Page 40 of 47

Re: Putin Invades Ukraine II

Posted: Wed Mar 01, 2023 10:51 am
by vnatale
glennds wrote: Wed Mar 01, 2023 9:28 am
vnatale wrote: Tue Feb 28, 2023 11:04 am
seajay wrote: Tue Feb 28, 2023 10:20 am
What with the starvation, and now more recent invasion by a vile terrorist neighbour, I'm certain that Ukraine deeply regrets having ever believed Russian promises when it surrendered its nukes.

Caught twice, one would expect Ukraine to never be caught out again. Can't see how a negotiated settlement might ever be agreed when one side is so openly a repeated liar/abuser.


I recently heard that Ukraine would have never had had the capability to maintain a nuclear arsenal.


This wouldn't surprise me. I've also read there would have been international repercussions for UKR refusing to disarm. Presumably trade restrictions.
However, in a world that wants to move toward disarmament, what message does it send to other countries that once they disarm they can end up in the same predicament as UKR? This whole episode is a poster child for more armament.


The question is if you can disarm if you really never had the capability in the first place.

Those bombs were located in their country geographically but were they ever able to actually use them prior to giving them up?

Re: Putin Invades Ukraine II

Posted: Wed Mar 01, 2023 11:45 am
by glennds
vnatale wrote: Wed Mar 01, 2023 10:51 am

The question is if you can disarm if you really never had the capability in the first place.

Those bombs were located in their country geographically but were they ever able to actually use them prior to giving them up?
Vinny,
Here's a short article that answers your question (from an organization that promotes the elimination of nuclear weapons so beware whatever bias they may have). The short answer is no, Ukraine did not have an independent nuclear arsenal and was not able to use the weapons in question, which were abandoned Soviet nuclear warheads, ICBMs and bombers.
Could they have developed the expertise to effectively use these weapons? I cannot say.
Would Russia have invaded them if they still had possession of these weapons? The article speculates the answer to be yes.

https://www.icanw.org/did_ukraine_give_ ... ?locale=en

Foreign Affairs just put out a short article on the underlying nuclear weapon issue in the Ukraine conflict. It's a complicated puzzle.
https://www.foreignaffairs.com/ukraine/ ... ar-weapons

Re: Putin Invades Ukraine II

Posted: Fri Mar 03, 2023 2:27 pm
by seajay
A concern is the starting of a new weapons race, where nukes are old-hat. Simple vertical launch missiles that inject a deadly virus into the jet stream that traverses the world to end all life as we know it. Assured mutual destruction, but where the proliferation is more inclined to see accidents. Maybe 'intelligent' life is so rare across the universe because really its quite dumb, survives for just a brief flash in universal scale terms.

Re: Putin Invades Ukraine II

Posted: Fri Mar 03, 2023 4:56 pm
by Kriegsspiel
seajay wrote: Fri Mar 03, 2023 2:27 pm A concern is the starting of a new weapons race, where nukes are old-hat. Simple vertical launch missiles that inject a deadly virus into the jet stream that traverses the world to end all life as we know it. Assured mutual destruction, but where the proliferation is more inclined to see accidents. Maybe 'intelligent' life is so rare across the universe because really its quite dumb, survives for just a brief flash in universal scale terms.
Well, I don't think you need a "new" arms race to deliver viruses with a missile. You could do it with balloons for much cheaper, and probably more fool-proof as well. Or you can infect people (knowingly or unknowingly) and they can carry it on planes to wherever. IMO, designer-bugs are a much more nightmarish idea; that you can design a bacteria/virus that can preferentially infect a certain group, or leave a certain group alone. Obviously powerful in the hands of an ethnically homogeneous country.

Re: Putin Invades Ukraine II

Posted: Fri Mar 03, 2023 5:53 pm
by dualstow
The Japanese did this to the Chinese in the 40’s. Dropped disease bombs on them.

Re: Putin Invades Ukraine II

Posted: Fri Mar 03, 2023 6:54 pm
by Mark Leavy
Indeed a long history. Diseased cow carcasses via Trebuchet.

Re: Putin Invades Ukraine II

Posted: Fri Mar 03, 2023 9:30 pm
by Dieter
Ah, “The White Plague”, by Frank Herbert

Good book

Re: Putin Invades Ukraine II

Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2023 7:37 pm
by SilentMajority
glennds wrote: Tue Feb 28, 2023 10:28 am
seajay wrote: Tue Feb 28, 2023 10:20 am What with the starvation, and now more recent invasion by a vile terrorist neighbour, I'm certain that Ukraine deeply regrets having ever believed Russian promises when it surrendered its nukes.

Caught twice, one would expect Ukraine to never be caught out again. Can't see how a negotiated settlement might ever be agreed when one side is so openly a repeated liar/abuser.
Not to mention the US and UK security guarantees that were part of the 1992 agreement. Makes you wonder how any country can rely on any agreement when the counterparty cites change in change in President as a basis to renege.
This is a very good point glennds, sincerely and truly.

Any nation that makes an agreement with a democracy is very foolish to expect it to be honored. Much safer and more reliable to choose non-democratic partners and alliances as they are more likely to honor agreements, lest their word count for nothing. The executive branch in the US is ultimately in control of our foreign relations and that changes hands every 4-8 years. No sense in making any long term agreements with the US gov't.

Re: Putin Invades Ukraine II

Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2023 7:48 pm
by SilentMajority
SilentMajority wrote: Sat Dec 31, 2022 10:05 am
seajay wrote: Sat Dec 31, 2022 9:48 am Putin is under time pressures and as such is likely to make a big push come the spring.
I would think the thawing ground and snow in spring would turn the landscape into a morass. Pretty sure any heavy rainfall in the April-May timeframe results in flooding. I think they call it General Mud.

I expect a major offensive in Jan. I'd be surprised if it doesn't happen by mid Feb at least.
This post of mine didn't age well.

It's March 6th and the temp is well above freezing in most of eastern Ukraine with the Rasputitsa (melting snow, heavy rains and much) on the way.

Putin, God of War, when will you end them???

Re: Putin Invades Ukraine II

Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2023 11:39 pm
by Dieter
SilentMajority wrote: Mon Mar 06, 2023 7:37 pm
glennds wrote: Tue Feb 28, 2023 10:28 am
seajay wrote: Tue Feb 28, 2023 10:20 am What with the starvation, and now more recent invasion by a vile terrorist neighbour, I'm certain that Ukraine deeply regrets having ever believed Russian promises when it surrendered its nukes.

Caught twice, one would expect Ukraine to never be caught out again. Can't see how a negotiated settlement might ever be agreed when one side is so openly a repeated liar/abuser.
Not to mention the US and UK security guarantees that were part of the 1992 agreement. Makes you wonder how any country can rely on any agreement when the counterparty cites change in change in President as a basis to renege.
This is a very good point glennds, sincerely and truly.

Any nation that makes an agreement with a democracy is very foolish to expect it to be honored. Much safer and more reliable to choose non-democratic partners and alliances as they are more likely to honor agreements, lest their word count for nothing. The executive branch in the US is ultimately in control of our foreign relations and that changes hands every 4-8 years. No sense in making any long term agreements with the US gov't.
A couple of thoughts

* the Russians also signed up to the agreement

* my understanding is that the agreement didn’t include any hard security guarantees (IIRC, the French and Germans didn’t want to antagonize the Russians)

So, yeah, either need a hard treaty or nukes.

Re: Putin Invades Ukraine II

Posted: Tue Mar 07, 2023 6:01 am
by SilentMajority
Dieter wrote: Mon Mar 06, 2023 11:39 pm
SilentMajority wrote: Mon Mar 06, 2023 7:37 pm
glennds wrote: Tue Feb 28, 2023 10:28 am
seajay wrote: Tue Feb 28, 2023 10:20 am What with the starvation, and now more recent invasion by a vile terrorist neighbour, I'm certain that Ukraine deeply regrets having ever believed Russian promises when it surrendered its nukes.

Caught twice, one would expect Ukraine to never be caught out again. Can't see how a negotiated settlement might ever be agreed when one side is so openly a repeated liar/abuser.
Not to mention the US and UK security guarantees that were part of the 1992 agreement. Makes you wonder how any country can rely on any agreement when the counterparty cites change in change in President as a basis to renege.
This is a very good point glennds, sincerely and truly.

Any nation that makes an agreement with a democracy is very foolish to expect it to be honored. Much safer and more reliable to choose non-democratic partners and alliances as they are more likely to honor agreements, lest their word count for nothing. The executive branch in the US is ultimately in control of our foreign relations and that changes hands every 4-8 years. No sense in making any long term agreements with the US gov't.
A couple of thoughts

* the Russians also signed up to the agreement

* my understanding is that the agreement didn’t include any hard security guarantees (IIRC, the French and Germans didn’t want to antagonize the Russians)

So, yeah, either need a hard treaty or nukes.
Do you think the US government broke the treaty when they overthrew the elected government of the Ukraine in 2014?

Russia made an agreement with the legitimate government of the Ukraine, not the US-controlled one that took power via CIA supported revolution in 2014

Re: Putin Invades Ukraine II

Posted: Tue Mar 07, 2023 9:38 pm
by vnatale
SilentMajority wrote: Tue Mar 07, 2023 6:01 am
Dieter wrote: Mon Mar 06, 2023 11:39 pm
SilentMajority wrote: Mon Mar 06, 2023 7:37 pm
glennds wrote: Tue Feb 28, 2023 10:28 am
seajay wrote: Tue Feb 28, 2023 10:20 am
What with the starvation, and now more recent invasion by a vile terrorist neighbour, I'm certain that Ukraine deeply regrets having ever believed Russian promises when it surrendered its nukes.

Caught twice, one would expect Ukraine to never be caught out again. Can't see how a negotiated settlement might ever be agreed when one side is so openly a repeated liar/abuser.


Not to mention the US and UK security guarantees that were part of the 1992 agreement. Makes you wonder how any country can rely on any agreement when the counterparty cites change in change in President as a basis to renege.


This is a very good point glennds, sincerely and truly.

Any nation that makes an agreement with a democracy is very foolish to expect it to be honored. Much safer and more reliable to choose non-democratic partners and alliances as they are more likely to honor agreements, lest their word count for nothing. The executive branch in the US is ultimately in control of our foreign relations and that changes hands every 4-8 years. No sense in making any long term agreements with the US gov't.


A couple of thoughts

* the Russians also signed up to the agreement

* my understanding is that the agreement didn’t include any hard security guarantees (IIRC, the French and Germans didn’t want to antagonize the Russians)

So, yeah, either need a hard treaty or nukes.


Do you think the US government broke the treaty when they overthrew the elected government of the Ukraine in 2014?

Russia made an agreement with the legitimate government of the Ukraine, not the US-controlled one that took power via CIA supported revolution in 2014


I never knew any of this until reading it just now. Paints a totally different picture than the one you are always providing here. Ironic I was led to it from reading a baseball book: "The headline for Markovits’s story, which ran in 2020, was “How McKinsey Destroyed the Middle Class.” Reporters for the New York Times, Walt Bogdanich and Michael Forsythe, wrote a 2018 piece with a similarly striking title: “How McKinsey Has Helped Raise the Stature of Authoritarian Governments.” The investigation cited McKinsey’s work rehabilitating the image of Ukrainian president Viktor Yanukovych, who has since been found guilty of treason, as well as other unsavory McKinsey engagements in countries like China and Saudi Arabia."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viktor_Yanukovych

Yanukovych was elected president in 2010, defeating Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko. The election was judged free and fair by international observers.[5][6] In November 2013, a series of events started that led to his ousting as president.[7][8][9] Amid pressure from Russia,[10] Yanukovych suddenly changed his mind and rejected a pending association agreement with the EU, instead choosing to pursue closer ties with Russia and a Russian loan bailout. This sparked large protests by supporters of European integration, who occupied Kyiv's Independence Square and held rallies throughout Ukraine, in a wave of civil unrest dubbed the "Euromaidan". In January 2014, this developed into deadly clashes in Kyiv between protesters and Berkut special riot police.[11] There was severe violence in Kyiv on 18–20 February, when police snipers fired on protesters, killing almost 100.[12] On 21 February, Yanukovych and the parliamentary opposition signed an agreement to bring about an interim unity government, constitutional reforms and early elections.[13] Later that day, however, he secretly fled the capital for Kharkiv, claiming his car was shot at as he left Kyiv, and travelling next to Crimea, and eventually to exile in Russia.[14]

On 22 February 2014, the Ukrainian parliament voted to remove him from his post and schedule early elections on the grounds that he had withdrawn from his constitutional duties,[15][16] rather than through the impeachment process.[17][18][19][20] Two days later, the interim government issued a warrant for his arrest, accusing him of responsibility for "mass killing of civilians".[21] After his departure, Yanukovych held several press conferences, and declared himself to remain "the legitimate head of the Ukrainian state elected in a free vote by Ukrainian citizens".[22] On 18 June 2015, Yanukovych was officially deprived of the title of president by parliament.[23] On 24 January 2019, he was sentenced in absentia to thirteen years' imprisonment for high treason by a Ukrainian court.[24]

Re: Putin Invades Ukraine II

Posted: Thu Apr 13, 2023 6:11 pm
by dualstow
What do the Teixeira-linked Pentagon documents reveal?

Some takeaways here - https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-65238951

One detail:
One document, dated 23 March, refers to the presence of a small number of Western special forces operating inside Ukraine, without specifying their activities or location. The UK has the largest contingent (50), followed by Latvia (17), France (15), the US (14) and the Netherlands (1).
Western governments typically refrain from commenting on such sensitive matters, but this detail is likely to be seized upon by Moscow, which has in recent months argued that it is not just confronting Ukraine, but Nato as well.
and from Time (because I don’t have a NYT subscription)
The U.S. has Penetrated Russian Intelligence

The U.S. has a much clearer picture of Russian military operations than it does of Ukrainian planning, according to the New York Times. American intelligence has been able to obtain daily real-time warnings on the timing of Moscow’s strikes and even its specific targets. By exposing which Russian agencies the United States knows the most about, the leak could change this, as Russia could potentially cut off the sources of information the U.S. was able to access.

https://time.com/6270145/leaked-pentago ... ns-russia/

Re: Putin Invades Ukraine II

Posted: Fri Apr 21, 2023 5:42 pm
by dualstow
Russia’s air force accidentally bombs its own city
Blast from Su-34 bomber shatters apartment windows, damages cars, leaves 20-meter crater in Belgorod; social media first blames Kyiv, until Moscow acknowledges mistake
https://www.timesofisrael.com/russian-a ... -own-city/

Re: Putin Invades Ukraine II

Posted: Fri Apr 21, 2023 6:42 pm
by ppnewbie

I never knew any of this until reading it just now. Paints a totally different picture than the one you are always providing here. Ironic I was led to it from reading a baseball book: "The headline for Markovits’s story, which ran in 2020, was “How McKinsey Destroyed the Middle Class.” Reporters for the New York Times, Walt Bogdanich and Michael Forsythe, wrote a 2018 piece with a similarly striking title: “How McKinsey Has Helped Raise the Stature of Authoritarian Governments.” The investigation cited McKinsey’s work rehabilitating the image of Ukrainian president Viktor Yanukovych, who has since been found guilty of treason, as well as other unsavory McKinsey engagements in countries like China and Saudi Arabia."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viktor_Yanukovych

Yanukovych was elected president in 2010, defeating Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko. The election was judged free and fair by international observers.[5][6] In November 2013, a series of events started that led to his ousting as president.[7][8][9] Amid pressure from Russia,[10] Yanukovych suddenly changed his mind and rejected a pending association agreement with the EU, instead choosing to pursue closer ties with Russia and a Russian loan bailout. This sparked large protests by supporters of European integration, who occupied Kyiv's Independence Square and held rallies throughout Ukraine, in a wave of civil unrest dubbed the "Euromaidan". In January 2014, this developed into deadly clashes in Kyiv between protesters and Berkut special riot police.[11] There was severe violence in Kyiv on 18–20 February, when police snipers fired on protesters, killing almost 100.[12] On 21 February, Yanukovych and the parliamentary opposition signed an agreement to bring about an interim unity government, constitutional reforms and early elections.[13] Later that day, however, he secretly fled the capital for Kharkiv, claiming his car was shot at as he left Kyiv, and travelling next to Crimea, and eventually to exile in Russia.[14]

On 22 February 2014, the Ukrainian parliament voted to remove him from his post and schedule early elections on the grounds that he had withdrawn from his constitutional duties,[15][16] rather than through the impeachment process.[17][18][19][20] Two days later, the interim government issued a warrant for his arrest, accusing him of responsibility for "mass killing of civilians".[21] After his departure, Yanukovych held several press conferences, and declared himself to remain "the legitimate head of the Ukrainian state elected in a free vote by Ukrainian citizens".[22] On 18 June 2015, Yanukovych was officially deprived of the title of president by parliament.[23] On 24 January 2019, he was sentenced in absentia to thirteen years' imprisonment for high treason by a Ukrainian court.[24]
I hear a classic play in the regime change play book is organize a protest, throw in a few carefully placed very bad violent actors into the protest, use the ensuing heavy handed government response to foment larger protest, rinse repeat. Name it the color of your choice.

I do not know have a clear read on the truth but feel wary of any media take on an event. Even the one below is just something to destablalize what or who to trust.

https://seymourhersh.substack.com/p/how ... ord-stream

Re: Putin Invades Ukraine II

Posted: Sat Apr 22, 2023 3:58 pm
by Xan
dualstow wrote: Fri Apr 21, 2023 5:42 pm Russia’s air force accidentally bombs its own city
Blast from Su-34 bomber shatters apartment windows, damages cars, leaves 20-meter crater in Belgorod; social media first blames Kyiv, until Moscow acknowledges mistake
https://www.timesofisrael.com/russian-a ... -own-city/

Why would they admit that?

Re: Putin Invades Ukraine II

Posted: Sat Apr 22, 2023 4:05 pm
by ppnewbie
Xan wrote: Sat Apr 22, 2023 3:58 pm
dualstow wrote: Fri Apr 21, 2023 5:42 pm Russia’s air force accidentally bombs its own city
Blast from Su-34 bomber shatters apartment windows, damages cars, leaves 20-meter crater in Belgorod; social media first blames Kyiv, until Moscow acknowledges mistake
https://www.timesofisrael.com/russian-a ... -own-city/
Why would they admit that?
Also, for me, its information pollution and not really relevant other than maybe help a major media company help pay its bills by clicking and viewing some adds.

Re: Putin Invades Ukraine II

Posted: Sun Apr 23, 2023 1:49 pm
by dualstow
Xan wrote: Sat Apr 22, 2023 3:58 pm
dualstow wrote: Fri Apr 21, 2023 5:42 pm Russia’s air force accidentally bombs its own city
Blast from Su-34 bomber shatters apartment windows, damages cars, leaves 20-meter crater in Belgorod; social media first blames Kyiv, until Moscow acknowledges mistake
https://www.timesofisrael.com/russian-a ... -own-city/

Why would they admit that?
I don't know, but they did. Maybe they figured the truth would out anyway.

Re: Putin Invades Ukraine II

Posted: Sun Apr 23, 2023 1:50 pm
by dualstow
ppnewbie: I don't know what information pollution is, but I find this to be a fascinating event.

Re: Putin Invades Ukraine II

Posted: Sun Apr 23, 2023 2:27 pm
by ppnewbie
dualstow wrote: Sun Apr 23, 2023 1:50 pm ppnewbie: I don't know what information pollution is, but I find this to be a fascinating event.
Not being facetious in this question. What part fascinates you? To explain the reason, I am asking because I see an enormous and complex organization and operation (the Russian military and the war) making some mistakes. To me there is nothing unusual about it.

Re: Putin Invades Ukraine II

Posted: Sun Apr 23, 2023 3:01 pm
by dualstow
It’s not fascinating because it’s unthinkable or even highly unlikely. It’s fascinating because I like a few details here and there along with the big picture.
Even though you haven’t directly directly defined “information pollution,” I think I now know what you might have meant.

Re: Putin Invades Ukraine II

Posted: Sun May 21, 2023 9:31 am
by dualstow
Your guys conducted themselves bravely and finely, and with such men, you can become the world’s second-strongest army after Wagner,
—Prigozhin to Zelensky

Re: Putin Invades Ukraine II

Posted: Tue May 23, 2023 11:35 am
by dualstow
A group of anti-Kremlin fighters .. stormed Russia’s Belgorod region bordering Ukraine .. in armoured vehicles.

Anti-Kremlin Russian groups have previously mounted operations within Russia but this appears to be the first in which the goal is to occupy territory.
— Financial Times

ADDED: one of the two groups is headed by Denis Nikitin, a Russian far-right extremist and former mixed martial arts fighter. He ran a white nationalist clothing company before the invasion. O0 Politics War makes strange bed trenchfellows.

Re: Putin Invades Ukraine II

Posted: Tue May 30, 2023 8:38 am
by dualstow
Drone attacks have hit residential Moscow!

Re: Putin Invades Ukraine II

Posted: Tue May 30, 2023 10:56 am
by vnatale
dualstow wrote: Tue May 30, 2023 8:38 am
Drone attacks have hit residential Moscow!


https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/ ... 85460089-1

Wealthiest neighbourhoods near Putin's Moscow home hit by drones
Ukraine denies any responsibility for first apparent attack on civilian targets in Russia

By
Nataliya Vasilyeva,
RUSSIA CORRESPONDENT
30 May 2023 • 3:50pm