The "trend following" Permanent Portfolio signals
Moderator: Global Moderator
The "trend following" Permanent Portfolio signals
This is the Permanent Portfolio forum, after all. Here is a signals service for running a tactical PP.
The technique is 12-month Absolute Momentum. If the 12-month return of the asset is greater than the return of T-bills, then hold it. If less than T-bills, then go to T-bills or cash. You only trade once a month, on the same day of the month, as close as you can manage.
SIGNAL AS OF 1/15/2016
US Stocks: 0%
Long Treasuries: 25%
Gold: 0%
T-bills / Cash: 75%
If you are playing the "invest in the top two assets out of four game", then:
Long Treasuries: 50%
T-bills / Cash: 50%
We're not trading Long Treasuries, just the Stocks and Gold. Long Treasuries and Cash is about equal to a 10 year Treasury in volatility. I want to trade a minimum amount where it does the most good, and not trade everything.
If this thread goes dark, wake me up, and I'll report the latest. It's pretty easy, anyone can look this up for themselves at any time.
Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz......
The technique is 12-month Absolute Momentum. If the 12-month return of the asset is greater than the return of T-bills, then hold it. If less than T-bills, then go to T-bills or cash. You only trade once a month, on the same day of the month, as close as you can manage.
SIGNAL AS OF 1/15/2016
US Stocks: 0%
Long Treasuries: 25%
Gold: 0%
T-bills / Cash: 75%
If you are playing the "invest in the top two assets out of four game", then:
Long Treasuries: 50%
T-bills / Cash: 50%
We're not trading Long Treasuries, just the Stocks and Gold. Long Treasuries and Cash is about equal to a 10 year Treasury in volatility. I want to trade a minimum amount where it does the most good, and not trade everything.
If this thread goes dark, wake me up, and I'll report the latest. It's pretty easy, anyone can look this up for themselves at any time.
Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz......
Last edited by ochotona on Thu Jan 28, 2016 8:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: The "trend following" Permanent Portfolio signals
Yes, it's just the 12 month total return from Morningstar.comDesert wrote: Do you include interest and dividends in the calculation?
I'm going to turn off trend-following on bonds. I think when you consider bonds and cash together as a unified barbell, who cares? Together, they are WAY less volatile and loss-inducing than stocks and gold.
This thread is not trying to invalid Harry Browne's basic finding that the low-correlations between the four asset classes compensate for each other. That's a historical truth. Nevertheless, beloved Mathjak107 did make a good point, that the un-correlated volatilities in the portfolio tend to just fight and thrash with each other, and the weak underlying positive return, if any, has a tough time to manifest.
I want to see what happens if we just suppress some of the individual asset volatility when it does the most damage (in stock bear markets, or gold post-1980, post-2011), using a simple, slow-trading, 100% rule-based approach, and see if anything good comes out of it.
When Faber trend-followed the PP using 10 month moving averages, he improved the CAGR to about 10% from 1972-2010, and it looks less volatile than the original PP (he calls it PERM, unfortunately). He writes, "....the timing helps due to the highly volatile gold and US equity components."
Over on www.portfoliovisualizer.com, I can do the kind of test I want using Dual Momentum on VTI and IAU, Cash and bonds we're not trendfollowing.
From 2006-2015,
CAGR Sharpe MaxDD
Trend-following 10.8% 0.64 26%
Buy & hold 8.25% 0.60 26%
I think most PP holders would not mind an extra 2% of CAGR over the past decade.
From a starting $10,000 investment,
Trend-following $ 27,887
Buy & hold $ 22,094
DELTA = 26%
Last edited by ochotona on Sun Jan 17, 2016 9:56 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: The "trend following" Permanent Portfolio signals
Wh did you pick trend following over moving averages? (Did link to a moving aberages study even.)
Why moving to cash? I played around a bit with moving averages at portfolio visualizer, and switching to int term treasures instead of cash helped.
What with ITT yielding what cash used to....
Why moving to cash? I played around a bit with moving averages at portfolio visualizer, and switching to int term treasures instead of cash helped.
What with ITT yielding what cash used to....
Re: The "trend following" Permanent Portfolio signals
Chose 1-year return vs moving average after studying Antonacci's work against Faber's work. Both work, results about the same. Antonacci trades much less, making the portfolio lazier (= better).
Last edited by ochotona on Mon Jan 18, 2016 6:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: The "trend following" Permanent Portfolio signals
Meb Faber's ETF "VAMO" is supposed to have active hedging risk-reduction. It's not buying / selling, but using futures, but I'm not convinced it's working properly. It's too new. But it would be cool if it did work, the only other active management would be you running to the UPS Store carrying many small and strangely dense little boxes to and fro...
Re: The "trend following" Permanent Portfolio signals
Portfolio 1: US Equities
Portfolio 2: Gold
Portfolio 3: 50% cash + 50% long US Treasuries
The equities and gold are where the risk lie in the PP.
Portfolio 2: Gold
Portfolio 3: 50% cash + 50% long US Treasuries
The equities and gold are where the risk lie in the PP.
Re: The "trend following" Permanent Portfolio signals
In another thread, it has been suggested that a catastrophic crack-up of long Treasuries could occur if interest rates go negative, then start to come back from negative towards positive. So I'll publish 1-year lookback TMOM signals for TLO as well as SCHB, and IAU. That will be Monday, Feb. 15.
- dualstow
- Executive Member
- Posts: 14292
- Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
- Location: synagogue of Satan
- Contact:
Re: The "trend following" Permanent Portfolio signals
I think that was suggested by you, wasn't it?ochotona wrote: In another thread, it has been suggested that a catastrophic crack-up of long Treasuries could occur if interest rates go negative, then start to come back from negative towards positive.
The main thing suggested by Craig was that it probably wouldn't be worth it to him to hold long treasuries below 1% yield.
9pm EST Explosions in Iran (Isfahan) and Syria and Iraq. Not yet confirmed.
Re: The "trend following" Permanent Portfolio signals
The trend-following PP signals are issued today for February 15, 2015, President's Day, a NYSE Holiday
Stocks: STAY IN CASH
Gold: HOLD
Long Treasuries: HOLD
Cash: HOLD (always)
This uses a 1-year total return of the asset criteria. It must be above the 90-day T-Bills interest rate, the risk free rate.
Optionally, as discussed earlier, you could just buy and hold cash and long Treasuries, and never go into and out of the Treasuries, because the cash - Treasuries barbell isn't that volatile compared to gold or stocks.
Thank you.
Stocks: STAY IN CASH
Gold: HOLD
Long Treasuries: HOLD
Cash: HOLD (always)
This uses a 1-year total return of the asset criteria. It must be above the 90-day T-Bills interest rate, the risk free rate.
Optionally, as discussed earlier, you could just buy and hold cash and long Treasuries, and never go into and out of the Treasuries, because the cash - Treasuries barbell isn't that volatile compared to gold or stocks.
Thank you.
Last edited by ochotona on Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Cortopassi
- Executive Member
- Posts: 3338
- Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2014 2:28 pm
- Location: https://www.jwst.nasa.gov/content/webbL ... sWebb.html
Re: The "trend following" Permanent Portfolio signals
You say stocks: go to cash, but were they not already in cash on Jan 15? Your first post shows them at 0%?
If that isn't the case, then this would bear out my biggest concern, you will get whipsawed out here at a short term bottom, market has some potential to rise next month, and buy back in higher.
If that isn't the case, then this would bear out my biggest concern, you will get whipsawed out here at a short term bottom, market has some potential to rise next month, and buy back in higher.
Test of the signature line
Re: The "trend following" Permanent Portfolio signals
I clarified the prior post. Yes, you will get whipsawed from time to time. If that bothers you, don't do trend-following. I got whipsawed in Nov-Dec 2015. It wasn't fun, but at least I had a specific methodology to follow, to guide me past my emotions.Cortopassi wrote: You say stocks: go to cash, but were they not already in cash on Jan 15? Your first post shows them at 0%?
If that isn't the case, then this would bear out my biggest concern, you will get whipsawed out here at a short term bottom, market has some potential to rise next month, and buy back in higher.
The Antonacci method makes a round-trip trade every 1.3 years, on average.
Re: The "trend following" Permanent Portfolio signals
The trend-following PP signals are issued based on the close on March 14, 2016:
Stocks: STAY IN CASH
Gold: HOLD
Long Treasuries: HOLD
Cash: HOLD (always)
This uses a 1-year total return of the asset criteria. It must be above the 90-day T-Bills interest rate, the risk free rate (0.34%).
Optionally, as discussed earlier, you could just buy and hold cash and long Treasuries, and never go into and out of the Treasuries, because the cash - Treasuries barbell isn't that volatile compared to gold or stocks.
Thank you.
Stocks: STAY IN CASH
Gold: HOLD
Long Treasuries: HOLD
Cash: HOLD (always)
This uses a 1-year total return of the asset criteria. It must be above the 90-day T-Bills interest rate, the risk free rate (0.34%).
Optionally, as discussed earlier, you could just buy and hold cash and long Treasuries, and never go into and out of the Treasuries, because the cash - Treasuries barbell isn't that volatile compared to gold or stocks.
Thank you.
- MachineGhost
- Executive Member
- Posts: 10054
- Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 9:31 am
Re: The "trend following" Permanent Portfolio signals
Why are you using the middle of the month?
"All generous minds have a horror of what are commonly called 'Facts'. They are the brute beasts of the intellectual domain." -- Thomas Hobbes
Disclaimer: I am not a broker, dealer, investment advisor, physician, theologian or prophet. I should not be considered as legally permitted to render such advice!
Disclaimer: I am not a broker, dealer, investment advisor, physician, theologian or prophet. I should not be considered as legally permitted to render such advice!
Re: The "trend following" Permanent Portfolio signals
I'm going to get back onto the end-of-month schedule.
ALL FOUR PP ASSETS ARE "ON" AS OF 4/1/2016
ALL FOUR PP ASSETS ARE "ON" AS OF 4/1/2016
Re: The "trend following" Permanent Portfolio signals
are u using real money to do this?
Re: The "trend following" Permanent Portfolio signals
OH YES.... indeed... 60% of my entire portfolio is trend-following. This is a serious commitment.var wrote: are u using real money to do this?
- Cortopassi
- Executive Member
- Posts: 3338
- Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2014 2:28 pm
- Location: https://www.jwst.nasa.gov/content/webbL ... sWebb.html
Re: The "trend following" Permanent Portfolio signals
Ocho, the 10 month Ivy signals got back in stocks on April 1. From the chart, looks like late 2015-2016 so far has been possibly the most whipsawed period of the past 20 years? It's worked well in the past, but more than anything I am personalyl just using this as confirmation bias that I am doing the right thing by not doing this and just using PP bands.
Test of the signature line
- MachineGhost
- Executive Member
- Posts: 10054
- Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 9:31 am
Re: The "trend following" Permanent Portfolio signals
No, 1994 had more whipsaws. 4 in a row if I recall correctly.Cortopassi wrote: Ocho, the 10 month Ivy signals got back in stocks on April 1. From the chart, looks like late 2015-2016 so far has been possibly the most whipsawed period of the past 20 years? It's worked well in the past, but more than anything I am personalyl just using this as confirmation bias that I am doing the right thing by not doing this and just using PP bands.
What trend following does is basically shift risk; in return for giving up half of the drawdown, you take on whipsaw and tracking risk. No free lunch it seems. The trick is that the when-invested gains overcome the cumulative whipsawed losses as well as the missed opportunity losses from not being fully invested at a bottom. It does do that which is the only reason why it works.
I like downside risk management so long as I don't personally have to be responsible for it. It's emotionally tough to be flittering in and out of the markets with huge chunks of your capital. You have both fear of missing out as well as fear of being whipsawed.
Besides, the PP hedging only works by relying on the assets to be fully invested at all times. Using trend following on the assets changes the correlated risk parity such that the optimal weights may be entirely different than a fully invested PP.
Last edited by MachineGhost on Thu Apr 07, 2016 3:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"All generous minds have a horror of what are commonly called 'Facts'. They are the brute beasts of the intellectual domain." -- Thomas Hobbes
Disclaimer: I am not a broker, dealer, investment advisor, physician, theologian or prophet. I should not be considered as legally permitted to render such advice!
Disclaimer: I am not a broker, dealer, investment advisor, physician, theologian or prophet. I should not be considered as legally permitted to render such advice!