The tech-dumbell portfolio

A place to talk about speculative investing ideas for the optional Variable Portfolio

Moderator: Global Moderator

pmward
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1731
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2019 4:39 pm

Re: The tech-dumbell portfolio

Post by pmward » Wed May 06, 2020 2:37 pm

mathjak107 wrote:
Wed May 06, 2020 2:34 pm

to take it a step further , not only does what happens before and after the time frame you are looking at matter but so does how much you have invested at the time matter .

what happens now to my portfolio in dollars up or down is far greater of an impact then the same moves 30 years ago .

so it is all well and good i was part of th 1980's bull market , but the time frame leading in was some of the worst in history with markets dead for 20 years ... we had little money yet to take part in the great bull ... the size of your portfolio and when , can matter more than the market return itself .
Absolutely, there is a start date lottery in a way. That's part of what Tyler really highlighted in his charts, as his data is all on averaging each start date to get a better understanding of the average ride each investor had. I wish Tyler were around today, he is more eloquent at describing these things than I am. The Tyler signal is beaming into the sky, let's see if he notices, lol.
User avatar
mathjak107
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 4456
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 2:54 am
Location: bayside queens ny
Contact:

Re: The tech-dumbell portfolio

Post by mathjak107 » Wed May 06, 2020 3:26 pm

Michael kitces did a whole paper on a recommended glide path based on the fact the damage done later on is severe when our fuel tanks are full vs when starting out or half way to retirement.

He found the best glide path to be what he calls a bond tent .....ten years pre retirement start to fill up the bond tent and reduce equities...ten years in to retirement start to bring them back up to your desired allocation....

It is a downward glide path and then a rising glide path
mdwilson1991
Associate Member
Associate Member
Posts: 39
Joined: Wed Dec 11, 2019 3:46 pm

Re: The tech-dumbell portfolio

Post by mdwilson1991 » Wed May 06, 2020 7:24 pm

I don't guess it matters anymore, but really this belongs in the Vp forum. It is not the PP.
User avatar
dualstow
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 14228
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
Location: synagogue of Satan
Contact:

Re: The tech-dumbell portfolio

Post by dualstow » Wed May 06, 2020 8:04 pm

mdwilson1991 wrote:
Wed May 06, 2020 7:24 pm
I don't guess it matters anymore, but really this belongs in the Vp forum. It is not the PP.
No, you're right. It really does.
Sam Bankman-Fried sentenced to 25 years
User avatar
Xan
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 4392
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 1:51 pm

Re: The tech-dumbell portfolio

Post by Xan » Wed May 06, 2020 9:12 pm

Moved.
User avatar
mathjak107
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 4456
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 2:54 am
Location: bayside queens ny
Contact:

Re: The tech-dumbell portfolio

Post by mathjak107 » Thu May 07, 2020 5:31 am

here is kitces's paper on the " bond tent " and avoiding the dangerous red zone , when our portfolio's are largest .

https://www.kitces.com/blog/managing-po ... -red-zone/
User avatar
mathjak107
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 4456
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 2:54 am
Location: bayside queens ny
Contact:

Re: The tech-dumbell portfolio

Post by mathjak107 » Thu May 07, 2020 5:32 am

dualstow wrote:
Wed May 06, 2020 8:04 pm
mdwilson1991 wrote:
Wed May 06, 2020 7:24 pm
I don't guess it matters anymore, but really this belongs in the Vp forum. It is not the PP.
No, you're right. It really does.

In 2001, the United States' military airdropped 2.4 million Pop-Tarts in Afghanistan during the US invasion.[11]
but they had no electricity for the toasters ....
User avatar
mathjak107
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 4456
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 2:54 am
Location: bayside queens ny
Contact:

Re: The tech-dumbell portfolio

Post by mathjak107 » Thu May 07, 2020 7:33 am

ooooh no , the brown sugar ones were amazing hot
User avatar
Smith1776
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 3501
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2017 6:01 pm

Re: The tech-dumbell portfolio

Post by Smith1776 » Thu Jul 02, 2020 4:13 am

Libertarian666, do you mind sharing a bit more about your thoughts and reasoning behind your portfolio? What's the overall thesis?

How arbitrary are the percentages? Do you have a threshold/target price for gold? What would the rest of the capital markets have to look like for you to put some money into the more traditional assets? Even if you continue to eschew the most common equity funds, would you consider gold miners as part of your portfolio?

Very interested in hearing your perspective.
I still find the James Rickards portfolio fascinating.
Libertarian666
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 5994
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm

Re: The tech-dumbell portfolio

Post by Libertarian666 » Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:23 am

Smith1776 wrote:
Thu Jul 02, 2020 4:13 am
Libertarian666, do you mind sharing a bit more about your thoughts and reasoning behind your portfolio? What's the overall thesis?

How arbitrary are the percentages? Do you have a threshold/target price for gold? What would the rest of the capital markets have to look like for you to put some money into the more traditional assets? Even if you continue to eschew the most common equity funds, would you consider gold miners as part of your portfolio?

Very interested in hearing your perspective.
The overall thesis is that when things are normal, missing out on maximum portfolio performance isn't disastrous.

But when things are insane, it's very important to have a portfolio that can handle such insanity. The last thing I need in a crisis is to have to worry about whether my savings are secure.

As for percentages, those are a byproduct of my foreseeable cash needs and available investing opportunities.

I.e., I bought the Swiss Franc annuity when it was available because I thought it combined low risk and possible capital gains (not for tax purposes but for portfolio purposes). I consider it "deep cash" that can go up in value but should not be accessed except in an emergency or when I can no longer defer taking payments (my age 85). When that happens, I'll probably cash it in rather than take the annuity payout, which isn't very attractive.

Other than that, until recently I've generally kept as much cash as I thought I might need in a couple of years, with the rest being in gold.

Recently I've upped that amount to about 7 years of excess expenses (after Social Security payments). I don't want to have to sell gold at a low point and having that much cash reduces how closely I have to monitor my cash balance.
User avatar
mathjak107
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 4456
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 2:54 am
Location: bayside queens ny
Contact:

Re: The tech-dumbell portfolio

Post by mathjak107 » Thu Jul 02, 2020 4:22 pm

With decent gains in the prosperity cycle it cushions the down cycles just fine in a diversified portfolio. I Could give half my portfolio away that I accumulated over the decades and still be way ahead , compared to protecting it by sticking it in t- bills
Last edited by mathjak107 on Thu Jul 02, 2020 4:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
mathjak107
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 4456
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 2:54 am
Location: bayside queens ny
Contact:

Re: The tech-dumbell portfolio

Post by mathjak107 » Thu Jul 02, 2020 4:24 pm

Going to far to one side and betting against the house is rarely a good idea either
User avatar
Smith1776
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 3501
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2017 6:01 pm

Re: The tech-dumbell portfolio

Post by Smith1776 » Thu Jul 02, 2020 5:27 pm

Libertarian666 wrote:
Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:23 am


The overall thesis is that when things are normal, missing out on maximum portfolio performance isn't disastrous.

But when things are insane, it's very important to have a portfolio that can handle such insanity. The last thing I need in a crisis is to have to worry about whether my savings are secure.

As for percentages, those are a byproduct of my foreseeable cash needs and available investing opportunities.

I.e., I bought the Swiss Franc annuity when it was available because I thought it combined low risk and possible capital gains (not for tax purposes but for portfolio purposes). I consider it "deep cash" that can go up in value but should not be accessed except in an emergency or when I can no longer defer taking payments (my age 85). When that happens, I'll probably cash it in rather than take the annuity payout, which isn't very attractive.

Other than that, until recently I've generally kept as much cash as I thought I might need in a couple of years, with the rest being in gold.

Recently I've upped that amount to about 7 years of excess expenses (after Social Security payments). I don't want to have to sell gold at a low point and having that much cash reduces how closely I have to monitor my cash balance.
Thanks for sharing, Tech. Very interesting.
I still find the James Rickards portfolio fascinating.
User avatar
jalanlong
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 829
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2019 7:30 am

Re: The tech-dumbell portfolio

Post by jalanlong » Fri Jul 03, 2020 7:44 am

I am VERY drawn to a portfolio of cash and gold right now along with paying off all of my existing debt. The PP has served me well. And I am well aware of the money lost over the years thinking "this time is different." I didn't think this time was different in the tech bubble nor in 2008. But I just cannot shake the feeling that this time IS different.

Looking at a populace (and media) that seems to be taking a hard left politically and wants no end of "free" stuff that our govt is willing to provide with no way to pay the bill. And with an economy drunk on low interest rates and debt, I just don't see any way that gold and cash (and zero debt) are not the places to be for the forseeable future. I mean the Fed may prop up the markets for a while buying corp bonds and eventually stocks because those are also "too big to fail" given pensions etc. But ultimately can those type of party tricks work forever? My lifetime maybe. But not my child's lifetime and I am accumulating a nestegg for him to receive as well.
User avatar
Smith1776
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 3501
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2017 6:01 pm

Re: The tech-dumbell portfolio

Post by Smith1776 » Fri Jul 03, 2020 8:05 am

jalanlong wrote:
Fri Jul 03, 2020 7:44 am
I am VERY drawn to a portfolio of cash and gold right now along with paying off all of my existing debt. The PP has served me well. And I am well aware of the money lost over the years thinking "this time is different." I didn't think this time was different in the tech bubble nor in 2008. But I just cannot shake the feeling that this time IS different.

Looking at a populace (and media) that seems to be taking a hard left politically and wants no end of "free" stuff that our govt is willing to provide with no way to pay the bill. And with an economy drunk on low interest rates and debt, I just don't see any way that gold and cash (and zero debt) are not the places to be for the forseeable future. I mean the Fed may prop up the markets for a while buying corp bonds and eventually stocks because those are also "too big to fail" given pensions etc. But ultimately can those type of party tricks work forever? My lifetime maybe. But not my child's lifetime and I am accumulating a nestegg for him to receive as well.
If I may make a suggestion, if you are currently invested in the PP but want to express an active view on the economy, I think it's best to do it by tilting. This is in contrast to totally dumping the assets you don't feel comfortable with. Keep the target allocation of each asset between 20% at least and 40% at most. So, if you like gold, put 40% of the portfolio in gold and 20% in each of the rest. You mentioned both cash and gold though. So how about 30% each in cash and gold, and 20% in stocks and long bonds.

Interestingly, this approach has Browne's blessing. In Best Laid Plans he briefly covers different PP tilts that can allow one to express an active view without breaking the overall balanced nature of the PP. Just make sure to keep the assets between 20% and 40%. Like prosperity? Go 40% stocks ala the Golden Butterfly. Like cash? Tilt 40% to that asset. You get the picture.

Remember that a truly diversified portfolio is likely always going to have at least one asset that you are not comfortable with. Once you go beyond the 20% and 40% ranges it's really not balanced anymore and you've lost the PP "warranty". Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying don't do that. You're a smart and independent thinker who has good judgment to exercise. I'm just offering my 2 cents is all.
I still find the James Rickards portfolio fascinating.
Libertarian666
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 5994
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm

Re: The tech-dumbell portfolio

Post by Libertarian666 » Fri Jul 03, 2020 10:17 am

jalanlong wrote:
Fri Jul 03, 2020 7:44 am
I am VERY drawn to a portfolio of cash and gold right now along with paying off all of my existing debt. The PP has served me well. And I am well aware of the money lost over the years thinking "this time is different." I didn't think this time was different in the tech bubble nor in 2008. But I just cannot shake the feeling that this time IS different.

Looking at a populace (and media) that seems to be taking a hard left politically and wants no end of "free" stuff that our govt is willing to provide with no way to pay the bill. And with an economy drunk on low interest rates and debt, I just don't see any way that gold and cash (and zero debt) are not the places to be for the forseeable future. I mean the Fed may prop up the markets for a while buying corp bonds and eventually stocks because those are also "too big to fail" given pensions etc. But ultimately can those type of party tricks work forever? My lifetime maybe. But not my child's lifetime and I am accumulating a nestegg for him to receive as well.
I don't know if I've mentioned this before but I also have no debt.
User avatar
buddtholomew
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 2464
Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 4:16 pm

Re: The tech-dumbell portfolio

Post by buddtholomew » Fri Jul 03, 2020 4:24 pm

Smith1776 wrote:
Fri Jul 03, 2020 8:05 am
jalanlong wrote:
Fri Jul 03, 2020 7:44 am
I am VERY drawn to a portfolio of cash and gold right now along with paying off all of my existing debt. The PP has served me well. And I am well aware of the money lost over the years thinking "this time is different." I didn't think this time was different in the tech bubble nor in 2008. But I just cannot shake the feeling that this time IS different.

Looking at a populace (and media) that seems to be taking a hard left politically and wants no end of "free" stuff that our govt is willing to provide with no way to pay the bill. And with an economy drunk on low interest rates and debt, I just don't see any way that gold and cash (and zero debt) are not the places to be for the forseeable future. I mean the Fed may prop up the markets for a while buying corp bonds and eventually stocks because those are also "too big to fail" given pensions etc. But ultimately can those type of party tricks work forever? My lifetime maybe. But not my child's lifetime and I am accumulating a nestegg for him to receive as well.
If I may make a suggestion, if you are currently invested in the PP but want to express an active view on the economy, I think it's best to do it by tilting. This is in contrast to totally dumping the assets you don't feel comfortable with. Keep the target allocation of each asset between 20% at least and 40% at most. So, if you like gold, put 40% of the portfolio in gold and 20% in each of the rest. You mentioned both cash and gold though. So how about 30% each in cash and gold, and 20% in stocks and long bonds.

Interestingly, this approach has Browne's blessing. In Best Laid Plans he briefly covers different PP tilts that can allow one to express an active view without breaking the overall balanced nature of the PP. Just make sure to keep the assets between 20% and 40%. Like prosperity? Go 40% stocks ala the Golden Butterfly. Like cash? Tilt 40% to that asset. You get the picture.

Remember that a truly diversified portfolio is likely always going to have at least one asset that you are not comfortable with. Once you go beyond the 20% and 40% ranges it's really not balanced anymore and you've lost the PP "warranty". Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying don't do that. You're a smart and independent thinker who has good judgment to exercise. I'm just offering my 2 cents is all.
Is it 20/40 or 15/35?
I would expect all assets to fall within 15/35% to correspond with recommended rebalancing bands. I am on the fringes with a 40/15/15/30 allocation ;D
User avatar
Smith1776
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 3501
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2017 6:01 pm

Re: The tech-dumbell portfolio

Post by Smith1776 » Fri Jul 03, 2020 5:32 pm

buddtholomew wrote:
Fri Jul 03, 2020 4:24 pm

Is it 20/40 or 15/35?
I would expect all assets to fall within 15/35% to correspond with recommended rebalancing bands. I am on the fringes with a 40/15/15/30 allocation ;D
Very cool, Budd! Can you specify which asset is which in your 40/15/15/30 mix? I love hearing about people's PP variations. (That and what your bodybuilding secrets are haha!)

In my mind it's 15/35 rebalancing bands for the vanilla PP, but 20/40 for minimum and maximum target allocations if one wanted to tilt. Either way, one should do what they're comfortable with. I will admit there's always a degree of subjectivity. :)
I still find the James Rickards portfolio fascinating.
User avatar
Kriegsspiel
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 4052
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 5:28 pm

Re: The tech-dumbell portfolio

Post by Kriegsspiel » Fri Jul 03, 2020 6:29 pm

There's something to what mathjak. . is saying too. Having a safe and secure PP combined with a VP that can be more aggressive when you want it to be is the way to go, IMO.
You there, Ephialtes. May you live forever.
User avatar
mathjak107
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 4456
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 2:54 am
Location: bayside queens ny
Contact:

Re: The tech-dumbell portfolio

Post by mathjak107 » Sat Jul 04, 2020 5:06 am

as of now the pp represents 2/3's of my invested dollars , while 1/3 is still in the fidelity insight income model ...over the last couple of months i have been shielding gains by moving more in to the pp.... so now things are reversed with the pp the larger portion .

it can get hairy at times with so much in the individual components when they move together and show as much volatility as a 100% equities mix , but luckily there are not to many days like that .

i will have the last little bit of what i want to move in on monday , giving each position a 500k slice ....
Post Reply