Stock scream room

Discussion of the Stock portion of the Permanent Portfolio

Moderator: Global Moderator

User avatar
dualstow
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 14231
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
Location: synagogue of Satan
Contact:

Re: Stock scream room

Post by dualstow » Thu Mar 21, 2019 9:01 am

pmward wrote:
Thu Mar 21, 2019 8:49 am
check this video out which shows an eerily similar setup between 2018/early 2019 and 1990/early 1991.
Why are similarities in technical analysis invariably "eerie?" O0
Sam Bankman-Fried sentenced to 25 years
pmward
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1731
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2019 4:39 pm

Re: Stock scream room

Post by pmward » Thu Mar 21, 2019 9:21 am

dualstow wrote:
Thu Mar 21, 2019 9:01 am
pmward wrote:
Thu Mar 21, 2019 8:49 am
check this video out which shows an eerily similar setup between 2018/early 2019 and 1990/early 1991.
Why are similarities in technical analysis invariably "eerie?" O0
The rarity of the combination of signals, and just how similar the two time periods look from a price action standpoint. Not to mention 1991 was also ~10 years into a cyclical bull market that most people thought was long in the tooth. I find it interesting at least. It's always good to look at both perspectives. There is a possibility that instead of sitting on the ledge of the next bear market, we could actually be on the launching pad of the next bull market. I can't say that I would complain with a decade long blowoff in the market since my goal is FI within 10 years, haha. We will have to see. It's rare to see bull thesis like that these days, so it's a nice reprieve from all the doom and gloom that has been in the financial media lately.
User avatar
ochotona
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 3353
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2015 5:54 am

Re: Stock scream room

Post by ochotona » Thu Mar 21, 2019 10:35 am

25% stock allocation just about perfect for these confusing times without any clear signals. Gasp where have I seen that 25% figure before???
pmward
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1731
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2019 4:39 pm

Re: Stock scream room

Post by pmward » Thu Mar 21, 2019 11:26 am

There is definitely a lot of wisdom in permanently holding some of all asset classes just in case. Even in times when the direction and trend seems certain, the market really can do anything.
User avatar
Kriegsspiel
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 4052
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 5:28 pm

Re: Stock scream room

Post by Kriegsspiel » Thu Mar 21, 2019 5:26 pm

Was this posted here yet? "The Key To Investing Success Is Less Stress." Advocating for 35% stocks:
Financial advisers will generally recommend what has become the standard asset allocation, which is 80 percent in stocks and 20 percent in bonds, with investors allocating more to bonds as they age. But even that is too risky. Some well-known hedge funds have put out papers saying that even a 60/40 portfolio isn’t well diversified when viewed from the perspective of how each asset class contributes to the overall risk of the portfolio.

I propose an allocation to stocks of 35 percent for all investors in all circumstances, and an allocation to bonds of 65 percent. The reason being is that most advisers focus on returns to the exclusion of all else. They start by asking how much money you want in retirement, then they have you figure out how much you are willing to contribute and back out the rate of return you need. Most people assume an 8 percent return from an equity portfolio. I’m not going to quibble with the historical returns of the stock market—everyone knows what they are—but I will say that few people realize those returns because of suboptimal behavior along the way. In other words, buying on the highs and selling on the lows. Or, they only faithfully dollar cost average on the way up.
You there, Ephialtes. May you live forever.
pmward
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1731
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2019 4:39 pm

Re: Stock scream room

Post by pmward » Thu Mar 21, 2019 7:11 pm

35% also happens to be pretty close to risk parity.
pmward
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1731
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2019 4:39 pm

Re: Stock scream room

Post by pmward » Wed Mar 27, 2019 4:02 pm

I feel like we are playing ping pong. Every other day we are just bouncing back and forth between about 2800 and 2820. Neither level wants to give.
User avatar
ochotona
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 3353
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2015 5:54 am

Re: Stock scream room

Post by ochotona » Wed Mar 27, 2019 8:25 pm

pmward wrote:
Wed Mar 27, 2019 4:02 pm
I feel like we are playing ping pong. Every other day we are just bouncing back and forth between about 2800 and 2820. Neither level wants to give.
Futures below 2800 now...
User avatar
ochotona
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 3353
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2015 5:54 am

Re: Stock scream room

Post by ochotona » Thu Mar 28, 2019 5:57 pm

PMWARD, USMV iShares Edge MSCI Minimum Volatility USA ETF looks like a possibility. It has several years of track record, seems to work as designed, tested out will during Q4 2018. I could get back to my 40% stock position and only be exposed to 25% SPX volatility. Only 15 bips expenses.
pmward
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1731
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2019 4:39 pm

Re: Stock scream room

Post by pmward » Thu Mar 28, 2019 6:06 pm

Is it going to be for a long term hold or just a temporary thing? Low vol as a factor has done pretty well on the whole, but for the part of your equities that is in your PP I think that volatile assets are a part of what makes the PP strategy work as a whole. Low vol might be something you could do temporarily on anything above that. Though this might at least be worth a read: https://www.etf.com/sections/index-inve ... nopaging=1
User avatar
ochotona
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 3353
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2015 5:54 am

Re: Stock scream room

Post by ochotona » Fri Mar 29, 2019 6:22 am

pmward wrote:
Thu Mar 28, 2019 6:06 pm
Is it going to be for a long term hold or just a temporary thing? Low vol as a factor has done pretty well on the whole, but for the part of your equities that is in your PP I think that volatile assets are a part of what makes the PP strategy work as a whole. Low vol might be something you could do temporarily on anything above that. Though this might at least be worth a read: https://www.etf.com/sections/index-inve ... nopaging=1
Oh geez, USMV is at 52 week highs. Everyone is piling into it. Not a good idea. SCHD, a dividend payer, is a better idea. I could use the div to buy some put options.
pmward
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1731
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2019 4:39 pm

Re: Stock scream room

Post by pmward » Fri Mar 29, 2019 9:29 am

In general, I don't think dividend payers are a bad place to be late cycle. Even if we wind up having another year or two euphoric blow off top, I think you would still do well on the whole. Defensive stocks are a bit pricey now because of all the negativity, I mean the chart of XLU looks like a fighter jet did a max climb take off, haha. But we also might be seeing some late cycle rotation out of tech / cyclicals and into more defensive "value" (ex-financials at least), dividend payers, and other non-cyclicals that have been very unloved in recent years.
User avatar
ochotona
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 3353
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2015 5:54 am

Re: Stock scream room

Post by ochotona » Fri Mar 29, 2019 12:02 pm

pmward wrote:
Fri Mar 29, 2019 9:29 am
In general, I don't think dividend payers are a bad place to be late cycle. Even if we wind up having another year or two euphoric blow off top, I think you would still do well on the whole. Defensive stocks are a bit pricey now because of all the negativity, I mean the chart of XLU looks like a fighter jet did a max climb take off, haha. But we also might be seeing some late cycle rotation out of tech / cyclicals and into more defensive "value" (ex-financials at least), dividend payers, and other non-cyclicals that have been very unloved in recent years.
Put in a limit order for SCHD, just 0.50% below current levels. Might fill next week.
pmward
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1731
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2019 4:39 pm

Re: Stock scream room

Post by pmward » Fri Mar 29, 2019 2:00 pm

Another interesting take: https://www.themacrotourist.com/posts/2 ... ieldcurve/

I can't recall a time I was as unsure about what way the market was going to move as I am right now. I'm literally torn between Jan 2018-Now being a market top distribution cycle, or it being the consolidation period before an irrational exuberance blow off top.
User avatar
ochotona
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 3353
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2015 5:54 am

Re: Stock scream room

Post by ochotona » Fri Mar 29, 2019 4:13 pm

pmward wrote:
Fri Mar 29, 2019 2:00 pm
Another interesting take: https://www.themacrotourist.com/posts/2 ... ieldcurve/

I can't recall a time I was as unsure about what way the market was going to move as I am right now. I'm literally torn between Jan 2018-Now being a market top distribution cycle, or it being the consolidation period before an irrational exuberance blow off top.
For anyone who is paying attention, this stock market is a mess.

If it is like 1998, and we have more of this keg party to go, the thought of being heavily invested and getting out just at the right moment is absolutely terrifying. You would never get out in time, like a smoky fire in a dark nightclub with inadequate or blocked exits. What if ETFs go no bid in a panic situation?

I have said for a long time publicly on this forum that the HBPP would make a great hideout portfolio during the next SHTF, but it wasn't really for me because I needed more growth. But finally, I really believe we are coming up to that era where growth takes a back seat to safety. Like a physician, you have to think "do no harm" to your portfolio.

At age 58 I don't get any do-overs. I already have 10x my salary in retirement assets, I won't get another chance to accumulate this kind of pile if I screw it. If I'm wrong, I got out early and sit out a year or two while a blow off top takes place. So what.
pmward
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1731
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2019 4:39 pm

Re: Stock scream room

Post by pmward » Fri Mar 29, 2019 4:47 pm

Well said. I am personally pretty happy sitting in a golden butterfly, as I'll be reasonably well protected in a downturn, and still be able to participate in an upturn. And, while my goal is FI within 10 years, at 37 it won't really kill me to miss that target date by a couple years (I'm not planning on retiring right away when I hit FI anyways). HBPP and GB are both really good portfolios in times of uncertainty like this. Warren Buffet's first two rules of investing: Rule #1: don't lose money. Rule #2: don't ever forget rule #1. These markets are very confusing and difficult to read right now. It is indeed better to be safe than sorry.
User avatar
ochotona
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 3353
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2015 5:54 am

Re: Stock scream room

Post by ochotona » Fri Mar 29, 2019 8:08 pm

Since Christmas Eve, I was really beating up on myself... and other people on this board didn't help... well, I'm only down 2.5% since my peak wealth September 2018. Bonds took off, and gold a bit since Christmas Eve. I still did better since the peak as compared to an S&P 500 buy-and-holder. I guess it's just a lesson in ignore the peanut gallery and broad diversification across asset classes works.
User avatar
dualstow
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 14231
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
Location: synagogue of Satan
Contact:

Re: Stock scream room

Post by dualstow » Sat Mar 30, 2019 10:37 am

ochotona wrote:
Fri Mar 29, 2019 8:08 pm
Since Christmas Eve, I was really beating up on myself... and other people on this board didn't help...
Didn’t help you adhere to the pp, or...?
Sam Bankman-Fried sentenced to 25 years
Jeffreyalan
Full Member
Full Member
Posts: 83
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2016 1:50 pm

Re: Stock scream room

Post by Jeffreyalan » Mon Apr 01, 2019 7:35 am

How do you guys stay the course with your portfolios? I have been in the Desert Portfolio for a couple of years and it has done well for me. However, whenever I read about current events (robots taking jobs, Democratic Socialists, Govt Debt, End of the bull market etc) it makes me want to go to all cash and not risk .01 of my hard earned savings. How do you guys stay balanced and not go to the extreme of going to cash?
pmward
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1731
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2019 4:39 pm

Re: Stock scream room

Post by pmward » Mon Apr 01, 2019 9:17 am

Jeffreyalan wrote:
Mon Apr 01, 2019 7:35 am
How do you guys stay the course with your portfolios? I have been in the Desert Portfolio for a couple of years and it has done well for me. However, whenever I read about current events (robots taking jobs, Democratic Socialists, Govt Debt, End of the bull market etc) it makes me want to go to all cash and not risk .01 of my hard earned savings. How do you guys stay balanced and not go to the extreme of going to cash?
If you have a diversified portfolio (which you do) then none of those things matter, because you have specifically chosen assets that will respond favorably to all of the above. You always will have an asset that will be in a bull market. If you go to cash it defeats the purpose, especially since your defensive allocations are probably all down, you would be locking in losses and stripping them from their chance to shine. Most of these macro-economic environments and trends are cyclical, like a pendulum that swings back and forth over many years and even decades in some cases (like deflation to inflation). If you stick to your allocation and rebalance accordingly you will always be selling the in favor assets high to buy the out of favor assets low, so you will always be loaded up on the out of favor assets just in time for the pendulum swing and the roles to reverse.

Going to cash is also not a decision to take lightly, look at how hard of a time Ocho has been having trying to decide whether or not to get back in. Actively managing a portfolio is very stressful. Getting out is a much easier choice to make than getting back in. Until you've been in that position, you don't really understand. I lost a lot of sleep after going to cash in the past, trying to decide whether or not I should get back in, it's not fun. Look at the people on the Bogleheads forum that have been in cash since like 2015, and are still sitting there waiting for "the big one" that seems to never happen to get back in (and even when it does eventually come, will they really pull the trigger??? Will they even be able to get back in lower than they got out???) Don't take the decision to go to cash lightly. You have chosen a defense first portfolio, I would personally just sit back and let it do it's job.

Also, I sometimes find solace going back on the bogleheads forum and reading the posts from the 2008/2009 timeframe. If you could go back and purchase stocks at 2009 prices would you? I know in hind site I personally would be borrowing money any way I could to throw into the market. However, when you read what people were actually saying... you read comments about how the market was "expensive". During the best buying opportunity in my lifetime people thought the market was expensive... You read all kinds of logical reasons why the world was going to end and the market was going to go back down, all of which sounded plausible but either didn't happen or didn't play out like people suspected (I mean who would have thought that QE, 0% interest rates, and low inflation could all co-exist for almost a decade???). At any period of time there are always potential headwinds. There is always an argument that can be made that the market is "expensive", that the government is going to screw everything up, and that doom and gloom is the only possible outcome. Likewise an argument can always be made that the markets have nowhere to go but up. But at the end of the day, the markets tend to move in the way that fools the maximum amount of people possible. Markets had people capitulating on bonds to buy stocks the last couple of years... and bonds have in turn been the best performing asset. The market is not a logical or rational thing, especially in the short term. So nobody knows what will happen. It's best for most people to pick a balanced portfolio and just stick to it come what may.
User avatar
Xan
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 4392
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 1:51 pm

Re: Stock scream room

Post by Xan » Mon Apr 01, 2019 10:25 am

Jeffreyalan wrote:
Mon Apr 01, 2019 7:35 am
How do you guys stay the course with your portfolios? I have been in the Desert Portfolio for a couple of years and it has done well for me. However, whenever I read about current events (robots taking jobs, Democratic Socialists, Govt Debt, End of the bull market etc) it makes me want to go to all cash and not risk .01 of my hard earned savings. How do you guys stay balanced and not go to the extreme of going to cash?
You're assuming cash is the asset to be in... A lot of other smart people have the same struggle with "why am I not 100% in stocks" and "why am I not 100% in gold". (I don't think anybody has this problem with LTTs but I could be wrong!)

We hold everything because our "why am I not in" is very likely to be wrong.
Jeffreyalan
Full Member
Full Member
Posts: 83
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2016 1:50 pm

Re: Stock scream room

Post by Jeffreyalan » Mon Apr 01, 2019 11:16 am

The case for 100% cash is a lot stronger than 100% Gold or Stocks IMO. 100% stocks could easily lose you 50% in a year and make take many, many years to recover. Cash will not ever do that to you unless you are talking about runaway inflation. Correct me if I am wrong on that.

When I say I think about going to cash, I don't mean for a certain period of time and then trying to jump back in. I am thinking of going to cash permanently. I often think instead of putting my money at risk (even if it is a small risk) squeezing a 4-6% return out of the Desert Portfolio, why don't I just keep my money in 2.5% bank accounts and Treasury bills and focus on trying to save more, cutting my cost of living, having no debt, buying things in bulk, taking advantage of special bank offers of promotional rates, working an extra hour of overtime each week? Those would be certain returns instead of hopeful returns.
User avatar
dualstow
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 14231
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
Location: synagogue of Satan
Contact:

Re: Stock scream room

Post by dualstow » Mon Apr 01, 2019 11:25 am

The U.S. dollar seems safer than most other currencies, but you could still see your purchasing power destroyed one day.
Sam Bankman-Fried sentenced to 25 years
User avatar
Xan
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 4392
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 1:51 pm

Re: Stock scream room

Post by Xan » Mon Apr 01, 2019 11:33 am

Jeffreyalan wrote:
Mon Apr 01, 2019 11:16 am
The case for 100% cash is a lot stronger than 100% Gold or Stocks IMO.
Certainly that is true in, as you say, your opinion. There are others who have just as strong an opinion that the correct default is gold or stocks.
pmward
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1731
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2019 4:39 pm

Re: Stock scream room

Post by pmward » Mon Apr 01, 2019 12:06 pm

Jeffreyalan wrote:
Mon Apr 01, 2019 11:16 am
The case for 100% cash is a lot stronger than 100% Gold or Stocks IMO. 100% stocks could easily lose you 50% in a year and make take many, many years to recover. Cash will not ever do that to you unless you are talking about runaway inflation. Correct me if I am wrong on that.

When I say I think about going to cash, I don't mean for a certain period of time and then trying to jump back in. I am thinking of going to cash permanently. I often think instead of putting my money at risk (even if it is a small risk) squeezing a 4-6% return out of the Desert Portfolio, why don't I just keep my money in 2.5% bank accounts and Treasury bills and focus on trying to save more, cutting my cost of living, having no debt, buying things in bulk, taking advantage of special bank offers of promotional rates, working an extra hour of overtime each week? Those would be certain returns instead of hopeful returns.
Correction, in a portfolio with 30% stocks a 50% decline in stocks is a 15% decline in the portfolio (likely much less because your bonds and/or gold would likely be appreciating at the same time). This isn't a debate of one asset vs another, it's a debate between a diversified portfolio or a 100% all in bet on cash.

Cash over the long term keeps up with inflation and nothing more. While it appears like you are making money, you aren't. Those 2.5% rates are also likely to go bye bye as odds are looking like a 25-50 bp rate cut in the next year or two (possibly more). That "4-6%" return you quoted for desert portfolio is also real after inflation expected return, comparing a real return to a nominal return is apples to oranges. The 4-6% real expected return for a desert portfolio sure beats the hell out of the 0% real expected return of cash to me.

The Fed has also stated they are going to start moving their balance sheet over to the short end of the curve, placing more downward pressures on short term treasuries, even if the fed funds rate stays the same. Cash has lost money to inflation every year for the last decade other than 2018. Negative interest rates are also a possibility that the Fed is on record as considering in the next turn down. So holding 100% cash could actually cost you money in nominal terms at some point. You're better off just staying pat.
Post Reply