study of 90-10 portfolios
Moderator: Global Moderator
study of 90-10 portfolios
Suppose you were going to build a portfolio which is 90% bonds, and 10% "full discretion" i.e. any asset class.
What kind of bond would you use for the 90% and what holdings would you use for the other 10%? And why?
Purely for academic study - Not Financial Advice.
What kind of bond would you use for the 90% and what holdings would you use for the other 10%? And why?
Purely for academic study - Not Financial Advice.
Re: study of 90-10 portfolios
This is along the same line of thinking as Larry Swedroe. Swedroe advocates investing in small proportions of high returning but very volatile stocks and balancing them with high percentages of stable bonds.
His classic example is the Swedroe Min Fat Tails portfolio. It has 70% bonds split between short-term treasuries and TIPS, and 30% stocks split between small cap value and emerging markets. In his book "Reducing the Risk of Black Swans" he updates the bond recommendation to simply using 5-year treasuries and tweaks the stocks slightly, but the basic idea is the same.
Among non-PP options, I admit I'm kinda partial to the Swedroe MFT approach. The results (especially the PP-like low volatility with good returns) are quite impressive. You might consider reading up on his work.
His classic example is the Swedroe Min Fat Tails portfolio. It has 70% bonds split between short-term treasuries and TIPS, and 30% stocks split between small cap value and emerging markets. In his book "Reducing the Risk of Black Swans" he updates the bond recommendation to simply using 5-year treasuries and tweaks the stocks slightly, but the basic idea is the same.
Among non-PP options, I admit I'm kinda partial to the Swedroe MFT approach. The results (especially the PP-like low volatility with good returns) are quite impressive. You might consider reading up on his work.
Re: study of 90-10 portfolios
Bernstein talks about never being less than 25% stocks (or more than 75%.).
What duration bonds / include a cash emergency fund? Around these here parts, the default for "Bonds" implies long duration treasuries....
All that being said, I'd go simple route and put into one of S&P 500, total IS stock, or total world.
If a little more non-Bond, I'd put at least 5% into Gold.
What duration bonds / include a cash emergency fund? Around these here parts, the default for "Bonds" implies long duration treasuries....
All that being said, I'd go simple route and put into one of S&P 500, total IS stock, or total world.
If a little more non-Bond, I'd put at least 5% into Gold.
- MachineGhost
- Executive Member
- Posts: 10054
- Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 9:31 am
Re: study of 90-10 portfolios
Zero Coupons and Private Equity. I'd do a ladder since the liquidity event is hard to time.atrchi wrote: Suppose you were going to build a portfolio which is 90% bonds, and 10% "full discretion" i.e. any asset class.
What kind of bond would you use for the 90% and what holdings would you use for the other 10%? And why?
Purely for academic study - Not Financial Advice.
"All generous minds have a horror of what are commonly called 'Facts'. They are the brute beasts of the intellectual domain." -- Thomas Hobbes
Disclaimer: I am not a broker, dealer, investment advisor, physician, theologian or prophet. I should not be considered as legally permitted to render such advice!
Disclaimer: I am not a broker, dealer, investment advisor, physician, theologian or prophet. I should not be considered as legally permitted to render such advice!
- Ad Orientem
- Executive Member
- Posts: 3483
- Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2011 2:47 pm
- Location: Florida USA
- Contact:
Re: study of 90-10 portfolios
I would not do a 90% bond portfolio. Whatever you use for the remaining 10% would not be enough to protect you from a sharp rise in interest rates or inflation.
Trumpism is not a philosophy or a movement. It's a cult.
- dualstow
- Executive Member
- Posts: 14292
- Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
- Location: synagogue of Satan
- Contact:
Re: study of 90-10 portfolios
I agree with Ad O. I can see myself running a Swedroe Min Fat Tails, but gun to my head, if I could only have 10% in stocks, I'd probably pick 1/2 google and 1/2 some other individual stock and try to 'shoot the moon'.
9pm EST Explosions in Iran (Isfahan) and Syria and Iraq. Not yet confirmed.
Re: study of 90-10 portfolios
Then, during bear markets you'd want to be 10% shortdualstow wrote: I agree with Ad O. I can see myself running a Swedroe Min Fat Tails, but gun to my head, if I could only have 10% in stocks, I'd probably pick 1/2 google and 1/2 some other individual stock and try to 'shoot the moon'.
- dualstow
- Executive Member
- Posts: 14292
- Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
- Location: synagogue of Satan
- Contact:
Re: study of 90-10 portfolios
I don't short, ever.
One would have to hold onto these tech stocks even when they lose most of their value, in order to not miss out on the sudden increases.
Not easy.
One would have to hold onto these tech stocks even when they lose most of their value, in order to not miss out on the sudden increases.
Not easy.
9pm EST Explosions in Iran (Isfahan) and Syria and Iraq. Not yet confirmed.
Re: study of 90-10 portfolios
The thing about the largest % increases, they live next door to the largest % declines. Best to avoid those neighborhoods.dualstow wrote: I don't short, ever.
One would have to hold onto these tech stocks even when they lose most of their value, in order to not miss out on the sudden increases.
Not easy.
Re: study of 90-10 portfolios
Would something like Rob Kirby's Portfolio be considered equivalent to Larry Swedroes Black Swan approach??
1/3 Equity, 1/3 Cash/Bonds 1/3 Real Assets (Gold etc)
ie 1/3 Risk 2/3 Low Risk
http://taxoasis.com/files/EVERYTHING-Yo ... esting.pdf
Any thoughts on this 3 x 33% approach? Sounds very close to the PP.....
Hal
1/3 Equity, 1/3 Cash/Bonds 1/3 Real Assets (Gold etc)
ie 1/3 Risk 2/3 Low Risk
http://taxoasis.com/files/EVERYTHING-Yo ... esting.pdf
Any thoughts on this 3 x 33% approach? Sounds very close to the PP.....
Hal
Aussie GoldSmithPP - 25% PMGOLD, 75% VDCO
Re: study of 90-10 portfolios
I never understood the point of 90/10 portfolios, which describes most target date funds (except they are 90% stocks). The 10% is just too small a slice to make a measurable impact, unless you design it so that the 10% is extremely volatile and moves in the opposite direction to the 90%. In the Desert Portfolio, the 10% gold only softens the impact of high inflation, and I think is more about getting people to hold some gold who are otherwise uncomfortable with the idea. I suppose you could think about a leveraged ETF.
I second the suggestion to look at the Swedroe portfolios, or the Desert, if you want to hold a large slice of short-ish term bonds. I went with something like that in my TIAA-CREF account using the TIAA guaranteed fund, which is actually an insurance vehicle that behaves like cash with an outsized return (currently a hair over 3%).
I second the suggestion to look at the Swedroe portfolios, or the Desert, if you want to hold a large slice of short-ish term bonds. I went with something like that in my TIAA-CREF account using the TIAA guaranteed fund, which is actually an insurance vehicle that behaves like cash with an outsized return (currently a hair over 3%).
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch." -- Benjamin Franklin
- dualstow
- Executive Member
- Posts: 14292
- Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
- Location: synagogue of Satan
- Contact:
Re: study of 90-10 portfolios
You must be younger than I thought!sophie wrote: I never understood the point of 90/10 portfolios, which describes most target date funds (except they are 90% stocks).
9pm EST Explosions in Iran (Isfahan) and Syria and Iraq. Not yet confirmed.
Re: study of 90-10 portfolios
Not :-) but even so, I got out of target portfolios several years ago when I saw that they had me in 90% stocks. I was pretty shocked and that's when I decided I'd better handle the portfolios myself.dualstow wrote:You must be younger than I thought!sophie wrote: I never understood the point of 90/10 portfolios, which describes most target date funds (except they are 90% stocks).
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch." -- Benjamin Franklin
- dualstow
- Executive Member
- Posts: 14292
- Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
- Location: synagogue of Satan
- Contact:
Re: study of 90-10 portfolios
Not to derail the thread, but for what it's worth, I have a tiny amount in Vanguard's year 2035, and that's now closer to 80% in stocks. 2025 fund is 66% stocks, so I guess that's where I'll be in ten years.
Point taken, though, and I wouldn't want my whole portfolio to have that allocation.
Point taken, though, and I wouldn't want my whole portfolio to have that allocation.
9pm EST Explosions in Iran (Isfahan) and Syria and Iraq. Not yet confirmed.