Stocks have been going up because profits are through the roof and economic optimism is off the charts.ochotona wrote: ↑Mon Jul 09, 2018 8:12 pm I heard an interesting explanation for why stocks have been going up since the "trade war" began. Some people are viewing it as a short squeeze, that so many people had gone short in advance of the trade war starting that they were too many short, and they could be taken advantage of by short squeeze.
Another reason to not try short term trading!
Stock scream room
Moderator: Global Moderator
Re: Stock scream room
- Cortopassi
- Executive Member
- Posts: 3338
- Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2014 2:28 pm
- Location: https://www.jwst.nasa.gov/content/webbL ... sWebb.html
Re: Stock scream room
Don, that's why I am in the PP. I (partially), and it seems many others here and around the country, believe this market to be some sort of hallucination. How can we be doing well? The news always seems to be bad. Or tweaked. Or fake. Who can believe the market really can still keep on going up? Look at the chart, it is unsustainable. Obama screwed things up. Trump is screwing them up more. Trade wars. Russiagate.Don wrote: ↑Wed Jul 11, 2018 3:55 pmStocks have been going up because profits are through the roof and economic optimism is off the charts.ochotona wrote: ↑Mon Jul 09, 2018 8:12 pm I heard an interesting explanation for why stocks have been going up since the "trade war" began. Some people are viewing it as a short squeeze, that so many people had gone short in advance of the trade war starting that they were too many short, and they could be taken advantage of by short squeeze.
Another reason to not try short term trading!
Immigration. Mass shootings.
And on and on. Without the PP, I would be languishing in a hole (either in cash or too much gold) looking at the market going up and up and gold going sideways and getting more and more frustrated that it isn't crashing. At least I am participating.
The PP is the best thing that happened to my investing life.
- Cortopassi
- Executive Member
- Posts: 3338
- Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2014 2:28 pm
- Location: https://www.jwst.nasa.gov/content/webbL ... sWebb.html
Re: Stock scream room
See, here's a perfect example. Market roaring higher. Any reasons? Not really.
Not like you'll hear on the news "Market higher because Trump pissed off NATO allies" Or "Market higher as new tariffs put in place"
I still can't rectify it mentally. I'm just glad I own stocks, even though on days like today they defy all logic.
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/extre ... 2018-07-12
Not like you'll hear on the news "Market higher because Trump pissed off NATO allies" Or "Market higher as new tariffs put in place"
I still can't rectify it mentally. I'm just glad I own stocks, even though on days like today they defy all logic.
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/extre ... 2018-07-12
Re: Stock scream room
People need simple rules - rebalancing bands, or very simple technical trading rules that are not subject to interpretation.
I vent as much as anyone here, if not more, but I've learned trading by the news flow is a disaster.
I vent as much as anyone here, if not more, but I've learned trading by the news flow is a disaster.
- Cortopassi
- Executive Member
- Posts: 3338
- Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2014 2:28 pm
- Location: https://www.jwst.nasa.gov/content/webbL ... sWebb.html
-
- Executive Member
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2016 1:40 am
- Contact:
Re: Stock scream room
Billions of people wake up every day and produce tons of stuff. Prices for everything should drop, but currency is printed to keep prices "stable." Scarce real assets (stocks) go up from inflation, inexorably.
Even when organic growth (population growth) declines, govs step in to support asset prices. eg BOJ buying stocks.
Even when organic growth (population growth) declines, govs step in to support asset prices. eg BOJ buying stocks.
- Cortopassi
- Executive Member
- Posts: 3338
- Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2014 2:28 pm
- Location: https://www.jwst.nasa.gov/content/webbL ... sWebb.html
Re: Stock scream room
So Facebook is down 18.5% today, to levels not seen, since, gasp, May 7, 2018 A whole 2.5 months ago.
Kind of shows a bit of the craziness of a certain class of stocks, as described in the article below.
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/25/this-ma ... -says.html
This doesn't sound like our stock portion is as diversified as we might think.
“What has kept the market near record terrain are a mere six stocks — Alphabet, Apple, Amazon, Netflix, Microsoft and Facebook,” Rosenberg said in a note to clients Wednesday. “Strip out these six flashy stocks, and the overall market has done practically nothing year-to-date.”
Kind of shows a bit of the craziness of a certain class of stocks, as described in the article below.
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/25/this-ma ... -says.html
This doesn't sound like our stock portion is as diversified as we might think.
“What has kept the market near record terrain are a mere six stocks — Alphabet, Apple, Amazon, Netflix, Microsoft and Facebook,” Rosenberg said in a note to clients Wednesday. “Strip out these six flashy stocks, and the overall market has done practically nothing year-to-date.”
- dualstow
- Executive Member
- Posts: 14306
- Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
- Location: synagogue of Satan
- Contact:
Re: Stock scream room
Diversified enough to capture some return from those six. That’s why we index, right? Buy the haystack, because it’s not so easy to find the needle.Cortopassi wrote: ↑Thu Jul 26, 2018 9:16 am This doesn't sound like our stock portion is as diversified as we might think.
“What has kept the market near record terrain are a mere six stocks — Alphabet, Apple, Amazon, Netflix, Microsoft and Facebook,” Rosenberg said in a note to clients Wednesday. “Strip out these six flashy stocks, and the overall market has done practically nothing year-to-date.”
https://www.bogleheads.org/forum/viewto ... 0&t=253655
- buddtholomew
- Executive Member
- Posts: 2464
- Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 4:16 pm
Re: Stock scream room
Leadership in the S&P changes over time.dualstow wrote: ↑Thu Jul 26, 2018 9:21 amDiversified enough to capture some return from those six. That’s why we index, right? Buy the haystack, because it’s not so easy to find the needle.Cortopassi wrote: ↑Thu Jul 26, 2018 9:16 am This doesn't sound like our stock portion is as diversified as we might think.
“What has kept the market near record terrain are a mere six stocks — Alphabet, Apple, Amazon, Netflix, Microsoft and Facebook,” Rosenberg said in a note to clients Wednesday. “Strip out these six flashy stocks, and the overall market has done practically nothing year-to-date.”
https://www.bogleheads.org/forum/viewto ... 0&t=253655
I also have a healthy amount of MC and SCV to diversify further.
-
- Executive Member
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2016 1:40 am
- Contact:
Re: Stock scream room
> “Strip out these six flashy stocks, and the overall market has done practically nothing year-to-date.”
"An equal-weight index of the S&P - which reduces the importance of the top 5 to just 1% of the total - is on pace for a 10% gain in 2018"
via http://fat-pitch.blogspot.com/2018/07/t ... heyre.html
And hasnt small value been doing well? How to reconcile?
"An equal-weight index of the S&P - which reduces the importance of the top 5 to just 1% of the total - is on pace for a 10% gain in 2018"
via http://fat-pitch.blogspot.com/2018/07/t ... heyre.html
And hasnt small value been doing well? How to reconcile?
- Cortopassi
- Executive Member
- Posts: 3338
- Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2014 2:28 pm
- Location: https://www.jwst.nasa.gov/content/webbL ... sWebb.html
Re: Stock scream room
Now it's FAAMG, instead of FANG? Microsoft is a big growth stock again? Whatever.
All the media coverage on Facebook's plunge yesterday was over the top and unsettling. Plummeting! Biggest loss ever by a company in one day!
But again, it only takes them back to where they were on May 4, 2018. Madness!
And of course, people will buy the "dip"
https://seekingalpha.com/article/419080 ... ok-buy-dip
And they will probably be right. What will it take, a week or two to recover?
All the media coverage on Facebook's plunge yesterday was over the top and unsettling. Plummeting! Biggest loss ever by a company in one day!
But again, it only takes them back to where they were on May 4, 2018. Madness!
And of course, people will buy the "dip"
https://seekingalpha.com/article/419080 ... ok-buy-dip
And they will probably be right. What will it take, a week or two to recover?
- buddtholomew
- Executive Member
- Posts: 2464
- Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 4:16 pm
Re: Stock scream room
Corto, even with FB > 20% decline, S&P500 did fine, NASDAQ took a little bit but nothing concerning.Cortopassi wrote: ↑Fri Jul 27, 2018 8:21 am Now it's FAAMG, instead of FANG? Microsoft is a big growth stock again? Whatever.
All the media coverage on Facebook's plunge yesterday was over the top and unsettling. Plummeting! Biggest loss ever by a company in one day!
But again, it only takes them back to where they were on May 4, 2018. Madness!
And of course, people will buy the "dip"
https://seekingalpha.com/article/419080 ... ok-buy-dip
And they will probably be right. What will it take, a week or two to recover?
FB was due...
Re: Stock scream room
TWTR, wow!
-
- Full Member
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2018 3:30 pm
Re: Stock scream room
When I see a headline like Mark Zuckerburg "losing" the greatest amount of money any human being has ever lost in a single day it only tells me how financially illiterate people are (or else knowingly posting click-bait with a hyperbolic headline).
I'm assuming, of course, that Mr. Zuckerburg didn't sell any of his stock in his own company to lock in the loss, in which case he still owns the same number of shares he did before. Any accountant will tell you there was no "loss".
I'm assuming, of course, that Mr. Zuckerburg didn't sell any of his stock in his own company to lock in the loss, in which case he still owns the same number of shares he did before. Any accountant will tell you there was no "loss".
Last edited by hardlawjockey on Fri Jul 27, 2018 3:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- buddtholomew
- Executive Member
- Posts: 2464
- Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 4:16 pm
- dualstow
- Executive Member
- Posts: 14306
- Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
- Location: synagogue of Satan
- Contact:
Re: Stock scream room
I don't know, it feels like one kind of loss. You're technically right that he didn't lock in a loss. Still, when the lira was suddenly worth a fraction of its value, my Italian buddy's father was worth far less overnight. It probably never recovered in a significant way before the Euro came along (I didn't check).hardlawjockey wrote: ↑Fri Jul 27, 2018 3:16 pm When I see a headline like Mark Zuckerburg "losing" the greatest amount of money any human being has ever lost in a single day it only tells me how financially illiterate people are (or else knowingly posting click-bait with a hyperbolic headline).
I'm assuming, of course, that Mr. Zuckerburg didn't sell any of his stock in his own company to lock in the loss, in which case he still owns the same number of shares he did before. Any accountant will tell you there was no "loss".
Certainly, some stocks go down and never come back up, which is why it's a fallacy to think that we'll be fine as long as we just hold on (to individual stocks). I'm not putting words in your mouth and I know you know this. I'm just putting it here because it's part of my argument.
On the other hand, Zuckerberg is in that rare position of being able to steer the company in which he's invested. He has a chance to actively create value. I don't feel too sorry for him for losing more than I'll ever have.
Re: Stock scream room
I've never heard this logic applied to the gains that people have in their investments... that you haven't really "made" money until you sell.dualstow wrote: ↑Tue Jul 31, 2018 10:50 amI don't know, it feels like one kind of loss. You're technically right that he didn't lock in a loss. Still, when the lira was suddenly worth a fraction of its value, my Italian buddy's father was worth far less overnight. It probably never recovered in a significant way before the Euro came along (I didn't check).hardlawjockey wrote: ↑Fri Jul 27, 2018 3:16 pm When I see a headline like Mark Zuckerburg "losing" the greatest amount of money any human being has ever lost in a single day it only tells me how financially illiterate people are (or else knowingly posting click-bait with a hyperbolic headline).
I'm assuming, of course, that Mr. Zuckerburg didn't sell any of his stock in his own company to lock in the loss, in which case he still owns the same number of shares he did before. Any accountant will tell you there was no "loss".
-
- Full Member
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2018 3:30 pm
Re: Stock scream room
Maybe individual investors don't apply this logic in their thinking but the IRS does. Which most of us appreciate at tax time, I'm sure.barrett wrote: ↑Tue Jul 31, 2018 4:21 pmI've never heard this logic applied to the gains that people have in their investments... that you haven't really "made" money until you sell.dualstow wrote: ↑Tue Jul 31, 2018 10:50 amI don't know, it feels like one kind of loss. You're technically right that he didn't lock in a loss. Still, when the lira was suddenly worth a fraction of its value, my Italian buddy's father was worth far less overnight. It probably never recovered in a significant way before the Euro came along (I didn't check).hardlawjockey wrote: ↑Fri Jul 27, 2018 3:16 pm When I see a headline like Mark Zuckerburg "losing" the greatest amount of money any human being has ever lost in a single day it only tells me how financially illiterate people are (or else knowingly posting click-bait with a hyperbolic headline).
I'm assuming, of course, that Mr. Zuckerburg didn't sell any of his stock in his own company to lock in the loss, in which case he still owns the same number of shares he did before. Any accountant will tell you there was no "loss".
Re: Stock scream room
I'm with Dualstow on this one although I realize it's just a matter of semantics. It's probably more correct to write "Zuckerberg Suffers US$18.8 Billion Portfolio Diminution", or something like that. I just know that if my net worth were down 20% in one day, I'd be freaking out and at least feel "a sense of loss." Or, put another way, Zuckerberg has a lot less that he can convert to T-Bills, gold or whatever (assuming he is OK with taking a rather significant tax hit and upping his cost basis!).hardlawjockey wrote: ↑Fri Jul 27, 2018 3:16 pm When I see a headline like Mark Zuckerburg "losing" the greatest amount of money any human being has ever lost in a single day it only tells me how financially illiterate people are (or else knowingly posting click-bait with a hyperbolic headline).
I'm assuming, of course, that Mr. Zuckerburg didn't sell any of his stock in his own company to lock in the loss, in which case he still owns the same number of shares he did before. Any accountant will tell you there was no "loss".
- Cortopassi
- Executive Member
- Posts: 3338
- Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2014 2:28 pm
- Location: https://www.jwst.nasa.gov/content/webbL ... sWebb.html
Re: Stock scream room
I would have put a billion in each of the PP assets and let the rest ride. Pretty sure my, and the next 200 generations in my family would be ok.
Now for us peons in the PP who don't have that many zeros in their net worth, today is yet another painful day. Getting close for me to the max down % I have had for the year.
It makes me understand the usefulness of the rebalancing bands. I can't tell you how many times I've said to myself, it (GLD/TLT) just can't go any lower, and in a previous life, I would have averaged down, only to see it go lower. The bands are at such painful losses for each asset that they work better than guessing. Same for upside bands, but feels like I will never see that on any asset, except cash.
Now for us peons in the PP who don't have that many zeros in their net worth, today is yet another painful day. Getting close for me to the max down % I have had for the year.
It makes me understand the usefulness of the rebalancing bands. I can't tell you how many times I've said to myself, it (GLD/TLT) just can't go any lower, and in a previous life, I would have averaged down, only to see it go lower. The bands are at such painful losses for each asset that they work better than guessing. Same for upside bands, but feels like I will never see that on any asset, except cash.
- buddtholomew
- Executive Member
- Posts: 2464
- Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 4:16 pm
Re: Stock scream room
Took the words out of my mouth...Cortopassi wrote: ↑Wed Aug 01, 2018 9:14 am I would have put a billion in each of the PP assets and let the rest ride. Pretty sure my, and the next 200 generations in my family would be ok.
Now for us peons in the PP who don't have that many zeros in their net worth, today is yet another painful day. Getting close for me to the max down % I have had for the year.
It makes me understand the usefulness of the rebalancing bands. I can't tell you how many times I've said to myself, it (GLD/TLT) just can't go any lower, and in a previous life, I would have averaged down, only to see it go lower. The bands are at such painful losses for each asset that they work better than guessing. Same for upside bands, but feels like I will never see that on any asset, except cash.
- dualstow
- Executive Member
- Posts: 14306
- Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
- Location: synagogue of Satan
- Contact:
Re: Stock scream room
I'm like John D Rockefeller. The only thing that gives me pleasure is to see my dividends coming in.Cortopassi wrote: ↑Wed Aug 01, 2018 9:14 am ..
Now for us peons in the PP who don't have that many zeros in their net worth, today is yet another painful day.
..
- buddtholomew
- Executive Member
- Posts: 2464
- Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 4:16 pm
Re: Stock scream room
It’s always GLD and TLT taking the beating.
No one ever mentioned the pitfalls of GLD and TLT cannobalizing each other...
No one ever mentioned the pitfalls of GLD and TLT cannobalizing each other...
- dualstow
- Executive Member
- Posts: 14306
- Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
- Location: synagogue of Satan
- Contact:
Re: Stock scream room
Budd, it's always mentioned, in the form of "The assets are not designed to all move in the same direction."buddtholomew wrote: ↑Wed Aug 01, 2018 2:34 pm It’s always GLD and TLT taking the beating.
No one ever mentioned the pitfalls of GLD and TLT cannobalizing each other...
- buddtholomew
- Executive Member
- Posts: 2464
- Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 4:16 pm
Re: Stock scream room
Haha, see the irony in that statement with everything down today. Just venting...just sad that we sit for 8 years waiting for either GLD or TLT to rally enough to rebalance. Now that stocks are feeling some pain, they still go down. Hmmm..dualstow wrote: ↑Wed Aug 01, 2018 3:08 pmBudd, it's always mentioned, in the form of "The assets are not designed to all move in the same direction."buddtholomew wrote: ↑Wed Aug 01, 2018 2:34 pm It’s always GLD and TLT taking the beating.
No one ever mentioned the pitfalls of GLD and TLT cannobalizing each other...