Treasury in ETFs

Post by jalanlong » Tue Oct 29, 2019 6:14 pm

The same things I like about the Desert Portfolio are the same things that worry me about it.

One the one hand, it is so simple to have my entire portfolio in 3 funds (IEF, VTI, IAU) that seem to cover most economic scenarios. But on the other hand I look at my brokerage statement and think oh my gosh all of my money is in 3 funds. I have none of the various assets I am told I need to diversify. No corp bonds. No intl. No small cap or factor funds. You gotta have strength in your convictions I guess.
User avatar
sophie
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1959
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 7:15 pm

Re: 10 Year Treasury in ETFs

Post by sophie » Wed Oct 30, 2019 9:39 am

You need at least 20% gold to do well in a 1970s-like era - check the year by year real returns on Portfoliocharts.com and you'll see what I mean.

I thought the whole point of the Desert Portfolio was to appeal to conservative investors who are skittish about gold. It fills that niche very well. It certainly would have done better in the 1970s than any purely stock/bond portfolio.
User avatar
jalanlong
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 829
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2019 7:30 am

Re: 10 Year Treasury in ETFs

Post by jalanlong » Wed Oct 30, 2019 11:21 am

sophie wrote:
Wed Oct 30, 2019 9:39 am
You need at least 20% gold to do well in a 1970s-like era - check the year by year real returns on Portfoliocharts.com and you'll see what I mean.

I thought the whole point of the Desert Portfolio was to appeal to conservative investors who are skittish about gold. It fills that niche very well. It certainly would have done better in the 1970s than any purely stock/bond portfolio.
You are correct that if I start a backtest at 1980 then 60/30/10 (10Y Treasury, Stocks, Gold) beats 50/30/20 but if I change the starting date to 1972 then that 8 years makes all the difference and the 50/30/20 wins easily. How much of that came from the decoupling from the gold standard which will never be repeated again?
Post Reply