That's not a ponzi scheme. That's capitalism. But I agree with your overall assessment. The system isn't designed to just produce what it did last year. It has to continuously expand lest it will collapse.stuper1 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 24, 2019 11:45 pmThat's why I refer to our economy as a Ponzi scheme. It all depends on the rate of growth not slowing down, which needs more consumers.boglerdude wrote: ↑Sun Feb 24, 2019 11:39 pm> we still have the highest interest rates of any advanced economy
Population growth is the easy money. When people stop wanting to move to the US, the party's over
Viability of HBPP with perpetually low interest rate Fed
Moderator: Global Moderator
Re: Viability of HBPP with perpetually low interest rate Fed
Re: Viability of HBPP with perpetually low interest rate Fed
I don't think the capitalist system was actually "designed". It's the product of evolution.moda0306 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 01, 2019 8:31 amThat's not a ponzi scheme. That's capitalism. But I agree with your overall assessment. The system isn't designed to just produce what it did last year. It has to continuously expand lest it will collapse.stuper1 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 24, 2019 11:45 pmThat's why I refer to our economy as a Ponzi scheme. It all depends on the rate of growth not slowing down, which needs more consumers.boglerdude wrote: ↑Sun Feb 24, 2019 11:39 pm> we still have the highest interest rates of any advanced economy
Population growth is the easy money. When people stop wanting to move to the US, the party's over
Re: Viability of HBPP with perpetually low interest rate Fed
Well then I have some questions and maybe need to learn more. It sounds to me like maybe capitalism is a ponzi scheme. How about a place like Japan, which admittedly I know next to nothing about. Does Japan have a capitalist economy? I looked up some statistics for them. Their immigration rate is about 17% of ours. Over the last 30 years, their GNP has increased by about 50% and the US's has increased by about 130%. So, compared to Japan, we have six times the number of immigrants per year, and we are getting 2.5 times the amount of GNP growth. Is this a good tradeoff for us? I personally doubt it. I think our immigration rate is too high to allow good assimilation of the newcomers. Who is profiting mainly from our extra GNP growth? Is it middle class people or people who are already very rich? Maybe we would be better off if our ponzi version was a bit less aggressive.moda0306 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 01, 2019 8:31 amThat's not a ponzi scheme. That's capitalism. But I agree with your overall assessment. The system isn't designed to just produce what it did last year. It has to continuously expand lest it will collapse.stuper1 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 24, 2019 11:45 pmThat's why I refer to our economy as a Ponzi scheme. It all depends on the rate of growth not slowing down, which needs more consumers.boglerdude wrote: ↑Sun Feb 24, 2019 11:39 pm> we still have the highest interest rates of any advanced economy
Population growth is the easy money. When people stop wanting to move to the US, the party's over
Re: Viability of HBPP with perpetually low interest rate Fed
Actually, the opposite. If you look at the research, immigrants are much more likely to become millionaires than native born Americans. We natural born Americans take our country and what it offers for granted.
- Kriegsspiel
- Executive Member
- Posts: 4052
- Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 5:28 pm
Re: Viability of HBPP with perpetually low interest rate Fed
stuper1 and moda, it seems that you're both hinting at Ricardo's law of diminishing marginal returns? IE, adding more workers while other inputs remain static results in diminishing increases in output.
You there, Ephialtes. May you live forever.
- Kriegsspiel
- Executive Member
- Posts: 4052
- Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 5:28 pm
Re: Viability of HBPP with perpetually low interest rate Fed
Doesn't seem relevant to stuper1's point though. (Cultural) assimilation is independent of financial status. You could argue something like "so what? Let (foreign immigrant from X) keep their culture as long as they contribute to America's GDP." But I think that's what stuper1 (correct me if I'm wrong) is arguing is a undesirable goal insofar as maintaining a cohesive country.
You there, Ephialtes. May you live forever.
Re: Viability of HBPP with perpetually low interest rate Fed
It seems to me that the PP is still as relevant as ever, even in a low interest rate environment.
Those low interest rates are putting the hurt on other, more traditional portfolios, as well.
Those low interest rates are putting the hurt on other, more traditional portfolios, as well.
🛞 The All-Terrain Portfolio 🛞
- blue_ruin17
- Executive Member
- Posts: 153
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2016 11:16 pm
- Location: New Brunswick, Canada
Re: Viability of HBPP with perpetually low interest rate Fed
I am less concerned with the viability of HBPP in the context of perpetually low interest rates than I am interested in HBPP's ability to survive the consequences of "perpetually" low interest rates.
In this regard, I am unconcerned.
In this regard, I am unconcerned.
STAT PERPETUS PORTFOLIO DUM VOLVITUR ORBIS
Amazon: Investing Equanimity: The Logic & Wisdom of the Permanent Portfolio
Amazon: Investing Equanimity: The Logic & Wisdom of the Permanent Portfolio
Re: Viability of HBPP with perpetually low interest rate Fed
Concerns about perpetually low interest rates are perfectly valid, they can go lower, and may even go negative as you've stated. The problem is- what if you align yourself for this expectation and are wrong? I'd rather have a portfolio that takes my emotions out of it and forces me to mechanically transfer profits from a running bull to a bear in preparation for a reversal whenever it happens.
When I've lost money with investing, it was when I thought I'd have to prepare for catastrophe (watching news and checking prices daily) and aligned myself too far on one side of the bet (ahem/cough silver 2011) ..
When I've lost money with investing, it was when I thought I'd have to prepare for catastrophe (watching news and checking prices daily) and aligned myself too far on one side of the bet (ahem/cough silver 2011) ..
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 117
- Joined: Mon May 11, 2015 10:24 pm
Re: Viability of HBPP with perpetually low interest rate Fed
Funny how currency matters ... I have a "global" golden butterfly, with cash in SEK and evaluating in SEK.europeanwizard wrote: ↑Sat Feb 23, 2019 1:08 pmGold: 1,7%
Bonds: 0,9%
Stocks: -0,5%
Cash: 0,7%
So an average of 0.7% in 2018, thanks to gold. I'm switching out of a Euro PP, and taking steps toward a global PP. I've already moved out of EU stocks, and taken a global stocks fund. I'll probably do the same for bonds.
SEK having lost 25% to all currencies, the global PP is doing great. Everything is doing great. Except cash.