If you read the full document he went into great detail on more than just that one point. He did discuss that point, and the case as a whole, including all presented allegations and evidence. I still don't think you've read beyond the first few paragraphs. You would see my point if you read the whole thing.Maddy wrote: ↑Sat Nov 28, 2020 7:23 amLet's make it simple. Here's what the court stated at the outset of its opinion:
"This case is not about whether those claims are true. Rather, the Campaign appeals on a very narrow ground: whether the District Court abused its discretion in not letting the Campaign amend its complaint a second time. It did not."
This prefatory remark tells you, point blank, that the court's ruling is limited to that narrow, isolated issue. You seem to want to create something more of the court's opinion than the court itself intended.
You keep challenging me to come up with "evidence." How the hell would I know what evidence of fraud exists? Last time I checked, they weren't allowing me access to the ballots, or the software, or the videos, or the witnesses. I'm withholding judgment until the evidence is presented, following full and fair discovery, in a court of law. You, to the contrary, have already made up your mind--and not only that, you've decided what the evidence does and does not prove before the evidence has even been presented.
And if you really want to know what my intent here is, it's to combat the fantasy land tinfoil hat internet BS that Tech and SomeDude keep trying to pass off as real "evidence". I have yet to see them submit anything from a credible source. So you may interpret my push back against them as if my mind is 100% made up. On the contrary, I've said multiple times here that my opinion will change if real evidence emerges. My opinion is based on the state of the evidence right now. My mind is far from made up. But if you want to be so stringent why are you not hammering Tech and SomeDude about their non-credible sources? To me, that speaks to the fact that you have your own mind made up already, even after admitting there is no evidence. So to me it seems like you're a hypocrite.